fred_journeyman wrote:Catherine wrote:Honestly, as much as SA was a good singer, he was never really part of the band. In concerts, he didn't seem to gell well with the guys. Perry seemed to, but I think JSS has hit the nail on the head. There seems to be a mutual respect between JSS and the other guys. I feel bad for Augeri. I love Perry, but know that that is the past. Whatever Journey decides to do with SA and JSS is their business, but as a fan of the group as a whole, I'd ask the guys to treat both SA and JSS with a little more dignity and respect this time around if there should be a "switch".
I tend to agree. Not one person on this forum (well, maybe one), has had the type of success that fronting for a band like Journey can bring. SA was the "also ran" by most standards (hated by many from day one), and I'm sure if anyone never felt like he was truly part of the band, it was Augeri.
He is probably dealing with an extreme amount of embarrassment and wishes to just hide. The way some on this forum talk leaves the obvious impression that they suffer from a very large superiority complex, as if they themselves would never stoop to the supposed level that Augeri stooped to. I personally, have never walked in the man's shoes and cannot even begin to imagine what the daily pressure was like. Of course he could have said "You know what? My voice is giving out. Can you get someone to take over for me until it heals?" or "I need to bow out gracefully and transition things over to a new guy." He didn't and either the guys, or management or both helped with the lie. They're all culpable and they ALL should apologize to the fans, not just Augeri (with the exception of JSS).
But, Journey needs a scapegoat now so that they can continue touring and making money. It's easier to point all fingers at Augeri (and he <u>was</u> wrong), rather than assume or accept at least some of the blame.
<b>Steve: thanks for bringing Journey back from the dead and I wish you well in all your future endeavors. Not all of us are ready to run you out of town on a rail. You're human, unlike some here who apparently think they're not only above the law, but above the spectrum of frailty that exists in each of us. What you did was wrong (and I'm sure you know that)...</b>
DOH! You had me up until there.
I've asked this over and over again and NOBODY has a response: who says it was wrong?
Is there some written code/law regarding this issue? IMO it's only wrong IF the intent was to misrepresent themselves to the fans in order to rip them off. I can't see this as the intent. SA isn't a talentless Milli Vanilli "pretty boy" who was thrust onto the stage in red leather pants in order to fool everybody!
Those who have been so quick to tell me to get a life regarding what I believe in are the SAME people who have responded to Tapegate as if MURDER on the scale of genocide has been committed!!!
Who is it that really neds to get a life?
I recall other Tapegate scandals. Remember ELO? Here's a band that was put through the wringer, too. All they did was try to give their GIANT audiences the BEST possible show. The studio tricks that Jeff Lynne did with his voice could NOT be properly duplicated live so they used "help" on some of the more complicated tracks. BIG DEAL.
I just don't get the emotional outbursts to this issue. I will argue this again: studio technology is used like CRAZY on vocals and every other instrument. This is "OK" to EVERYONE and it's EXPECTED and accepted. Live shows are also enhanced including vocals BUT dare NOT lip synch - even though Britney Spears among others does it OUTWARDLY.
Where is the voice of reason on this?
Technology can be used for this but not for that. Certain people can lip synch but others who are sick can't.
Who made up these "rules" ...?
What a bunch of CRAP! The WHOLE of it.