Rockindeano wrote:I still laugh out loud when I remember his "Lie Finder" smack.
The problem is that Fact Finder turned out to be correct in that exchange.

Moderator: Andrew
Rockindeano wrote:I still laugh out loud when I remember his "Lie Finder" smack.
conversationpc wrote:Rockindeano wrote:I still laugh out loud when I remember his "Lie Finder" smack.
The problem is that Fact Finder turned out to be correct in that exchange.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
RedWingFan wrote:conversationpc wrote:Rockindeano wrote:I still laugh out loud when I remember his "Lie Finder" smack.
The problem is that Fact Finder turned out to be correct in that exchange.
Are we talking about the "Pulitzer" exchange?
7 Wishes wrote:Fact Finder, what you're failing to do is adjust these figures into actual dollars. Once you count inflation and currency devaluation, your theories, while still valid, are not entirely accurate.
The #1 and #2 biggest defecit spenders of all time (real AND adjusted dollars) are...Reagan and W. Bush. In fact, in 1983, DEFECIT SPENDING under Reagan accounted for 6% of the economy and 13% of the GDP. We are still paying for that today.
Trickle down economics DOES NOT WORK.
Any other questions?
RossValoryRocks wrote:
You just proved what a complete and total economic moron you are.
Deficit spending is NOT Trickledown economics. Trickledown economics is the lowering of the top tax rates to a managable level to spur investment in business and innovation.
If Reagan and the Congress in the 80's hadn't deficit spent this country would have collapsed econmically. When Reagan took office he inheirited an economy with 13% inflation and near 10% unemployment, when he left office unemployment was 5.3% and inflation was at much more managable level.
The 13% inflation was crippling us. Imagine having money in a CD or savings account making 5% interest, at 13% inflation that means you are LOSING 8% of your moneys value.
If you want to debate economics I will crush you like the putrid little bug you are, I wrote a masters thesis on it. I will cite source after source after source that says you are WRONG WRONG WRONG and wrong again.
Lowering taxes boosts government income EVERY TIME, it is the overspending that is beyond belief and one reason I couldn't stand the republican congress after 2000.
7 Wishes wrote:RossValoryRocks wrote:
You just proved what a complete and total economic moron you are.
Deficit spending is NOT Trickledown economics. Trickledown economics is the lowering of the top tax rates to a managable level to spur investment in business and innovation.
If Reagan and the Congress in the 80's hadn't deficit spent this country would have collapsed econmically. When Reagan took office he inheirited an economy with 13% inflation and near 10% unemployment, when he left office unemployment was 5.3% and inflation was at much more managable level.
The 13% inflation was crippling us. Imagine having money in a CD or savings account making 5% interest, at 13% inflation that means you are LOSING 8% of your moneys value.
If you want to debate economics I will crush you like the putrid little bug you are, I wrote a masters thesis on it. I will cite source after source after source that says you are WRONG WRONG WRONG and wrong again.
Lowering taxes boosts government income EVERY TIME, it is the overspending that is beyond belief and one reason I couldn't stand the republican congress after 2000.
Wow. You are the biggest son of a bitch I have ever encountered on any forum, ever. I'll send you my picture so you know exactly what I look like when I get to Vegas, so you can tell me this shit to my face.
I also have an MBA, incidentally. We both tend to cite "studies" or "evidence" that backs up our contentions. I can throw just as much back at you as you can dish out. However, I had thought we had gotten past name-calling. That is not my game.
So...feel free to call me out in Las Vegas. I'll even show up with one hand tied behind my back to give you a sporting chance.
RossValoryRocks wrote:I am trained US Marine buddy boy and probably as easily as big as you are...but I don't pick on the disabled, weren't you just saying how many health issues you have? Wouldn't be to cool to take you on in your diminished condition! I will tell you whatever I like to your face and you will sit there and do nothing, unless you are terminally stupid or have something to say to my face which I will probably laugh because words are just that, words. You should learn that fact.
conversationpc wrote:RedWingFan wrote:conversationpc wrote:Rockindeano wrote:I still laugh out loud when I remember his "Lie Finder" smack.
The problem is that Fact Finder turned out to be correct in that exchange.
Are we talking about the "Pulitzer" exchange?
Yeah, the one in the Clinton Library thread.
7 Wishes wrote:conversationpc wrote:RedWingFan wrote:conversationpc wrote:Rockindeano wrote:I still laugh out loud when I remember his "Lie Finder" smack.
The problem is that Fact Finder turned out to be correct in that exchange.
Are we talking about the "Pulitzer" exchange?
Yeah, the one in the Clinton Library thread.
The only thing he was "correct" about was that it didn't win a Pulitzer.
The facts contained therein are indisputable, in my opinion. But pc and FF have proven me wrong in the past, and I'm open to a debate.
How about this: go back to that article, and disprove each major theorem, citing sources. The writer of that article did.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
7 Wishes wrote:RossValoryRocks wrote:I am trained US Marine buddy boy and probably as easily as big as you are...but I don't pick on the disabled, weren't you just saying how many health issues you have? Wouldn't be to cool to take you on in your diminished condition! I will tell you whatever I like to your face and you will sit there and do nothing, unless you are terminally stupid or have something to say to my face which I will probably laugh because words are just that, words. You should learn that fact.
Right, you're the even-keeled one who has his shit together, and I'm the one who is out of line. Nice. Hypocrite.
You called ME out, dude. You were the one who recommended I not come to Vegas - before I even knew who you were or had done anything other than criticize the Bush Administration (with anger, I will admit). YOU are the one who hands out the put-downs and the not-too-subtle threats.
I'm just responding like an asshole to an asshole. But you showed your colors first. YOU made the threats, not me. It's all there for everyone to see, in plain view. I'll see you in Vegas.
7 Wishes wrote:Voyager, thanks for the backup. It correlates EXACTLY to the point I was making.
But they will "debunk" it with bogus statistics and lies. Ross will be the first do get in the fray.
Can that fucker play keys ?Voyager wrote:7 Wishes wrote:Voyager, thanks for the backup. It correlates EXACTLY to the point I was making.
But they will "debunk" it with bogus statistics and lies. Ross will be the first do get in the fray.
The only Ross we need in the fray is Ross Perot. He would put an end to this deficit spending.
![]()
![]()
7 Wishes wrote:Voyager, thanks for the backup. It correlates EXACTLY to the point I was making.
But they will "debunk" it with bogus statistics and lies. Ross will be the first do get in the fray.
conversationpc wrote:The Congress probably has more sway over spending than does the President, so put that in your pipe and smoke it.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
7 Wishes wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1X-I-38lrU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ef3C7h52Cs
So, no-one in the Bush Administration lied, eh?
Rockindeano wrote:Trust me Stu, 935 is a conservative number. You can probably add a 1 in the front and would be pretty accurate.
I do admire you Cons and your loyalty, but you are flay out wrong; again.
RossValoryRocks wrote:
Because hey YouTube is such a reliable source.Not only that the 935 lies sources were also biased and funded by Soros.
Get a grip...find some new material or something...you act is getting very old.
7 Wishes wrote:RossValoryRocks wrote:
Because hey YouTube is such a reliable source.Not only that the 935 lies sources were also biased and funded by Soros.
Get a grip...find some new material or something...you act is getting very old.
Wow, you are such an ignorant douchebag.
THIS IS ACTUAL FOOTAGE OF YOUR HERO PRESDIENT'S TOP TWO PEOPLE!!!!!!!!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests