Let's Put Some Things Back Into Perspective

We all heared Steve Perry's singing at the White Sox parade and it was - terrible! However, how many of us can sing Don't Stop Believing without music and with a bunch of out of tune baseball players around us?
This kind of reminds me of the situation with Steve Walsh from Kansas. When Kansas released "Freaks of Nature" in 1994, Steve Walsh sounded absolutely horrible on alot of songs from that album. However, as things have progressed, Walsh has actually improved his voice greatly since '94! He'll never sound like he did in 1977, but how could anybody expect him to? We might be able to fight age with plastic surgery, and certainly a good vocal coach can help improve a voice, but I do not believe it is possible for any aging tenor rock singer to sound the same today as they would have in the 1970's. The only guy that comes to mind that still sounds great (and I haven't heard him in awhile,) is Dennis DeYoung. But..I digress...
The samething applies to Steve Perry as well. I have been watching the Greatest Hits DVD of Journey Videos all day today and the videos say alot about Perry's voice even in the 1980's. His voice "matured" greatly from 1978 to 1983. He developed a raspy voice that seemed more prominent on the ROR tour - at least what the music videos tell me. Now, I Still think he sounded great on the later live videos, but nothing like he sounded in 1978.
Let's face it, when a person matures, everything matures. The body itself starts shrinking, even though the nose and ears continue to grow. The voice declines as well. Could we expect Joe Montana to go back to the NFL and play Quarterback in his upper 40's? Of course not! So, why are we expecting Steve Perry to be able to sing "Don't Stop Believing" like he did, early in his career?" It's not going to happen, and judging his voice by what he did at the Sox' parade isn't a fair assessment. Let's face it, TBF was the way it was because Perry sounded better on the balladly songs. I think the worst song on the album was Castles Burning - a "rocker."
For today's standards with Journey..Neal wanting Journey to be more of a rock band than a pop band, then Steve Augeri is better suited for the job. Why? Well it's simple. Steve Augeri is much younger than Steve Perry, and Augeri's voice hasn't had the opportunity to go through the years of torture on tour like Perry's has. If Journey holds up another decade, do we really expect Augeri to sound the same as what he does today? That's not a realistic expectation. Myself personally, I can tell a difference with Augeri's voice between Red 13 and Generations. Not that it is a huge difference, but having him put a few years under his belt singing for Journey...it has to put a big strain on his voice. Look at the few problems he had on this past tour.
Believe me, Steve Perry still has the voice, it just isn't suited for rock these days. Maybe some upbeat pop tunes with a bit of rock, but I believe he has matured into more of a TBF singer....which isn't a bad thing because that album had some great songs on it. But, for the state of Journey and Steve Perry, today, Journey's better off with Steve Augeri. Augeri still has a few years before the loud rock music becomes more than what his tenor can muster. Think about how hard it is to sing a Journey rock song! Alot of rock songs don't necessarily require such strict melodic singing as what Journey rock songs require. It's a challenge for anybody's voice and I believe that is why filling Steve Perry's shoes is such a huge thing to do. I don't even believe Perry himself could fill those shoes at this point.
Singers like Perry and DeYoung have raised the bar so high for singers in rock music nowadays - it's no wonder that the majority of the bands have baritone singers! The point in my whole rambling is that I betcha if Perry recorded an album today, it would sound awesome. And, don't say..."well that's because of the machinery there to make people's voices sound great.." while that might be true to a certain extent..remember that all the other singers in this business probably use that same "machinery" so that's not a good excuse to be hatin' on the guy.
I'll continue to be hopeful that Perry returns to the music business as a full time singer - not behind the scenes. I'll also continue to pull for Journey as well. To me, it's the best of both worlds!
This kind of reminds me of the situation with Steve Walsh from Kansas. When Kansas released "Freaks of Nature" in 1994, Steve Walsh sounded absolutely horrible on alot of songs from that album. However, as things have progressed, Walsh has actually improved his voice greatly since '94! He'll never sound like he did in 1977, but how could anybody expect him to? We might be able to fight age with plastic surgery, and certainly a good vocal coach can help improve a voice, but I do not believe it is possible for any aging tenor rock singer to sound the same today as they would have in the 1970's. The only guy that comes to mind that still sounds great (and I haven't heard him in awhile,) is Dennis DeYoung. But..I digress...
The samething applies to Steve Perry as well. I have been watching the Greatest Hits DVD of Journey Videos all day today and the videos say alot about Perry's voice even in the 1980's. His voice "matured" greatly from 1978 to 1983. He developed a raspy voice that seemed more prominent on the ROR tour - at least what the music videos tell me. Now, I Still think he sounded great on the later live videos, but nothing like he sounded in 1978.
Let's face it, when a person matures, everything matures. The body itself starts shrinking, even though the nose and ears continue to grow. The voice declines as well. Could we expect Joe Montana to go back to the NFL and play Quarterback in his upper 40's? Of course not! So, why are we expecting Steve Perry to be able to sing "Don't Stop Believing" like he did, early in his career?" It's not going to happen, and judging his voice by what he did at the Sox' parade isn't a fair assessment. Let's face it, TBF was the way it was because Perry sounded better on the balladly songs. I think the worst song on the album was Castles Burning - a "rocker."
For today's standards with Journey..Neal wanting Journey to be more of a rock band than a pop band, then Steve Augeri is better suited for the job. Why? Well it's simple. Steve Augeri is much younger than Steve Perry, and Augeri's voice hasn't had the opportunity to go through the years of torture on tour like Perry's has. If Journey holds up another decade, do we really expect Augeri to sound the same as what he does today? That's not a realistic expectation. Myself personally, I can tell a difference with Augeri's voice between Red 13 and Generations. Not that it is a huge difference, but having him put a few years under his belt singing for Journey...it has to put a big strain on his voice. Look at the few problems he had on this past tour.
Believe me, Steve Perry still has the voice, it just isn't suited for rock these days. Maybe some upbeat pop tunes with a bit of rock, but I believe he has matured into more of a TBF singer....which isn't a bad thing because that album had some great songs on it. But, for the state of Journey and Steve Perry, today, Journey's better off with Steve Augeri. Augeri still has a few years before the loud rock music becomes more than what his tenor can muster. Think about how hard it is to sing a Journey rock song! Alot of rock songs don't necessarily require such strict melodic singing as what Journey rock songs require. It's a challenge for anybody's voice and I believe that is why filling Steve Perry's shoes is such a huge thing to do. I don't even believe Perry himself could fill those shoes at this point.
Singers like Perry and DeYoung have raised the bar so high for singers in rock music nowadays - it's no wonder that the majority of the bands have baritone singers! The point in my whole rambling is that I betcha if Perry recorded an album today, it would sound awesome. And, don't say..."well that's because of the machinery there to make people's voices sound great.." while that might be true to a certain extent..remember that all the other singers in this business probably use that same "machinery" so that's not a good excuse to be hatin' on the guy.

I'll continue to be hopeful that Perry returns to the music business as a full time singer - not behind the scenes. I'll also continue to pull for Journey as well. To me, it's the best of both worlds!
