I'm not white. I'm not blind, nor inured to racism from whites either.
However, to include blacks among the limited number of key cast members
would inaccurately inflate 'black participation' in the Pacific theater.
I've never heard firsthand tale nor seen photographs of black Americans
fighting in the war here. Why should there be a difference between the
real and the 'reel' records?
My country suffered unimaginably under the Japanese during that war.
American blood remains in the very soil and sands of my country.
Your fathers' sacrifice, to free
our fathers and all our generations to come,
is something Filipinos won't ever forget, and anyone trying to reshape that memory
for revisionist, political ends is most profoundly disrespectful.
Spike Lee doesn't even have the capability to MAKE a revisionist film.
all he can muster is, in effect, to criticize the work of another director.
Did he expect that filmmaker to remain silent?
Not just any filmmaker, but Clint Eastwood?
-wech
*Clint's right, too.
His movie is really about those who raised the flag on Mt. Suribachi.
That there weren't any black soldiers present for that, isn't Eastwood's fault.
Lee's 'plantation' comment was simply abhorrent.