MR

New Bumper Stickers for 2007

Bush: End of an Error

That's OK, I Wasn't Using My Civil Liberties Anyway

Let's Fix Democracy In This Country First

If You Want a Nation Ruled By Religion, Move to Iran

Bush. Like a Rock. Only Dumber.

If You Can Read This, You're Not Our President

Of Course It Hurts: You're Getting Screwed by an Elephant!

Hey, Bush Supporters: Embarrassed Yet?

George Bush: Creating the Terrorists Our Kids Will Have to Fight

Impeachment: It's Not Just for Blow Jobs Anymore

America: One Nation, Under Surveillance

They call Him "W" So He Can Spell It

Whose God Do You Kill For?

Jail To The Chief

No, Seriously, Why Did We Invade Iraq?

Bush: God's Way Of Proving Intelligent Design Is Full Of Crap

Bad President! No Banana.

We Need a President Who's Fluent In At Least One Language

We're Making Enemies Faster Than We Can Kill Them

Is It Vietnam Yet?

Bush Doesn't Care About White People, Either

Where Are We Going? And Why Are We In This Handbasket?

You Elected Him. You Deserve Him.

Dub'ya, Your Dad Should'a Pulled Out, Too!

When Bush Took Office, Gas Was $1.46

Pray For Impeachment

The Republican Party: Our Bridge To The 11th Century

What Part of "Bush Lied" Don't You Understand?

One Nation Under Clod

2004: Embarrassed. 2005: Horrified. 2006: Terrified.

Bush Never Exhaled

At Least Nixon Resigned

I like bush, but I prefer shaved

Uhhh...
For the record, Liam is a Republican....

MMMS wrote:Uhhh...
For the record, Liam is a Republican....

Rick wrote:

MMMS wrote:Uhhh...
For the record, Liam is a Republican....

Aggies=Republicans, Longhorns=Democrats

Rick wrote:New Bumper Stickers for 2007

Bush: End of an Error

That's OK, I Wasn't Using My Civil Liberties Anyway

Let's Fix Democracy In This Country First

If You Want a Nation Ruled By Religion, Move to Iran

Bush. Like a Rock. Only Dumber.

If You Can Read This, You're Not Our President

Of Course It Hurts: You're Getting Screwed by an Elephant!

Hey, Bush Supporters: Embarrassed Yet?

George Bush: Creating the Terrorists Our Kids Will Have to Fight

Impeachment: It's Not Just for Blow Jobs Anymore

America: One Nation, Under Surveillance

They call Him "W" So He Can Spell It

Whose God Do You Kill For?

Jail To The Chief

No, Seriously, Why Did We Invade Iraq?

Bush: God's Way Of Proving Intelligent Design Is Full Of Crap

Bad President! No Banana.

We Need a President Who's Fluent In At Least One Language

We're Making Enemies Faster Than We Can Kill Them

Is It Vietnam Yet?

Bush Doesn't Care About White People, Either

Where Are We Going? And Why Are We In This Handbasket?

You Elected Him. You Deserve Him.

Dub'ya, Your Dad Should'a Pulled Out, Too!

When Bush Took Office, Gas Was $1.46

Pray For Impeachment

The Republican Party: Our Bridge To The 11th Century

What Part of "Bush Lied" Don't You Understand?

One Nation Under Clod

2004: Embarrassed. 2005: Horrified. 2006: Terrified.

Bush Never Exhaled

At Least Nixon Resigned

I like bush, but I prefer shaved

THOSE ARE FREAKIN' HILARIOUS!

Funny jokes but the jokes on his intelligence are based on the faulty Lovenstein Institute report...

Debunked: "Lovenstein Institute" report that George W. Bush "has lowest IQ of all presidents of past 50 years"

Additional investigation revealed that the presidential IQ report ("Report: President Bush has lowest IQ of all presidents of past 50 years") attributed to the (fictitious) Lovenstein Institute is a hoax, debunked July 18, 2001 by snopes.com, an urban legends website (click here to read the snopes.com exposé; click here to read the original report, published in the fictitious "Pennsylvania Court Observer." In a Lexis-Nexis search, I found the hoax reported as factual information in at least four foreign newspapers: Guardian ("Diary" by Matthew Norman, July 19, 2001), The Express ("By George he's the dimmest," July 20, 2001, p. 8, no byline), the Scottish Daily Record ("Dumbya's dumb day" by Alexandra Williams, July 20, 2001, p. 2), and Bilt Zeitung ("Bush dümmster Präsident seit 1945 -- IQ nur 91," Aug. 1, 2001, no byline).

