Page 1 of 1

OT: Political ads

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 1:22 am
by conversationpc
Is anyone else sick of all these campaign ads?

Image

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 1:26 am
by knox
I am tired of people TALKING about the political ads - not you in this post, but on the news and talk shows.

We only have a couple more days, then we get to hear what went wrong on the losers' side, who SHOULD have won, and still very little change based on who actually got elected.

Aaaahhh, politics. Here in TN it is Ford vs Corker. Talk about smear campains on both sides. :roll:

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 1:43 am
by KCfla
I HATE THEM!!!!!!!

Can anyone please explain to me why they feel that bashing their opponents is supposed to endear us to them?
Why not just talk about the damn ISSUES!
Thankfully, I can do searches on this thing to figure out what candidates I want to support. But how about all those people that don't have computers ( ie: elderly, poor, tech-challenged). They're very hard pressed to figure out who the hell to vote for anymore. They don't even send out flyers anymore like they used to.

I could go on for hours on this, but I'm off today, and I'm trying to keep my blood pressure under control!
Image

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 1:45 am
by NealIsGod
Have to hit the mute button every commercial break during the news. Hate them.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 1:46 am
by Just Mindy
Hate them too. I cannot stand this time of year when the ads heat up. I generally tune them out, because it's all the same garbage, insults flinging back and forth. Most candidates appear to be more interested in tearing down their opponents, instead of trying to build themselves up.

Useless.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 1:48 am
by NealIsGod
MSR wrote:Hate them too. I cannot stand this time of year when the ads heat up. I generally tune them out, because it's all the same garbage, insults flinging back and forth. Most candidates appear to be more interested in tearing down their opponents, instead of trying to build themselves up.

Useless.


Makes you wonder why you should vote for any of those clowns.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 1:52 am
by knox
I used to be a "MY political party is right and yours is wrong" guy. Now, though I agree with the ISSUES on my political side, I realize that EVERY POLITICIAN is not what he/she claims to be. I have come to the conclusion that if you are in politics, you have done - and are doing - crooked things to get and hold your position.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 1:55 am
by Just Mindy
NealIsGod wrote:Makes you wonder why you should vote for any of those clowns.

I wonder all the time, believe me...

Issues, what issues? It's more like, who irritated me the least with those damn ads :? :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:00 am
by Clasicrockldy
I still get flyers in the mail for various issues here in California. Damn, they even sent a 190 page book on everything ! The candidates, the propositions.......... it is a huge read !

As for ads on tv, my ears block them out ! :lol: :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:00 am
by AR
Arthur Carlson

Image

For City Council

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:03 am
by Clasicrockldy
AR wrote:Arthur Carlson

Image

For City Council


Lmaoooo AR ! :lol: :lol: What about that dingbat Governor that was on "Benson"? :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:08 am
by fred-journeyman
I swear that I could have built a HOUSE with all the paper ads I've gotten in the mail! I don't even look at them...in the garbage they go. Whether it's radio, TV or print, I don't even pay attention anymore.

I'm tired of it too...

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:09 am
by jrnychick
When I have the tv on, almost every commercial is for or against a candidate. This is the first year we've received tons of fliers in the mail. We are literally getting between 5 and 10 a day! Little do they know that I just stand in the garage as I flip through the mail, and all of those fliers go directly into the recycling bin! They don't even make it into the house! I really get annoyed with all of the mud-slinging. Of course some are trying to connect their opponents in some way with President Bush. Here in Illinois, we also have candidates trying to connect their opponents to former governor George Ryan. He'll be going to prison in a few months.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:13 am
by NealIsGod
Do all of you get ads with Michael J. Fox supporting whichever candidate endoreses stem cell research?

re

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:18 am
by lights1961
Its time for the seed corn and pestiside farm commercials!!

Rick

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:19 am
by KCfla
WOW- I haven't seen any of those flyers this time. Of course- Hubby could be pitching them in the trash BEFORE I see the mail!
Never thought of that Image

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:20 am
by chickpea
knox wrote:I am tired of people TALKING about the political ads - not you in this post, but on the news and talk shows.

We only have a couple more days, then we get to hear what went wrong on the losers' side, who SHOULD have won, and still very little change based on who actually got elected.

Aaaahhh, politics. Here in TN it is Ford vs Corker. Talk about smear campains on both sides. :roll:


I'm so sick of Bob Corker and Harold Ford, Jr., commercials. Corker's voice annoys me. I didn't care for him when he was our mayor.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:28 am
by ohsherrie
Oh I hate them. I don't think campaigning as we've come to know it should even be allowed. The candidates should be required to publish the facts about themselves and their stands on the pertinent issues. Of course these resumes would then need to be reviewed and the honesty of them verified by an impartial review board. Then the candidates should be required to participate in a series of televised debates conducted by representatives from each of the major networks and major newspapers. Then keep their mouths shut and let the people decide which candidate best suits their needs. In fact, it would be ideal if the people could actually vote on the issues and then let the candidate who fits the profile these votes reflect have the job.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:31 am
by NealIsGod
ohsherrie wrote:Oh I hate them. I don't think campaigning as we've come to know it should even be allowed. The candidates should be required to publish the facts about themselves and their stands on the pertinent issues. Of course these resumes would then need to be reviewed and the honesty of them verified by an impartial review board. Then the candidates should be required to participate in a series of televised debates conducted by representatives from each of the major networks and major newspapers. Then keep their mouths shut and let the people decide which candidate best suits their needs. In fact, it would be ideal if the people could actually vote on the issues and then let the candidate who fits the profile these votes reflect have the job.


ohsherrie for President. :D

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:33 am
by ohsherrie
NealIsGod wrote:
ohsherrie wrote:Oh I hate them. I don't think campaigning as we've come to know it should even be allowed. The candidates should be required to publish the facts about themselves and their stands on the pertinent issues. Of course these resumes would then need to be reviewed and the honesty of them verified by an impartial review board. Then the candidates should be required to participate in a series of televised debates conducted by representatives from each of the major networks and major newspapers. Then keep their mouths shut and let the people decide which candidate best suits their needs. In fact, it would be ideal if the people could actually vote on the issues and then let the candidate who fits the profile these votes reflect have the job.


ohsherrie for President. :D


Thanks for the vote of confidence NIG but I think I'd rather clean toilets. :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:35 am
by NealIsGod
ohsherrie wrote:
NealIsGod wrote:
ohsherrie wrote:Oh I hate them. I don't think campaigning as we've come to know it should even be allowed. The candidates should be required to publish the facts about themselves and their stands on the pertinent issues. Of course these resumes would then need to be reviewed and the honesty of them verified by an impartial review board. Then the candidates should be required to participate in a series of televised debates conducted by representatives from each of the major networks and major newspapers. Then keep their mouths shut and let the people decide which candidate best suits their needs. In fact, it would be ideal if the people could actually vote on the issues and then let the candidate who fits the profile these votes reflect have the job.


ohsherrie for President. :D


Thanks for the vote of confidence NIG but I think I'd rather clean toilets. :lol:


What you described above isn't much different. :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:37 am
by ohsherrie
NealIsGod wrote:
ohsherrie wrote:
NealIsGod wrote:
ohsherrie wrote:Oh I hate them. I don't think campaigning as we've come to know it should even be allowed. The candidates should be required to publish the facts about themselves and their stands on the pertinent issues. Of course these resumes would then need to be reviewed and the honesty of them verified by an impartial review board. Then the candidates should be required to participate in a series of televised debates conducted by representatives from each of the major networks and major newspapers. Then keep their mouths shut and let the people decide which candidate best suits their needs. In fact, it would be ideal if the people could actually vote on the issues and then let the candidate who fits the profile these votes reflect have the job.


ohsherrie for President. :D


Thanks for the vote of confidence NIG but I think I'd rather clean toilets. :lol:


What you described above isn't much different. :lol:


Not a much to wade through in the toilet. :wink:

PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 2:41 am
by KCfla
ohsherrie wrote:Oh I hate them. I don't think campaigning as we've come to know it should even be allowed. The candidates should be required to publish the facts about themselves and their stands on the pertinent issues. Of course these resumes would then need to be reviewed and the honesty of them verified by an impartial review board. Then the candidates should be required to participate in a series of televised debates conducted by representatives from each of the major networks and major newspapers. Then keep their mouths shut and let the people decide which candidate best suits their needs. In fact, it would be ideal if the people could actually vote on the issues and then let the candidate who fits the profile these votes reflect have the job.


What she said!!!!!!!!!!!