Page 1 of 3

Election 2008 Vote: HOW I finally made up my mind...

PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:47 am
by edcha
Sarah Palin and John McCain get my vote this November! :D And this may be considered a crazy idea by most of you….Whether this team wins this coming election or not, I would love to see her try to become the first woman President 8 to 12 years from now, if not earlier. By then, she’ll be 52 to 56 years old, and shall have gotten more experience and exposure in the national, if not in the international arena. That is---if she doesn’t mess up (too much!) during the intervening years. :wink:

Most people agree that Sarah Palin's first speech performance was phenomenal—especially considering that this was her very first national live appearance! However, that was not the reason that caused me to make up my mind. I did my own research over the last few days; and I considered a bunch of factors---most of which were qualitative and intangible. Presented BELOW was how I did it.

When I face a relatively difficult decision that involves several choices---like choosing between several similar big items to buy or choosing between several possible solutions to a relatively big problem---I usually resort to an analysis which resembles what is known as Kepner-Tregoe analysis. This simplifies the decision-making process because it sort of creates a level playing field for each choice---by converting everything to numbers. Although subjectivity remains because of built-in personal biases, I would say that it’s a lot better than making decisions based largely on emotions! :wink:

Perhaps this also can help some people make decisions—if not for this election, may be for some relatively more challenging choices in the future.

Here are the steps for those of you who are interested.

1. Make a list of CRITERIA that are important to your decision regarding the choices.
2. Put a WEIGHT on each criterion proportional to the degree of its importance or priority to the decision. In order to simplify, I use percents which total 100 vertically.
3. Then GRADE each choice relative to each other (50-100 range) for each criterion.
4. For each criterion, multiply the WEIGHT by the GRADE for each choice to get the POINTS.
5. For each choice, add the points vertically to get the TOTAL POINTS.
6. The higher the TOTAL POINTS, the better is the choice!

(Note: Don’t worry if you don’t get it….other people say, "eenie meenie miney mo" works for them, too!) :lol:

Presented below is my own personal assessment. For sure, each one of you will have your own set of criteria and your own grading system. As for me, I have made up my mind! And yes, I am pretty confident about my decision and I don’t have to wait for the speech tonight---nor the other speeches and debates! :D :wink:

TOTAL POINTS SUMMARY (details below):
Palin-----------97.45
McCain---------94.60
Obama---------93.65
Biden---------- 90.80


(...Sorry, I couldn't get the columns below to align for easy reading :oops: :cry: )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR PRESIDENT:
McCain Obama (the first grade/point pair refers to McCain; the second to Obama):

SELECTED CRITERIA Weight Grade/ Points Grade/ Points (respectively)


1.Established leadership ability 10% 100 10.00 95 9.50

2.Established credibility/trustworthiness 10% 100 10.00 95 9.50

3.Clear, sensible, implementable plan 10% 90 9.00 90 9.00

4.Actual executive/decision-making exp. 8% 90 7.20 80 6.40

5.Ability to relate to/inspire people 8% 90 7.20 100 8.00

6.Breadth/depth of experience 5% 95 4.75 90 4.50

7.Strong & tough but nice personality 5% 95 4.75 90 4.50

8.Clear and firm positions on issues 5% 100 5.00 95 4.75

9.Anti-"politics as usual" 5% 90 4.50 100 5.00

10.Proven loyalty and service to USA 5% 100 5.00 90 4.50

11.Eloquence with substance 5% 90 4.50 95 4.75

12.Knowledge & experience: Economy 5% 90 4.50 90 4.50

13.Knowledge & experience: Foreign Affairs 3% 100 3.00 95 2.85

14.Good, strong family background 3% 100 3.00 100 3.00

15.Freshness and vigor 3% 80 2.40 100 3.00

16.Family-oriented 2% 100 2.00 100 2.00

17.Sense of humor 2% 95 1.90 95 1.90

18.Consensus-building ability 2% 100 2.00 100 2.00

19.Positive outlook/openness to good ideas 2% 100 2.00 100 2.00

20.Public/Media relations 2% 95 1.90 100 2.00


TOTAL POINTS McCain 94.60 Obama 93.65

Note: The candidate with the higher points, McCain, gets my vote; and the chance to manage my own company…and that of the USA!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR VICE-PRESIDENT:
Palin Biden (the first grade/point pair refers to Palin, the second to Biden):
SELECTED CRITERIA Weight Grade Points Grade Points (respectively)

1. Established leadership ability 10% 100 10.00 90 9.00

2. Established credibility/trustworthiness 10% 100 10.00 90 9.00

3. Clear, sensible, implementable plan 10% 90 9.00 90 9.00

4. Actual executive/decision-making exp. 8% 100 8.00 80 6.40

5. Ability to relate to/inspire people 8% 100 8.00 90 7.20

6. Breadth/depth of experience 5 % 95 4.75 90 4.50

7. Strong & tough but nice personality 5% 100 5.00 90 4.50

8. Clear and firm positions on issues 5% 100 5.00 95 4.75

9. Anti-"politics as usual" 5% 100 5.00 90 4.50

10. Proven loyalty and service to USA 5% 90 4.50 90 4.50

11. Eloquence with substance 5% 100 5.00 85 4.25

12. Knowledge & experience: Economy 5% 100 5.00 90 4.50

13. Knowledge & experience: Foreign Affairs 3% 90 2.70 100 3.00

14. Good, strong family background 3% 100 3.00 100 3.00

15. Freshness and vigor 3% 100 3.00 90 2.70

16. Family-oriented 2% 100 2.00 100 2.00

17. Sense of humor 2% 100 2.00 100 2.00

18. Consensus-building ability 2% 100 2.00 100 2.00

19. Positive outlook/openness to good ideas 2% 100 2.00 100 2.00

20. Public/Media relations 2% 75 1.50 100 2.00


TOTAL POINTS Palin 97.45 Biden 90.80
Note: The candidate with the higher points, Palin, gets my vote; and the chance to manage my own company…and that of the USA!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 4:17 am
by jrnyman28
That's a lot of effort...."She's HAWT" works for me!!!

Just kidding.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 4:23 am
by artist4perry
Ow! Your makin my head hurt! OCD! Get help! LOL! :wink: :lol: :lol:
Image

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:17 am
by edcha
jrnyman28 wrote:That's a lot of effort...."She's HAWT" works for me!!!

Just kidding.


Yeah!... I worked so hard I didn't even have the chance to check MR for a couple of weeks! :wink:

Yes...the fact that "She's HAWT!" is a nice bonus! :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:20 am
by edcha
artist4perry wrote:Ow! Your makin my head hurt! OCD! Get help! LOL! :wink: :lol: :lol:
Image


Yup! I'm actually on my way to consult a psychiatrist or a psycho...whichever comes first! :lol: :lol: :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 9:46 am
by separate_wayz
I simply asked: which candidate has the best titties? :shock:

1. Quality of Titties ....... 100%

McCain 0.00%
Palin 100.00%
Obama 0.00%
Biden 0.00%

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:16 am
by etcetera
Objectivity in subjectivity...kind of. Cool!

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 11:30 am
by Since 78
separate_wayz wrote:I simply asked: which candidate has the best titties? :shock:

1. Quality of Titties ....... 100%

McCain 0.00%
Palin 100.00%
Obama 0.00%
Biden 0.00%


What did you do in 2004?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 12:18 pm
by edcha
separate_wayz wrote:I simply asked: which candidate has the best titties? :shock:

1. Quality of Titties ....... 100%

McCain 0.00%
Palin 100.00%
Obama 0.00%
Biden 0.00%


Hi SW,
Do you know that in Arnel's world, that word actually refers to a very important body part of men? !!! Now your grades are really screwed-up! :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol:
(if you remove one 't" and the "es", it means a male sex organ in Tagalog (Philippine) language!) :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 12:29 pm
by etcetera
edcha wrote:
separate_wayz wrote:I simply asked: which candidate has the best titties? :shock:

1. Quality of Titties ....... 100%

McCain 0.00%
Palin 100.00%
Obama 0.00%
Biden 0.00%


Hi SW,
In Arnel's world, that word actually refers to a very important body part of men!!! Now your grades are really screwed-up! :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol:


The tally will be something like:

1. Quality of Ti*i ....... 100%

McCain >0.00%
Palin 0.00%
Obama >0.00%
Biden >0.00%

:lol: :lol: :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 12:36 pm
by edcha
etcetera wrote:Objectivity in subjectivity...kind of. Cool!


Yup! It kind of minimize---but not eliminate---subjectivity. :)
It could be a very useful tool...in narrowing down your choices, at the very least.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 12:42 pm
by edcha
etcetera wrote:
edcha wrote:
separate_wayz wrote:I simply asked: which candidate has the best titties? :shock:

1. Quality of Titties ....... 100%

McCain 0.00%
Palin 100.00%
Obama 0.00%
Biden 0.00%


Hi SW,
In Arnel's world, that word actually refers to a very important body part of men!!! Now your grades are really screwed-up! :shock: :lol: :lol: :lol:


The tally will be something like:

1. Quality of Ti*i's ....... 100%

McCain >0.00%
Palin 0.00%
Obama >0.00%
Biden >0.00%

:lol: :lol: :lol:


Etc., are you sure your >0.00 grade for the three men will not be questioned by some people? :lol: :lol: :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 12:46 pm
by Don
Are you people smoking crack?

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 12:49 pm
by Since 78
Gunbot wrote:Are you people smoking crack?


They should just go with the best tits, much less confusing!! :lol: :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 12:51 pm
by etcetera
edcha wrote:Etc., are you sure your >0.00 grade for the three men will not be questioned by some people? :lol: :lol: :lol:


How about >= (greater than or equal to) instead of > then? :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:12 pm
by edcha
Gunbot wrote:Are you people smoking crack?



Give us a break, bud! :wink: :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:22 pm
by Don
edcha wrote:
Gunbot wrote:Are you people smoking crack?



Give us a break, bud! :wink: :lol:


Sorry, I'm not McDonalds. :lol: When the conversation goes from tits to dicks but there aren't any chics in the thread I gotta wonder about you guys.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:24 pm
by edcha
etcetera wrote:
edcha wrote:Etc., are you sure your >0.00 grade for the three men will not be questioned by some people? :lol: :lol: :lol:


How about >= (greater than or equal to) instead of > then? :lol:


etc., we better get back on track (topic) here! These Pinoy jokes may be too much for our kaibigan (friend) G-bot! :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:27 pm
by Don
edcha wrote:
etcetera wrote:
edcha wrote:Etc., are you sure your >0.00 grade for the three men will not be questioned by some people? :lol: :lol: :lol:


How about >= (greater than or equal to) instead of > then? :lol:


etc., we better get back on track (topic) here! These Pinoy jokes may be too much for our kaibigan (friend) G-bot! :lol:


You guys can keep the titi, I'm all about puki.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:31 pm
by edcha
Gunbot wrote:
edcha wrote:
Gunbot wrote:Are you people smoking crack?



Give us a break, bud! :wink: :lol:


Sorry, I'm not McDonalds. :lol: When the conversation goes from tits to dicks but there aren't any chics in the thread I gotta wonder about you guys.


Opsss! Is etc. a guy? :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:32 pm
by Don
edcha wrote:
Gunbot wrote:
edcha wrote:
Gunbot wrote:Are you people smoking crack?



Give us a break, bud! :wink: :lol:


Sorry, I'm not McDonalds. :lol: When the conversation goes from tits to dicks but there aren't any chics in the thread I gotta wonder about you guys.


Opsss! Is etc. a guy? :lol:


I don't have a clue. You pinoys leave everything a mystery. The only one's I'm sure about is Wech/he and Twinklestar/she.

We need to start another photothread

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:37 pm
by edcha
Gunbot wrote:
edcha wrote:
Gunbot wrote:
edcha wrote:
Gunbot wrote:Are you people smoking crack?



Give us a break, bud! :wink: :lol:


Sorry, I'm not McDonalds. :lol: When the conversation goes from tits to dicks but there aren't any chics in the thread I gotta wonder about you guys.


Opsss! Is etc. a guy? :lol:


I don't have a clue. You pinoys leave everything a mystery. The only one's I'm sure about is Wech/he and Twinklestar/she.

We need to start another photothread


Now, that's really scary! :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:50 pm
by edcha
Gunbot wrote:
edcha wrote:
etcetera wrote:
edcha wrote:Etc., are you sure your >0.00 grade for the three men will not be questioned by some people? :lol: :lol: :lol:


How about >= (greater than or equal to) instead of > then? :lol:


etc., we better get back on track (topic) here! These Pinoy jokes may be too much for our kaibigan (friend) G-bot! :lol:


You guys can keep the titi, I'm all about puki.


Gosh! have you not learned your painful lessons, man! :shock: :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:55 pm
by Don
edcha wrote:
Gunbot wrote:
edcha wrote:
etcetera wrote:
edcha wrote:Etc., are you sure your >0.00 grade for the three men will not be questioned by some people? :lol: :lol: :lol:


How about >= (greater than or equal to) instead of > then? :lol:


etc., we better get back on track (topic) here! These Pinoy jokes may be too much for our kaibigan (friend) G-bot! :lol:


You guys can keep the titi, I'm all about puki.


Gosh! have you not learned your painful lessons, man! :shock: :lol:


We all have addictions, Filipinas are mine. MASARAP! :D

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:59 pm
by Moon Beam
Gunbot wrote:The least of things with a meaning is worth more in life than the greatest of things without it.


First time I'm reading this Gunbot and I must say Sir, it be beautiful......superiorly siggy!

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:36 pm
by 7 Wishes
Try this on for side for hypocrisy...
[url]
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/0 ... 23852.html [/url]
Palin didn't actually MAKE ANY POINTS. She is exploiting her appeal - and being simultaneously exploited by the party she represents.

People, it is PERFECTLY FAIR for the media to investigate this woman's background. There is more than one termination-related skeleton in her closet! She "apparently" fired a councilman when she was mayor because he wouldn't back the Palin- and NRA-sponsored concealed gun law. Now, her sister's ex is a dirtbag, it would seem, so no-one can fault her for feeling that kind of animosity...but "if" she did fire his boss because he wouldn't fire the guy, she broke the law.

You're being swindled by the Republicans again if you're falling for all of this. THEY DIDN'T PRESENT ANY IDEAS OR SOLUTIONS - they just conjured up the ghosts of 9/11 and fell back on their fearmongering and hatemongering. You hammer away at Obama's "lack of ideas" - yet he has put a VERY DETAILED report (available in a pdf file online, but I won't bother to post it since you won't read it anyway) about how he plans to turn this country around. McCain and Palin offered NOTHING. NOTHING at all.

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:39 pm
by Since 78
7 Wishes wrote:Try this on for side for hypocrisy...
[url]
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/0 ... 23852.html [/url]
Palin didn't actually MAKE ANY POINTS. She is exploiting her appeal - and being simultaneously exploited by the party she represents.

People, it is PERFECTLY FAIR for the media to investigate this woman's background. There is more than one termination-related skeleton in her closet! She "apparently" fired a councilman when she was mayor because he wouldn't back the Palin- and NRA-sponsored concealed gun law. Now, her sister's ex is a dirtbag, it would seem, so no-one can fault her for feeling that kind of animosity...but "if" she did fire his boss because he wouldn't fire the guy, she broke the law.

You're being swindled by the Republicans again if you're falling for all of this. THEY DIDN'T PRESENT ANY IDEAS OR SOLUTIONS - they just conjured up the ghosts of 9/11 and fell back on their fearmongering and hatemongering. You hammer away at Obama's "lack of ideas" - yet he has put a VERY DETAILED report (available in a pdf file online, but I won't bother to post it since you won't read it anyway) about how he plans to turn this country around. McCain and Palin offered NOTHING. NOTHING at all.


Dude!! Shes Hot!! Have a Beer and relax!! :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:40 pm
by Don
I just don't see the appeal of Palin. She's riding the NAUGHTY LIBRARIAN card at the moment but let's see how it is in a few weeks.

Oh, and she sleeps with eskimos

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 2:59 pm
by Since 78
Gunbot wrote:I just don't see the appeal of Palin. She's riding the NAUGHTY LIBRARIAN card at the moment but let's see how it is in a few weeks.

Oh, and she sleeps with eskimos


Librarians need Love Too!! :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 3:05 pm
by 7 Wishes
Nothin' like lickin' a librarian!