Moderator: Andrew
Andrew wrote:
Journey management stated: "The band feels that you are not a true supporter of the new line-up and therefore will not grant this interview."
donnaplease wrote:I'm sorry you were denied, Andrew. In a way, however, it is a testiment to your willingness to allow all views on the state of Journey affairs.
I do find it interesting that they would deny you now, but granted an interview with you in 2006, which was so soon after the tapegate saga broke, and if I understand history correctly, was very much played out here. Just doesn't make sense to me. Go figure.
MCC620 wrote:donnaplease wrote:I'm sorry you were denied, Andrew. In a way, however, it is a testiment to your willingness to allow all views on the state of Journey affairs.
I do find it interesting that they would deny you now, but granted an interview with you in 2006, which was so soon after the tapegate saga broke, and if I understand history correctly, was very much played out here. Just doesn't make sense to me. Go figure.
actually makes perfect sense if what the band and managemnet wanted was a way to force augeri out of the band.
Enigma869 wrote:Andrew wrote:
Journey management stated: "The band feels that you are not a true supporter of the new line-up and therefore will not grant this interview."
These guys REALLY need to grow the fuck up! This "sorry, you don't like us enough" bullshit is embarrassing! I don't think I've EVER come across ANY group of artists who whine more about criticism. I realize that you haven't criticized them, Drew. I just don't get these guys. They're in the public eye. They should understand that with that, comes scrutiny. Sometimes the scrutiny is favorable, and sometimes it isn't. They should NEVER choose to grant interviews, based upon who their cheerleading squad is. I've never come across a group of misfits who are in more dire need of a public relations department! These fuckers just don't get it! Have they ever heard of the notion that there is no such thing as bad (and free) publicity![]()
![]()
![]()
John from Boston
MCC620 wrote:(Crazy)Dulce Lady wrote:fluff 'em
mgmt is full of.............well, you know...............
come on deb don't put it all on management. we all know neal and jon have a say.
Saint John wrote:Arnel got torn to shreds here pretty badly for a long time. I can't say that their decision surprises me one bit. Had Arnel been afforded 1/100th of the same "protection" Soto receives, that interview would have been granted in a second. I'm not saying that Andrew is a bad person in any way, but I think he made some poor decisions regarding the pasting Arnel took. At one time, there were literally 2 or 3 people sticking up for him while he got belted. Schon and Cain had a history of fuck ups to wage war against them at least in some capacity. The same simply cannot be said about Arnel. He's never done shit to anyone and the length of his professional, cultural and personal online rape was far too long.
Saint John wrote:Arnel got torn to shreds here pretty badly for a long time. I can't say that their decision surprises me one bit. Had Arnel been afforded 1/100th of the same "protection" Soto receives, that interview would have been granted in a second. I'm not saying that Andrew is a bad person in any way, but I think he made some poor decisions regarding the pasting Arnel took. At one time, there were literally 2 or 3 people sticking up for him while he got belted. Schon and Cain had a history of fuck ups to wage war against them at least in some capacity. The same simply cannot be said about Arnel. He's never done shit to anyone and the length of his professional, cultural and personal online rape was far too long.
Behshad wrote:Maybe they will grant you the interview if you ban Soto,,,,,,without letting him know about it,,,,
donnaplease wrote:Saint John wrote:Arnel got torn to shreds here pretty badly for a long time. I can't say that their decision surprises me one bit. Had Arnel been afforded 1/100th of the same "protection" Soto receives, that interview would have been granted in a second. I'm not saying that Andrew is a bad person in any way, but I think he made some poor decisions regarding the pasting Arnel took. At one time, there were literally 2 or 3 people sticking up for him while he got belted. Schon and Cain had a history of fuck ups to wage war against them at least in some capacity. The same simply cannot be said about Arnel. He's never done shit to anyone and the length of his professional, cultural and personal online rape was far too long.
That was months ago, Dan. He's had quite a lot of cheerleading going on for quite some time.
MCC620 wrote:
unfortunately it seems they prefer "controlled" publicity.
Enigma869 wrote:MCC620 wrote:
unfortunately it seems they prefer "controlled" publicity.
I think you're correct! It's just really inexcuseable. I realize that no band or artists wants bad things about them. I just think that these guys really need to take a step back and look at the big picture. Whether people are critical of something or not, it doesn't change the fact that they are fans of the music of this band! That should be good enough. Hopefully, someone will boot Schon and Co. in the ass, and make them realize just how bad they look when they turn down an interview and give their reason as "sorry, you don't like us enough". Truly embarrassing!
Behshad wrote:Maybe they will grant you the interview if you ban Soto,,,,,,without letting him know about it,,,,
ProgRocker53 wrote:Enigma869 wrote:MCC620 wrote:
unfortunately it seems they prefer "controlled" publicity.
I think you're correct! It's just really inexcuseable. I realize that no band or artists wants bad things about them. I just think that these guys really need to take a step back and look at the big picture. Whether people are critical of something or not, it doesn't change the fact that they are fans of the music of this band! That should be good enough. Hopefully, someone will boot Schon and Co. in the ass, and make them realize just how bad they look when they turn down an interview and give their reason as "sorry, you don't like us enough". Truly embarrassing!
Not every day this happens with me and you John... but...
I do agree.
While both you and Dan make a good point about the band having good reasons to deny this interview, Maria makes a good point too....Why didnt the band deny Drew the interview in 2006 when Augeri wasnt being treated like a King here......wednesday's child wrote:Dan's right.
I was lurkng here at the height of the racist ugliness last year, so let's not pretend none of it happened,
or that it was less vast than it was, or that Arnel didn't really mean much when he referred to past negativity
here.
That said...
I beleve Arnel himself will give you an interview.
Unless journey management muzzles him, he's actually okay with it.
You just have to understand that his limited free time is going to go first to those who
don't remind him of past and (I assure you) extremely painful unpleasantness.
Arnel's on record, regarding that intervew of yours that Rip's been trying to broker:
"Knellsky: I HAVEN'T EVEN HAD AN INTERVIEW WITH RYAN. HEHEHE. IT WILL HAPPEN"
-wech
Saint John wrote:Arnel got torn to shreds here pretty badly for a long time. I can't say that their decision surprises me one bit. Had Arnel been afforded 1/100th of the same "protection" Soto receives, that interview would have been granted in a second. I'm not saying that Andrew is a bad person in any way, but I think he made some poor decisions regarding the pasting Arnel took. At one time, there were literally 2 or 3 people sticking up for him while he got belted. Schon and Cain had a history of fuck ups to wage war against them at least in some capacity. The same simply cannot be said about Arnel. He's never done shit to anyone and the length of his professional, cultural and personal online rape was far too long.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests