Ehwmatt wrote:Voyager wrote:I see it more like it is simply different than your traditional view on sexual relationships, but I don't think it has anything to do with being unnatural. Is it abnormal for our two male pomeranians to hump each other? Should I take them to the vet to be evaluated for deviant sexual behavior? What if one of my daughters happens to turn out gay - should I label her an "unnatural deviant" and treat her accordingly?
The far right wing of this country sure has created a lot of bigotry. Bashing gays is no different than bashing black people, hispanics, or any other minority.

The far left of this country has sure made it hard to have views that don't fall 100% in line with theirs

.
I really hope you're not playing the bigot/race card on me man, come on. It's not ok to "bash" gays (in this instance, deciding Adam cannot "rock" because he is gay). I'm not going to go to Bobby's house and "get him" for being gay. I just don't have to sit here and believe that it is an intended offshoot of natural human/living creature sexuality. Labeling something deviant doesn't go hand in hand with executing them, imprisoning them, or denying them rights, whatever history of discrimination may be in the past. Living creatures are hard-wired to reproduce. Aside from the hours spent in your formative years beating your cock to a pulp to nudey magazines, there is another deep-seated reason you're attracted to that big rack and tight snatch. Heterosexuality is the NATURAL inclination. Animal homosexuality isn't any more natural than human and that doesn't prove anything. Again, if I could wave my hand and make everyone and everything homosexual, where would that leave us?
Ehwmatt, you seem like a pretty reasonable guy, and you hit on something VERY true, for YOU. "another deep-seated reason you're attracted to that big rack and tight snatch", you see, "naturally", I'm not attracted to that, and while I find a woman's body beautiful, I have no "natural attraction" to it, nor do any of my male friends, but my lesbian friends are a different story. If we weren't "hard wired" to be who we are, we wouldn't be who we are.
The biggest mistake people make is thinking that we're playing a game or choosing this. Now, I'm not like some gay people who will say, "I'd never choose to be gay if I had a choice", because I've had a really good life and the only negative comments I get are from people like you who don't really understand and don't want to understand. (no disrespect)
Natural is an individual thing. I mean make-up, microwaves, and ipods aren't "natural", but they exist. So saying something isn't "natural" is way out of bound. Birth control is the opposite of natural, breast implants are NO natural, and I could go on and on.
Here's what I tell people during this discussion. Go to the most remote place in this world. Find a tribe of people that don't read, don't have a religion or any contact with the outside world and among those people you will find a homosexual.
Another scientific theory of homosexuality, since it's only about 8 to 10% of the population is natural population control engineered by "nature".
Okay, the soap box is gone, sorry to keep on, but I think if someone takes a minute to try and understand instead of knee-jerking to conclusions the world might be a better place.
I don't care who anyone fucks, or loves or lives with, (as long as they are legal and consensual), so why should somone care who I love, live with or fuck?
The bottom line is this, if someone has a problem with a gay artists, it's obvious that person's problem and not the artist's.