Aside from the factual errors noted in snopes.com's debunking, the story is transparently bogus, given that JFK (IQ reportedly 174) actually tested at 119 (though admittedly on the relatively crude Otis test) and Nixon (IQ reportedly 155), actually tested nearly a full standard deviation lower, at 143, according to the historical record. Given his academic record, Bill Clinton (IQ reportedly 182) probably has an IQ quite similar to that of Al Gore (who tested at 134, according to the public record).

In short, our presidents aren't nearly as smart as the bogus Lovenstein report would have us believe. [Intellectuals tend to be mediocre politicians who have great difficulty faking connectedness voters.] Given that intelligence tests are standardized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15, the average Democratic president, with a "Lovenstein IQ" of 156 (i.e., +3.7 SD) would be in the top one-hundredth of one percent under the bell curve -- that is, the top 10,000th relative to the general population in intellectual ability). Moreover, it is unlikely that there would be a gap of nearly three standard deviations between the IQs of Democratic ("Lovenstein IQ" = 156) and Republican ("Lovenstein IQ" = 115.5) presidents.

conversationpc wrote:Funny jokes but the jokes on his intelligence are based on the faulty Lovenstein Institute report...

Debunked: "Lovenstein Institute" report that George W. Bush "has lowest IQ of all presidents of past 50 years"

Additional investigation revealed that the presidential IQ report ("Report: President Bush has lowest IQ of all presidents of past 50 years") attributed to the (fictitious) Lovenstein Institute is a hoax, debunked July 18, 2001 by snopes.com, an urban legends website (click here to read the snopes.com exposé; click here to read the original report, published in the fictitious "Pennsylvania Court Observer." In a Lexis-Nexis search, I found the hoax reported as factual information in at least four foreign newspapers: Guardian ("Diary" by Matthew Norman, July 19, 2001), The Express ("By George he's the dimmest," July 20, 2001, p. 8, no byline), the Scottish Daily Record ("Dumbya's dumb day" by Alexandra Williams, July 20, 2001, p. 2), and Bilt Zeitung ("Bush dümmster Präsident seit 1945 -- IQ nur 91," Aug. 1, 2001, no byline).

Aside from the factual errors noted in snopes.com's debunking, the story is transparently bogus, given that JFK (IQ reportedly 174) actually tested at 119 (though admittedly on the relatively crude Otis test) and Nixon (IQ reportedly 155), actually tested nearly a full standard deviation lower, at 143, according to the historical record. Given his academic record, Bill Clinton (IQ reportedly 182) probably has an IQ quite similar to that of Al Gore (who tested at 134, according to the public record).

In short, our presidents aren't nearly as smart as the bogus Lovenstein report would have us believe. [Intellectuals tend to be mediocre politicians who have great difficulty faking connectedness voters.] Given that intelligence tests are standardized with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15, the average Democratic president, with a "Lovenstein IQ" of 156 (i.e., +3.7 SD) would be in the top one-hundredth of one percent under the bell curve -- that is, the top 10,000th relative to the general population in intellectual ability). Moreover, it is unlikely that there would be a gap of nearly three standard deviations between the IQs of Democratic ("Lovenstein IQ" = 156) and Republican ("Lovenstein IQ" = 115.5) presidents.

Well of course.

Yup. Republican here. BUT...NO FUCKIN' DEBATES WITH ME. That was/IS my main general rule on here. I HATE politics.

[quote="MMMS"]Uhhh...
For the record, Liam is a Republican,I still like him anyway

stevew2 wrote:

MMMS wrote:Uhhh...
For the record, Liam is a Republican,I still like him anyway

Well Thank you.

Too bad all those Bush lines, "Bushisms" are not funny, but all true.

Without a doubt, he did more harm to not only America but to the world than anyone. Good riddance. Go to Hell Mr. President, you deserve it.

Poor Bush. He can't catch a break.

its kind of scary at this minute not knowing what in the hell is going to happen next.hell if you read news from other places in the world they consider bush a terrorist like we consider bin laden one.thats pretty damn bad.he has pissed a lot of people off and in january of '09 someone is going to have to come behind him and clean all his messes up and thats IF he hasn't declared martial law or has some trick up his sleeve.

mikemarrs wrote:its kind of scary at this minute not knowing what in the hell is going to happen next.hell if you read news from other places in the world they consider bush a terrorist like we consider bin laden one.thats pretty damn bad.he has pissed a lot of people off and in january of '09 someone is going to have to come behind him and clean all his messes up and thats IF he hasn't declared martial law or has some trick up his sleeve.

I'm not saying Bush is a great President, because he's not, but he's cleaning up Clinton's mess due to his lack of interest in terrorism.

mikemarrs wrote:its kind of scary at this minute not knowing what in the hell is going to happen next.hell if you read news from other places in the world they consider bush a terrorist like we consider bin laden one.thats pretty damn bad.he has pissed a lot of people off and in january of '09 someone is going to have to come behind him and clean all his messes up and thats IF he hasn't declared martial law or has some trick up his sleeve.

There are many other places in the world that ALWAYS consider the president of the US a terrorist. They don't really care who it is. Bush is a very easy target. The next president, Republican or Democrat, will have their picture defiled in street protests around the world too. If Hillary becomes president, the extremist countries are really going to be gunning for her because she's a woman. The problem is that the terrorists don't like US. They don't like our way of life and they would like to see us ALL dead.

conversationpc wrote:

mikemarrs wrote:its kind of scary at this minute not knowing what in the hell is going to happen next.hell if you read news from other places in the world they consider bush a terrorist like we consider bin laden one.thats pretty damn bad.he has pissed a lot of people off and in january of '09 someone is going to have to come behind him and clean all his messes up and thats IF he hasn't declared martial law or has some trick up his sleeve.

I'm not saying Bush is a great President, because he's not, but he's cleaning up Clinton's mess due to his lack of interest in terrorism.

Clinton doesn't deserve to be blamed for terrorist attacks, if you want to blame someone, blame the terrorists. btw, Bush sucks!

Rick wrote:

conversationpc wrote:

mikemarrs wrote:its kind of scary at this minute not knowing what in the hell is going to happen next.hell if you read news from other places in the world they consider bush a terrorist like we consider bin laden one.thats pretty damn bad.he has pissed a lot of people off and in january of '09 someone is going to have to come behind him and clean all his messes up and thats IF he hasn't declared martial law or has some trick up his sleeve.

I'm not saying Bush is a great President, because he's not, but he's cleaning up Clinton's mess due to his lack of interest in terrorism.

Clinton doesn't deserve to be blamed for terrorist attacks, if you want to blame someone, blame the terrorists. btw, Bush sucks!

There's plenty of blame to go around on all sides but it is fact that Bin Laden was basically offered to Clinton on a silver platter.

And, yes, the terrorists themselves are ultimately to blame but there were definitely contributing factors that allowed it to happen.

conversationpc wrote:Funny jokes but the jokes on his intelligence are based on the faulty Lovenstein Institute report...

You are absolutely correct. It was all caused by Bush's fawlty intelligence.

Monker wrote:

conversationpc wrote:Funny jokes but the jokes on his intelligence are based on the faulty Lovenstein Institute report...

You are absolutely correct. It was all caused by Bush's fawlty intelligence.

Your humor is usually imperceptible to others. This is even more so.

Monker wrote:

conversationpc wrote:Funny jokes but the jokes on his intelligence are based on the faulty Lovenstein Institute report...

You are absolutely correct. It was all caused by Bush's fawlty intelligence.

You're kidding, right?

conversationpc wrote:There's plenty of blame to go around on all sides but it is fact that Bin Laden was basically offered to Clinton on a silver platter.

And, yes, the terrorists themselves are ultimately to blame but there were definitely contributing factors that allowed it to happen.

Yeah, and Bin Laden was SUPPORTED by Reagan and daddy Bush...as was Saddam, until his greed for oil got the best of him. So, whatever. Saddam was only 'bad' when he started fighting someone else besides Iran. I doubt anybody here even heard of Bin Laden before 911...And, he was only 'bad' when he stopped fighting the Soviets and target the US instead.

Funny how Bin Laden and his type are 'freedom fighters' at one point in their history, and are terrorists when they start targeting the US.

No unfortunately, I don't think the idiot is kidding. I mean we all know here that there is NO greater intelligence than Monker. Hell he even tried to tell Andrew how to run his forums. I would be interested to see how any of these self righteous armchair quarterbacks would have handled all of this mess. I know the Dems would have tried diplomacy, and when that didn't work just to show Iraq we meant business, they would have raised our taxes.

I am so tired of both sides doing nothing but trying to sell everybody else on their we're right and they suck mantras. Both sides suck and neither one is better or more truthful than the other. So until there is at least one candidate that is willing to tell me the truth, I would appreciate it greatly if both parties and all of their followers would just SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!!!

chf34jmac wrote:No unfortunately, I don't think the idiot is kidding. I mean we all know here that there is NO greater intelligence than Monker. Hell he even tried to tell Andrew how to run his forums. I would be interested to see how any of these self righteous armchair quarterbacks would have handled all of this mess. I know the Dems would have tried diplomacy, and when that didn't work just to show Iraq we meant business, they would have raised our taxes.

Oh, please. I said FROM THE START that it was all BS. Sadam doesn't have the brains to build ANY weapon to attack the US. Iraq was NEVER a threat to this country. Period. The worse thing he could do was attack Isreal...NOT US.

What would I do? Send a few bombers over and blow up whatever sites he refused to have inspected. That's all it would have taken. You don't want it inspected? Fine, it's going to cease to exist. THAT would have been my policy. Invading Iraq was a such a HUGE, monsterous mistake...perhaps Neal and Jonathan were giving Bush advice based on their lovely experience of running Journey.

I am so tired of both sides doing nothing but trying to sell everybody else on their we're right and they suck mantras.

The only thing I was wrong about back before the war started was saying that Bush wasn't stupid enough to invade Iraq. Today, I think it is plenty obvious that he was plenty stoopid enough.

It was a stupid decision. It was wrong. Whether you like it or not, it IS the fault of the Republican party...with the mini-Bush leading the way. And, the cowards who supported him because it was the PC thing to do are ALSO at fault - all of them - regardless of what party they belong to.

Who was wrong? The people who thought this was going to end in a matter of days. The people who thought Iraqi oil money would pay for it. The people who were so uninformed that they believed Iraq had something to do with 9/11. The people who thought gas prices would go down. The people who thought Iraqi's would welcome us a 'liberators'. The people who refused to recognize that there was NEVER any 'real' threat to the US. The people who thought elections in Iraq would solve 'something'. YOU GUYS WERE WRONG. Admit it. Iraq is one fucked up country - and we put ourselves RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF IT...for no reason AT ALL. It was fucked up before we took over...Just as Journey was fucked up before JSS entered the picture.

So sorry that I was right about Iraq. I was right about JSS. I was right about the state of Journey...which nowadays everybody seems to agree with me about anyway.

And, yeah, I tried to tell Andrew how to run his site. I thought it could be more then what it was, and is...and the only way to do that was to get rid of some of the CRAP that was posted here. But, nowadays, I DON'T CARE so much what goes on here, or on Frank's site, or on any future BT. It doesn't matter any longer...and it hasn't for a while now. I do however find it pretty humorous that some of the same people who complained about my 'whining' are now the loudest complainers of how Andrew runs this forum.

Both sides suck and neither one is better or more truthful than the other.

Then don't buy into the BS that Clinton was the cause of this. BOTH Bin Laden and Saddam were propped up by Reagan, Bush, and the Republican party - that is a FACT.

So until there is at least one candidate that is willing to tell me the truth, I would appreciate it greatly if both parties and all of their followers would just SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!!!

Yeah, right. Take ANY heated topic: abortion, stem cells, gay marriage, whatever....the 'canidates' are going to say what they think 'their' people want them to say. THAT is politics.

my best friend is a stand up kind of guy.this dude has been in iraq since the late spring of 2003.he came home for a few months in 2006 and got sent right back.his daughter was born not too long after he left in '03.he has never complained or anything and has went about serving his country.he has barely seen his family and his mother died during this time and his wife divorced him.i hope he is well.we had long talks about this.known him since we were 11 years old.one of the few who turned out descent in life.....

I thought they were funny. Sent them around to a few friends. Hope you don't mind Rick.