Moderator: Andrew
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Journey has it's own problems.
As Herbie once stated, "it's nowhere near the money making machine it once used to be".
I can't imagine that those involved both with Journey and SoulSirkus (*ahem* Azoff management *ahem*) would wish to see SoulSirkus do anything but succeed immensely.
Why would those involved, such as Azoff co., wish to see Sirkus fail?
By having two succesful touring bands in their repetoire, instead of only one, wouldn't those involved stand to do nothing but win?
Thoughts?
LAWoman wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:Journey has it's own problems.
As Herbie once stated, "it's nowhere near the money making machine it once used to be".
I can't imagine that those involved both with Journey and SoulSirkus (*ahem* Azoff management *ahem*) would wish to see SoulSirkus do anything but succeed immensely.
Why would those involved, such as Azoff co., wish to see Sirkus fail?
By having two succesful touring bands in their repetoire, instead of only one, wouldn't those involved stand to do nothing but win?
Thoughts?
Because if SS is huge the fear is that Neal will prefer to do that rather than Journey.
LAWoman wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:Journey has it's own problems.
As Herbie once stated, "it's nowhere near the money making machine it once used to be".
I can't imagine that those involved both with Journey and SoulSirkus (*ahem* Azoff management *ahem*) would wish to see SoulSirkus do anything but succeed immensely.
Why would those involved, such as Azoff co., wish to see Sirkus fail?
By having two succesful touring bands in their repetoire, instead of only one, wouldn't those involved stand to do nothing but win?
Thoughts?
Because if SS is huge the fear is that Neal will prefer to do that rather than Journey.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:LAWoman wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:Journey has it's own problems.
As Herbie once stated, "it's nowhere near the money making machine it once used to be".
I can't imagine that those involved both with Journey and SoulSirkus (*ahem* Azoff management *ahem*) would wish to see SoulSirkus do anything but succeed immensely.
Why would those involved, such as Azoff co., wish to see Sirkus fail?
By having two succesful touring bands in their repetoire, instead of only one, wouldn't those involved stand to do nothing but win?
Thoughts?
Because if SS is huge the fear is that Neal will prefer to do that rather than Journey.
So what?
Who stands to lose from Neal touring with SoulSirkus?
Certainly not Azoff management. They are representing both Journey and SoulSirkus. If Sirkus takes off, Azoff management stands to make more money, not lose.
As far as I can tell, the only people that would personally lose (besides the fans) is Augeri, Cain, Valory and Castronovo- and so far, they have been nothing but supportive.
jrnyman28 wrote:This is such a crock of shit!!
From the JSS Tour Diary:
"Now this 1 is a difficult 1 because the ink aint dried on it yet but bottom line 2 answer a lot of your questions as 2 why we're not on a major label, why we're not being properly promoted, why our shows have been small in attendance, well it can only be based on these 3 simple words...'conflict of interest'! It has been the downfall of this band from the get go in that the people working with/4 Journey simply do not want 2 see this thing get 2 'big'. It's fully understandable & I don't hold grudges but bottom line is we are suffering from it where we do deserve the same shot as bands like Velvet Revolver or Audioslave but as long as the representation end of things are combined, there is a 'conflict of interest'. It has become desperately apparent 2 us now that 4 Soul SirkUS 2 have it's own legs, we must move forward with someone(s) who share(s) our vision & dream of where this band needs 2 be. We nor Neal want 2 take anything away from Journey, the band stands on it's own legacy & will continue 2 do so 4 as long as the remaining members wish 2, but love it or lump it, SS WILL also have it's own reign & our course of action will begin very soon. With this, u can expect 2 see things as they should have & will be 4 this band. We are beyond ecstatic about what we have here & plan on showing just how serious we are."
Journey and SS were in a position to help each other, not hold each other back! This really pisses me off! The only nice thing I can say is that I hope this will lead to a bigger outcome for SS. Having learned from this, and finding the right "people" for the job, SS has the potential to really benefit from this set back!
And now we see why the band had to cancel Ventura, and why the other venues were not very full...
"We're really bummed we had 2 cancel the Ventura show but bottom line it just wasn't financially sensible 2 the promoter or us, as well as the embarrassment of playing in front of a handful of people. We had little or no promotion on this tour in the US whereas we have been informed our shows overseas have been selling extremely well & we're playing places twice the size as we just did here at home...do u see the pattern here...Journey doesn't tour Europe so promote SS there, Journey tour the US so keep SS on a leash? Ah, it gets clearer the more I blab, eh? I wish the news had come sooner about Ventura so maybe alternate plans could have been made, but with my little scoop of news above, please understand u will see bigger & brighter things 4 us in the future, things done 4 our advantage, not against it!"
ace wrote:LAWoman wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:Journey has it's own problems.
As Herbie once stated, "it's nowhere near the money making machine it once used to be".
I can't imagine that those involved both with Journey and SoulSirkus (*ahem* Azoff management *ahem*) would wish to see SoulSirkus do anything but succeed immensely.
Why would those involved, such as Azoff co., wish to see Sirkus fail?
By having two succesful touring bands in their repetoire, instead of only one, wouldn't those involved stand to do nothing but win?
Thoughts?
Because if SS is huge the fear is that Neal will prefer to do that rather than Journey.
But who is the fearful party here? Certainly not the Band Journey and their workers. They are always supportive of Neal's music. Jon's studio was used to record the cd, Journey's crew is working the SS tour. Sort of leaves you thinking, eh?
JourneyTroll wrote:Dave, do you kiss your children with the same mouth that spews profanity?
JourneyTroll wrote:I too am disappointed at how unsuccessful the Soul Sirkus tour has been. I too am disappointed at the apathy of people towards Soul Sirkus, yet I am not resorting to swearing.
Journeytroll
jrnyman28 wrote:JourneyTroll wrote:Dave, do you kiss your children with the same mouth that spews profanity?
Yes I do. I still shower my children with love and affection. My children know what "family" means and they know how to behave in the world.
If you will notice, you can pretty much count the number of times I swear on this board on one hand. Quite trying to divert attention away from the thoughts expressed in people posts.
JourneyTroll wrote:I too am disappointed at how unsuccessful the Soul Sirkus tour has been. I too am disappointed at the apathy of people towards Soul Sirkus, yet I am not resorting to swearing.
Journeytroll
As I said before, not swearing does not make your posts any more palatable...
NealIsGod wrote:Like it or not, Soul SirkUS is not a supergroup, certainly not the way PlanetUS was going to be. The labels look at the band as a bunch of classic rockers. The type of music they play does not pull in most Journey fans, so having Neal is of no benefit. The people who listen to radio stations that should play Soul SirkUS are age 16-30 (and I am being generous with 30). A band like Soul SirkUS just isn't marketable to people of that age, sad as that is. And music is all about marketing these days, no longer about the music.
I welcome your thoughts on these opinions, unless you are JourneyTroll.
Like it or not, Soul SirkUS is not a supergroup, certainly not the way PlanetUS was going to be.
JourneyTroll wrote:So you are proud of yourself for expressing profanity in your opinion.
Journeytroll
jrnyman28 wrote:JourneyTroll wrote:So you are proud of yourself for expressing profanity in your opinion.
Journeytroll
It completely baffles me how you can come to that conclusion based on what I wrote. Just what reality do you live in?
Monker wrote:So you are proud of yourself for expressing profanity in your opinion.
Well, maybe he's not, but I am!
Who cares...you are really running out things to whine about, huh?
Like it or not, Soul SirkUS is not a supergroup, certainly not the way PlanetUS was going to be. The labels look at the band as a bunch of classic rockers. The type of music they play does not pull in most Journey fans, so having Neal is of no benefit. The people who listen to radio stations that should play Soul SirkUS are age 16-30 (and I am being generous with 30). A band like Soul SirkUS just isn't marketable to people of that age, sad as that is. And music is all about marketing these days, no longer about the music.
heardonthestreet wrote: His part in Classic Journey showed quality which is lost in the quantity of what he is now doing.
Journey will always be Neals one claim to fame in my opinion.
To me his style is only outstanding with a band like Journey
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests