MR

Here's one that will surely stir up the nut jobs on both sides of the political arena.

Mr. Obama in a news conference tried to tie the "nappy headed Ho" thing to the Virginia Tech massacre. I'm am not sure of the exact wording but his point was that they were both the same. DUDE WTF! The Same? His handlers and speech writers missed the fucking boat on this one.

That's like saying "Iran won't give up its' nuclear arsenal, let's go attack Ethiopia."

I have thought about this since I heard it and still cannot for the life of me figure out what the fucking correlation between the two is. Somebody, anybody please help me figure this one out.

He votes to the left of Dennis Kucinich. That's all I need to know! I didn't hear the comment tying Imus' irrelevant words to what happened this week. If he did say that, how ridiculous and foolish he is. He seems like a nice guy, but no one I could ever vote for.

Do you have a link to this Chief? I'd like to hear/read it. I hope I don't have to vote for Obama to keep another Bush out of the White House, but I can't believe he'd be stupid enough to say something like that. It sounds like a Republican spin job to me, but I could be wrong.

ohsherrie wrote:It sounds like a Republican spin job to me, but I could be wrong.

Nah. Most Democrats are dumb enough to say that kind of thing all on their own.

conversationpc wrote:

ohsherrie wrote:It sounds like a Republican spin job to me, but I could be wrong.

Nah. Most Democrats are dumb enough to say that kind of thing all on their own.

Oh don't even start it Dave. Any group of people that elected W has no room to call any other group dumb.

I actually caught this on the radio as I was getting out of the car. So no i don't know of any link. And truthfully for all I know it may have just been sound bites pasted together.

ohsherrie wrote:

conversationpc wrote:

ohsherrie wrote:It sounds like a Republican spin job to me, but I could be wrong.

Nah. Most Democrats are dumb enough to say that kind of thing all on their own.

Oh don't even start it Dave. Any group of people that elected W has no room to call any other group dumb.

I'm not exactly proud of voting for Bush but the alternative was even worse. Besides that, I TRULY believe that MOST Republicans AND Democrats aren't worth voting for. Unfortunately, that's what we're stuck with.

conversationpc wrote:
I'm not exactly proud of voting for Bush but the alternative was even worse.

Oh really? And YOU know Kerry or Gore would have been worse? You DO know this "president" will go down as the worst ever.

Dave, you are plain brainwashed.

RockinDeano wrote:

conversationpc wrote:
I'm not exactly proud of voting for Bush but the alternative was even worse.

Oh really? And YOU know Kerry or Gore would have been worse? You DO know this "president" will go down as the worst ever.

Dave, you are plain brainwashed.

Coming from you, that's a real compliment. Thanks a bunch.

W is the worst President EVER. My cat's turds would have done less harm, and therefore been better Presidents.

Moose wrote:http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/04/17/obama-compares-va-tech-massacre-to-outsourcing/

OMG! Thanks Moose.Why am I relieved after reading that?

I see the scummy GOP is already at it. Smear smear smear.

You all should be so proud to be part of such an outstanding party. So proud!

RockinDeano wrote:I see the scummy GOP is already at it. Smear smear smear.

You all should be so proud to be part of such an outstanding party. So proud!

So the GOP are responsible for Obama's words now?

Moose wrote:http://www.texasrainmaker.com/2007/04/17/obama-compares-va-tech-massacre-to-outsourcing/

Coming from a woman whose husband's job ends May 19 due to the company moving to China..........well I'll spare Andrew my comments.

ALL politicians are whores, thieves and liars. I wish a nuke would fall on congress and the white house.

RedWingFan wrote:

RockinDeano wrote:I see the scummy GOP is already at it. Smear smear smear.

You all should be so proud to be part of such an outstanding party. So proud!

So the GOP are responsible for Obama's words now?

Don't be stupid. They cut and paste and take everything out of context and YOU fucking know it.

Yeah, the Democrats NEVER do that. If you buy that I'll sell you Staten Island for $5.00


Face it. Both parties are pieces of shit and I think you realize that too.

We get more real truth right here on these boards than any politician will ever give us.

chf34jmac wrote:Face it. Both parties are pieces of shit and I think you realize that too.

Exactly.

chf34jmac wrote:That's like saying "Iran won't give up its' nuclear arsenal, let's go attack Ethiopia."

Or, that almost all of the 911 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, they were trained in Afghanistan, so let's go to war in Iraq and take the war to the terrorists.

Monker wrote:

chf34jmac wrote:That's like saying "Iran won't give up its' nuclear arsenal, let's go attack Ethiopia."

Or, that almost all of the 911 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, they were trained in Afghanistan, so let's go to war in Iraq and take the war to the terrorists.

Look at Monker! Dude, you have been spot on lately. Nice work bro. Screw this Administration and all its' lies and deceit.

RockinDeano wrote:

Monker wrote:

chf34jmac wrote:That's like saying "Iran won't give up its' nuclear arsenal, let's go attack Ethiopia."

Or, that almost all of the 911 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, they were trained in Afghanistan, so let's go to war in Iraq and take the war to the terrorists.

Look at Monker! Dude, you have been spot on lately. Nice work bro. Screw this Administration and all its' lies and deceit.

Yeah it's good to kill terrorists as long as they're not in Iraq...That's bad

RedWingFan wrote:

RockinDeano wrote:

Monker wrote:

chf34jmac wrote:That's like saying "Iran won't give up its' nuclear arsenal, let's go attack Ethiopia."

Or, that almost all of the 911 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, they were trained in Afghanistan, so let's go to war in Iraq and take the war to the terrorists.

Look at Monker! Dude, you have been spot on lately. Nice work bro. Screw this Administration and all its' lies and deceit.

Yeah it's good to kill terrorists as long as they're not in Iraq...That's bad

The US going to Iraq on a lie is really no different than what "terrorists" do is it? Killing 200,000 innocent people. Yep, it's ok, as long as the US is doing it. Give me a break.

You guys are missing the point of what I was getting at. The point I was attempting to make was his comparison of Imus to the VT attack. I still don't see how he connected those dots. Maybe my analogy of Iran and Ethiopia wasn't the best one. But tell me how there is any relation or even similarity between those two things.

Monker wrote:

chf34jmac wrote:That's like saying "Iran won't give up its' nuclear arsenal, let's go attack Ethiopia."

Or, that almost all of the 911 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, they were trained in Afghanistan, so let's go to war in Iraq and take the war to the terrorists.

I was talking to a friend of mine on the phone last night who said essentially what you did. He was in the first unit to invade Bagdad in the beginning of the war. He was over there for 2 years getting shot at. Now he's been out for 2 years and after struggling with PTSD ( he still doesnt like loud sounds..wont listen to loud music and doesnt like driving on the freeways in Cali, engine backfires really freak him out) he's been working, going to night school, and is starting up his own business. Most of his unit have been called back and now he got the call, even with them knowing he has PTSD. He's patriotic and is proud to have served his country, but he doesnt believe we should be there...and never should have went into Iraq and feels he already served his part. He also had suffered a knee injury. If he has to go back it will stop everything he has been working so hard to achieve in his life. He said if he does have to go he will, though,... really has no choice, the marines can call you back for 8 years after discharge. I hope he doesnt have to go and that they all come home soon.

I hope they all come home soon too. Enough killing already. I personally would feel more protectd if our soldiers were here and not over there. Although there is no doubt in my mind that the American people would take care of each other and defend one another if we were attacked here. I would still rather have our soldiers at home.

RockinDeano wrote:

RedWingFan wrote:

RockinDeano wrote:

Monker wrote:

chf34jmac wrote:That's like saying "Iran won't give up its' nuclear arsenal, let's go attack Ethiopia."

Or, that almost all of the 911 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, they were trained in Afghanistan, so let's go to war in Iraq and take the war to the terrorists.

Look at Monker! Dude, you have been spot on lately. Nice work bro. Screw this Administration and all its' lies and deceit.

Yeah it's good to kill terrorists as long as they're not in Iraq...That's bad

The US going to Iraq on a lie is really no different than what "terrorists" do is it? Killing 200,000 innocent people. Yep, it's ok, as long as the US is doing it. Give me a break.

The "terrorists" were following orders given by their superiors. Our miliatry does the same. You've just used terrorists and the military in the same context. Also, terrorists aim for civilians...innocent ones. Our military does NOT. Your comparison is absurd bullshit. This is one of the most thoughtless, ignorant posts of all-time. Total bullshit.

saint John wrote:

RockinDeano wrote:

RedWingFan wrote:

RockinDeano wrote:

Monker wrote:

chf34jmac wrote:That's like saying "Iran won't give up its' nuclear arsenal, let's go attack Ethiopia."

Or, that almost all of the 911 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, they were trained in Afghanistan, so let's go to war in Iraq and take the war to the terrorists.

Look at Monker! Dude, you have been spot on lately. Nice work bro. Screw this Administration and all its' lies and deceit.

Yeah it's good to kill terrorists as long as they're not in Iraq...That's bad

The US going to Iraq on a lie is really no different than what "terrorists" do is it? Killing 200,000 innocent people. Yep, it's ok, as long as the US is doing it. Give me a break.

The "terrorists" were following orders given by their superiors. Our miliatry does the same. You've just used terrorists and the military in the same context. Also, terrorists aim for civilians...innocent ones. Our military does NOT. Your comparison is absurd bullshit. This is one of the most thoughtless, ignorant posts of all-time. Total bullshit.

Like all of his posts. Left wing liberal. He just as bad as the right wing radicals. Both are factless asses.

I found that two of his statements had racial overtones and I feel that he is prejudiced toward white people. I hope that he shoots himself in his other foot down the line.

And besides, how can you trust anyone who doesn't pay his traffic fines on time?

RockinDeano wrote:

RedWingFan wrote:

RockinDeano wrote:

Monker wrote:

chf34jmac wrote:That's like saying "Iran won't give up its' nuclear arsenal, let's go attack Ethiopia."

Or, that almost all of the 911 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, they were trained in Afghanistan, so let's go to war in Iraq and take the war to the terrorists.

Look at Monker! Dude, you have been spot on lately. Nice work bro. Screw this Administration and all its' lies and deceit.

Yeah it's good to kill terrorists as long as they're not in Iraq...That's bad

The US going to Iraq on a lie is really no different than what "terrorists" do is it? Killing 200,000 innocent people. Yep, it's ok, as long as the US is doing it. Give me a break.

True most of the 911 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia and origianally trained in Afghanistan.

However, most of them (except for the 1 that was arrested) lived and worked in South Floridafor almost 2 years which is where (on their student visas) they also received their flight training.

Let me know when W is sending the troops.


Cat