Page 1 of 2

WITTW-New York Marathon

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:09 am
by Angel
What It Takes To Win was just played on NBC's coverage of the ING NYC Marathon.

GO PAULA!!!!

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:17 am
by Saint John
Cool...but who the fuck is Paula?

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:18 am
by Angel
Saint John wrote:Cool...but who the fuck is Paula?

Paula Radcliffe

She won the women's marathon!

Image

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:21 am
by SusieP
British athlete famous for taking a leak at the side of the road during a marathon.
Seen by millions on tv. :lol:

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:22 am
by Enigma869
Angel wrote:Paula Radcliffe

She won the women's marathon!

Image



She looks American and has an American sounding name. How the hell did that happen? Did the Kenyans not show up this year?


John from Boston

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:23 am
by Saint John
Angel wrote:
Saint John wrote:Cool...but who the fuck is Paula?

Paula Radcliffe

She won the women's marathon!
That's the "B" race. The men's race is the only one that counts. :lol:

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:24 am
by Saint John
Enigma869 wrote: Did the Kenyans not show up this year?
Obama has them all working for ACORN. :lol:

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:27 am
by Angel
Saint John wrote:
Angel wrote:
Saint John wrote:Cool...but who the fuck is Paula?

Paula Radcliffe

She won the women's marathon!
That's the "B" race. The men's race is the only one that counts. :lol:

So you think you could beat Paula Radcliffe in a marathon????

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:28 am
by Saint John
Angel wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Angel wrote:
Saint John wrote:Cool...but who the fuck is Paula?

Paula Radcliffe

She won the women's marathon!
That's the "B" race. The men's race is the only one that counts. :lol:

So you think you could beat Paula Radcliffe in a marathon????
Not the point. Women are inferior athletically. If not, you'd have both genders competing together...but then you'd never win anything. :lol:

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:29 am
by Angel
SusieP wrote:British athlete famous for taking a leak at the side of the road during a marathon.
Seen by millions on tv. :lol:

Not only did she stop to pee, but she won the race. Sure, she could have held it-or found a more appropriate place but either may have cost her the win. That woman has some serious dedication!
I LOVE PAULA!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6I2-YP42rs

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:31 am
by Gordon from Edinburgh
] Not the point. Women are inferior athletically.


Well, i wouldnt fancy many mens chances in a doubles match against Venus and Serena - both of whom have a faster second serve than most of the top male players................

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:32 am
by JH'sTXfan
Angel wrote:
SusieP wrote:British athlete famous for taking a leak at the side of the road during a marathon.
Seen by millions on tv. :lol:

Not only did she stop to pee, but she won the race. Sure, she could have held it-or found a more appropriate place but either may have cost her the win. That woman has some serious dedication!
I LOVE PAULA!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6I2-YP42rs


:shock: :lol: Without exposing a thing. Go Paula!

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:33 am
by Angel
Saint John wrote:
Angel wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Angel wrote:
Saint John wrote:Cool...but who the fuck is Paula?

Paula Radcliffe

She won the women's marathon!
That's the "B" race. The men's race is the only one that counts. :lol:

So you think you could beat Paula Radcliffe in a marathon????
Not the point. Women are inferior athletically. If not, you'd have both genders competing together...but then you'd never win anything. :lol:

SOME women are inferior to SOME men athletically. I can guarantee you that Paula Radcliffe is NOT inferior to YOU athletically.

Now, while I can see the basis for your arguement being that elite men physically and genetically have the ability to run faster than elite women, don't make blanket statements about men vs women. :wink:

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:35 am
by Saint John
Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:] Not the point. Women are inferior athletically.


Well, i wouldnt fancy many mens chances in a doubles match against Venus and Serena - both of whom have a faster second serve than most of the top male players................


You're kidding, right? Federer and Nadal would crush them. They could play 300 sets and the Williams sisters wouldn't win one. This is of course assuming that Federer and Nadal practiced for some time as partners. Doubles is all about teamwork, which is why you seldom see the games best players competing. They tend to stick to singles. :wink:

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:38 am
by Gordon from Edinburgh
Saint John wrote:
Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:] Not the point. Women are inferior athletically.


Well, i wouldnt fancy many mens chances in a doubles match against Venus and Serena - both of whom have a faster second serve than most of the top male players................


You're kidding, right? Federer and Nadal would crush them. They could play 300 sets and the Williams sisters wouldn't win one. This is of course assuming that Federer and Nadal practiced for some time as partners. Doubles is all about teamwork, which is why you seldom see the games best players competing. They tend to stick to singles. :wink:


Thats the top two men in the world - most of the time they crush the other MEN never mind what they would be like against the Williams sisters. I did say against MOST top players they would do well....not all.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:39 am
by Saint John
Angel wrote:SOME women are inferior to SOME men athletically.

Name a sport women are better at. And sweeping floors doesn't count. :lol:
Angel wrote: I can guarantee you that Paula Radcliffe is NOT inferior to YOU athletically.

She's got me in running, but I'd take her in boxing, baseball, football, arm wrestling, weight liftling, basketball and beer drinking. :lol:

Angel wrote:don't make blanket statements about men vs women.
Why not? We're physically superior across the board.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:41 am
by JH'sTXfan
Saint John wrote:
Angel wrote:SOME women are inferior to SOME men athletically.

Name a sport women are better at. And sweeping floors doesn't count. :lol:
Angel wrote: I can guarantee you that Paula Radcliffe is NOT inferior to YOU athletically.

She's got me in running, but I'd take her in boxing, baseball, football, arm wrestling, weight liftling, basketball and beer drinking. :lol:

Angel wrote:don't make blanket statements about men vs women.
Why not? We're physically superior across the board.


You can't pee as gracefully as Paula did. :lol:

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:42 am
by Gordon from Edinburgh
[
She looks American and has an American sounding name. How the hell did that happen?


John - Radcliffe is a very old English name - from Nottingham i think - but, she does look like an American.

She pisses like a horse tho................

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:43 am
by Gordon from Edinburgh
Saint John wrote:
Angel wrote:SOME women are inferior to SOME men athletically.

Name a sport women are better at.


Cheerleading? :wink:

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:45 am
by Saint John
Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:] Not the point. Women are inferior athletically.


Well, i wouldnt fancy many mens chances in a doubles match against Venus and Serena - both of whom have a faster second serve than most of the top male players................


You're kidding, right? Federer and Nadal would crush them. They could play 300 sets and the Williams sisters wouldn't win one. This is of course assuming that Federer and Nadal practiced for some time as partners. Doubles is all about teamwork, which is why you seldom see the games best players competing. They tend to stick to singles. :wink:


Thats the top two men in the world - most of the time they crush the other MEN never mind what they would be like against the Williams sisters. I did say against MOST top players they would do well....not all.
I re-read your post. Apologies, sir.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
by Saint John
Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Angel wrote:SOME women are inferior to SOME men athletically.

Name a sport women are better at.


Cheerleading? :wink:

Oh shit. Good one, dude!!! :lol:

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:47 am
by SusieP
Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:[
She looks American and has an American sounding name. How the hell did that happen?


John - Radcliffe is a very old English name - from Nottingham i think - but, she does look like an American.

She pisses like a horse tho................


Yep.
Radcliffe-on-Trent is a village in Nottinghamshire. So the name originates from there.
Also in this County is a village named Gotham.
And another is called Bunny.
I do not jest.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:48 am
by Gordon from Edinburgh
I re-read your post. Apologies, sir.[/quote]

Hey SJ, no need to apologise dude. :lol:

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:48 am
by Enigma869
Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:John - Radcliffe is a very old English name - from Nottingham i think - but, she does look like an American.



Well, whether a Brit or an American, it doesn't change my point...where the hell were the Kenyans? I've heard of fewers Brits winning marathons than Americans!


John from Boston

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:48 am
by SusieP
JH'sTXfan wrote:
Saint John wrote:
Angel wrote:SOME women are inferior to SOME men athletically.

Name a sport women are better at. And sweeping floors doesn't count. :lol:
Angel wrote: I can guarantee you that Paula Radcliffe is NOT inferior to YOU athletically.

She's got me in running, but I'd take her in boxing, baseball, football, arm wrestling, weight liftling, basketball and beer drinking. :lol:

Angel wrote:don't make blanket statements about men vs women.
Why not? We're physically superior across the board.


You can't pee as gracefully as Paula did. :lol:

Or pee without exposing anything. :lol:

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:49 am
by SusieP
Enigma869 wrote:
Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:John - Radcliffe is a very old English name - from Nottingham i think - but, she does look like an American.



Well, whether a Brit or an American, it doesn't change my point...where the hell were the Kenyans? I've heard of fewers Brits winning marathons than Americans!


John from Boston


They are all visiting Nottingham. :lol:

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:49 am
by Saint John
Hey, all you English fuckers...any of you watching the Calzaghe-Jones fight Saturday night? I can't wait. Calzaghe is gonna beat him fucking senseless. I can't stand Roy Jones Jr.

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:51 am
by Angel
Saint John wrote:
Angel wrote:SOME women are inferior to SOME men athletically.

Name a sport women are better at. And sweeping floors doesn't count. :lol:
Angel wrote: I can guarantee you that Paula Radcliffe is NOT inferior to YOU athletically.

She's got me in running, but I'd take her in boxing, baseball, football, arm wrestling, weight liftling, basketball and beer drinking. :lol:

Angel wrote:don't make blanket statements about men vs women.
Why not? We're physically superior across the board.

You're missing the point. I already said you were correct that genetically speaking men do have more athletic ability, as a general rule. But, Paula Radcliffe, Deena Kastor and Amy Palmiero-Winters could kick ass against 99% of the male population (and Amy only has one leg!)

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:51 am
by Rick
Damn, that's desperation. When you gotta go, you gotta go. :shock: :lol:

PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:53 am
by Angel
Enigma869 wrote:
Gordon from Edinburgh wrote:John - Radcliffe is a very old English name - from Nottingham i think - but, she does look like an American.



Well, whether a Brit or an American, it doesn't change my point...where the hell were the Kenyans? I've heard of fewers Brits winning marathons than Americans!


John from Boston

Kenyans usually dominate in men's running but not as much in women's. Although this year it was a Brazillian that won the men's marathon.