Page 1 of 1
Rolling Stone : Journey Revelation Review
Posted:
Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:03 pmby footprints
hi! here's a brief review of Revelation from ROLLING STONE. if the link does not work, don't kill me. I am new here
http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/album/21456870/review/21470276/revelation?rating=11
Posted:
Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:14 pmby stevew2
Thats pretty cool. thanks for sharing
Posted:
Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:18 pmby Since 78
stevew2 wrote:Thats pretty cool. thanks for sharing
Come on, that was gay and you know it!!
J/K thanks for posting it!
Posted:
Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:21 pmby stevew2
Since 78 wrote:stevew2 wrote:Thats pretty cool. thanks for sharing
Come on, that was gay and you know it!!
J/K thanks for posting it!
Friga likes sharing ,why shouldnt we??
Posted:
Wed Jun 25, 2008 5:36 pmby MarcelJordan
3 stars. More than Escape. Hmmm.
Posted:
Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:57 pmby jrnyjetster
THIS from a magazine that has always hated Journey?
They actually consider them "formidable"? "Some
damn good originals"??
Posted:
Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:27 pmby Michigan Girl
MarcelJordan wrote:3 stars. More than Escape. Hmmm.
Exactly....hmmmmm!!!!!
Posted:
Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:46 pmby separate_wayz
Click on the link and scroll down .... check out the picture of Journey.
(By the way .....
both Escape
and Frontiers got 2 stars from Rolling Stone .... )
Posted:
Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:51 pmby youkeepmewaiting
Thanks for the link
Posted:
Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:57 pmby walkslikealady
I received an offer through email offering to pay me to blog or respond to reviews. I always wonder if some of the responses I read are paid endorsements.
I was never into Rolling Stone magazine...does Rolling Stone still have any credibility?
Posted:
Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:58 pmby Saint John
walkslikealady wrote:does Rolling Stone still have any credibility?
When
did they? Good Journey review or not, fuck them.
Posted:
Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:12 amby Vocalsmanvocals
jrnyjetster wrote:THIS from a magazine that has always hated Journey?
They actually consider them "formidable"? "Some
damn good originals"??
Ya, very surprised to see that...They have not given Journey or any melodic rock band for that matter, little, bad, or if any press on releases...
as well! lol
Thanks for the link!
Posted:
Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:31 amby ProgRocker53
It amazes me how many people here at MR don't realize it when Rolling Stone, etc. give very back-handed reviews..
Almost as if the writer was TOLD to write a good review, OR that they REALLY did like the CD but had to make it rude to uphold a certain mindset, etc. for the rag....
Rolling Stone.. NO credibility in my eyes.
Posted:
Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:39 amby Món
I'd give it 3 stars as well, just for the re-recorded material... NOT NECESSARY AT ALL.
Anyway, I give the new stuff 4.5 stars. 
Posted:
Thu Jun 26, 2008 6:58 amby Gin and Tonic Sky
This review in places sounds like the NY Times Review . Stolen thoughts, especially the last three lines
Is Judy Rosen a pen name for Joe Biden, cos the plagarism skills this writer displays are impressive?
Posted:
Thu Jun 26, 2008 7:04 amby Onestepper
Gin and Tonic Sky wrote:This review in places sounds like the NY Times Review . Stolen thoughts, especially the last three lines
Is Judy Rosen a pen name for Joe Biden, cos the plagarism skills this writer displays are impressive?
A Joe Biden reference out of nowhere. Nice work!
Posted:
Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:35 amby mistiejourney
Wow - this is like being given the Grammy in Rolling Stone terms; they hate Journey with a passion! Definitely some back-handed compliments and some straight up ones, too! I am floored!
Posted:
Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:48 amby Rick
Món wrote:I'd give it 3 stars as well, just for the re-recorded material...
NOT NECESSARY AT ALL.
Anyway, I give the new stuff 4.5 stars.
Yes, it was absolutely necessary to secure the deal with WalMart. WalMart is paying them over $4.00 per sale of Revelation. What would they have gotten with a label? A buck? Maybe? WalMart insisted on the rerecorded songs. Wasn't an option.