MR

Anybody see SteveW lately? I think Cain found him and killed him. The tour is over now, Cain has free time.

Tito wrote:Anybody see SteveW lately? I think Cain found him and killed him. The tour is over now, Cain has free time.

Word has it that they are going to be wed in San Francisco in mid-November. Steve has probably been away from the forum preparing for the big day.

Voyager wrote:

Tito wrote:Anybody see SteveW lately? I think Cain found him and killed him. The tour is over now, Cain has free time.

Word has it that they are going to be wed in San Francisco in mid-November. Steve has probably been away from the forum preparing for the big day.

Cain isn't a fruit.

Tito wrote:

Voyager wrote:

Tito wrote:Anybody see SteveW lately? I think Cain found him and killed him. The tour is over now, Cain has free time.

Word has it that they are going to be wed in San Francisco in mid-November. Steve has probably been away from the forum preparing for the big day.

Cain isn't a fruit.

That's the story and he's sticking to it.
Closet door sure creaks a lot though.

Tito wrote:

Voyager wrote:

Tito wrote:Anybody see SteveW lately? I think Cain found him and killed him. The tour is over now, Cain has free time.

Word has it that they are going to be wed in San Francisco in mid-November. Steve has probably been away from the forum preparing for the big day.

Cain isn't a fruit.

Just joking dude. I think everyone is aware of that... except for maybe SteveW.

Voyager wrote:

Nice brows. He must have them threaded.

Rhiannon wrote:

Voyager wrote:

Nice brows. He must have them threaded.

Maybe! Or wax stips.
Those are the greatest. No lady should be without those. Total godsend.

You two are going to go the way of SteveW if you keep it up.

Tito wrote:You two are going to go the way of SteveW if you keep it up.

Oh please. There's nothing wrong with a woman OR a man landscaping their eyebrows. Everyone needs some cleanup work, its called basic grooming. She said Cain has nice brows. Its a compliment!!

bluejeangirl76 wrote:

Tito wrote:You two are going to go the way of SteveW if you keep it up.

Oh please. There's nothing wrong with a woman OR a man landscaping their eyebrows. Everyone needs some cleanup work, its called basic grooming. She said Cain has nice brows. Its a compliment!!

I use a beard trimmer on mine or I'd look like James Whitmore in Shawshank Redemption. I don't like over-manicured eyebrows on anyone.

SteveW2 is probably being anally raped by one of The Whale's piano legs right about now.

Rick wrote:

bluejeangirl76 wrote:

Tito wrote:You two are going to go the way of SteveW if you keep it up.

Oh please. There's nothing wrong with a woman OR a man landscaping their eyebrows. Everyone needs some cleanup work, its called basic grooming. She said Cain has nice brows. Its a compliment!!

I use a beard trimmer on mine or I'd look like James Whitmore in Shawshank Redemption. I don't like over-manicured eyebrows on anyone.

Me either. Over-manicured is just as weird as not manicuring them at all. Like the chicks who get rid of them and draw them back on... omg. And I saw a chick in the store the other day with some seriously scary brows... I wanted to slip some wax strip into her cart as a favor.

Tito wrote:You two are going to go the way of SteveW if you keep it up.

There's nothing wrong with a little manscaping. It's very metro.

conversationpc wrote:SteveW2 is probably being anally raped by one of The Whale's piano legs right about now.

Hate Crime!

Tito wrote:

conversationpc wrote:SteveW2 is probably being anally raped by one of The Whale's piano legs right about now.

Hate Crime!

Sheesh, leave a little while and I come back and ..................on to another thread!

conversationpc wrote:SteveW2 is probably being anally raped by one of The Whale's piano legs right about now.

...while Cain enjoys a glass of wine and listens to Who's Crying Now play in the background.

Saint John wrote:

conversationpc wrote:SteveW2 is probably being anally raped by one of The Whale's piano legs right about now.

...while Cain enjoys a glass of wine and listens to Who's Crying Now play in the background.

Rhiannon wrote:

Tito wrote:You two are going to go the way of SteveW if you keep it up.

There's nothing wrong with a little manscaping. It's very metro.

Metro is worse then gay. Either be out or be straight. low hip jeans and facials, dildo experiments letting your women be the pitcher and you the catcher, that shit is flat gross. Do you women really want a guy who is a wussy and want's you to direct him? Is this a byproduct of the feminist revolution? Men should be the one opening doors for women, pushing the chairs in, and stepping in front when needed. Fuck this dildo swapping, gerbil excavating, feminine soft look crap. It's like lesbians looking for a chick with a dick.

Gunbot wrote:Metro is worse then gay. Either be out or be straight. low hip jeans and facials, dildo experiments letting your women be the pitcher and you the catcher, that shit is flat gross. Do you women really want a guy who is a wussy and want's you to direct him? Is this a byproduct of the feminist revolution? Men should be the one opening doors for women, pushing the chairs in, and stepping in front when needed. Fuck this dildo swapping, gerbil excavating, feminine soft look crap. It's like lesbians looking for a chick with a dick.

Wow, I've never found a more accurate description of "metro" ever in my life.
And to answer your question... I do NOT. I prefer my men to look like men, smell like men, dress like men, and yes... act like them too! Guns, and explosions, burping, farting, scruffy, alpha, ball-scratching, etc. BUT, some women *love* the metro-douchebag look. And from what I've seen of the local scene in Chicago, there is a high concentration of metro-douchebag looking guys in the northern Cook Co. area. Do I have to go to Wisconsin to find a real man? Holy shit...

Gunbot wrote:

Rhiannon wrote:

Tito wrote:You two are going to go the way of SteveW if you keep it up.

There's nothing wrong with a little manscaping. It's very metro.

Metro is worse then gay. Either be out or be straight. low hip jeans and facials, dildo experiments letting your women be the pitcher and you the catcher, that shit is flat gross. Do you women really want a guy who is a wussy and want's you to direct him? Is this a byproduct of the feminist revolution? Men should be the one opening doors for women, pushing the chairs in, and stepping in front when needed. Fuck this dildo swapping, gerbil excavating, feminine soft look crap. It's like lesbians looking for a chick with a dick.

This is a great post.

Rhiannon wrote:

Gunbot wrote:Metro is worse then gay. Either be out or be straight. low hip jeans and facials, dildo experiments letting your women be the pitcher and you the catcher, that shit is flat gross. Do you women really want a guy who is a wussy and want's you to direct him? Is this a byproduct of the feminist revolution? Men should be the one opening doors for women, pushing the chairs in, and stepping in front when needed. Fuck this dildo swapping, gerbil excavating, feminine soft look crap. It's like lesbians looking for a chick with a dick.

Wow, I've never found a more accurate description of "metro" ever in my life.
And to answer your question... I do NOT. I prefer my men to look like men, smell like men, dress like men, and yes... act like them too! Guns, and explosions, burping, farting, scruffy, alpha, ball-scratching, etc. BUT, some women *love* the metro-douchebag look. And from what I've seen of the local scene in Chicago, there is a high concentration of metro-douchebag looking guys in the northern Cook Co. area. Do I have to go to Wisconsin to find a real man? Holy shit...

My husband is from CA. And he is far from "metro". I like the door being opened for me, my chair pulled out for me, and someone to treat me like a lady. Now not everyone is the same. To each his or her own!

artist4perry wrote:

Rhiannon wrote:

Gunbot wrote:Metro is worse then gay. Either be out or be straight. low hip jeans and facials, dildo experiments letting your women be the pitcher and you the catcher, that shit is flat gross. Do you women really want a guy who is a wussy and want's you to direct him? Is this a byproduct of the feminist revolution? Men should be the one opening doors for women, pushing the chairs in, and stepping in front when needed. Fuck this dildo swapping, gerbil excavating, feminine soft look crap. It's like lesbians looking for a chick with a dick.

Wow, I've never found a more accurate description of "metro" ever in my life.
And to answer your question... I do NOT. I prefer my men to look like men, smell like men, dress like men, and yes... act like them too! Guns, and explosions, burping, farting, scruffy, alpha, ball-scratching, etc. BUT, some women *love* the metro-douchebag look. And from what I've seen of the local scene in Chicago, there is a high concentration of metro-douchebag looking guys in the northern Cook Co. area. Do I have to go to Wisconsin to find a real man? Holy shit...

My husband is from CA. And he is far from "metro". I like the door being opened for me, my chair pulled out for me, and someone to treat me like a lady. Now not everyone is the same. To each his or her own!

It's like one of my buddies from Mooresville, NC always says, "I'm the man... I drive the damn boat." I am a firm believer in the natural balance and order in relationships... and if that makes me old-fashioned, so be it. I was raised that the woman ruled "in" the house, and the man's domain was outside. Meaning I'll cook dinner while you mow the yard... etc.

Rhiannon wrote:I prefer my men to look like men, smell like men, dress like men, and yes... act like them too! Guns, and explosions, burping, farting, scruffy, alpha, ball-scratching, etc. BUT, some women *love* the metro-douchebag look.

As long as they're not running around on me, disrespecting me or beating me up, they can use every damned hair product I have if they want to. And metrosexual is a stupid fucking term. I don't see anything wrong with a guy taking a little pride in his appearance.

bluejeangirl76 wrote:

Rhiannon wrote:I prefer my men to look like men, smell like men, dress like men, and yes... act like them too! Guns, and explosions, burping, farting, scruffy, alpha, ball-scratching, etc. BUT, some women *love* the metro-douchebag look.

As long as they're not running around on me, disrespecting me or beating me up, they can use every damned hair product I have if they want to. And metrosexual is a stupid fucking term. I don't see anything wrong with a guy taking a little pride in his appearance.

Yeah, metrosexual must mean something different in Cali, I've never heard that of which G~boy describes !!!

bluejeangirl76 wrote:

Rhiannon wrote:I prefer my men to look like men, smell like men, dress like men, and yes... act like them too! Guns, and explosions, burping, farting, scruffy, alpha, ball-scratching, etc. BUT, some women *love* the metro-douchebag look.

As long as they're not running around on me, disrespecting me or beating me up, they can use every damned hair product I have if they want to. And metrosexual is a stupid fucking term. I don't see anything wrong with a guy taking a little pride in his appearance.

Metro is the term coined by the crowd that were first to be metro. It isn't derogatory. Hygiene is one thing. Wearing my jeans is another. We'll have to agree to disagree here. No man should use more product in his hair than I do. Nor should he use "guyliner" or wear a little foundation. Etc... He also shouldn't use a tanning bed or have soft hands. That's just me... those are my dealbreakers. Along with the disrespecting, cheating, and abuse you mentioned.

Rhiannon wrote:Hygiene is one thing. Wearing my jeans is another.

I'm sure you do both very well.

Rhiannon wrote:

bluejeangirl76 wrote:

Rhiannon wrote:I prefer my men to look like men, smell like men, dress like men, and yes... act like them too! Guns, and explosions, burping, farting, scruffy, alpha, ball-scratching, etc. BUT, some women *love* the metro-douchebag look.

As long as they're not running around on me, disrespecting me or beating me up, they can use every damned hair product I have if they want to. And metrosexual is a stupid fucking term. I don't see anything wrong with a guy taking a little pride in his appearance.

Metro is the term coined by the crowd that were first to be metro. It isn't derogatory. Hygiene is one thing. Wearing my jeans is another. We'll have to agree to disagree here. No man should use more product in his hair than I do. Nor should he use "guyliner" or wear a little foundation. Etc... He also shouldn't use a tanning bed or have soft hands. That's just me... those are my dealbreakers. Along with the disrespecting, cheating, and abuse you mentioned.

I wasn't disagreeing with you. I said there's nothing wrong with taking a little pride, i.e. manscaping the furry areas, fingernail filing, dressing nicely, etc. You can be a "guy" guy and still do those things.

bluejeangirl76 wrote:

Rhiannon wrote:

bluejeangirl76 wrote:

Rhiannon wrote:I prefer my men to look like men, smell like men, dress like men, and yes... act like them too! Guns, and explosions, burping, farting, scruffy, alpha, ball-scratching, etc. BUT, some women *love* the metro-douchebag look.

As long as they're not running around on me, disrespecting me or beating me up, they can use every damned hair product I have if they want to. And metrosexual is a stupid fucking term. I don't see anything wrong with a guy taking a little pride in his appearance.

Metro is the term coined by the crowd that were first to be metro. It isn't derogatory. Hygiene is one thing. Wearing my jeans is another. We'll have to agree to disagree here. No man should use more product in his hair than I do. Nor should he use "guyliner" or wear a little foundation. Etc... He also shouldn't use a tanning bed or have soft hands. That's just me... those are my dealbreakers. Along with the disrespecting, cheating, and abuse you mentioned.

I wasn't disagreeing with you. I said there's nothing wrong with taking a little pride, i.e. manscaping the furry areas, fingernail filing, dressing nicely, etc. You can be a "guy" guy and still do those things.

Catfight?

bluejeangirl76 wrote:I wasn't disagreeing with you. I said there's nothing wrong with taking a little pride, i.e. manscaping the furry areas, fingernail filing, dressing nicely, etc. You can be a "guy" guy and still do those things.

I think it comes down to what each finds personally "attractive". If I ever saw a guy filing his nails, I think I'd puke.

Rhiannon wrote:

bluejeangirl76 wrote:I wasn't disagreeing with you. I said there's nothing wrong with taking a little pride, i.e. manscaping the furry areas, fingernail filing, dressing nicely, etc. You can be a "guy" guy and still do those things.

I think it comes down to what each finds personally "attractive". If I ever saw a guy filing his nails, I think I'd puke.

Ok then that only leaves two options. Do you prefer a man to have nails past the edge of his fingers (THAT makes ME puke and I see that a lot... BLAH!) or do you go for the bitten-down-to-nothing and bloody look? WHAT is wrong with a guy filing? They make those little sets with the clippers and files for men too. (It IS called a MANicure, you know... )