DrFU wrote:timstar78 wrote: --- what a bunch of tupperware, Auto-Tuned, sensationalized nonsense.
Nice!
+1
Moderator: Andrew
I'm going to have to agree w/you, Kev!! I'm also goingkgdjpubs wrote:Saint John wrote:carleysdad wrote:I appreciate the fact that SP would rather retire while he was on top (and his vocals were strong)
On top?!?! Then he should have retired after the Frontiers tour. What followed were 2 sissified Journey albums and one of the single biggest shit heaps ever recorded. He cut ROR short, cut FTLOSM short and completely bailed on TBF. Way to go out "on top!"![]()
![]()
PS And then there's the Bill Graham show. Guzzle guzzle.
for the average fan....he DID retire when he was on top. The average fan could care less that ROR tour was cut short, and FTLOSM and TBF are a small footnote at best. Unless you are a diehard, you have never even heard of the Bill Graham show, much less heard it.
To the average fan (which GREATLY outnumbers any other group), Perry retired after ROR when Journey was big. That is going out on top. The truth is a bit more complicated, but the popular perception is what it is based on.
carleysdad wrote:Say what you will about Steve Perry stepping away from the spotlight and not recording any new music, but after watching Bon Jovi's performance on Sunday evenings AMA's (and witnessing Jon Bon Jovi's absolutely HORRIBLE vocals), I appreciate the fact that SP would rather retire while he was on top (and his vocals were strong) instead of continuing to tour and milk his fans of $$$ like Bon Jovi continues to do.
Pelata wrote:They've lost some of their range...not their quality...they both still have something to offer vocally, IMO. When you lose some of your range, you accomodate by writing new material in lower keys and tuning down older material a touch finding a way to pull it off.
FamilyMan wrote:carleysdad wrote:Say what you will about Steve Perry stepping away from the spotlight and not recording any new music, but after watching Bon Jovi's performance on Sunday evenings AMA's (and witnessing Jon Bon Jovi's absolutely HORRIBLE vocals), I appreciate the fact that SP would rather retire while he was on top (and his vocals were strong) instead of continuing to tour and milk his fans of $$$ like Bon Jovi continues to do.
This post is absurd. Go see Bon Jovi live before you suggest they've jumped the shark. Jon had the same self-doubts and frustrations about the road and the business in the 90's, but instead of squandering the gift he was given, he re-evaluated himself and his band, reinvented their image, and carried on - to the delight of his fans. Bon Jovi is one of the few throwbacks to the supergroup era, and they give it every thing they have live.
STORY_TELLER wrote:Pelata wrote:They've lost some of their range...not their quality...they both still have something to offer vocally, IMO. When you lose some of your range, you accomodate by writing new material in lower keys and tuning down older material a touch finding a way to pull it off.
Granted re: range, but IMO JBJ has lost a bit of quality too. His sound is much more nasal now, which tells me he's forcing his voice to compensate for something. That compensating factor is what changed the quality. Ergo his vocal quality isn't as strong. The character has changed and it's less attractive as a result. Listening to the organic floating flow of his vibrato in the link I provided from his heyday, the difference is pretty stark to me.
Don wrote:Didn't Bon Jovi just sellout The New Meadowlands Stadium, not to mention a fortnight of shows at the O2 in London? if there is a demand there from the public, why should ther Band retire? The fans seem to understand that Jon's voice isn't what it used to be but for them it's the memories and reliving the past most likely, while for the new fans, he sounds just as good as most of the new artist vocal wise.
If Bon jovi couldn't pack them in anymore, I might agree but next to U2, AC-DC and Bruce Springsteen, they are the biggest old school rock out there. When the fans have had enough, that's when the band should hang it up.
bru87tr wrote:JBJ vocals have been terrible for a long long time.
This is coming from a huge fan who bought the first album when it came out. BJ wasn't even a headline then.
Someone said he never had strong vocals ? Sure, he was no SP, but back in the day he could really belt it out. I seen him live many times and very early on, he had a very strong voice.
Now he sounds like my grandmother singing. He sounds terrble IMO and has been singing this way for a very long time.
carleysdad wrote:Say what you will about Steve Perry stepping away from the spotlight and not recording any new music, but after watching Bon Jovi's performance on Sunday evenings AMA's (and witnessing Jon Bon Jovi's absolutely HORRIBLE vocals), I appreciate the fact that SP would rather retire while he was on top (and his vocals were strong) instead of continuing to tour and milk his fans of $$$ like Bon Jovi continues to do.
Rockindeano wrote:bru87tr wrote:JBJ vocals have been terrible for a long long time.
This is coming from a huge fan who bought the first album when it came out. BJ wasn't even a headline then.
Someone said he never had strong vocals ? Sure, he was no SP, but back in the day he could really belt it out. I seen him live many times and very early on, he had a very strong voice.
Now he sounds like my grandmother singing. He sounds terrble IMO and has been singing this way for a very long time.
You do know Jon gets serious help live right? He isn't 100% live. That has been well known for years now.
marco17 wrote:Rockindeano wrote:bru87tr wrote:JBJ vocals have been terrible for a long long time.
This is coming from a huge fan who bought the first album when it came out. BJ wasn't even a headline then.
Someone said he never had strong vocals ? Sure, he was no SP, but back in the day he could really belt it out. I seen him live many times and very early on, he had a very strong voice.
Now he sounds like my grandmother singing. He sounds terrble IMO and has been singing this way for a very long time.
You do know Jon gets serious help live right? He isn't 100% live. That has been well known for years now.
David Bryan hits most of the high notes during Livin' on a Prayer these days... Jon hasn't been able to hit them for years. They put on a helluva spectical live, but now they have 2-3 other background players behind them. It used to be the 5 of them out there live. I guess they are trying to capture the ablum sounds that can't be done live without extra help....who knows..
Rockindeano wrote:Hint- that was Augeri's signal to Elson to roll tape, when he rotated his arm in the air.
PianoMan1986 wrote:Rockindeano wrote:Hint- that was Augeri's signal to Elson to roll tape, when he rotated his arm in the air.
I never knew that one either -- I assume since the '01 DVD?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests