stevew2 wrote: Just because there wasnt anything remarkable about it doesnt make it dreadful.
You have your opinion, and I have mine! We can agree to disagree! To my ears, it was
DREADFUL
stevew2 wrote: That song was to high for him
Most of the catalog was "too high" for Augeri. It's not a knock on the guy...It's simply a fact! I have always found Augeri to be a class act and a likeable guy. That said, he was simply out of his league, trying to sing most of Journey's back catalog!
stevew2 wrote: anyone that sings for Journey will try to sound like Perry.
"try" being the operative word in that sentence!
stevew2 wrote:He didnt try to sound like a clone, he put his own style into the songs also.
We finally agree on something

The problem with Augeri was that he simply did NOT have the range to sing the music, period, end of story! He was SUPERB on "Arrival", when trying to sing in his own natural range! One final point...The casual Journey fan (i.e. not the nuts visiting this board) have ZERO desire to hear Augeri's "own style" or anyone else's, for that matter. They want to hear ALL of these songs belted out, as close to the original versions, as possible! Neal and company finally figured that out, hence Arnel being brought in to the band!
stevew2 wrote: His voice couldnt handle the over touring.
You'll get ZERO argument from me on that point!
stevew2 wrote: He did it longer than Perry.
Right, and Ricky Mahorn played 5 years longer than Larry Bird, and Warrick Dunn played longer than Barry Sanders... What's your point?? Just because he did it longer doesn't mean he did it better! Longevity means absolutely NOTHING! I'll take quality over quantity, 100% of the time!
stevew2 wrote: They should have hired an 18 year old if they wanted to tour like 18 year olds
I would say that based upon Journey's history with lead singers, it might well come to that. Neal might be locked in his room, surfing youtube for the next Perry impersonator, as I type this
John from Boston