Arnel Interview

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

Arnel Interview

Postby Andrew » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:20 am

There has been some ongoing efforts from a few forum members (started by Rip Rokken) to bridge some of the divide between this forum and the official Arnel Pineda forum.

I for one welcome such moves as Arnel has shown himself to be a fellow of fine standing and humble origins and has by all reports been tearing it up on stage with the band this tour.
Arnel was unfairly targetted by a few here in the early days, but I think most of those folks have moved on and a few others have been won over by his efforts on the outstanding Journey album.

Part of the current efforts to perhaps give Arnel a chance to shine was a feature interview with me for this site. A request had been sent some montha go, so I sent another request this week.

It is with much regret and some sadness that I report that this request has been denied.

I hope that in time, it will be reconsidered. My door remains always open...
Last edited by Andrew on Wed Aug 06, 2008 4:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10961
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Postby ProgRocker53 » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:22 am

...wow. just... wow.

i pretty much feel devastated about this. :( no words.
User avatar
ProgRocker53
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3673
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:59 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby donnaplease » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:25 am

I'm sorry you were denied, Andrew. In a way, however, it is a testiment to your willingness to allow all views on the state of Journey affairs.

I do find it interesting that they would deny you now, but granted an interview with you in 2006, which was so soon after the tapegate saga broke, and if I understand history correctly, was very much played out here. Just doesn't make sense to me. Go figure. :roll:
User avatar
donnaplease
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:38 am
Location: shenandoah valley

Re: Arnel Interview

Postby Enigma869 » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:27 am

Andrew wrote:
Journey management stated: "The band feels that you are not a true supporter of the new line-up and therefore will not grant this interview."




These guys REALLY need to grow the fuck up! This "sorry, you don't like us enough" bullshit is embarrassing! I don't think I've EVER come across ANY group of artists who whine more about criticism. I realize that you haven't criticized them, Drew. I just don't get these guys. They're in the public eye. They should understand that with that, comes scrutiny. Sometimes the scrutiny is favorable, and sometimes it isn't. They should NEVER choose to grant interviews, based upon who their cheerleading squad is. I've never come across a group of misfits who are in more dire need of a public relations department! These fuckers just don't get it! Have they ever heard of the notion that there is no such thing as bad (and free) publicity :roll: :roll: :roll:


John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby MCC620 » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:28 am

donnaplease wrote:I'm sorry you were denied, Andrew. In a way, however, it is a testiment to your willingness to allow all views on the state of Journey affairs.

I do find it interesting that they would deny you now, but granted an interview with you in 2006, which was so soon after the tapegate saga broke, and if I understand history correctly, was very much played out here. Just doesn't make sense to me. Go figure. :roll:


actually makes perfect sense if what the band and managemnet wanted was a way to force augeri out of the band.
~Maria~
Haters Gonna Hate
MCC620
8 Track
 
Posts: 929
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:34 am

Postby donnaplease » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:29 am

MCC620 wrote:
donnaplease wrote:I'm sorry you were denied, Andrew. In a way, however, it is a testiment to your willingness to allow all views on the state of Journey affairs.

I do find it interesting that they would deny you now, but granted an interview with you in 2006, which was so soon after the tapegate saga broke, and if I understand history correctly, was very much played out here. Just doesn't make sense to me. Go figure. :roll:


actually makes perfect sense if what the band and managemnet wanted was a way to force augeri out of the band.


I know, M. :?
User avatar
donnaplease
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:38 am
Location: shenandoah valley

Postby (Crazy)Dulce Lady » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:29 am

fluff 'em :roll:

mgmt is full of.............well, you know............... :?
Last edited by (Crazy)Dulce Lady on Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Image
User avatar
(Crazy)Dulce Lady
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3504
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 2:52 pm
Location: Lost In The Translation

Re: Arnel Interview

Postby MCC620 » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:30 am

Enigma869 wrote:
Andrew wrote:
Journey management stated: "The band feels that you are not a true supporter of the new line-up and therefore will not grant this interview."




These guys REALLY need to grow the fuck up! This "sorry, you don't like us enough" bullshit is embarrassing! I don't think I've EVER come across ANY group of artists who whine more about criticism. I realize that you haven't criticized them, Drew. I just don't get these guys. They're in the public eye. They should understand that with that, comes scrutiny. Sometimes the scrutiny is favorable, and sometimes it isn't. They should NEVER choose to grant interviews, based upon who their cheerleading squad is. I've never come across a group of misfits who are in more dire need of a public relations department! These fuckers just don't get it! Have they ever heard of the notion that there is no such thing as bad (and free) publicity :roll: :roll: :roll:


John from Boston



unfortunately it seems they prefer "controlled" publicity. but between this and the ilaa screwup with the meet and greets they are getting some not so good publicity
~Maria~
Haters Gonna Hate
MCC620
8 Track
 
Posts: 929
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:34 am

Postby Don » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:30 am

I'm disappointed for you as a journalist not getting the interview, but for allowing us a forum to voice our opinions openly without fear of censorship concerning our individual attitudes about Journey, I salute your intregity.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby MCC620 » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:31 am

(Crazy)Dulce Lady wrote:fluff 'em :roll:

mgmt is full of.............well, you know............... :?


come on deb don't put it all on management. we all know neal and jon have a say.
~Maria~
Haters Gonna Hate
MCC620
8 Track
 
Posts: 929
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:34 am

Postby donnaplease » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:36 am

MCC620 wrote:
(Crazy)Dulce Lady wrote:fluff 'em :roll:

mgmt is full of.............well, you know............... :?


come on deb don't put it all on management. we all know neal and jon have a say.


Maria, I'd be willing to bet it was at least partially JC's input. He gets roasted here constantly (well deserved, might I add).

Keep up the good work, boys!!! 8)
User avatar
donnaplease
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:38 am
Location: shenandoah valley

Postby Saint John » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:36 am

Arnel got torn to shreds here pretty badly for a long time. I can't say that their decision surprises me one bit. Had Arnel been afforded 1/100th of the same "protection" Soto receives, that interview would have been granted in a second. I'm not saying that Andrew is a bad person in any way, but I think he made some poor decisions regarding the pasting Arnel took. At one time, there were literally 2 or 3 people sticking up for him while he got belted. Schon and Cain had a history of fuck ups to wage war against them at least in some capacity. The same simply cannot be said about Arnel. He's never done shit to anyone and the length of his professional, cultural and personal online rape was far too long.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby donnaplease » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:37 am

Saint John wrote:Arnel got torn to shreds here pretty badly for a long time. I can't say that their decision surprises me one bit. Had Arnel been afforded 1/100th of the same "protection" Soto receives, that interview would have been granted in a second. I'm not saying that Andrew is a bad person in any way, but I think he made some poor decisions regarding the pasting Arnel took. At one time, there were literally 2 or 3 people sticking up for him while he got belted. Schon and Cain had a history of fuck ups to wage war against them at least in some capacity. The same simply cannot be said about Arnel. He's never done shit to anyone and the length of his professional, cultural and personal online rape was far too long.


That was months ago, Dan. He's had quite a lot of cheerleading going on for quite some time.
User avatar
donnaplease
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3435
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:38 am
Location: shenandoah valley

Postby ProgRocker53 » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:38 am

Saint John wrote:Arnel got torn to shreds here pretty badly for a long time. I can't say that their decision surprises me one bit. Had Arnel been afforded 1/100th of the same "protection" Soto receives, that interview would have been granted in a second. I'm not saying that Andrew is a bad person in any way, but I think he made some poor decisions regarding the pasting Arnel took. At one time, there were literally 2 or 3 people sticking up for him while he got belted. Schon and Cain had a history of fuck ups to wage war against them at least in some capacity. The same simply cannot be said about Arnel. He's never done shit to anyone and the length of his professional, cultural and personal online rape was far too long.


Good post..
User avatar
ProgRocker53
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3673
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:59 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby Behshad » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:38 am

Maybe they will grant you the interview if you ban Soto,,,,,,without letting him know about it,,,, :shock:
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby ProgRocker53 » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:38 am

Behshad wrote:Maybe they will grant you the interview if you ban Soto,,,,,,without letting him know about it,,,, :shock:


LMFAO
User avatar
ProgRocker53
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3673
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:59 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby ProgRocker53 » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:39 am

donnaplease wrote:
Saint John wrote:Arnel got torn to shreds here pretty badly for a long time. I can't say that their decision surprises me one bit. Had Arnel been afforded 1/100th of the same "protection" Soto receives, that interview would have been granted in a second. I'm not saying that Andrew is a bad person in any way, but I think he made some poor decisions regarding the pasting Arnel took. At one time, there were literally 2 or 3 people sticking up for him while he got belted. Schon and Cain had a history of fuck ups to wage war against them at least in some capacity. The same simply cannot be said about Arnel. He's never done shit to anyone and the length of his professional, cultural and personal online rape was far too long.


That was months ago, Dan. He's had quite a lot of cheerleading going on for quite some time.


And deservedly so.. Arnel's great.
User avatar
ProgRocker53
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3673
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:59 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: Arnel Interview

Postby Enigma869 » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:39 am

MCC620 wrote:
unfortunately it seems they prefer "controlled" publicity.


I think you're correct! It's just really inexcuseable. I realize that no band or artists wants bad things said about them. I just think that these guys really need to take a step back and look at the big picture. Whether people are critical of something or not, it doesn't change the fact that they are fans of the music of this band! That should be good enough. Hopefully, someone will boot Schon and Co. in the ass, and make them realize just how bad they look when they turn down an interview and give their reason as "sorry, you don't like us enough". Truly embarrassing!


John from Boston
Last edited by Enigma869 on Wed Aug 06, 2008 11:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Re: Arnel Interview

Postby ProgRocker53 » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:40 am

Enigma869 wrote:
MCC620 wrote:
unfortunately it seems they prefer "controlled" publicity.


I think you're correct! It's just really inexcuseable. I realize that no band or artists wants bad things about them. I just think that these guys really need to take a step back and look at the big picture. Whether people are critical of something or not, it doesn't change the fact that they are fans of the music of this band! That should be good enough. Hopefully, someone will boot Schon and Co. in the ass, and make them realize just how bad they look when they turn down an interview and give their reason as "sorry, you don't like us enough". Truly embarrassing!


Not every day this happens with me and you John... but...

I do agree.
User avatar
ProgRocker53
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3673
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:59 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby kathyhelms » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:41 am

That is very sad, I am sorry Andrew. We know you are a fair man. If we can do anything to help, please let us know.
kathyhelms
45 RPM
 
Posts: 219
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 12:52 pm
Location: burleson TX

Postby MCC620 » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:42 am

while the slicing and dicing of augeri (who was with the band for 8 years and gave andrew many great interviews) and his fans was still occurring online here, andrew spent an entire weekend in california with the band and got the inside scoop. but now they don't feel he is a true supporter of the band? typical journey bullshit. they obviously think they don't need him and his site anymore.
~Maria~
Haters Gonna Hate
MCC620
8 Track
 
Posts: 929
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:34 am

Postby Saint John » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:43 am

Behshad wrote:Maybe they will grant you the interview if you ban Soto,,,,,,without letting him know about it,,,, :shock:


:lol: :lol: :lol: Someone call Cronin and tell him to tell Soto that Andrew banned him!!! :lol: :shock: :twisted: :wink:
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby ProgRocker53 » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:43 am

Haha, someone needs to give Arnel advice to never talk to Cronin ;)
User avatar
ProgRocker53
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3673
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:59 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby Behshad » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:44 am

Would it help any if Tito started one of them appreciation thread thingies for Arnel???
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Re: Arnel Interview

Postby MCC620 » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:45 am

ProgRocker53 wrote:
Enigma869 wrote:
MCC620 wrote:
unfortunately it seems they prefer "controlled" publicity.


I think you're correct! It's just really inexcuseable. I realize that no band or artists wants bad things about them. I just think that these guys really need to take a step back and look at the big picture. Whether people are critical of something or not, it doesn't change the fact that they are fans of the music of this band! That should be good enough. Hopefully, someone will boot Schon and Co. in the ass, and make them realize just how bad they look when they turn down an interview and give their reason as "sorry, you don't like us enough". Truly embarrassing!


Not every day this happens with me and you John... but...

I do agree.


he NEVER agrees with me :shock:
~Maria~
Haters Gonna Hate
MCC620
8 Track
 
Posts: 929
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:34 am

Postby Don » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:46 am

Does this mean this new found love affair with the "Shoutbox" is over? Or is everyone going to be over there asking "Why" every other post? You know it's going to happen.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby wednesday's child » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:46 am

Dan's right.
I was lurkng here at the height of the racist ugliness last year, so let's not pretend none of it happened,
or that it was less vast than it was, or that Arnel didn't really mean much when he referred to past negativity
here.

That said...
I beleve Arnel himself will give you an interview.
Unless journey management muzzles him, he's actually okay with it.
You just have to understand that his limited free time is going to go first to those who
don't remind him of past and (I assure you) extremely painful unpleasantness.

Arnel's on record, regarding that intervew of yours that Rip's been trying to broker:

"Knellsky: I HAVEN'T EVEN HAD AN INTERVIEW WITH RYAN. HEHEHE. IT WILL HAPPEN"


-wech
User avatar
wednesday's child
8 Track
 
Posts: 857
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:44 am
Location: Quezon City

Postby tammy » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:49 am

Sorry to hear that for you, Andrew...but, this is a place where people can express their different feelings & opinions where other places won't let you. Doesn't it show something when we can read & know all the 'bad stuff that went down' and still love & buy Journey's music? Geez.
tammy
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2338
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:17 am
Location: leftside

Postby Behshad » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:52 am

wednesday's child wrote:Dan's right.
I was lurkng here at the height of the racist ugliness last year, so let's not pretend none of it happened,
or that it was less vast than it was, or that Arnel didn't really mean much when he referred to past negativity
here.

That said...
I beleve Arnel himself will give you an interview.
Unless journey management muzzles him, he's actually okay with it.
You just have to understand that his limited free time is going to go first to those who
don't remind him of past and (I assure you) extremely painful unpleasantness.

Arnel's on record, regarding that intervew of yours that Rip's been trying to broker:

"Knellsky: I HAVEN'T EVEN HAD AN INTERVIEW WITH RYAN. HEHEHE. IT WILL HAPPEN"




-wech
While both you and Dan make a good point about the band having good reasons to deny this interview, Maria makes a good point too....Why didnt the band deny Drew the interview in 2006 when Augeri wasnt being treated like a King here......
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby YoungJRNY » Wed Aug 06, 2008 10:52 am

Saint John wrote:Arnel got torn to shreds here pretty badly for a long time. I can't say that their decision surprises me one bit. Had Arnel been afforded 1/100th of the same "protection" Soto receives, that interview would have been granted in a second. I'm not saying that Andrew is a bad person in any way, but I think he made some poor decisions regarding the pasting Arnel took. At one time, there were literally 2 or 3 people sticking up for him while he got belted. Schon and Cain had a history of fuck ups to wage war against them at least in some capacity. The same simply cannot be said about Arnel. He's never done shit to anyone and the length of his professional, cultural and personal online rape was far too long.


50 thumbs up!
Image
User avatar
YoungJRNY
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7000
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:54 am
Location: Krypton

Next

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests