OT: Should a family man be allowed to follow his dream?

I just sat down for a moment and watched an interesting show.
It's called MORAL COURT. A married man of 25 years, with a $50,000 life insurance, and 11 children, some of which are grown;
wants to sail the Pacific Ocean from California to Hawaii, ALONE in a catamaran.
Now, his wife, a part time Pharmacist, says NO.
She took him to MORAL COURT.
The judge ruled in her favor.
What do you think? Was the Judge fair? Just because the man is married with children, does that mean he should give up his dream?
It's called MORAL COURT. A married man of 25 years, with a $50,000 life insurance, and 11 children, some of which are grown;
wants to sail the Pacific Ocean from California to Hawaii, ALONE in a catamaran.
Now, his wife, a part time Pharmacist, says NO.
She took him to MORAL COURT.
The judge ruled in her favor.
What do you think? Was the Judge fair? Just because the man is married with children, does that mean he should give up his dream?