by journey361 » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:45 am
Good points, but it's also a double-edged sword. You were afforded the luxury of a bad performance back then, but these days every show is recorded and every performance scrutinized. Add the internet, message boards, blogs, etc. and one could argue that the archaic times of the 70's and 80's had advantages that today's artists aren't afforded.
And I'm not sure what the difference in today's technology is other than Pro Tools but, to me, Escape and Frontiers sound as good as any album ever produced. I actually prefer the old recording sound. Much of today's music has a compressed sound that is far less full sounding than that of yesteryear.
Well, again am i a loon, hell yes, i saw SP sing when he was 28 (I believe Adam Lambert's age now) and he stung my dam ass to the point where i'm still talking about how great he is and how nobody even comes close to him in so many ways i just won't get into now. But to the issue at hand, my point is-(You were afforded the luxury of a bad performance back then) there was no bad performance back then, not by Journey, instrumental and vocally. For goodness sake, Journey back in the day was better than most on their worst day. SP's out-of-this-world vocals were so special from the get go, you knew he was set for stardom.