OT: Patriots Are DONE!

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Postby Michigan Girl » Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:31 am

Luvsaugeri wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
Luvsaugeri wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
Luvsaugeri wrote:
StocktontoMalone wrote:

Nice assumption.....WRONG! I'm a Lions fan.....nice try though. :wink:


Well then....you're REALLY having a bad day today!! :D :wink:

:shock:
Hey, hey, hey.........friend...... :evil: :wink:


Yeah but your Cowboys whooped on my Browns.....so today isn't a wash for you!! :D


True....But the Lions have my heart..... :wink:


Well in that case....I feel your pain girlfriend!!


& I feel yours....... :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby RossValoryRocks » Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:31 am

StocktontoMalone wrote:Name a more talented player than this guy



Image


Jim Brown...Walter Payton...to name just 2...
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby Michigan Girl » Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:32 am

StocktontoMalone wrote:Name a more talented player than this guy



Image


God, I miss him....... :cry:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby S2M » Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:33 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:
StocktontoMalone wrote:Name a more talented player than this guy



Image


Jim Brown...Walter Payton...to name just 2...


You're tripping.....Barry was 10x the backs they were.

And when you are done hanging with my AV - let me know.... :wink:
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby Luvsaugeri » Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:36 am

Since 78 wrote:
Luvsaugeri wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
Luvsaugeri wrote:
StocktontoMalone wrote:

Nice assumption.....WRONG! I'm a Lions fan.....nice try though. :wink:


Well then....you're REALLY having a bad day today!! :D :wink:

:shock:
Hey, hey, hey.........friend...... :evil: :wink:


Yeah but your Cowboys whooped on my Browns.....so today isn't a wash for you!! :D


Ill apologize in advance for next week!! :wink:


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Image
Luvsaugeri
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1187
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:21 pm
Location: Buckeye Nation

Postby RossValoryRocks » Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:38 am

StocktontoMalone wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:
StocktontoMalone wrote:Name a more talented player than this guy



Image


Jim Brown...Walter Payton...to name just 2...


You're tripping.....Barry was 10x the backs they were.

And when you are done hanging with my AV - let me know.... :wink:


You are out of your mind bro. Jim Brown might be the best back EVER for any era. Have you ever actually watched some of his games?? UNREAL what he did.
Payton was the best back since Brown. Sanders was a phenomenal player on a terrible team, but there are other backs who were as good if not better.
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby conversationpc » Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:40 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:You are out of your mind bro. Jim Brown might be the best back EVER for any era. Have you ever actually watched some of his games?? UNREAL what he did.
Payton was the best back since Brown. Sanders was a phenomenal player on a terrible team, but there are other backs who were as good if not better.


Yeah, I would have to agree that Jim Brown is still the best running back in the history of the game but Sanders isn't far behind.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby S2M » Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:42 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:
StocktontoMalone wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:
StocktontoMalone wrote:Name a more talented player than this guy



Image


Jim Brown...Walter Payton...to name just 2...


You're tripping.....Barry was 10x the backs they were.

And when you are done hanging with my AV - let me know.... :wink:


You are out of your mind bro. Jim Brown might be the best back EVER for any era. Have you ever actually watched some of his games?? UNREAL what he did.
Payton was the best back since Brown. Sanders was a phenomenal player on a terrible team, but there are other backs who were as good if not better.


If Barry had an O-line, he'd have had 25,000 yards. Guy NEVER got hit. Broke more ankles than a Bank got dimes. Sure, he wasn't a powerback, but why hold THAT against him.

I'd like to hear a case for Payton, and Brown.
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby conversationpc » Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:48 am

StocktontoMalone wrote:If Barry had an O-line, he'd have had 25,000 yards. Guy NEVER got hit. Broke more ankles than a Bank got dimes. Sure, he wasn't a powerback, but why hold THAT against him.

I'd like to hear a case for Payton, and Brown.


Barry got hit plenty. My guess is he led the leage almost every year in tackles for losses but, then again, that's probably mostly due to his crap offensive line.

However, Brown scored more touchdowns, 106 to 99, than Sanders in over 700 less rushing attempts. He also averaged more yards, 5.2 to 5.0, than Sanders. I don't know about Brown's offensive line, though, since he played back in the 50s and 60s, I doubt we could even compare the o-lines of the two teams.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Enigma869 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:54 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:
Jim Brown...Walter Payton...to name just 2...



I believe the consensus of most NFL historians is that Jim Brown was the greatest running back ever. Having watched many films of Brown, it's tough to argue against it. I would also say that comparing Brown and Sanders is like comparing Larry Bird to Michael Jordan. They were both great players, but really had nothing in common (style wise). Brown ran over people, and Sanders ran away from people. Brown couldn't be tackled, and Sanders couldn't be caught!

As for Payton being better than Sanders...I don't agree. I saw Payton's entire career and he was a GREAT player, and a better person. That said, he didn't have half the moves Sanders had. Sanders was a GREAT, GREAT, GREAT running back, who played on HORRENDOUS Lions teams (not that there is any other kind of Lions team). The other thing that most football fans don't quite comprehend is just how important an offensive line is. Sanders had ZERO help on the line, his entire career! Sanders is the only guy I ever saw (including Brown) get pushed back 15 yards, only to come out on the other side of the field and gain 40 yards. He was simply a remarkable football player that never got the credit he deserved, because he was forced to toil away in obscurity for that god-awful Lions franchise!


John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby RossValoryRocks » Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:58 am

Enigma869 wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:
Jim Brown...Walter Payton...to name just 2...



I believe the consensus of most NFL historians is that Jim Brown was the greatest running back ever. Having watched many films of Brown, it's tough to argue against it. I would also say that comparing Brown and Sanders is like comparing Larry Bird to Michael Jordan. They were both great players, but really had nothing in common (style wise). Brown ran over people, and Sanders ran away from people. Brown couldn't be tackled, and Sanders couldn't be caught!

As for Payton being better than Sanders...I don't agree. I saw Payton's entire career and he was a GREAT player, and a better person. That said, he didn't have half the moves Sanders had. Sanders was a GREAT, GREAT, GREAT running back, who played on HORRENDOUS Lions teams (not that there is any other kind of Lions team). The other thing that most football fans don't quite comprehend is just how important an offensive line is. Sanders had ZERO help on the line, his entire career! Sanders is the only guy I ever saw (including Brown) get pushed back 15 yards, only to come out on the other side of the field and gain 40 yards. He was simply a remarkable football player that never got the credit he deserved, because he was forced to toil away in obscurity for that god-awful Lions franchise!


John from Boston


You might have convinced me about Payton here. But Brown is still IMO the best ever.

You are right about different styles for sure.
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby S2M » Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:59 am

RossValoryRocks wrote:
Enigma869 wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:
Jim Brown...Walter Payton...to name just 2...



I believe the consensus of most NFL historians is that Jim Brown was the greatest running back ever. Having watched many films of Brown, it's tough to argue against it. I would also say that comparing Brown and Sanders is like comparing Larry Bird to Michael Jordan. They were both great players, but really had nothing in common (style wise). Brown ran over people, and Sanders ran away from people. Brown couldn't be tackled, and Sanders couldn't be caught!

As for Payton being better than Sanders...I don't agree. I saw Payton's entire career and he was a GREAT player, and a better person. That said, he didn't have half the moves Sanders had. Sanders was a GREAT, GREAT, GREAT running back, who played on HORRENDOUS Lions teams (not that there is any other kind of Lions team). The other thing that most football fans don't quite comprehend is just how important an offensive line is. Sanders had ZERO help on the line, his entire career! Sanders is the only guy I ever saw (including Brown) get pushed back 15 yards, only to come out on the other side of the field and gain 40 yards. He was simply a remarkable football player that never got the credit he deserved, because he was forced to toil away in obscurity for that god-awful Lions franchise!


John from Boston


You might have convinced me about Payton here. But Brown is still IMO the best ever.

You are right about different styles for sure.


The difference in their stats is negligible.....I guess you just prefer Brown.
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby Michigan Girl » Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:02 pm

Enigma869 wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:
Jim Brown...Walter Payton...to name just 2...



I believe the consensus of most NFL historians is that Jim Brown was the greatest running back ever. Having watched many films of Brown, it's tough to argue against it. I would also say that comparing Brown and Sanders is like comparing Larry Bird to Michael Jordan. They were both great players, but really had nothing in common (style wise). Brown ran over people, and Sanders ran away from people. Brown couldn't be tackled, and Sanders couldn't be caught!

As for Payton being better than Sanders...I don't agree. I saw Payton's entire career and he was a GREAT player, and a better person. That said, he didn't have half the moves Sanders had. Sanders was a GREAT, GREAT, GREAT running back, who played on HORRENDOUS Lions teams (not that there is any other kind of Lions team). The other thing that most football fans don't quite comprehend is just how important an offensive line is. Sanders had ZERO help on the line, his entire career! Sanders is the only guy I ever saw (including Brown) get pushed back 15 yards, only to come out on the other side of the field and gain 40 yards. He was simply a remarkable football player that never got the credit he deserved, because he was forced to toil away in obscurity for that god-awful Lions franchise!


John from Boston

:lol: :lol: :lol:
As usual, John, you have such a way with words.... I have to agree, although I will say Barry Sanders was ELECTRIFYING!!! :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby JrnyScarab » Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:07 pm

Michigan Girl wrote:
Enigma869 wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:
Jim Brown...Walter Payton...to name just 2...



I believe the consensus of most NFL historians is that Jim Brown was the greatest running back ever. Having watched many films of Brown, it's tough to argue against it. I would also say that comparing Brown and Sanders is like comparing Larry Bird to Michael Jordan. They were both great players, but really had nothing in common (style wise). Brown ran over people, and Sanders ran away from people. Brown couldn't be tackled, and Sanders couldn't be caught!

As for Payton being better than Sanders...I don't agree. I saw Payton's entire career and he was a GREAT player, and a better person. That said, he didn't have half the moves Sanders had. Sanders was a GREAT, GREAT, GREAT running back, who played on HORRENDOUS Lions teams (not that there is any other kind of Lions team). The other thing that most football fans don't quite comprehend is just how important an offensive line is. Sanders had ZERO help on the line, his entire career! Sanders is the only guy I ever saw (including Brown) get pushed back 15 yards, only to come out on the other side of the field and gain 40 yards. He was simply a remarkable football player that never got the credit he deserved, because he was forced to toil away in obscurity for that god-awful Lions franchise!


John from Boston

:lol: :lol: :lol:
As usual, John, you have such a way with words.... I have to agree, although I will say Barry Sanders was ELECTRIFYING!!! :wink:


I only watched a few games that Sanders played in. I have to tell you -- I was completely amazed at that mans ability to bounce off people and stop and change directions instantly. It was like watching a pinball bounce around in a pinball game. You were never quite sure where he was going.
User avatar
JrnyScarab
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1136
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:19 am
Location: Merrimack, NH

Postby Enigma869 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:13 pm

Sources: Brady out with ACL tear
By Michael Silver, Yahoo! Sports
2 hours, 55 minutes ago

New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady is expected to miss the rest of the 2008 season with a torn anterior cruciate ligament in his left knee, according to a source familiar with the injury.

While New England coach Bill Belichick said in his postgame press conference that he had no update on the status of Brady’s injury, two sources indicated it involved serious damage to the knee.

“It’s bad,” a team source said. “We’re going to have to play without him.”

Brady was hurt as he stepped up in the pocket to make a throw to wideout Randy Moss. Chiefs safety Bernard Pollard, who was on the ground, lunged forward and struck Brady’s leg, which buckled as he released the ball.

Brady was helped off the field and was later led down a staircase by team officials, presumably to undergo tests.

Fourth-year quarterback Matt Cassel, who had thrown just 39 passes in his career before Sunday, replaced Brady and completed 13 of 18 passes for 152 yards and a touchdown. Cassel, who backed up Carson Palmer and Matt Leinart at USC, hasn’t been a starting quarterback since high school. He won a competition with Matt Gutierrez during the preseason to retain the job as Brady’s primary backup.



Hmmmmm....Who was the guy who called this exact injury at the beginning of this thread! See that...If you watch enough football, you don't even need x-rays :shock: Rumor is that the Patriots are bringing in Chris Simms (Phil's kid) for a physical tomorrow (god, help me). All I can say is...the rest of the AFC should have some fun this season, because the Patriots will NOT be going to the playoffs! My prediction is that Pittsburgh beats Dallas in the Super Bowl!


John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby Michigan Girl » Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:17 pm

Enigma869 wrote:Sources: Brady out with ACL tear
By Michael Silver, Yahoo! Sports
2 hours, 55 minutes ago

New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady is expected to miss the rest of the 2008 season with a torn anterior cruciate ligament in his left knee, according to a source familiar with the injury.

While New England coach Bill Belichick said in his postgame press conference that he had no update on the status of Brady’s injury, two sources indicated it involved serious damage to the knee.

“It’s bad,” a team source said. “We’re going to have to play without him.”

Brady was hurt as he stepped up in the pocket to make a throw to wideout Randy Moss. Chiefs safety Bernard Pollard, who was on the ground, lunged forward and struck Brady’s leg, which buckled as he released the ball.

Brady was helped off the field and was later led down a staircase by team officials, presumably to undergo tests.

Fourth-year quarterback Matt Cassel, who had thrown just 39 passes in his career before Sunday, replaced Brady and completed 13 of 18 passes for 152 yards and a touchdown. Cassel, who backed up Carson Palmer and Matt Leinart at USC, hasn’t been a starting quarterback since high school. He won a competition with Matt Gutierrez during the preseason to retain the job as Brady’s primary backup.



Hmmmmm....Who was the guy who called this exact injury at the beginning of this thread! See that...If you watch enough football, you don't even need x-rays :shock: Rumor is that the Patriots are bringing in Chris Simms (Phil's kid) for a physical tomorrow (god, help me). All I can say is...the rest of the AFC should have some fun this season, because the Patriots will NOT be going to the playoffs! My prediction is that Pittsburgh beats Dallas in the Super Bowl!
John from Boston


Awwww, man, if you're gonna be right with your predictions don't say that!!! :shock: :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby JrnyScarab » Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:17 pm

Enigma869 wrote:All I can say is...the rest of the AFC should have some fun this season, because the Patriots will NOT be going to the playoffs! My prediction is that Pittsburgh beats Dallas in the Super Bowl!


John from Boston


John, we can only hope the Pats defense is extremely stingy this year and Cassel just manages a conservative game like the Pats of 2001 when Brady first stepped in.
User avatar
JrnyScarab
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1136
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:19 am
Location: Merrimack, NH

Postby Enigma869 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:22 pm

JrnyScarab wrote:John, we can only hope the Pats defense is extremely stingy this year and Cassel just manages a conservative game like the Pats of 2001 when Brady first stepped in.


Cassel will NOT be the QB of this team, all season. I'm not sure who it will be, but it won't be him. There is a reason the Patriots are bringing in Chris Simms already for a tryout. I wouldn't be shocked if the next call goes to Daunte Culpepper!


John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby JrnyScarab » Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:26 pm

Enigma869 wrote:
JrnyScarab wrote:John, we can only hope the Pats defense is extremely stingy this year and Cassel just manages a conservative game like the Pats of 2001 when Brady first stepped in.


Cassel will NOT be the QB of this team, all season. I'm not sure who it will be, but it won't be him. There is a reason the Patriots are bringing in Chris Simms already for a tryout. I wouldn't be shocked if the next call goes to Daunte Culpepper!


John from Boston


Culpepper! :shock: They definitely have screwed up by not having a QB on the roster with experience other than Brady. Whoever they go after will have to learn the system on the fly. I'm not getting my hopes up this year. This is gonna suck! :cry:
User avatar
JrnyScarab
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1136
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:19 am
Location: Merrimack, NH

Postby YoungJRNY » Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:46 pm

Depth is SO important in todays NFL it isn't even funny. The backup reserved should be ready at all costs and Cassel proved it today by looking good. KC has to be the most embarrassing team I've ever watched, but give credit when credits due. The Pats have the easiest schedule in the league and it couldn't have come at a better time, but it got just a tad bit harder with TB goin' down. Givin the time frame, someone like Byron Leftwhich would of been a good emergency pickup, or Culpepper. There isn't much left on the table as far as Simms goes..maybe they could make a push for a proven vet like Charlie Batch who might be cleared for trade bait the next couple weeks. They need to do something and act fast because defensive coordinators will rest easy tonight knowing the beast has just fallen. We will see.
Image
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Postby Arianddu » Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:55 pm

I've been trying to follow this thread with some vague idea of comprehension, but I have to confess, I now have this overwhelming desire to stick my fingers in my ears, close my eyes and sing Rugby songs very, very loudly after reading all of this thread. :lol: :lol:
Why treat life as a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving in an attractive & well-preserved body? Get there by skidding in sideways, a glass of wine in one hand, chocolate in the other, body totally worn out, screaming WOOHOO! What a ride!
User avatar
Arianddu
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4509
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2008 11:43 pm
Location: Adelaide, Australia

Postby Journey/Survivor » Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:34 pm

RossValoryRocks wrote:
StocktontoMalone wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:
StocktontoMalone wrote:Name a more talented player than this guy



Image


Jim Brown...Walter Payton...to name just 2...


You're tripping.....Barry was 10x the backs they were.

And when you are done hanging with my AV - let me know.... :wink:


You are out of your mind bro. Jim Brown might be the best back EVER for any era. Have you ever actually watched some of his games?? UNREAL what he did.
Payton was the best back since Brown. Sanders was a phenomenal player on a terrible team, but there are other backs who were as good if not better.


Jim Brown may be the greatest FOOTBALL player of all time?
Journey/Survivor
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4420
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 6:32 pm
Location: The Best Location In the Nation

Postby RossValoryRocks » Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:37 pm

Journey/Survivor wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:
StocktontoMalone wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:
StocktontoMalone wrote:Name a more talented player than this guy



Image


Jim Brown...Walter Payton...to name just 2...


You're tripping.....Barry was 10x the backs they were.

And when you are done hanging with my AV - let me know.... :wink:


You are out of your mind bro. Jim Brown might be the best back EVER for any era. Have you ever actually watched some of his games?? UNREAL what he did.
Payton was the best back since Brown. Sanders was a phenomenal player on a terrible team, but there are other backs who were as good if not better.


Jim Brown may be the greatest FOOTBALL player of all time?


RB...I think you have to look at the individual positions.
User avatar
RossValoryRocks
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3830
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 4:47 pm

Postby Enigma869 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:44 pm

RossValoryRocks wrote:RB...I think you have to look at the individual positions.



Journey/Survivor thinks Bernie Kosar is one of the best players of all-time, also. If they played for Cleveland, nobody could possibly be better! Now, back to reality...I agree with you that it is impossible in football to say one guy was "the greatest player ever". It simply doesn't work, and it has to be looked at, by position. Comparing Jim Brown to Joe Montana is simply moronic. If someone wants to say that Jim Brown is the greatest running back ever, I'll at least listen to the argument. I won't listen to an argument for any one player who is "the greatest of all time", because it's just not something that can be intelligently argued, when discussing NFL football.


John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby 7 Wishes » Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:00 pm

Luvsaugeri wrote:You cheat.....it comes back to bite you!!


Fuck you.
But around town, it was well known...when they got home at night
Their fat and psychopathic wives
Would thrash them within inches of their lives!
User avatar
7 Wishes
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4305
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:28 pm

Postby Journey/Survivor » Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:03 pm

Enigma869 wrote:
RossValoryRocks wrote:RB...I think you have to look at the individual positions.



Journey/Survivor thinks Bernie Kosar is one of the best players of all-time, also. If they played for Cleveland, nobody could possibly be better! Now, back to reality...I agree with you that it is impossible in football to say one guy was "the greatest player ever". It simply doesn't work, and it has to be looked at, by position. Comparing Jim Brown to Joe Montana is simply moronic. If someone wants to say that Jim Brown is the greatest running back ever, I'll at least listen to the argument. I won't listen to an argument for any one player who is "the greatest of all time", because it's just not something that can be intelligently argued, when discussing NFL football.


John from Boston


First off, fuck off.

Second of all I've never been a Kosar fan, I think a QB should be able to move better than Frankenstein. I was a much bigger Brian Sipe fan.

You can argue that Jim Brown was more dominating at his position than say Joe Montana was at his.

Who was a better Baseball player, Ted Williams or Oil Can Boyd? Williams was an outfielder and Boyd a pitcher so therefore obviously not playing the same position. Yet it's clear as day that Williams was the better player and to argue otherwise would be ridiculous. You can fairly compare a RB and a QB.
Journey/Survivor
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4420
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 6:32 pm
Location: The Best Location In the Nation

Postby 7 Wishes » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:35 pm

That was pretty close to being a cheap shot. You don't take a guy out from below the knee like that when he's already released the damned ball.
But around town, it was well known...when they got home at night
Their fat and psychopathic wives
Would thrash them within inches of their lives!
User avatar
7 Wishes
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4305
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 3:28 pm

Postby stevew2 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 3:48 pm

everyone is drunk or dead
User avatar
stevew2
MP3
 
Posts: 13073
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Maryland

Re: OT: Patriots Are DONE!

Postby Saint John » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:55 pm

Enigma869 wrote:For all of you Patriot haters, it's time to celebrate! The Pats are DONE! Brady is out of the game with what looks to be a serious knee injury. No official word yet, but based on my personal experience, looks to be an ACL injury. If that's the case, he's done for the season, and the Patriots won't win 5 games. Looks like the Jets are winning the AFC East!


John from Boston


You're out of your fucking tree. Pats are still an 11-5ish team. They'll be fine. Belichick will use this injury for motivation and get the very best out of each and every player. They are still a very good football team.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby conversationpc » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:26 pm

7 Wishes wrote:That was pretty close to being a cheap shot. You don't take a guy out from below the knee like that when he's already released the damned ball.


Nah...He was in the process of throwing the ball when he got hit.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDj0rzxJkq0
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

PreviousNext

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests