Moderator: Andrew

RossValoryRocks wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/financial_meltdown;_ylt=AitsdRRi53lJlHBiQQQVNF9v24cA
Good...maybe they can craft a piece of legislation that won't screw the people over while handing Wall Street everything!

Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama


Tito wrote:We need Ron Paul.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Tito wrote:We need Ron Paul.
He previously pledged not to endorse any singular candidate, but after Barr snubbed his PR event last week, Paul has officially thrown his support behind Chuck Baldwin.

RossValoryRocks wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/financial_meltdown;_ylt=AitsdRRi53lJlHBiQQQVNF9v24cA
Good...maybe they can craft a piece of legislation that won't screw the people over while handing Wall Street everything!
conversationpc wrote:RossValoryRocks wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/financial_meltdown;_ylt=AitsdRRi53lJlHBiQQQVNF9v24cA
Good...maybe they can craft a piece of legislation that won't screw the people over while handing Wall Street everything!
I called the office of Dan Burton, the representative from my district in Indiana, and urged him to vote against the bailout. The lady answering the phone said he had already decided to vote against it.
This bill would have given too much more power to the federal government. They've already done that with the Patriot Act. This would've been even worse.

Tito wrote:conversationpc wrote:RossValoryRocks wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/financial_meltdown;_ylt=AitsdRRi53lJlHBiQQQVNF9v24cA
Good...maybe they can craft a piece of legislation that won't screw the people over while handing Wall Street everything!
I called the office of Dan Burton, the representative from my district in Indiana, and urged him to vote against the bailout. The lady answering the phone said he had already decided to vote against it.
This bill would have given too much more power to the federal government. They've already done that with the Patriot Act. This would've been even worse.
Do you know why John Hostelter lost in '06? He was a good congressman.
RossValoryRocks wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/financial_meltdown;_ylt=AitsdRRi53lJlHBiQQQVNF9v24cA
Good...maybe they can craft a piece of legislation that won't screw the people over while handing Wall Street everything!
Gunbot wrote:It sounds to me that all credit will be shut off. Punishing Wallstreet in a heavy handed matter will be like cutting off our nose to spite our face. It's going to be ugly.
Voyager wrote:Gunbot wrote:It sounds to me that all credit will be shut off. Punishing Wallstreet in a heavy handed matter will be like cutting off our nose to spite our face. It's going to be ugly.
Exactly. If they don't pass this, the terrorists will be laughing at us. We will be doing what they tried to do and failed - wrecking the U.S. economy. That is where our power is.
All fingers point to Dubya. No one believes him now. They are tired of his scare tactics. Now when people really should believe our leaders, they can't. However, millions of businesses and individuals live day-to-day on credit. When that gets locked up - and it will if this doesn't pass - the economy will crash. This is not a sky-is-falling trick. It's reality.
Voyager wrote:Gunbot wrote:It sounds to me that all credit will be shut off. Punishing Wallstreet in a heavy handed matter will be like cutting off our nose to spite our face. It's going to be ugly.
Exactly. If they don't pass this, the terrorists will be laughing at us. We will be doing what they tried to do and failed - wrecking the U.S. economy. That is where our power is.
All fingers point to Dubya. No one believes him now. They are tired of his scare tactics. Now when people really should believe our leaders, they can't. However, millions of businesses and individuals live day-to-day on credit. When that gets locked up - and it will if this doesn't pass - the economy will crash. This is not a sky-is-falling trick. It's reality.


BobbyinTN wrote:It was Bush pushing for the fucking bailout and all you people do is blame democrats. How selective of you and how fucking predictable. You fucks who supported Bush through this whole thing should be the ones with extra money to pay back.

BobbyinTN wrote:It was Bush pushing for the fucking bailout and all you people do is blame democrats. How selective of you and how fucking predictable. You fucks who supported Bush through this whole thing should be the ones with extra money to pay back.

RossValoryRocks wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:It was Bush pushing for the fucking bailout and all you people do is blame democrats. How selective of you and how fucking predictable. You fucks who supported Bush through this whole thing should be the ones with extra money to pay back.
Yes he was, and he was wrong. BUT...it would have passed if Nancy Pelosi hadn't bloviated just prior to the vote with a partisan rant.
Voyager wrote:Why is it that Bush, McCain, and Obama all three back this bailout plan? It's because they have access to see things that we don't. All bitching and venting aside, the bottom line is that if this bailout doesn't pass the economy will crash - and it will crash hard.
Why argue the facts?

Voyager wrote:RossValoryRocks wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:It was Bush pushing for the fucking bailout and all you people do is blame democrats. How selective of you and how fucking predictable. You fucks who supported Bush through this whole thing should be the ones with extra money to pay back.
Yes he was, and he was wrong. BUT...it would have passed if Nancy Pelosi hadn't bloviated just prior to the vote with a partisan rant.
Pelosi can go have wild sex with Hillary Clinton as far as I am concerned. I could care less about what she says. I'm more concerned about the U.S. economy.

Fact Finder wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:It was Bush pushing for the fucking bailout and all you people do is blame democrats. How selective of you and how fucking predictable. You fucks who supported Bush through this whole thing should be the ones with extra money to pay back.
Dude,, Goerge is trying to be POTUS for everyone. That's his job. I think it's safe to say that he doesn't want to leave DC with this on his head.
RossValoryRocks wrote:Voyager wrote:RossValoryRocks wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:It was Bush pushing for the fucking bailout and all you people do is blame democrats. How selective of you and how fucking predictable. You fucks who supported Bush through this whole thing should be the ones with extra money to pay back.
Yes he was, and he was wrong. BUT...it would have passed if Nancy Pelosi hadn't bloviated just prior to the vote with a partisan rant.
Pelosi can go have wild sex with Hillary Clinton as far as I am concerned. I could care less about what she says. I'm more concerned about the U.S. economy.
Yeah but she tried to use the bully pulpit to score political points during a time the whole DC Establishment had decided to put partisan politics aside. And what about the rest of the post I made, no response except to this part?
Voyager wrote:Fact Finder wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:It was Bush pushing for the fucking bailout and all you people do is blame democrats. How selective of you and how fucking predictable. You fucks who supported Bush through this whole thing should be the ones with extra money to pay back.
Dude,, Goerge is trying to be POTUS for everyone. That's his job. I think it's safe to say that he doesn't want to leave DC with this on his head.
I think it's safe to say that he is going to.
The lack of a bailout will only help Obama's chances in November. That's why I cannot figure out why it was the Republicans who blocked it. That doesn't make any sense. They finally vote against Bush at the wrong time. Although I am an Obama supporter, I think they should do the bailout. If they don't, it will guarantee a win for him because the George Bush economy will crash hard - but I don't want it at that cost.

RossValoryRocks wrote:Voyager wrote:Fact Finder wrote:BobbyinTN wrote:It was Bush pushing for the fucking bailout and all you people do is blame democrats. How selective of you and how fucking predictable. You fucks who supported Bush through this whole thing should be the ones with extra money to pay back.
Dude,, Goerge is trying to be POTUS for everyone. That's his job. I think it's safe to say that he doesn't want to leave DC with this on his head.
I think it's safe to say that he is going to.
The lack of a bailout will only help Obama's chances in November. That's why I cannot figure out why it was the Republicans who blocked it. That doesn't make any sense. They finally vote against Bush at the wrong time. Although I am an Obama supporter, I think they should do the bailout. If they don't, it will guarantee a win for him because the George Bush economy will crash hard - but I don't want it at that cost.
Oh Obama is going to be elected, the Republicans in the House voted out of conscience for one, not their political interests.
McCain checked out last week. He doesn't want to be President this term, no matter who is they are a 1 term President. The deck is stacked against anyone being elected and doing anything worthwhile.
StocktontoMalone wrote:
And I can't believe that other members of congress block things that would be good for the people due to partisan politics....

RossValoryRocks wrote:StocktontoMalone wrote:
And I can't believe that other members of congress block things that would be good for the people due to partisan politics....
The bill in question WOULDN'T be good for the people is why the Republicans, and 95 Democrats didn't vote for it.
It is pork in the worst sense, and it wouldn't do jack for you or anyone else.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests