OPTION "0" or Another OPTION 4

Brian May is so articulate and thoughtful that anything derivative of what he said on his page would suffer by comparison.
I'll just offer the following quick observations:
- Neal and Jon sound pretty publicly cocky for 2 people who MUST have foreseen that they were about to and did just set off the firestorm they have,
- it strains credibility (although life is often incredible) that they and Azoff don't have an Ace secured that will provide substantially greater reward than what they had with Jeff,
- songs like "Winds of Freedom" weren't going to cut it -- I won't go into detail as to why, so if that was indicative of their collective creative output with Jeff, I can understand why it looked too risky to continue with him,
- CD "album" sales aren't likely to drive Journey's business in the future, given that they're tanking industry-wide,
- for Journey to be "relevant" again -- as people use that term in the vernacular -- the truth is that you need some multi-media exposure...someone or something that gets you onto "E," People Magazine, VH1 (not just VH1 Classic), and talk-shows -- essentially someone "pretty enough" for people to like to watch,
- if they want to make money with new music, they need to write the kinds of songs that iTunes users want to download as SINGLES, and Jeff has never written a "singles" hit (not even by the mid-chart standards that Herbie articulated in the infamous Castles Burning interview),
- they need a singer with a vocal range that meets or exceeds Steve Perry's in the early 80s and who has or can develop the proper phrasing for the Dirty Dozen, and finally,
- my guess is that the main issue with Jeff was that Neal and Jon didn't find the fit they want in a writing partner...in fact, my guess is that's such a high priority that the vocal character of both Steve A. and Jeff were simply a rationalization for dissatisfaction with their creative output, which is harder to specifically put your finger on and you can sometimes only tell whether "it" is "IT!" once you hear it.
Given that the Powers That Know on this board are convinced Jeremey is going to get the gig:
- he does have the vocal range and the proper phrasing for the job
- he could be a better songwriter for Journey from the demos I've heard, but I'd point out that even what I've heard him put out lacks the efficiency necessary to create a "Journey song," as I imagine Jon and Neal envision it,
- he lacks the proper "look" for promotion of the band: wattles, double chins, and beer guts aren't going to work for the lead singer of this band...some of the issue is fitness related, but I suspect not all and that he'd require "work" to get there even if the guys who trained the cast of "300" got a hold of him,
- as Brian May intimated, he lacks his own musical "world," which is simply a way of saying that his contribution would be to perpetuate what has come in the past and won't be able to INFLUENCE this band to move forward, which is clearly what everyone on this forum seems to want.
So where does that leave things? As best I can imagine right now, to cause all this chaos rationally (I know we can't assume that), Journey should have another, more promising Option 4 on the table -- someone who is his own man, who can influence this band and get it out of a rut, someone with something "NEW to offer, a new foil, someone who has a musical world of his own, and is worth arguing with."
One of the most successfully conceived comebacks for an 80s band was when they mined 90s rock for talent to overcome the loss of a lead singer. Everyone knows that Velvet Revolver is essentially G'nR with a new singer, but that doesn't mean they sound the same. They are musically "relevant" but distinct from G'nR, but that's because Slash and the other guys took a BIG chance when they brought Scott Weiland in. Dave Kushner's new too. Both guys have influenced the evolution of the new band. Result? Number One debut album.
I think Option 4 is better than bringing in someone to cover the old songs, however brilliantly, and writing in a Steve Perry mold.
So who could do it? Chris Cornell.
Think about it... Just out of the Audioslave breakup, lives in California, has something new to offer, would be a great 90s foil to old Journey's 80s music, definitely has his own musical world, is into some of the psychedelia Neal's playing is infused with, plays guitar in his own right, and would push Journey in directions that even Jeff could not.
Listen to "Arms Around Your Love" before you dismiss all of this as crazy-talk: http://www.myspace.com/chriscornell .
Does nobody else hear a little Steve Perry sneaking in there (without the complete aping of the legendary singer)? The man has the proper vocal range (doubt it? listen to some of the Soundgarden albums, where he exceeds Steve Perry's range). Think about it...
The other vocalist in that vein would be Myles Kennedy, but he's got a band right now, so they say...
The only other obvious thing I could imagine making any business sense in having Journey start up this shit-storm would be Option "0": they are virtually certain that they can bring back Coca-Cola Classic and the fact that the "chances of that are nearly zero" only means that any such announcement would ignite a CRAZY amount of publicity and drive ticket sales through the roof.
Now, wouldn't THAT be brill?!
I'll just offer the following quick observations:
- Neal and Jon sound pretty publicly cocky for 2 people who MUST have foreseen that they were about to and did just set off the firestorm they have,
- it strains credibility (although life is often incredible) that they and Azoff don't have an Ace secured that will provide substantially greater reward than what they had with Jeff,
- songs like "Winds of Freedom" weren't going to cut it -- I won't go into detail as to why, so if that was indicative of their collective creative output with Jeff, I can understand why it looked too risky to continue with him,
- CD "album" sales aren't likely to drive Journey's business in the future, given that they're tanking industry-wide,
- for Journey to be "relevant" again -- as people use that term in the vernacular -- the truth is that you need some multi-media exposure...someone or something that gets you onto "E," People Magazine, VH1 (not just VH1 Classic), and talk-shows -- essentially someone "pretty enough" for people to like to watch,
- if they want to make money with new music, they need to write the kinds of songs that iTunes users want to download as SINGLES, and Jeff has never written a "singles" hit (not even by the mid-chart standards that Herbie articulated in the infamous Castles Burning interview),
- they need a singer with a vocal range that meets or exceeds Steve Perry's in the early 80s and who has or can develop the proper phrasing for the Dirty Dozen, and finally,
- my guess is that the main issue with Jeff was that Neal and Jon didn't find the fit they want in a writing partner...in fact, my guess is that's such a high priority that the vocal character of both Steve A. and Jeff were simply a rationalization for dissatisfaction with their creative output, which is harder to specifically put your finger on and you can sometimes only tell whether "it" is "IT!" once you hear it.
Given that the Powers That Know on this board are convinced Jeremey is going to get the gig:
- he does have the vocal range and the proper phrasing for the job
- he could be a better songwriter for Journey from the demos I've heard, but I'd point out that even what I've heard him put out lacks the efficiency necessary to create a "Journey song," as I imagine Jon and Neal envision it,
- he lacks the proper "look" for promotion of the band: wattles, double chins, and beer guts aren't going to work for the lead singer of this band...some of the issue is fitness related, but I suspect not all and that he'd require "work" to get there even if the guys who trained the cast of "300" got a hold of him,
- as Brian May intimated, he lacks his own musical "world," which is simply a way of saying that his contribution would be to perpetuate what has come in the past and won't be able to INFLUENCE this band to move forward, which is clearly what everyone on this forum seems to want.
So where does that leave things? As best I can imagine right now, to cause all this chaos rationally (I know we can't assume that), Journey should have another, more promising Option 4 on the table -- someone who is his own man, who can influence this band and get it out of a rut, someone with something "NEW to offer, a new foil, someone who has a musical world of his own, and is worth arguing with."
One of the most successfully conceived comebacks for an 80s band was when they mined 90s rock for talent to overcome the loss of a lead singer. Everyone knows that Velvet Revolver is essentially G'nR with a new singer, but that doesn't mean they sound the same. They are musically "relevant" but distinct from G'nR, but that's because Slash and the other guys took a BIG chance when they brought Scott Weiland in. Dave Kushner's new too. Both guys have influenced the evolution of the new band. Result? Number One debut album.
I think Option 4 is better than bringing in someone to cover the old songs, however brilliantly, and writing in a Steve Perry mold.
So who could do it? Chris Cornell.
Think about it... Just out of the Audioslave breakup, lives in California, has something new to offer, would be a great 90s foil to old Journey's 80s music, definitely has his own musical world, is into some of the psychedelia Neal's playing is infused with, plays guitar in his own right, and would push Journey in directions that even Jeff could not.
Listen to "Arms Around Your Love" before you dismiss all of this as crazy-talk: http://www.myspace.com/chriscornell .
Does nobody else hear a little Steve Perry sneaking in there (without the complete aping of the legendary singer)? The man has the proper vocal range (doubt it? listen to some of the Soundgarden albums, where he exceeds Steve Perry's range). Think about it...
The other vocalist in that vein would be Myles Kennedy, but he's got a band right now, so they say...
The only other obvious thing I could imagine making any business sense in having Journey start up this shit-storm would be Option "0": they are virtually certain that they can bring back Coca-Cola Classic and the fact that the "chances of that are nearly zero" only means that any such announcement would ignite a CRAZY amount of publicity and drive ticket sales through the roof.
Now, wouldn't THAT be brill?!