odessa wrote:montyollie2 wrote:Just a quick note to say I'm really new on this board and I don't know ANY of you and your history... I have no biases and no bone to pick.
But Deano, you sound like you have a problem. Nothing gets my back up more than someone who criticizes a published writer by saying they could do better and then hurling personal attacks.
Present it. Where's your published book? I'll buy it if you give me the link.

Just thought you might like to know that this sort of crap is really a turn-off to the newcomer to a board. Civilised conversation is really not that difficult to master.
With all due respect to the orginal subject, I must comment on this post...
I don’t have a bone to pick in the dog fight either. However, Deano does have a right to speak his mind regarding any product being marketed to the consumer (at large) via any website he reads, especially as he is a major contributor to the website. As long as Deano (or anyone else) is expected to pay for (said) product, they have every right to critique (said) product- regardless of whether the individual selling (said) product likes it or not! In this case, it’s a book being sold by a member here who gathered much of the supporting (public) information from easily accessed sources off the internet...which was their prerogative, however it does give Dean's critique merit.
Most successful writers rely on some form of media to sell their written work, as such, they are
subject to reviews from Critics...its how their work sells (it’s called marketing). If you don’t like reading book reviews then that is your personal preference. The majority of the public DOES rely on some form of review. Many of the books that are best sellers (or listed on the New York Times as best sellers) have been subjected to critiques (good or bad) by major media outlets. This method allows the reading audience (at large) to grasp greater insights into whatever they would *potentially* purchase. As a “published author” a writer should know this and not have any problem with it. Nor should the writer indulge in a public war of words with those who provide negative commentary. It looks petty and demeans their product which they cannot separate from.
Regarding the reference of a “published” author; I was under the impression that the body of work noted is SELF published, in other words, PRINT ON DEMAND. Anyone can *self publish* any body of work using this method and claim they are a “Published author” or “writer with standing”. Therein lies the true technicality! There is a big difference having an independent entity behind One’s literary work and publishing it Oneself. Many publishing houses will not touch a self published writer after using such methods nor give it a second look. Again, Deano is correct here.
Lastly, If Deano was going to write a book, I am sure he has more than enough material (and sources) to produce a work of merit. He has had North American media exposure via the radio and print due to Tapegate. He has met with various members of the band and is known to them. If Deano decided to put together a manuscript (based on inside information about the band) he may very well get a Publishing House to back his work (with an editing department on site to proofread it). Potentially, Deano’s work could be serialized in magazines (of importance) gaining him greater exposure. It’s all about how Deano chooses to market his manuscript and himself. Many people would love to know who was the deep throat that provided Deano’s information for Tapegate. I am sure that whatever he decides to write, it would hold a level of fascination for the audience at large (not just because of *
what* he’s writing about, but because of *
Who* he is). Love him or hate him, people would defiantly be inclined to buy a book penned by him.
Thank you,Odessa,that was a great post and I happen to agree with everything you said.
You must know that I have NO problem with criticism,in fact I welcome it,as it's the only way to learn.
However,I like constructive criticism,not attacks.
Two things:
- I know what's Deano's opinion on this book and I am fine with it.
However,I must object on one thing:this book is not a compilation of interviews,it is BASED on public interviews.That's the difference.
The rest is subject to everyone's personal opinions.Negative or positive,I appreciate them all.
- Yes,this book is self-published and printed on demand.It was a way to get it to the Steve Perry fans around the world.
As you probably know,I live in Romania,I write in Romanian and my other books are published in my country at one of the publishing houses from my country.
I have no interest of publishing anything outside Romania.
Steve Perry's bio was an attempt to put in print( write about) everything I have learned about him and then publish it in a way that it could get it to his fans.
That's all.I have chosen a simple and fast way and I don't see what the problem is.
Looking forward to read other books about Perry,Journey,Schon etc.
A last note: what bothered me was that the subject in this thread was not about my book,but Deano felt the need to bite.Not to criticize,but to bite.
I respond well to constructive criticism,but I snap when people just throw mean remarks my way.
Go back and read.I didn't start the book discussion.
This is definitely not the thread to continue such a discussion,I know,but felt the urge to respond.
No one is perfect.