Should Journey Retire or Keep Touring?

I realize this decision is ultimately up to the band members themselves, but bands do care about what their fans think. What is your opinion on this? Should Journey continue to hire new singers to try to recreate the "legacy sound" from the 70's and 80's, or should they just retire?
Here's a post from Tomulator that I believe provides a very good argument for this topic:
Maybe they should have stopped in 1996 when Perry had had enough, and came back 11 years later in 2008 for one big reunion tour? The Police did this, and they've grossed over $212 million so far and climbing.
So what do you think? Are you happy to see Journey continue touring with singers like Steve Augeri, Jeff Scott Soto, and Arnel Pineda - or should they have thrown in the towel on Journey and gone in different musical directions?

Here's a post from Tomulator that I believe provides a very good argument for this topic:
Tomulator wrote:There are "middle of the road" bands...you know...like Survivor, Bad Co., Styx, DL, etc. that attained pretty lofty status but...just not LEGENDARY. Then there are the "upper tier" bands from Journey's era...you know...Journey, Aerosmith, Boston, Queen, Van Halen, etc. These bands were like "bolts of lightning" sent from the heavens...once in a lifetime type bands. Most of them don't last long...they aren't supposed to!
Journey honestly needed to retire the band around 10-12 years ago...after TBF (or maybe even PRIOR to it).
It's alot like a legendary boxer (e.g., Muhammed Ali or Sugar Ray Leonard) who keeps trying to come back one too many times...and is simply a "shell" of their former greatness. Journey's last "bout" should have been TBF...even at that, they were pushing it.
This shuffling in and out of singers, most of whom quite frankly aren't of the calibre of the rest of the band, is sad to me. There is but ONE singer for this band and he had the sense to quit with his dignity and legendary status intact. It's a question of knowing "when to say when".
The pics from the gig yesterday show a bunch of "pudgy gutted", gray haired, wrinkly faced, old men trying to play like it was 1980 with a young, talented but WAY OUT OF HIS LEAGUE singer. Neal in particular shocked me with his aged appearance.
They should do other musical things...apart and not as "Journey"...that shipped sailed a LONG TIME AGO.
JMO
Maybe they should have stopped in 1996 when Perry had had enough, and came back 11 years later in 2008 for one big reunion tour? The Police did this, and they've grossed over $212 million so far and climbing.
So what do you think? Are you happy to see Journey continue touring with singers like Steve Augeri, Jeff Scott Soto, and Arnel Pineda - or should they have thrown in the towel on Journey and gone in different musical directions?
