OT: Paris proves $$ Talks

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Cate » Fri May 18, 2007 8:37 am

Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Cate wrote:
RockinDeano wrote:
Cate wrote:
RockinDeano wrote:Way to save face, spin and retreat.

If I ever had the chance, I would rip off your head, and slam it onto a baseball tee...then jack that brainless dome into the fucking river.




You're an Asshole Deano, is there a day that can go by without you
hoping someone would die or calling women the most disgusting names?


I don't wish he would die, you fraile hole.

i am trying to convey in a typed sentence that I think the guy is a retard. Lighten up Francis.




Hey Jerkoff, I was refering to your posts in the past 24 hrs and the one in this thread. My name is not Francis... Fraile hole???


Back off, Cate...
You are WAY out of your league here
and butting your head in where it has no business being.

Rich is a grown man and knows how Dean likes to 'convey' his thoughts.
Let Dean and Rich hash this out however they see fit to do it.
NONE OF US need to chime in on this conversation
because it is a LONG OVER-DUE conversation between these 2
and this is the only place they can do it, considering Dean
is banned indefinitely from BT.

You don't like what Dean says, pass it over.
All you're doing is getting in the way.

"Lighten up, Francis"
Rent 'Stripes'... you'll get it...



Don't tell me what to do !!! I am not out of my League!
Read my post. Refering to the last 24 hrs to his bashing women, his Johnson Etc....
I know Rich is a retard !! :lol: Gee must have missed Stripes!
Cate
45 RPM
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:07 pm

Postby Carlitto H@kk » Fri May 18, 2007 8:56 am

Cate wrote:
Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Back off, Cate...
You are WAY out of your league here
and butting your head in where it has no business being.

Rich is a grown man and knows how Dean likes to 'convey' his thoughts.
Let Dean and Rich hash this out however they see fit to do it.
NONE OF US need to chime in on this conversation
because it is a LONG OVER-DUE conversation between these 2
and this is the only place they can do it, considering Dean
is banned indefinitely from BT.

You don't like what Dean says, pass it over.
All you're doing is getting in the way.

"Lighten up, Francis"
Rent 'Stripes'... you'll get it...



Don't tell me what to do !!! I am not out of my League!
Read my post. Refering to the last 24 hrs to his bashing women, his Johnson Etc....
I know Rich is a retard !! :lol: Gee must have missed Stripes!


No, you are quite out of your league.
And you calling Rich a "retard" is exactly
the reason why I am telling you that
you need to back off. This was a long,
over-due debate between Dean and Rich.
They didn't need any rermarks or rhetoric from the peanut gallery.

You upset about Dean bashing women and his johnson? :shock:
Must've missed the Johnson bashing.
Oh well, maybe next time he'll bash it up-side your chin.
Either way, if you wanted to bitch and moan about that kinda stuff, you
coulda done it in the threads that it was taking place :wink:

Don't become like our most recently
depArted, Jizz-gobblin' Asshole...
Keep your stalking to the threads that offend you.
Welcome to Terminus... You hungry?
User avatar
Carlitto H@kk
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2891
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:27 am
Location: Home & Well

Postby Cate » Fri May 18, 2007 9:08 am

Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Cate wrote:
Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Back off, Cate...
You are WAY out of your league here
and butting your head in where it has no business being.

Rich is a grown man and knows how Dean likes to 'convey' his thoughts.
Let Dean and Rich hash this out however they see fit to do it.
NONE OF US need to chime in on this conversation
because it is a LONG OVER-DUE conversation between these 2
and this is the only place they can do it, considering Dean
is banned indefinitely from BT.

You don't like what Dean says, pass it over.
All you're doing is getting in the way.

"Lighten up, Francis"
Rent 'Stripes'... you'll get it...



Don't tell me what to do !!! I am not out of my League!
Read my post. Refering to the last 24 hrs to his bashing women, his Johnson Etc....
I know Rich is a retard !! :lol: Gee must have missed Stripes!


No, you are quite out of your league.
And you calling Rich a "retard" is exactly
the reason why I am telling you that
you need to back off. This was a long,
over-due debate between Dean and Rich.
They didn't need any rermarks or rhetoric from the peanut gallery.

You upset about Dean bashing women and his johnson? :shock:
Must've missed the Johnson bashing.
Oh well, maybe next time he'll bash it up-side your chin.
Either way, if you wanted to bitch and moan about that kinda stuff, you
coulda done it in the threads that it was taking place :wink:

Don't become like our most recently
depArted, Jizz-gobblin' Asshole...
Keep your stalking to the threads that offend you.



Sorry. I'm not a stalker. My mistake , His Talking about the size of his Johnson.
Cate
45 RPM
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:07 pm

Postby Carlitto H@kk » Fri May 18, 2007 9:14 am

Cate wrote:Sorry. I'm not a stalker. My mistake ,
His Talking about the size of his Johnson.


Trust me on this, Sweet-Tits...
Don't become like our most recently
depArted, Jizz-gobblin' Asshole...
Keep your stalking to the threads that offend you.
Welcome to Terminus... You hungry?
User avatar
Carlitto H@kk
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2891
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:27 am
Location: Home & Well

Postby Cate » Fri May 18, 2007 9:23 am

Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Cate wrote:Sorry. I'm not a stalker. My mistake ,
His Talking about the size of his Johnson.


Trust me on this, Sweet-Tits...
Don't become like our most recently
depArted, Jizz-gobblin' Asshole...
Keep your stalking to the threads that offend you.




I got the AJA remark the first time. Lovely description ..
Cate
45 RPM
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:07 pm

Postby Andrew » Fri May 18, 2007 9:33 am

whocares wrote:Good GOD! Does it NEVER stop?????


Sadly it seems....NO it doesn't. What the hell am I going to do?

I have reached the very end of my patience.
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10961
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Postby summergirl » Fri May 18, 2007 9:33 am

Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Cate wrote:Sorry. I'm not a stalker. My mistake ,
His Talking about the size of his Johnson.


Trust me on this, Sweet-Tits...
Don't become like our most recently
depArted, Jizz-gobblin' Asshole...
Keep your stalking to the threads that offend you.


Just curious - why is it that someone who disagrees with Deano is immediately labeled a "stalker"?
summergirl
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:20 am

Postby NealIsGod » Fri May 18, 2007 9:35 am

summergirl wrote:
Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Cate wrote:Sorry. I'm not a stalker. My mistake ,
His Talking about the size of his Johnson.


Trust me on this, Sweet-Tits...
Don't become like our most recently
depArted, Jizz-gobblin' Asshole...
Keep your stalking to the threads that offend you.


Just curious - why is it that someone who disagrees with Deano is immediately labeled a "stalker"?


They're not. It's when they don't contribute anything but bitching and whining about Deano that they are called that.
User avatar
NealIsGod
MP3
 
Posts: 12512
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby SusieP » Fri May 18, 2007 9:41 am

So her sentence is halved?
Is she still going to Appeal against being given a jail sentence in the first place?
[So that she won't even serve half a sentence if the Appeal is granted?] Or by getting it halved does she lose the right to Appeal?
Last edited by SusieP on Fri May 18, 2007 9:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
SusieP
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2931
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:13 am
Location: up to no good in rainy Nottinghamshire, England

Postby summergirl » Fri May 18, 2007 9:43 am

NealIsGod wrote:
summergirl wrote:
Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Cate wrote:Sorry. I'm not a stalker. My mistake ,
His Talking about the size of his Johnson.


Trust me on this, Sweet-Tits...
Don't become like our most recently
depArted, Jizz-gobblin' Asshole...
Keep your stalking to the threads that offend you.


Just curious - why is it that someone who disagrees with Deano is immediately labeled a "stalker"?


They're not. It's when they don't contribute anything but bitching and whining about Deano that they are called that.


OK, but this is a Forum, where you are supposed to be able to freely express your opinions, but you cannot do that if you find what he says offensive unless you want to get slammed with horrible, derogatory threats. I guess Deano runs this board, it's very obvious. He can do/say whatever he wants and get away with it. Tell people to "die", use the C word - come on, is that really necessary? What kind of thrill does someone get when they do that? It's really pathetic...
summergirl
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:20 am

Postby NealIsGod » Fri May 18, 2007 9:43 am

SusieP wrote:So her sentence is halved?
Is she still going to Appeal against being given a jail sentence in the first place?
[So that she won't even serve half a sentence if the Appeal is granted?]

Why am I not surprised? :roll:


She would have big balls if she did that. This is probably the best she can do.
User avatar
NealIsGod
MP3
 
Posts: 12512
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby Carlitto H@kk » Fri May 18, 2007 9:43 am

NealIsGod wrote:
summergirl wrote:Just curious - why is it that someone who disagrees with Deano is immediately labeled a "stalker"?


They're not. It's when they don't contribute anything but bitching and whining about Deano that they are called that.


Thank you for answering, Niggy.

It has become all too popular in the past
few weeks, for whatever reason, for a few
folks that always seem to complain about Dean
to just follow him around and bitch and bait.
It gets old...
Welcome to Terminus... You hungry?
User avatar
Carlitto H@kk
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2891
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:27 am
Location: Home & Well

Postby SusieP » Fri May 18, 2007 9:44 am

NealIsGod wrote:
SusieP wrote:So her sentence is halved?
Is she still going to Appeal against being given a jail sentence in the first place?
[So that she won't even serve half a sentence if the Appeal is granted?]

Why am I not surprised? :roll:


She would have big balls if she did that. This is probably the best she can do.


So she will definitely serve SOME time then?

Oh Conrad would be SO proud. :roll:
User avatar
SusieP
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2931
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:13 am
Location: up to no good in rainy Nottinghamshire, England

Postby Andrew » Fri May 18, 2007 9:47 am

summergirl wrote:
NealIsGod wrote:
summergirl wrote:
Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Cate wrote:Sorry. I'm not a stalker. My mistake ,
His Talking about the size of his Johnson.


Trust me on this, Sweet-Tits...
Don't become like our most recently
depArted, Jizz-gobblin' Asshole...
Keep your stalking to the threads that offend you.


Just curious - why is it that someone who disagrees with Deano is immediately labeled a "stalker"?


They're not. It's when they don't contribute anything but bitching and whining about Deano that they are called that.


OK, but this is a Forum, where you are supposed to be able to freely express your opinions, but you cannot do that if you find what he says offensive unless you want to get slammed with horrible, derogatory threats. I guess Deano runs this board, it's very obvious. He can do/say whatever he wants and get away with it. Tell people to "die", use the C word - come on, is that really necessary? What kind of thrill does someone get when they do that? It's really pathetic...


He does NOT run this board, those comments have been removed and he has once again been warned. As have a couple of other people this week.

It's getting real tired, real quick.

If people want this board to remain, I suggest a re-think of the way you all post here should be considered ASAP.
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10961
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Postby NealIsGod » Fri May 18, 2007 9:48 am

summergirl wrote:
NealIsGod wrote:
summergirl wrote:
Carlitto H@kk wrote:
Cate wrote:Sorry. I'm not a stalker. My mistake ,
His Talking about the size of his Johnson.


Trust me on this, Sweet-Tits...
Don't become like our most recently
depArted, Jizz-gobblin' Asshole...
Keep your stalking to the threads that offend you.


Just curious - why is it that someone who disagrees with Deano is immediately labeled a "stalker"?


They're not. It's when they don't contribute anything but bitching and whining about Deano that they are called that.


OK, but this is a Forum, where you are supposed to be able to freely express your opinions, but you cannot do that if you find what he says offensive unless you want to get slammed with horrible, derogatory threats. I guess Deano runs this board, it's very obvious. He can do/say whatever he wants and get away with it. Tell people to "die", use the C word - come on, is that really necessary? What kind of thrill does someone get when they do that? It's really pathetic...


No. Almost all of us have had our run-ins with Deano and others in here. It is quite obvious who the trolls/baiters are and who the regular people are.

Most of us find him pretty damn funny because we know he's all about shocking people and getting reactions.
User avatar
NealIsGod
MP3
 
Posts: 12512
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby whocares » Fri May 18, 2007 9:49 am

I know it won't Stop Andrew, I just had to say it this morning.

I feel for ya bud. It's insane here anymore.
Without ego, we have no pride in what we are saying.
User avatar
whocares
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2672
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:47 pm
Location: all over the place

Postby NealIsGod » Fri May 18, 2007 9:50 am

Is it that bad? :?
User avatar
NealIsGod
MP3
 
Posts: 12512
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby Andrew » Fri May 18, 2007 9:52 am

Today - yes. The amount of posts I had to remove this morning was simply shitful. I am embarassed to have this forum representing my website.

Trolls, baiters and agitators. I've had enough.
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10961
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Postby Blondie » Fri May 18, 2007 9:52 am

OK, so this is a thread about Paris Hilton, right? I'm guessing that since noone was really shocked about her sentence getting reduced (I'm actually surprised it didn't get removed completely), we've gone off on a tangent.
"I still cling to hope, and I believe in love and that's faith enough for me"-RUSH

"Life's too short to be a dumbass" - Me

www.myspace.com/blondiesc
User avatar
Blondie
8 Track
 
Posts: 833
Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 9:30 am

Postby Saint John » Fri May 18, 2007 9:53 am

Andrew wrote:Today - yes. The amount of posts I had to remove this morning was simply shitful. I am embarassed to have this forum representing my website.

Trolls, baiters and agitators. I've had enough.


"Embarassed" has 2 r's my friend. I was good today, wasn't I?
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby SusieP » Fri May 18, 2007 9:56 am

Andrew wrote:Today - yes. The amount of posts I had to remove this morning was simply shitful. I am embarassed to have this forum representing my website.

Trolls, baiters and agitators. I've had enough.


But should the posters who behave themselves on here be punished for trollish, baiting and agitating behaviour?
Please don't shut down the Forum, Andrew.
It really is the most fun - and informative - place to visit on the net.
User avatar
SusieP
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2931
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:13 am
Location: up to no good in rainy Nottinghamshire, England

Postby nolippin » Fri May 18, 2007 10:02 am

Clearly your warnings are not being heeded by him or his handful of followers. Why do you continue to let a small number of people set the tone for this board?

Why do people who get fed up with it and speak up about it get warned and/or banned?


Andrew wrote:Today - yes. The amount of posts I had to remove this morning was simply shitful. I am embarassed to have this forum representing my website.

Trolls, baiters and agitators. I've had enough.
nolippin
8 Track
 
Posts: 857
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:12 am

Postby Andrew » Fri May 18, 2007 10:10 am

I do my best to accommodate everyone's wishes and remove people only when absolutely necessary.

Some I guess will again call for Deano's removal, but he has been spoken to. Truth be told, he was again under attack from the baiters and I am not happy with the way he dealt with that....but those baiting him are no better if not worse, as they know what they are doing.

One has been removed already this week and I'll continue on that path until there is peace here.
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10961
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Previous

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests