Rick wrote:Pacfanweb wrote:Aaron wrote:Dude, listen to Hagar and Tyler. Tyler can still hit the high note in Sweet Emotion (WTF knows what it is), he did it on Idol a couple of years ago. I about fell out of my chair. They are in the same age range and sound about the same as they did back in the 70's and 80's too. I think it's vocal muscle strength and chord flexibility. I think it takes hard work and practice to stay in shape range wise. I hope Steve continues to sing and work his pipes. I believe he will get bettter and get more range back with work and time.
2 things: One, Hagar and Tyler have never stopped singing, so their voices didn't just go for years without performing. That helps keep them from dropping off.
Two: Both Hagar and Tyler's voices are noticeably rougher than they used to be. We don't notice the difference as much because their voices changed gradually, and we heard them through every step of it....it's not like Sammy has just started back singing after getting kicked out of Van Halen in 1996 and we're going "damn, Sammy can still sing but his voice is a LOT rougher". Because it is.
I believe Perry's voice will rebound a bit if he continues to use it. No, it's not going to return to what it was even in 1994, but it'll get better than what it currently is.
This argument doesn't mention that something happened to Perry's voice that was unrepairable. I don't know what it was. A hemorrhaged or torn vocal cord, or both is the most likely thing, because polyps are more easily repaired. I don't know exactly when the first damage was done, but something major happened in the extension of the Escape tour, in 1982. Continuing to sing with the damage did even more. It's amazing he can even speak.
I guess we'll never know, unless he chooses to tell us. Could have just been the natural aging process. Some singers keep their voices for longer...it's not always clear why. Sammy Hagar, although his voice is much rougher, still can get up pretty high and still sounds like Sammy, although he admittedly doesn't take care of his voice at all.
Sebastian Bach's voice has deteriorated noticeably (and he's much younger), and he takes all sorts of care of his voice.
Perry took care of his voice, other than singing his ass off every night for years in his younger days. But he stopped for almost 20 years. Who knows what he'd still have now had he kept working it?
Elton John's voice went from a tenor to a baritone, but he had surgery that caused that, so that was essentially an injury.
Mickey Thomas still has most of his voice, amazingly. He is apparently just blessed. As is Mike Reno.
Robert Plant lost his high register by the early 80's, and it was completely gone by 1988, for sure. But he smoked. And I don't think he took care of his voice at all, either. Still sounds like Robert Plant in the lower regions, though...just like Perry still sounds like SMFP in his mid-range.
So some singers don't lose much, and some lose it early on, for varying reasons. I don't think there's any particular formula that if followed, would allow all these guys to keep singing into their 60's like they did in their 40's. A lot of it is just luck.
edit: Thinking of more older singers and how their voices have aged:
Tommy Shaw: His has aged well. Not like it was when he was younger, but he retains most of his range.
Dennis DeYoung: His seems slightly lower, maybe "richer"? But still has most of what he's always had.
Billy Joel: Noticeably a fuller, lower voice, but still can sing most of his stuff. I don't pay that much attention, but I'm sure he must tune his older stuff down.
Axl Rose: Always had a weird voice to try and classify. Has lost the power in the high range, though. I saw a video of him singing Sweet Child recently, and instead of full voice like he used to, was using a weak falsetto.
Roger Daltrey: His voice was noticeably lower in their 1989 reunion tour, when he was in his 40's...but sounded great compared to what he has now. But he's 70. (damn, it hurt to type that)
Pete Townshend: Also a lot lower, but then again, he's 69.
Mick Jagger: Another weird voice...and although I'm sure it's a bit lower, he can still sing Stones stuff just fine.
Stevie Wonder: Still has a powerful voice at 64, but he never stopped performing. Of course, not as clear and high as his younger self, but then again, nobody is.
Paul Rodgers: Voice is remarkably intact at 64.
Paul Stanley: More of a screamer than a singer. Voice is noticeably weaker now, but still gets it done. Age 62
David Lee Roth: Voice is GONE. Heavy smoker. That's what killed it, IMO. Might even regain some of it if he'd stop. Odd thing is, he's a health nut otherwise.