Moderator: Andrew
jrnysc wrote:IF being here was part of Jeff's demise, how will they handle Jeremey? They know he was on here quite a bit, and them and their management are also aware of how people here feel about them. Will they go against their own 'rules' and let him come back here to try and 'smooth over' the fanbase, or will he be strictly forbidden from communicating with us losers ever again?
conversationpc wrote:jrnysc wrote:IF being here was part of Jeff's demise, how will they handle Jeremey? They know he was on here quite a bit, and them and their management are also aware of how people here feel about them. Will they go against their own 'rules' and let him come back here to try and 'smooth over' the fanbase, or will he be strictly forbidden from communicating with us losers ever again?
THEY are the losers.
jrnysc wrote:conversationpc wrote:jrnysc wrote:IF being here was part of Jeff's demise, how will they handle Jeremey? They know he was on here quite a bit, and them and their management are also aware of how people here feel about them. Will they go against their own 'rules' and let him come back here to try and 'smooth over' the fanbase, or will he be strictly forbidden from communicating with us losers ever again?
THEY are the losers.
I know. Just a figure of speech.
conversationpc wrote:jrnysc wrote:conversationpc wrote:jrnysc wrote:IF being here was part of Jeff's demise, how will they handle Jeremey? They know he was on here quite a bit, and them and their management are also aware of how people here feel about them. Will they go against their own 'rules' and let him come back here to try and 'smooth over' the fanbase, or will he be strictly forbidden from communicating with us losers ever again?
THEY are the losers.
I know. Just a figure of speech.
Yeah, but I just HAD to say it anyway.
jrnysc wrote:So what do ya think? Do they TRY to smooth this place over, or hold Jeremey to one of the rules of employment I stated in another thread?
jrnysc wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Was being online with us supposedly part of the problem? I haven't heard about that.
It has been speculated.
ohsherrie wrote:jrnysc wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Was being online with us supposedly part of the problem? I haven't heard about that.
It has been speculated.
Hmmm, I don't know what he may have done on here that could have upset them, but it wouldn't surprise me.
Red13JoePa wrote:ohsherrie wrote:jrnysc wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Was being online with us supposedly part of the problem? I haven't heard about that.
It has been speculated.
Hmmm, I don't know what he may have done on here that could have upset them, but it wouldn't surprise me.
There is something to it.
I know I started seeing band biz that I was graciously allowed to be privvy to and kept to myself appearing online not from me and thinking..."hm. That can't be good."
jrnysc wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:ohsherrie wrote:jrnysc wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Was being online with us supposedly part of the problem? I haven't heard about that.
It has been speculated.
Hmmm, I don't know what he may have done on here that could have upset them, but it wouldn't surprise me.
There is something to it.
I know I started seeing band biz that I was graciously allowed to be privvy to and kept to myself appearing online not from me and thinking..."hm. That can't be good."
No. Nothing good coming out of that. I must say the updates were nice, however.
I was just going to say that. Jeremy came in to defend a rumor, then took the advice and has been mum since. I'm wondering if the Journey management isnt like that movie "The Firm". Ha!brywool wrote:Seems Jeremy already took the warning from a fan or two to vacate the premisis
jrnysc wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:ohsherrie wrote:jrnysc wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Was being online with us supposedly part of the problem? I haven't heard about that.
It has been speculated.
Hmmm, I don't know what he may have done on here that could have upset them, but it wouldn't surprise me.
There is something to it.
I know I started seeing band biz that I was graciously allowed to be privvy to and kept to myself appearing online not from me and thinking..."hm. That can't be good."
No. Nothing good coming out of that. I must say the updates were nice, however.
Red13JoePa wrote:jrnysc wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:ohsherrie wrote:jrnysc wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Was being online with us supposedly part of the problem? I haven't heard about that.
It has been speculated.
Hmmm, I don't know what he may have done on here that could have upset them, but it wouldn't surprise me.
There is something to it.
I know I started seeing band biz that I was graciously allowed to be privvy to and kept to myself appearing online not from me and thinking..."hm. That can't be good."
No. Nothing good coming out of that. I must say the updates were nice, however.
Yea.
Great outcome those led to.
Fucking writing sessions (which Deano said were REALLY promising) ground to a screeching shrieking halt after details of them started detonating online.
JrnyScarab wrote:
WOW. Heaven forbid that we hear that they are writing music! Top secret you know.
Eric wrote:He said things like "You cannot believe what our plans are for next year - I'm so excited"
I mean....vague stuff just to peak our curiousity.
JrnyScarab wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:jrnysc wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:ohsherrie wrote:jrnysc wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Was being online with us supposedly part of the problem? I haven't heard about that.
It has been speculated.
Hmmm, I don't know what he may have done on here that could have upset them, but it wouldn't surprise me.
There is something to it.
I know I started seeing band biz that I was graciously allowed to be privvy to and kept to myself appearing online not from me and thinking..."hm. That can't be good."
No. Nothing good coming out of that. I must say the updates were nice, however.
Yea.
Great outcome those led to.
Fucking writing sessions (which Deano said were REALLY promising) ground to a screeching shrieking halt after details of them started detonating online.
WOW. Heaven forbid that we hear that they are writing music! Top secret you know.
ohsherrie wrote:jrnysc wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Was being online with us supposedly part of the problem? I haven't heard about that.
It has been speculated.
Hmmm, I don't know what he may have done on here that could have upset them, but it wouldn't surprise me. It also wouldn't surprise me if Jeremey is warned away from getting to friendly with the fanbase. They might think Jeff's friendliness helped make him so popular and lord knows Neal and Jon aren't going to be friendly to increase their own popularity.
Red13JoePa wrote:JrnyScarab wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:jrnysc wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:ohsherrie wrote:jrnysc wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Was being online with us supposedly part of the problem? I haven't heard about that.
It has been speculated.
Hmmm, I don't know what he may have done on here that could have upset them, but it wouldn't surprise me.
There is something to it.
I know I started seeing band biz that I was graciously allowed to be privvy to and kept to myself appearing online not from me and thinking..."hm. That can't be good."
No. Nothing good coming out of that. I must say the updates were nice, however.
Yea.
Great outcome those led to.
Fucking writing sessions (which Deano said were REALLY promising) ground to a screeching shrieking halt after details of them started detonating online.
WOW. Heaven forbid that we hear that they are writing music! Top secret you know.
OK, look at the whole picture on this. A hiccup develops in the creative process (I knew about this) and before you knew it, 2-3 threads are blazing here titled "FUCK YOU, FRIGA!!!!!!" and "FRIGA SHOULD BE FIRED!!!!!!"
And you think that has no impact, it;s a just the band being overly secretive?
piecesofeight wrote:ohsherrie wrote:jrnysc wrote:ohsherrie wrote:Was being online with us supposedly part of the problem? I haven't heard about that.
It has been speculated.
Hmmm, I don't know what he may have done on here that could have upset them, but it wouldn't surprise me. It also wouldn't surprise me if Jeremey is warned away from getting to friendly with the fanbase. They might think Jeff's friendliness helped make him so popular and lord knows Neal and Jon aren't going to be friendly to increase their own popularity.
And BINGO was his name.
Red13JoePa wrote:How is it different?
It's different in that Jeff did not make the details of the sessions public knowledge.
JrnyScarab wrote:Red13JoePa wrote:How is it different?
It's different in that Jeff did not make the details of the sessions public knowledge.
Do you mean that Jeff told someone off the record and they leaked it to this board?
Perrylover wrote:IMHO "IF" Jeffs interaction with the fans was in any way part of this scenario, I would think that it wasn't the interaction on the board that was an issue, it would probably have been the "partying" and getting tanked with the fans that created an issue. I can see where this could become a problem when you start babbling with your "drinking buddies". It's hard telling who might hear what and repeat it where.
Deb
Users browsing this forum: Moonglow and 48 guests