Andrew, stop banning people!

Moderator: Andrew
Andrew wrote:Push me and I react. Simple. The guy was getting up my nose. I've sent a message to him about returning and I'll wait and see what the response from him is.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
RedWingFan wrote:Andrew wrote:Push me and I react. Simple. The guy was getting up my nose. I've sent a message to him about returning and I'll wait and see what the response from him is.
Maybe you should just go check out his blog?
mgstar1964 wrote:I just think that since its his first major outburst
leave it to the brits. lady garden I like that one. Now I can say "Madam can I tend to your garden"?SusieP wrote:Deb wrote:SusieP wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:SusieP wrote:bluejeangirl76 wrote:Beavers? Seriously?![]()
UK slang for a lady's rude bits you mean?
Yes. I'm afraid so.
You know - I think I like "rude bits" a lot better!!![]()
Me too.
And just because I know what these words mean, does not mean I use 'em.![]()
Well, I am partial to the occasional swear word, purely for emphasis and dramatic effect, you understand.![]()
![]()
And as we are all helping complete each other's education's tonight, another phrase for those particular rude bits is 'lady garden.'![]()
And 'front bottom.'
LOL, it's not just a UK slang.![]()
![]()
![]()
We probably stole it from you!
RedWingFan wrote:Andrew wrote:Push me and I react. Simple. The guy was getting up my nose. I've sent a message to him about returning and I'll wait and see what the response from him is.
Maybe you should just go check out his blog?
Andrew wrote:Push me and I react. Simple. The guy was getting up my nose. I've sent a message to him about returning and I'll wait and see what the response from him is.
Gunbot wrote:Andrew wrote:Push me and I react. Simple. The guy was getting up my nose. I've sent a message to him about returning and I'll wait and see what the response from him is.
What more do people want? All of a sudden it's become a bunch of Monday morning moderators. We don't know what was said between Andrew and Tito via PM. Why takes sides if you don't know the whole story?
I wish he kept me out of it. little dickheadSaint John wrote:Here's what Tito said:
Dear Andrew J. McNeice - MelodicRock.com Founder,
Why did you ban from your message board? I have done nothing wrong, honestly. All I said is Jefferey Soto's song and video, "21st Century" sounded and looked like Lenny Kravitz. Even his die hard fans halfway agreed with that and said there is nothing wrong with that. Then I asked, "What will he be next year?" This is in regards to his diverse talent and him always evolving. Mostly, I was just shit talking with his fans. That's what fans do whether it be music or sports. There was no hatred towards Soto in my comments.
You're a good and loyal person for protecting your friend, Jefferey, but there is no harm in my comments. I will say though, even though he saids he is thick skinned, I have to disagree with that. He should stay out of the fray and let the fans handle it. He does take it too personally. Some have brought up that Cain and Schon have gotten it a lot worse than Soto. Although that is true, my intent is not to hinder free speech and people's opinions i.e. SteveW's disrepectful comments of Cain (that's for you SteveW).
Finally, I kindly petition for you to reinstate me to your message board. I can't guarantee I will not mess around with Soto's FANS in the future but that's the fun of it. I know the Debs and Behshad like it. No one takes it personal. The only time I may address Jeff Soto is when he takes backdoor shots at the band. I will promise to lay off the caveman stuff (even though that was funny for those who got it) as a compromise. What do you say?
Thank you your friend,
Tito
Come on Dan....you guys have been pushing the envelope attacking Soto for a long time...so you know it wasn't just because of that thread....Andrew has given plenty of warning to tone it down and given your buddy lots of rope....so it was up to Tito to call for the noose or not......and the excuse .."well, others have attacked Journey members in the past so why can't we be down on Soto" doesn't fly...two wrongs don't make a right....I will say that you have toned it down for awhile but your buddy hasn't and has went at Soto at every opportunity...many, many times that have went unchecked. What's up with the dude and his hating on Soto anyway?....I don't see a reason for it other then to stir up.... be derisive and garner attention. What has Soto done to cause such vehemence ? ...because he surely can't be faulted on his talent...or for what he did for the band by jumping in short notice and finishing a tour for them......so what's up with you guys? I don't understand the need some have to attack people who are simply doing what their good at...my gosh..their all out their working hard....if you don't like their music then just don't buy it....and you can't fault others for liking it nor the guy thats making it just because it might not be your cup of tea. Why does it have to be if your supportive of the present Journey then you have to be against ex-Journey members?...Why can't every one of them simply be appreciated for their talents and contributions?Saint John wrote:mgstar1964 wrote:I just think that since its his first major outburst
Gotta disagree. Most people have PMed me asking me what the hell he even did!!! When I direct them to the thread they say "Oh....that???" Anyway, Andrew has said what is expected and those words will be passed along.
Blueskies wrote:Come on Dan....you guys have been pushing the envelope attacking Soto for a long time...so you know it wasn't just because of that thread....Andrew has given plenty of warning to tone it down and given your buddy lots of rope....so it was up to Tito to call for the noose or not......and the excuse .."well, others have attacked Journey members in the past so why can't we be down on Soto" doesn't fly...two wrongs don't make a right....I will say that you have toned it down for awhile but your buddy hasn't and has went at Soto at every opportunity...many, many times that have went unchecked. What's up with the dude and his hating on Soto anyway?....I don't see a reason for it other then to stir up.... be derisive and garner attention. What has Soto done to cause such vehemence ? ...because he surely can't be faulted on his talent...or for what he did for the band by jumping in short notice and finishing a tour for them......so what's up with you guys? I don't understand the need some have to attack people who are simply doing what their good at...my gosh..their all out their working hard....if you don't like their music then just don't buy it....and you can't fault others for liking it nor the guy thats making it just because it might not be your cup of tea.Saint John wrote:mgstar1964 wrote:I just think that since its his first major outburst
Gotta disagree. Most people have PMed me asking me what the hell he even did!!! When I direct them to the thread they say "Oh....that???" Anyway, Andrew has said what is expected and those words will be passed along.
Blueskies wrote:Come on Dan....you guys have been pushing the envelope attacking Soto for a long time...
Blueskies wrote:What's up with the dude and his hating on Soto anyway?
Blueskies wrote:What has Soto done to cause such vehemence ?
Blueskies wrote:...because he surely can't be faulted on his talent
Blueskies wrote:...or for what he did for the band by jumping in short notice and finishing a tour for them
Saint John wrote: We slapped people in the face with the cold hard truth after MONTHS of hearing RIDICULOUS forecasts for his future and that of Journey. We were dead right and others were dead wrong.
Dont get me into itnutz4Neal wrote:Ok, in short, why was Tito banned?
IMHO, SteveW's post have been much more offensive than anything Tito posted.
But in the long run, they both have the right to say what they want as long as it's within Andrews rules.
Just my opinion...
Bring back Tito!!!
Allied Forces wrote:You guys are falling into the same trap those before you did.
stevew2 wrote:Dont get me into itnutz4Neal wrote:Ok, in short, why was Tito banned?
IMHO, SteveW's post have been much more offensive than anything Tito posted.
But in the long run, they both have the right to say what they want as long as it's within Andrews rules.
Just my opinion...
Bring back Tito!!!
nutz4Neal wrote:Ok, in short, why was Tito banned?
IMHO, SteveW's post have been much more offensive than anything Tito posted.
But in the long run, they both have the right to say what they want as long as it's within Andrews rules.
Just my opinion...
Bring back Tito!!!
Saint John wrote:mgstar1964 wrote:I just think that since its his first major outburst
Gotta disagree. Most people have PMed me asking me what the hell he even did!!! When I direct them to the thread they say "Oh....that???" Anyway, Andrew has said what is expected and those words will be passed along.
Deb wrote:Andrew did what he felt was right and that's all that matters. I like Tito, we may butt heads alot when it comes to all things Soto or Martin.......but I can see his passion for his music (Friga, Schon) rivals my own. He doesn't have to like Soto, but I think the constant stabs at Soto's popularity/success/concert attendance is what is ruffling his fans' feathers and probably Andrews too. Come on Tito, there is lots of other stuff in this world to argue about without making it personal.
Play nice!
Thanks Rick. That being said, i hopeTito pms drew and gets it straightened out We cant do only tito canRick wrote:nutz4Neal wrote:Ok, in short, why was Tito banned?
IMHO, SteveW's post have been much more offensive than anything Tito posted.
But in the long run, they both have the right to say what they want as long as it's within Andrews rules.
Just my opinion...
Bring back Tito!!!
Stevew2 says a lot about Jon, but he doesn't argue the point that Jon isn't as good of a musician that others think he is. Steve is just having a little fun at Jon's expense. No harm, no foul. Tito on the other hand argues the point with other board members and with Andrew and with Jeff himself. That's a huge difference. When Andrew asks Steve to stop, he says ok. Not Tito. He questions Andrew and argues that he's done nothing wrong. Big difference.
I like Tito, I'm just explaining why I think he's not here, while Stevew2 is.
I'd love to see Tito back, but you can't question the owner of the sites authority over and over and expect to survive on their board. That's just not realistic.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests