MATTHEW wrote:Big J wrote:MATTHEW wrote:Big J wrote:FYRE wrote:Big J wrote:I admire your passion for it, but this is a terrible idea. No offense. Journey's last surviving draw as an artist is the die hard classic rock fan. Unless radio were gonna support it (which they won't, with the "Journey" label on it) - it doesn't stand a chance and would ultimately turn away more fans than it'd bring in.
The only "big idea" that might work that's left is a tour with Perry.
No offense taken. I'm a "retired" artist and I learned a long time ago that you can't please everyone.
If JOURNEY is in a desperate position with only one last surviving draw then that's scary.
It's not their fault they're in that position, it's the nature of the business today.
There are no long term musical acts of the new crop. Every rock band that's at the top of the game right now will be completely forgotten in 5 years...it's a disposable genre now. Matchbox 20 begat Creed who begat Nickleback who will give way to someone else in a year or so. Kinda sad. Anything older than two summers ago is gone.
Since the 1950s - since rock n roll began - the vast majority of bands have enjoyed a short shelf-life. It's always been the nature of the business.
Of course they have. The vast majority don't have hits.
Also - some old melodic rock bands continue to enjoy huge success - such as Bon Jovi and Aerosmith.
Exceptions to the rule and established before the rule became vogue. So do the Stones, Rod Stewart, etc.
So I disagree that it's everyone else's fault. Journey are at least partly responsible for the decline.
I think you're missing the point I'm trying to make. I'd liken today's music scene to the 70's and disco.
Hey, everyone loved that song "Good Times." Who was the artist? You don't know do you? It was Chic. One of the bigger disco artists there was in the era, had a few other hits, but nobody would know that. The acts were all disposable. Same with today's rock. Your major record selling artists will have a lifespan, the Britney Spearses and Christina Aguileras and Justin Timberlakes and a few of the rap artists. But in the rock world, they're disposable.
I'm sorry but anybody with even a rudimentary knowledge of pop music knows that "Good Times" was by Chic.
Of course. You know it, and I know it. The average record buyer doesn't.
There are hundreds of examples of 'disposable' acts in the 60s and the 80s too. And as for today...I'd say that the highest turnover of artists is in the RnB, hip-hop and house/techno scenes - because this music is essentially club music and driven by 12" mixes rather than albums.
Absolutely. Always been a habit of the record companies. Not until now has it really, REALLY hit mainstream rock though
Rock music? Well, the Foo Fighters, Oasis, Coldplay, Radiohead and Keane are just some of the bands who have emerged in recent years who have longevity.
How many, of those, will have a million seller if they put a record out tomorrow. Foo Fighters and possibly Radiohead. Coldplay's got a dark horse shot.
Or do you mean hard rock/AOR? Well, this genre peaked twenty years ago - so perhaps this type of music is just exhausted now?
Good point...I think it may be.
I think the best bet for a band of Journey's mold is, honetsly, to cater to their stereotype, whether they want to or not. WYLAW was precisely the right move. Yes, by that point their remaining audience was mostly mid 30's women. Cater to them in the format they now listen to and the format they most identify you with.
Trying to go "rock" with Faith in the Heartland or State of Grace or whatever is not going to move records, and it wont anyway because the label isn't backing them (no label is now).
Only the select few bands in their shoes can branch out a bit (Rod Stewart) without it being a complete disaster (Bon Jovi - This left Feels Right)