Page 1 of 1

OT: Jamie Lynn possibly Pregnant AGAIN!!!

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 5:37 pm
by T-Bone
:lol: Looking to overtake her big sis I take it?

Jamie Lynn Spears Pregnant Again!



From Daily Stab: If this is true then, wow…just WOW!!

The National Enquirer is reporting that 17 year old Jamie Lynn Spears is now expecting for the second time just three months after giving birth on June 19 to baby Maddie Briann.

And before you say anything about it being from TNE, just remember, they were right about her being pregnant the first time….

They say that Jamie Lynn is desperate to keep the shock­ing news secret and some people close to her are urging her to consider ending the pregnancy. A source says:

"Jamie Lynn is about eight weeks pregnant, and she and her mom Lynne are hysterical,"

"Neither of them knows what to do, but for now they’re trying to keep the news from getting out."


The unplanned pregnancy came as a shock to Jamie Lynn, who’d been breast feeding her infant daughter Maddie Briann.

"Jamie Lynn believed she couldn’t get pregnant while she was breast-feeding."

"She’d expected to have her period by early September. A home pregnancy test came back positive and Jamie Lynn cried her eyes out."


Her mother Lynne was livid when she found out, divulged an insider.

Meanwhile, insiders say that those close to Jamie Lynn are urging her to abort!

"They’ve reminded Jamie Lynn how much trouble she had adjusting to motherhood with Maddie, and pointed out that having a second baby now would only be a recipe for disaster."


UPDATE: OK! Magazine (you know, the ones paying her millions for Exclusive news) just put up a note saying they spoke to Jamie Lynn and she says she is NOT pregnant….

Only time will tell

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 5:45 pm
by StoneCold
So much for keepin' MR a Spears free zone. :)

What do they mean they don't know what "to do"? There's nothing "to do". Nature will take its course.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 5:59 pm
by Journey/Survivor
Yeah, Jamie Lynn is trying to prove that she's an even bigger slut than her sister. What an f-ing messed up family.

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:57 pm
by finalfight
Currently debunked on WWTDD and TMZ -

In complete contrast to what the NE said earlier today, TMZ says now that Jamie Lynn Spears is not pregnant, citing a source that cannot be turned into a peach, no matter what. (nyuk nyuk nyuk!)

Three-month-old Maddie Briann Aldridge is gonna have to wait to have a lil' baby brother or sister, because Jamie Lynn Spears is not pregnant, y'all!
While several reports are claiming Jamie Lynn is preggers again, an unimpeachable source tells TMZ Britney's baby sis does not have another bun in the oven.
Someone tell Lynne Spears and get her down from the ledge.

If TMZ is right, I’m willing to bet Jamie Lynn is the one who told the Enquirer she was pregnant. Because she’s an idiot, and if you can't do anything right, a good idea is to point out that at least you didn’t fuck up. It turns doing nothing into something admirable. And all she had to do was not get pregnant for a second time at 17. It would be like if I told my parents I was a democrat. Then I said, "naw I’m just kidding, but I am a gay pedophile necrophiliac". They would say, "oh my god, you're a democrat!" "No. I was kidding about that. But I do dig up dead boys and make love to them." "But not as a Democrat?" "No." "Oh thank god."

PostPosted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 10:09 pm
by Saint John
I'd hit it.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 12:52 am
by Rip Rokken
To me, it's very sad when I see kids seal their futures and limit their choices so soon in life by having a bunch of kids back to back before they are even 20, especially if they are not married. No offense to anyone whose done that, but they can unless you have limitless money, it really affects everything from that point on. Still trying to figure out why someone's not getting heat for being with this underage girl (is she still not even 18 years old)?

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 12:57 am
by Rhiannon
Rip Rokken wrote:Still trying to figure out why someone's not getting heat for being with this underage girl (is she still not even 18 years old)?


Different state laws... I believe the age of consent is 16 in some states, and it isn't considered "statutory" as long as the age difference isn't greater than 3 years. I think in Virginia it was something like that, 3-5. One of my best friends in school was 15 and dating a 20 year old. Funny, looking back now that is sooo wrong. But then it wasn't any big deal.

And I doubt there's any way Jamie Lynn's pregnant again. Her baby is only 3 months old. The tabs are reporting that she's 8-weeks along, meaning she would've conceived within the first month of giving birth. VERY unlikely... anybody who knows about childbirth and womanly matters will understand what I'm getting at.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 12:59 am
by Saint John
Rhiannon wrote: One of my best friends in school was 15 and dating a 20 year old. Funny, looking back now that is sooo wrong.
Where you're from a 20 year old dating a 10 year old is probably ok...as long as they're related. :lol:

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:01 am
by Tito
Saint John wrote:
Rhiannon wrote: One of my best friends in school was 15 and dating a 20 year old. Funny, looking back now that is sooo wrong.
Where you're from a 20 year old dating a 10 year old is probably ok...as long as they're related. :lol:



:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:01 am
by Ehwmatt
Saint John wrote:
Rhiannon wrote: One of my best friends in school was 15 and dating a 20 year old. Funny, looking back now that is sooo wrong.
Where you're from a 20 year old dating a 10 year old is probably ok...as long as they're related. :lol:


Heh. I can't even fathom what would drive a 20-year-old to date a 15-year-old. I'm sorry, no 15-year-old, boy or girl, is anywhere near mature enough to have a fruitful relationship with a 20-year-old. Maybe a very mature one could appear as much on the surface, but that'll erode away real fast. Plus, how stupid would you feel meeting the parents?

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:02 am
by Saint John
Ehwmatt wrote: Plus, how stupid would you feel meeting the parents?
Especially when they're your aunt and uncle!!! :lol:

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:02 am
by Rhiannon
Saint John wrote:
Rhiannon wrote: One of my best friends in school was 15 and dating a 20 year old. Funny, looking back now that is sooo wrong.
Where you're from a 20 year old dating a 10 year old is probably ok...as long as they're related. :lol:


BITE ME!! :evil: :lol:

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:04 am
by Rhiannon
Ehwmatt wrote:Heh. I can't even fathom what would drive a 20-year-old to date a 15-year-old. I'm sorry, no 15-year-old, boy or girl, is anywhere near mature enough to have a fruitful relationship with a 20-year-old. Maybe a very mature one could appear as much on the surface, but that'll erode away real fast. Plus, how stupid would you feel meeting the parents?


She was the school slut... there, I clarified! :lol:

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:06 am
by Saint John
Rhiannon wrote:She was the school slut...
Do you still talk to her? :lol: :shock: :twisted:

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:10 am
by Rhiannon
Saint John wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:She was the school slut...
Do you still talk to her? :lol: :shock: :twisted:


Yes, I do on occasion. She got married before we graduated HS and last I heard she was on her 4th kid. :lol: :P

PostPosted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:13 am
by Maui Tom
Rhiannon wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:She was the school slut...
Do you still talk to her? :lol: :shock: :twisted:


Yes, I do on occasion. She got married before we graduated HS and last I heard she was on her 4th kid. :lol: :P


By on her 4th kid do you mean.......

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 2:48 am
by annpea
Rhiannon wrote:
Rip Rokken wrote:Still trying to figure out why someone's not getting heat for being with this underage girl (is she still not even 18 years old)?


Different state laws... I believe the age of consent is 16 in some states, and it isn't considered "statutory" as long as the age difference isn't greater than 3 years. I think in Virginia it was something like that, 3-5. One of my best friends in school was 15 and dating a 20 year old. Funny, looking back now that is sooo wrong. But then it wasn't any big deal.

And I doubt there's any way Jamie Lynn's pregnant again. Her baby is only 3 months old. The tabs are reporting that she's 8-weeks along, meaning she would've conceived within the first month of giving birth. VERY unlikely... anybody who knows about childbirth and womanly matters will understand what I'm getting at.
It's possible and it has and can occur. That's why we advise women to use protection if they engage in sexual activities soon after giving birth.

PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 3:14 am
by Arkansas
Maui Tom wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Rhiannon wrote:She was the school slut...
Do you still talk to her? :lol: :shock: :twisted:


Yes, I do on occasion. She got married before we graduated HS and last I heard she was on her 4th kid. :lol: :P


By on her 4th kid do you mean.......


My thoughts exactly MT. We're sick.

Btw, someone tell me why I should care about that Spears chick?
(And why did I read this whole thread?)


later~

PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 12:58 pm
by wastingbeerz
Wow... quite possibly the most pointless OT post in here... ever... why either of the Spears sisters are even considered celebrities is anyone's guess. And the fact that anyone is even slightly surprised at the happenings in this family, let alone shocked at these things, greatly amuses me. Hell, it shocks me that people find this stuff shocking!!!

PostPosted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 1:27 am
by WIX
Saint John wrote:I'd hit it.



you mean tap that?

I just don't see you as the violent type that would hit it. :lol: