Gideon wrote:slucero wrote:Evolution (lol) as in, "progressive, well crafted songs, yet largely unmarketable to a larger audience" to "great songwriting, hooky, with generation spanning melodies".... to "sonically excellent, progressive, yet likely unmarketable"?
- Pre=Perry Journey: while progressive, had really interesting melodic sensibilities and was listenable..
- Perry-era Journey: pretty self explanatory
- Post Perry to Pre-Eclipse: numerous attempts at recapturing the legacy sound
- Eclipse: has none of the melodic intricacy of the Pre-Perry stuff and none of the appeal of the Perry-era or the post-Perry/pre-Eclipse era
I'm not sure I'd call that evolution.. surely, good/bad, right/wrong... it is moving away from having a broader appeal..

As I indicated, I was referring to a music formula. There was clear transition from one style to another, even during the Perry years, or do you consider "Precious Time" to be in the same vein as, say, "Positive Touch"?

Precious Time and Positive Touch are both good songs, period... stylistically different... but nonetheless well written and easily listenable. I'm not talking commercial viability here.. just that the songs are easily listened to.
Even within "styles".. there is good writing and bad writing... and of course, ultimately the writer must satisfy their own muse first...
"listen-ability" is largely the domain of "us"... typically construed as "commercial appeal" and measured in unit sales by the bean counters at labels.. the unfortunate truth is that the songs that garner most commercial appeal will typically have something about them that is formulaic I'd also venture listeners (such as us) hear and dismiss music that we think has been intentionally written with some formulaic intent.
On Eclipse - I hear two listenable songs: "Somebody" and "Anything Is Possible"... and there are bits of other songs where I think "yea here it comes" (like the amazing Hendrix licks NS is playing in the 1st verse of "To Whom It May Concern" ) and then poof... instant disconnect again...
If the intent was to write something that is "not like legacy Journey", a departure

if you will, then I'm not getting where they're going.. because to my ears this certainly is not progressive in a Journey sense. IMHO the pre-Perry progressive Journey is more listenable than the progressive Eclipse..
Where this album goes musically is not clear.. it's certainly not "Back to their progressive roots"... and it's definitely not their legacy sound... maybe it just goes in circles.. which, as JC said was the concept and the intent.