Saint John wrote:Jeremey wrote:Freddie is a lot tougher, and the way he treated his voice makes him a true enigma!
Please elaborate, if you will. While you're certainly the more refined critic here, I just can't believe Mercury is more difficult to sing than Perry. I'd love to hear why.
Freddie had very little formal technique. Guys like Freddie, Bon Scott, Brian Johnson, Axl Rose, Sammy Hagar, and others have/had a very singular way of singing, one that is 95% who they are, and 5% real technique. It's hard for me to explain, but Freddie could smoke, party all night, eat lots of sausages, or whatever, and what came out of his vocal cords was 95% going to be there, because he's basically belting what's there. He was real inconsistant live, had a very affected manor of singing when it came to his showboat style - Songs like "Radio Ga Ga" or "I Want To Break Free," and a very throaty, raw sound when he cut loose on songs like "Tie Your Mother Down." Freddie also didn't have a great tonal center, and he had more tendency to be "pitchy" live than a real studied vocalist.
All of these things make what he did more difficult to sing, for me at least. Perry had great technique, one of the best command of his own instrument of any male pop singer ever. Perry also followed a lot of rules, which makes it easier (not necessarily if you don't have the range) to sing a Perry song "straight" than a Freddie song.
That's all my opinion, of course - Jeff's got a good deal of experience covering both, so I'm sure he may have a different take on it, but every singer's different. Bottom line, you can't really say "what's tougher to sing - Howlin' Wolf or Wayne Newton?" because it's all subjective!!
