Looks like the Boss band lipped their performance...

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby RobbieG » Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:12 am

StoneCold wrote:Bruce owned this SB. He'll be forever remembered for that slide into the camera. A special treat for anyone with HD. :lol:


Yes they did put on a good performance even though some of it was lipped. I will put this performance at #3 with U2 #1 and Prince # 2. No one can top U2 for superbowl performance. :D
User avatar
RobbieG
LP
 
Posts: 573
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 11:04 am

Postby Rockindeano » Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:20 am

RobbieG wrote:
StoneCold wrote:Bruce owned this SB. He'll be forever remembered for that slide into the camera. A special treat for anyone with HD. :lol:


Yes they did put on a good performance even though some of it was lipped. I will put this performance at #3 with U2 #1 and Prince # 2. No one can top U2 for superbowl performance. :D


As far as entertainment, U2 pales to Bruce. U2 was great, but it was humdrum, no camera interaction, no personal interaction with fans. Go youtube both and see the difference. Bono is awesome, but never went to the crowd, never really had fun out there. Bruce was changing up lyrics, on the piano, and telling folks at home to put down the chicken fingers. That is a showman, the likes of which we will never see again.
Last edited by Rockindeano on Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby NealIsGod » Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:23 am

Rockindeano wrote:
RobbieG wrote:
StoneCold wrote:Bruce owned this SB. He'll be forever remembered for that slide into the camera. A special treat for anyone with HD. :lol:


Yes they did put on a good performance even though some of it was lipped. I will put this performance at #3 with U2 #1 and Prince # 2. No one can top U2 for superbowl performance. :D


As far as entertainment, U2 pales to Bruce. U2 was great, but it was humdrum, not camera interaction, no personal interaction with fans. Go youtube both and see the difference. Bono is awesome, but never went to the crowd, never really had fun out there. Bruce was changing up lyrics, on the piano, and telling folks at home to put down the chicken fingers. That is a showman, the likes of which we will never see again.


You sound like Arnel's hardcore fans. Don't exaggerate. :twisted:
User avatar
NealIsGod
MP3
 
Posts: 12512
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby Lula » Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:25 am

and the U2 performance was after the tragic sept 11. remember all the names of the victims on the screens? very moving tribute. don't be so quick to discount the "show."
User avatar
Lula
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4561
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2006 12:10 pm
Location: santa monica

Postby RobbieG » Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:26 am

Rockindeano wrote:
RobbieG wrote:
StoneCold wrote:Bruce owned this SB. He'll be forever remembered for that slide into the camera. A special treat for anyone with HD. :lol:


Yes they did put on a good performance even though some of it was lipped. I will put this performance at #3 with U2 #1 and Prince # 2. No one can top U2 for superbowl performance. :D


As far as entertainment, U2 pales to Bruce. U2 was great, but it was humdrum, not camera interaction, no personal interaction with fans. Go youtube both and see the difference. Bono is awesome, but never went to the crowd, never really had fun out there. Bruce was changing up lyrics, on the piano, and telling folks at home to put down the chicken fingers. That is a showman, the likes of which we will never see again.


Disagree U2 is one of the best out there. Period. Bruce is a distant seciond. Yes that showmanship put down those chicken fingers and guacamole. :lol: Not saying Bruce was not good just not at U2 level. Plus Bono and The Edge can sing live, that's the difference.
User avatar
RobbieG
LP
 
Posts: 573
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 11:04 am

Postby NealIsGod » Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:27 am

U2's catalog blows away Springsteen's (unless you're 55 or older). :P
User avatar
NealIsGod
MP3
 
Posts: 12512
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby RobbieG » Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:27 am

Lula wrote:and the U2 performance was after the tragic sept 11. remember all the names of the victims on the screens? very moving tribute. don't be so quick to discount the "show."


Thank You. :D :D
User avatar
RobbieG
LP
 
Posts: 573
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 11:04 am

Postby RobbieG » Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:28 am

NealIsGod wrote:U2's catalog blows away Springsteen's (unless you're 55 or older). :P



Thank You :D :D
User avatar
RobbieG
LP
 
Posts: 573
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 11:04 am

Postby Rockindeano » Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:28 am

NealIsGod wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
RobbieG wrote:
StoneCold wrote:Bruce owned this SB. He'll be forever remembered for that slide into the camera. A special treat for anyone with HD. :lol:


Yes they did put on a good performance even though some of it was lipped. I will put this performance at #3 with U2 #1 and Prince # 2. No one can top U2 for superbowl performance. :D


As far as entertainment, U2 pales to Bruce. U2 was great, but it was humdrum, not camera interaction, no personal interaction with fans. Go youtube both and see the difference. Bono is awesome, but never went to the crowd, never really had fun out there. Bruce was changing up lyrics, on the piano, and telling folks at home to put down the chicken fingers. That is a showman, the likes of which we will never see again.


You sound like Arnel's hardcore fans. Don't exaggerate. :twisted:


I thought about that when I wrote that last sentence, but hey, I at least I have history and sales on my side to back me up. "Arnel's hardcore fans." LOL, please, never ever let me be that fucking retarded. When Pineda writes a hit song, let me know.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby NealIsGod » Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:29 am

Rockindeano wrote:I thought about that when I wrote that last sentence, but hey, Iat least I have history and sales on to back me up. "Arnel's hardcore fans." LOL, please, never ever let me be that fucking retarded.


No, you'll never be that retarded. :lol:
User avatar
NealIsGod
MP3
 
Posts: 12512
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby RobbieG » Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:36 am

Rockindeano wrote:
NealIsGod wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
RobbieG wrote:
StoneCold wrote:Bruce owned this SB. He'll be forever remembered for that slide into the camera. A special treat for anyone with HD. :lol:


Yes they did put on a good performance even though some of it was lipped. I will put this performance at #3 with U2 #1 and Prince # 2. No one can top U2 for superbowl performance. :D


As far as entertainment, U2 pales to Bruce. U2 was great, but it was humdrum, not camera interaction, no personal interaction with fans. Go youtube both and see the difference. Bono is awesome, but never went to the crowd, never really had fun out there. Bruce was changing up lyrics, on the piano, and telling folks at home to put down the chicken fingers. That is a showman, the likes of which we will never see again.


You sound like Arnel's hardcore fans. Don't exaggerate. :twisted:


I thought about that when I wrote that last sentence, but hey, I at least I have history and sales on my side to back me up. "Arnel's hardcore fans." LOL, please, never ever let me be that fucking retarded. When Pineda writes a hit song, let me know.


Why would you be retarded? Only place Pineda will have a hit song written by him will be his homeland. This also applies to JSS, Augeri, right? May I ask what history and sales you have?? just curious? :lol: U2 is the bomb live. :D
User avatar
RobbieG
LP
 
Posts: 573
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 11:04 am

Postby Rockindeano » Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:40 am

NealIsGod wrote:U2's catalog blows away Springsteen's (unless you're 55 or older). :P


Oh I was just waiting for this.

Put up the songs side by side. Please.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby NealIsGod » Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:42 am

Rockindeano wrote:
NealIsGod wrote:U2's catalog blows away Springsteen's (unless you're 55 or older). :P


Oh I was just waiting for this.

Put up the songs side by side. Please.


I can only name about 6 or 7 Boss tunes, but at least 2 dozen U2 songs.
User avatar
NealIsGod
MP3
 
Posts: 12512
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby Rockindeano » Fri Feb 06, 2009 6:55 am

I went to U2.com and they claim to have 47 hits. I went to Brucespringsteen.net and get this, counted 47 hits.

hmm.

Bruce has number one album now and I am sure U2 will get their number 1 as well later this year. Want to bet either one gets album of the year?

PS- NIG, Born in the USA had 7 singes off it alone.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby Ehwmatt » Fri Feb 06, 2009 7:05 am

Rockindeano wrote:
RobbieG wrote:
StoneCold wrote:Bruce owned this SB. He'll be forever remembered for that slide into the camera. A special treat for anyone with HD. :lol:


Yes they did put on a good performance even though some of it was lipped. I will put this performance at #3 with U2 #1 and Prince # 2. No one can top U2 for superbowl performance. :D


As far as entertainment, U2 pales to Bruce. U2 was great, but it was humdrum, no camera interaction, no personal interaction with fans. Go youtube both and see the difference. Bono is awesome, but never went to the crowd, never really had fun out there. Bruce was changing up lyrics, on the piano, and telling folks at home to put down the chicken fingers. That is a showman, the likes of which we will never see again.


Undoubtedly the true measure of great showmanship for sure :D
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby Deb » Fri Feb 06, 2009 7:05 am

Rockindeano wrote:As far as entertainment, U2 pales to Bruce. U2 was great, but it was humdrum, no camera interaction, no personal interaction with fans. Go youtube both and see the difference. Bono is awesome, but never went to the crowd, never really had fun out there. Bruce was changing up lyrics, on the piano, and telling folks at home to put down the chicken fingers. That is a showman, the likes of which we will never see again.


Will have to give ya that one, nobody's going to top Bruce's "camera interaction". :lol:
Deb
MP3
 
Posts: 14934
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 11:23 am
Location: Gotta Love The Ride!

Postby Rockindeano » Fri Feb 06, 2009 7:11 am

Deb wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:As far as entertainment, U2 pales to Bruce. U2 was great, but it was humdrum, no camera interaction, no personal interaction with fans. Go youtube both and see the difference. Bono is awesome, but never went to the crowd, never really had fun out there. Bruce was changing up lyrics, on the piano, and telling folks at home to put down the chicken fingers. That is a showman, the likes of which we will never see again.


Will have to give ya that one, nobody's going to top Bruce's "camera interaction". :lol:


How bout shutting your hole and sending me my fuckin Luongo keychain. Isn't 9 straight losses at home enough? I need that keychain goddamn you! :twisted:

If you don't send it, I will send you a pair of my smelly skidmarked underwear airtight in a ziplog bag. 8)
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby StoneCold » Fri Feb 06, 2009 7:24 am

RobbieG wrote:Disagree U2 is one of the best out there. Period. Bruce is a distant second. Yes that showmanship put down those chicken fingers and guacamole. :lol: Not saying Bruce was not good just not at U2 level. Plus Bono and The Edge can sing live, that's the difference.


I like U2 a lot but The Edge "singing" isn't something I'd brag about, live or not.

They're completely different so beyond comparing the SB shows its tough to go there. I will say I get tired of U2's music before Bruce because a lot of U2 is designed to be radio friendly as opposed to having soul touching meaning.

U2 does have some deep stuff but to get there requires more production because they rely on a lot of sound effects.

Springsteen's able to convey emotion with simpler lyrics and music. I had more fun watching Bruce than U2 because the tone of the show. I enjoyed the songs and got some laughs along the way.
User avatar
StoneCold
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6310
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:32 pm

Postby Blueskies » Fri Feb 06, 2009 7:33 am

StoneCold wrote:
RobbieG wrote:Disagree U2 is one of the best out there. Period. Bruce is a distant second. Yes that showmanship put down those chicken fingers and guacamole. :lol: Not saying Bruce was not good just not at U2 level. Plus Bono and The Edge can sing live, that's the difference.


I like U2 a lot but The Edge "singing" isn't something I'd brag about, live or not.

They're completely different so beyond comparing the SB shows its tough to go there. I will say I get tired of U2's music before Bruce because a lot of U2 is designed to be radio friendly as opposed to having soul touching meaning.

U2 does have some deep stuff but to get there requires more production because they rely on a lot of sound effects.

Springsteen's able to convey emotion with simpler lyrics and music. I had more fun watching Bruce than U2 because the tone of the show. I enjoyed the songs and got some laughs along the way.
I like both. Good post, I agree.
Blueskies
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9620
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 6:09 am

Postby Deb » Fri Feb 06, 2009 7:48 am

Rockindeano wrote:
Deb wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:As far as entertainment, U2 pales to Bruce. U2 was great, but it was humdrum, no camera interaction, no personal interaction with fans. Go youtube both and see the difference. Bono is awesome, but never went to the crowd, never really had fun out there. Bruce was changing up lyrics, on the piano, and telling folks at home to put down the chicken fingers. That is a showman, the likes of which we will never see again.


Will have to give ya that one, nobody's going to top Bruce's "camera interaction". :lol:


How bout shutting your hole and sending me my fuckin Luongo keychain. Isn't 9 straight losses at home enough? I need that keychain goddamn you! :twisted:

If you don't send it, I will send you a pair of my smelly skidmarked underwear airtight in a ziplog bag. 8)


Ewwww. Image

And 10 points up on Vancouver......thank you very much. :mrgreen:
Deb
MP3
 
Posts: 14934
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 11:23 am
Location: Gotta Love The Ride!

Postby artist4perry » Fri Feb 06, 2009 8:25 am

Deb wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:
Deb wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:As far as entertainment, U2 pales to Bruce. U2 was great, but it was humdrum, no camera interaction, no personal interaction with fans. Go youtube both and see the difference. Bono is awesome, but never went to the crowd, never really had fun out there. Bruce was changing up lyrics, on the piano, and telling folks at home to put down the chicken fingers. That is a showman, the likes of which we will never see again.


Will have to give ya that one, nobody's going to top Bruce's "camera interaction". :lol:


How bout shutting your hole and sending me my fuckin Luongo keychain. Isn't 9 straight losses at home enough? I need that keychain goddamn you! :twisted:

If you don't send it, I will send you a pair of my smelly skidmarked underwear airtight in a ziplog bag. 8)


Ewwww. Image

And 10 points up on Vancouver......thank you very much. :mrgreen:

What scares me is he is saving them............................ :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby bluejeangirl76 » Fri Feb 06, 2009 8:30 am

artist4perry wrote:What scares me is he is saving them............................ :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:


Completely unrelated, a4p... but is that a urinal in your avatar?
User avatar
bluejeangirl76
MP3
 
Posts: 13346
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:36 am

Postby artist4perry » Fri Feb 06, 2009 8:39 am

bluejeangirl76 wrote:
artist4perry wrote:What scares me is he is saving them............................ :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:


Completely unrelated, a4p... but is that a urinal in your avatar?


It is considered "Art". By a famous Artist named Duchamp............ Is it art? Is what I ask, and has been debated for years since ...............Kinda like you, he liked to challenge the status quo........... :wink: :D :D

Fountain is a 1917 work by Marcel Duchamp. It is one of the pieces which he called readymades (also known as found art), because he made use of an already existing object—in this case a urinal, which he titled Fountain and signed "R. Mutt". The art show to which Duchamp submitted the piece stated that all works would be accepted, but Fountain was not actually displayed, and the original has been lost. The work is regarded by some as a major landmark in 20th century art. [2] Replicas commissioned by Duchamp in the 1960s are now on display in museums.

After much debate by the board members (most of whom did not know Duchamp had submitted it) about whether the piece was or was not art, Fountain was hidden from view during the show.[5] Duchamp and Arensberg resigned from the board after the exhibition.
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby Ehwmatt » Fri Feb 06, 2009 8:46 am

Comparing U2 and Bruce is about as meaningful as comparing Metallica to Crosby Stills & Nash. Why do it? Very different music, aside from PERHAPS some political overlap.
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby Arkansas » Fri Feb 06, 2009 8:54 am

artist4perry wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
artist4perry wrote:What scares me is he is saving them............................ :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:


Completely unrelated, a4p... but is that a urinal in your avatar?


It is considered "Art". By a famous Artist named Duchamp............ Is it art? Is what I ask, and has been debated for years since ...............Kinda like you, he liked to challenge the status quo........... :wink: :D :D

Fountain is a 1917 work by Marcel Duchamp. It is one of the pieces which he called readymades (also known as found art), because he made use of an already existing object—in this case a urinal, which he titled Fountain and signed "R. Mutt". The art show to which Duchamp submitted the piece stated that all works would be accepted, but Fountain was not actually displayed, and the original has been lost. The work is regarded by some as a major landmark in 20th century art. [2] Replicas commissioned by Duchamp in the 1960s are now on display in museums.

After much debate by the board members (most of whom did not know Duchamp had submitted it) about whether the piece was or was not art, Fountain was hidden from view during the show.[5] Duchamp and Arensberg resigned from the board after the exhibition.


It's a cooling & self-cleaning pet bed. Put a cushion in it, and attach a low-power vacuum hose to the main pipe. The cat/dog will sleep comfortably as the air streams around him, and the dander & fur will get disposed of properly.


later~
Arkansas
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2565
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:23 am
Location: duh?

Postby artist4perry » Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:11 am

Arkansas wrote:
artist4perry wrote:
bluejeangirl76 wrote:
artist4perry wrote:What scares me is he is saving them............................ :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:


Completely unrelated, a4p... but is that a urinal in your avatar?


It is considered "Art". By a famous Artist named Duchamp............ Is it art? Is what I ask, and has been debated for years since ...............Kinda like you, he liked to challenge the status quo........... :wink: :D :D

Fountain is a 1917 work by Marcel Duchamp. It is one of the pieces which he called readymades (also known as found art), because he made use of an already existing object—in this case a urinal, which he titled Fountain and signed "R. Mutt". The art show to which Duchamp submitted the piece stated that all works would be accepted, but Fountain was not actually displayed, and the original has been lost. The work is regarded by some as a major landmark in 20th century art. [2] Replicas commissioned by Duchamp in the 1960s are now on display in museums.

After much debate by the board members (most of whom did not know Duchamp had submitted it) about whether the piece was or was not art, Fountain was hidden from view during the show.[5] Duchamp and Arensberg resigned from the board after the exhibition.


It's a cooling & self-cleaning pet bed. Put a cushion in it, and attach a low-power vacuum hose to the main pipe. The cat/dog will sleep comfortably as the air streams around him, and the dander & fur will get disposed of properly.


later~



Image

You mean like this? Could have a use like that! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :shock: :shock: Poor kitty! Just hope he doesn't want to get even when he finds it's a urinal........


Image
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby The Sushi Hunter » Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:27 am

Rockindeano wrote:No problems here.

Bruce sang live, all of it. So did Stevie. The band sang too, but had assurances to help. As a matter of fact, this may be the first Super Bowl that was actually sung 100% live by the main vocals. Prince lipped, Tom Petty lipped as did McCartney to a lesser extent. If you dickheads remember, one condition that Bruce made when he agreed to do this is 100% live or no deal. He said he didn't care how it sounded, it was going to be live. Backing vocals are semi acceptable in regular tours, and E Street does not use taped vocals of any kind, but in this situation, where they have to be up and running in 4 minutes, perfectly acceptable. The music was all 100% live, and you heard how perfect they sounded.

Not even remotely close to "lipping."

Try again losers.


Your right, it's not lipping, but realistically it's much more of a challenge to sing with a completely live band then it is to just get up and do a glorified karaoke bit, and that's exactly what it was. The music wasn't at all 100% live Deano and you saying that just makes you sound a bit rediculous man. So Bruce sort of fudged on his one condition that this had to be 100% live or no deal. It was a karaoke half time show with the bonus "tea bag" manuever in there. God I learn something hillarious every day when I'm on this site. Guess I'll be thinking about this now every time I'm taking the teabag out of my cup of hot tea from now on. :lol:
User avatar
The Sushi Hunter
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4881
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:54 am
Location: Hidden Valley, Japan

Postby Rockindeano » Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:49 am

The Sushi Hunter wrote:
Rockindeano wrote:No problems here.

Bruce sang live, all of it. So did Stevie. The band sang too, but had assurances to help. As a matter of fact, this may be the first Super Bowl that was actually sung 100% live by the main vocals. Prince lipped, Tom Petty lipped as did McCartney to a lesser extent. If you dickheads remember, one condition that Bruce made when he agreed to do this is 100% live or no deal. He said he didn't care how it sounded, it was going to be live. Backing vocals are semi acceptable in regular tours, and E Street does not use taped vocals of any kind, but in this situation, where they have to be up and running in 4 minutes, perfectly acceptable. The music was all 100% live, and you heard how perfect they sounded.

Not even remotely close to "lipping."

Try again losers.


Your right, it's not lipping, but realistically it's much more of a challenge to sing with a completely live band then it is to just get up and do a glorified karaoke bit, and that's exactly what it was. The music wasn't at all 100% live Deano and you saying that just makes you sound a bit rediculous man. So Bruce sort of fudged on his one condition that this had to be 100% live or no deal. It was a karaoke half time show with the bonus "tea bag" manuever in there. God I learn something hillarious every day when I'm on this site. Guess I'll be thinking about this now every time I'm taking the teabag out of my cup of hot tea from now on. :lol:


Horse shit. That band plays live better than any in music. So the NFL had some measures in place to offer up a more steady sound. You can't fault any artist for that. That is just impossible to have a 22 piece band take the stage in 4 minutes including set up. I am ok with it. All 5 guitars were powered on, although I am sure Patti and Suzie's were not as loud. IMO, Steven and Nils provided the real guitar sound. Max did play, and so were the pianos. The horns were live. It's all good. No excuses to be made. Your argument about playing live is correct, but that would be more appropriately directed to a band that perhaps struggles live. This band can do this shit better than any band. They played over 150 songs live last tour. Think about that- 150 different songs. They know their shit.

More importantly, and I think about this literally at work every night. Did you ever get that rotten shell fish smell out of your old ladies mouth? I told you how best to go about that procedure. Just stick it in there.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

Postby Tito » Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:51 am

LIPPER.
User avatar
Tito
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4024
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 4:47 am
Location: Chicago, Il

Postby Rockindeano » Fri Feb 06, 2009 9:56 am

Tito wrote:LIPPER.


You don't want to go there buddy. Your signature is the picture of a lipper. He lipped his lame joke for a song Every Generation all tour long. You need proof? Good because I don't have it, but I do know.
User avatar
Rockindeano
Forever Deano
 
Posts: 25864
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:52 am
Location: At Peace

PreviousNext

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests