Rock Fn wrote:You're kidding right?
No.
They're already done.
Your opinion and I disagree with it.
They would be doing it for the money? What are they doing now?
Their jobs. What I meant was that if they chose to have Steve Perry back in the group and he accepted, THAT would be for the money. This is simply their line of work; what they do for their career.
Most of the time they look like manikins on stage.
Opinion and a ridiculous one at that. Keith Richards looks like a mannequin on stage...and he's been smoking the same cigarette for years...
Queen just embarked on a very successful tour. Those guys are all pushing 60.
A bit different. Paul Rodgers is 57, yes, but he's also continued singing throughout his career. Never let up. If Freddie Mercury was still with us, he'd be 60 and probably still singing as well. If you STOP singing as Perry has done, you don't just get back on stage after a decade or more absence and pick up where you left off. He knows that. Too bad some of his diehard fans don't.
I have the right to voice my opnion.
Never said you didn't have the right to voice your opinion. When you do, it gives me an opportunity to point out your faulty reasoning, so keep 'em coming.

If I want to or don't want too see them, It's my buisness.
Never implied it wasn't. I was simply pointing out that people like you, who go under the guise of caring about Journey, really seem to only care about the fact that Journey has gone out without your favorite singer, Steve Perry. Anything less than him at the helm is not Journey. Certainly your opinion is valid for you, but it is not the end all/be all. Journey is doing fine, in my opinion. Ultimately, if they are playing concerts in front of crowds who enjoy listening and if the guys themselves are having fun at it, then that's really all that matters, in my opinion. If Steve Perry came back, Journey would truly become a nostalgia act, or possibly even an odd curiousity.