bufordt9 wrote:KCfla wrote:ohsherrie wrote:I understand what you're saying Fred, and I agree as it applies to the 2005 tour. As I remember it was the beginning of that tour when it became obvious that Augeri was in big trouble vocally. What some of us don't understand is why they booked the UK dates and agreed to the tour with DL when they had to know he wasn't getting better. I know a lot of people's incomes would have been adversly effected by them taking time off until the issue could be resolved, but it would have been a lot better course of action than the tapes.
It does make one wonder if some legal circumstances within the corporation made it necessary to handle it the way they did. Maybe it was the only way to get the necessary changes made.
And they're evidently still struggling with the legal resolution.
What she said!!!!!
It would have been easier for them to just pass on the Euro-tour, and the DL tour . And by that I mean; IF Steve A's voice needed more time to heal ( if it ever does/has/will!) then wouldn't it have made more sense to say "maybe next year" to all those offers? Instead of pushing things to where they ended up?
Unless, of course, that was the point to pushing things. That they really wanted SA gone- and used this as an excuse to get rid of him???? Not that we'll ever know, mind
Then thats where SA himself should have stepped in and said hey guys, my voice is shot, I need time off...where were his brains ?????
Somewhere under his ego?