Thinking of SP while seeing Elton John in concert....

Last week, i had the opportunity to see Elton John in concert in Las Vegas. During the concert, I thought about Steve Perry quite a bit. After the concert, I came away with some thoughts and I just wanted to hear what people have to say about them.
First, have any of you seen EJ in concert in Las Vegas?? If so, what did you think? My first thought when he started singing was that his voice was definitely not the same as it was at one time. (For obvious reasons, of course). He struggled with the high notes and at times was almost screaming the lyrics. He sang all of his hits - the show was a solid two hours long. He had a band with him that seemed to provide backup vocals for him especially during the rough spots. While I thought he was pretty good, one thing that disturbed me was (and for anyone who has seen the show will understand this.....) what surrounded him as he sang. The entire time he sang, there was a huge background for everyone to see that had, what I call a video or montage, that corresponded to the particular song he was singing. And, believe it or not, the entire time there was an awful lot of nudity in the background and also an orgy and someone attempting suicide. There was also several blowup items that were on stage at different times -- one being a half peeled banana between two cherries and a very large blowup hanging on one side of the venue of breasts with big nipples.
OK why am I saying all of this....... well, first of all let me say that my personal feelings were that he wanted all of these distractions in his show to divert people's attention from the fact that his voice isn't as good as before. And while it probably worked for some, it didn't work for me. I thought he had more class than this. He didn't have to put on the show the way that he did. While I am not a prude, after awhile it became extremely annoying. I kept thinking would SP does this to overcome his possible voice shortcomings? NO..... HOWEVER, let me say this.....I made it a point of listening to people's comments after the show and the PEOPLE LOVED HIM -- even though his voice wasn't like it was before. And I'm thinking why did he have to resort to the distractions when in reality, people would have loved the concert just as much if he would have come out, sat at his piano, and just sang with none of the theatrics. The people DIDN'T CARE one iota that he was older, heavier and not the same singer he was before. They LOVED HIM and were just so happy to have seen him. While the venue only held about 4,500 people, it was an awesome place to see him - it was intimate, the sound was perfect and he sells out just about every show he does there.
So, I'm thinking.....while I know SP wouldn't stoop to that level in regard to the type of show he would put on, I know that there are a whole lot of people that just want to hear him sing again even if he is not the same as in the past. His millions of fans would be very accepting of him, regardless. And I know he would sell out every show he would put on. It would be the perfect setting for him and he would be in one place, not touring all over.
Any thoughts????
First, have any of you seen EJ in concert in Las Vegas?? If so, what did you think? My first thought when he started singing was that his voice was definitely not the same as it was at one time. (For obvious reasons, of course). He struggled with the high notes and at times was almost screaming the lyrics. He sang all of his hits - the show was a solid two hours long. He had a band with him that seemed to provide backup vocals for him especially during the rough spots. While I thought he was pretty good, one thing that disturbed me was (and for anyone who has seen the show will understand this.....) what surrounded him as he sang. The entire time he sang, there was a huge background for everyone to see that had, what I call a video or montage, that corresponded to the particular song he was singing. And, believe it or not, the entire time there was an awful lot of nudity in the background and also an orgy and someone attempting suicide. There was also several blowup items that were on stage at different times -- one being a half peeled banana between two cherries and a very large blowup hanging on one side of the venue of breasts with big nipples.
OK why am I saying all of this....... well, first of all let me say that my personal feelings were that he wanted all of these distractions in his show to divert people's attention from the fact that his voice isn't as good as before. And while it probably worked for some, it didn't work for me. I thought he had more class than this. He didn't have to put on the show the way that he did. While I am not a prude, after awhile it became extremely annoying. I kept thinking would SP does this to overcome his possible voice shortcomings? NO..... HOWEVER, let me say this.....I made it a point of listening to people's comments after the show and the PEOPLE LOVED HIM -- even though his voice wasn't like it was before. And I'm thinking why did he have to resort to the distractions when in reality, people would have loved the concert just as much if he would have come out, sat at his piano, and just sang with none of the theatrics. The people DIDN'T CARE one iota that he was older, heavier and not the same singer he was before. They LOVED HIM and were just so happy to have seen him. While the venue only held about 4,500 people, it was an awesome place to see him - it was intimate, the sound was perfect and he sells out just about every show he does there.
So, I'm thinking.....while I know SP wouldn't stoop to that level in regard to the type of show he would put on, I know that there are a whole lot of people that just want to hear him sing again even if he is not the same as in the past. His millions of fans would be very accepting of him, regardless. And I know he would sell out every show he would put on. It would be the perfect setting for him and he would be in one place, not touring all over.
Any thoughts????