MR

I was reading the headlines on CNN.com, and here is what is making news:

CNN.com wrote:GM will run out of cash by January.

Circuit City files for bankruptcy.

Angelina's twins are getting very smiley.

DHL freight company cutting 10,000 jobs.

Uncle Sam revises AIG bailout figures upwards.

Fannie Mae: More bad loans, more losses

Who really gives a damn what the fuck Angelina Jolie's twins are doing? That shit makes me so sick the way people obsess about Pitt and Jolie... especially in light of what is happening with our economy crashing. If those two and their 18 children dropped off a cliff, I wouldn't lose a wink of sleep.

I'm with you, but sadly, people do care. My wife reads People Magazine religiously, and I've never really understood it. I'm proud to say that I've never read People Magazine in my life! I guess some people like to live vicariously through the rich and famous. I don't have any other explanation for it.


John from Boston

Voyager wrote:I was reading the headlines on CNN.com, and here is what is making news:

CNN.com wrote:GM will run out of cash by January.

Circuit City files for bankruptcy.

Angelina's twins are getting very smiley.

DHL freight company cutting 10,000 jobs.

Uncle Sam revises AIG bailout figures upwards.

Fannie Mae: More bad loans, more losses

Who really gives a damn what the fuck Angelina Jolie's twins are doing? That shit makes me so sick the way people obsess about Pitt and Jolie... especially in light of what is happening with our economy crashing. If those two and their 18 children dropped off a cliff, I wouldn't lose a wink of sleep.

It's stuff like that, that made me know 4 years ago Obama was going to win. Stupid people and pop culture. Then again, maybe they're the smart ones. They know we're fucked either way, they might as well be entertained by it.

Enigma869 wrote:I'm with you, but sadly, people do care. My wife reads People Magazine religiously, and I've never really understood it. I'm proud to say that I've never read People Magazine in my life! I guess some people like to live vicariously through the rich and famous. I don't have any other explanation for it.


John from Boston

I read the Arnel and Journey article this past summer. That was it.

In regards to the twins, if my face was buried in Angelina's breasts, I'd be smiling too.

epresley wrote:In regards to the twins, if my face was buried in Angelina's breasts, I'd be smiling too.

I think Jolie is looking pretty tired, and I never really understood the big attraction with her. There are much better looking actresses out there than her... and her attitude seems nasty. Take her makeup off and she is nothing special.

Voyager wrote:

epresley wrote:In regards to the twins, if my face was buried in Angelina's breasts, I'd be smiling too.

I think Jolie is looking pretty tired, and I never really understood the big attraction with her. There are much better looking actresses out there than her... and her attitude seems nasty. Take her makeup off and she is nothing special.

Well, that may be, but maybe I should have pointed out that I would be smiling if my face was buried in just about anyone's breasts. It was not necessarily an endorsement of Angelina.

epresley wrote:

Voyager wrote:

epresley wrote:In regards to the twins, if my face was buried in Angelina's breasts, I'd be smiling too.

I think Jolie is looking pretty tired, and I never really understood the big attraction with her. There are much better looking actresses out there than her... and her attitude seems nasty. Take her makeup off and she is nothing special.

Well, that may be, but maybe I should have pointed out that I would be smiling if my face was buried in just about anyone's breasts. It was not necessarily an endorsement of Angelina.

Anyone's breasts? Okay, here you go:



Just kidding... I know what you meant.

Hey, no more shirtless pics of Tito, ok? Too much.........too much...........

Voyager wrote:

epresley wrote:In regards to the twins, if my face was buried in Angelina's breasts, I'd be smiling too.

I think Jolie is looking pretty tired, and I never really understood the big attraction with her. There are much better looking actresses out there than her... and her attitude seems nasty. Take her makeup off and she is nothing special.

With all due respect , I think 99% of the male population who dont find her attractive are the ones pushing for the same-sex marriage. Im guessing/hoping youre in the 1% category

Behshad wrote:

Voyager wrote:

epresley wrote:In regards to the twins, if my face was buried in Angelina's breasts, I'd be smiling too.

I think Jolie is looking pretty tired, and I never really understood the big attraction with her. There are much better looking actresses out there than her... and her attitude seems nasty. Take her makeup off and she is nothing special.

With all due respect , I think 99% of the male population who dont find her attractive are the ones pushing for the same-sex marriage. Im guessing/hoping youre in the 1% category

LOL - just because I don't find Jolie super attractive doesn't mean I am gay. She just doesn't turn me on for some reason. I think it's her husband-stealing attitude that bothers me the most. I don't think she is ugly by any means... just not as attractive as everyone gives her credit for.

Now here's a hottie:

Behshad wrote:

Voyager wrote:

epresley wrote:In regards to the twins, if my face was buried in Angelina's breasts, I'd be smiling too.

I think Jolie is looking pretty tired, and I never really understood the big attraction with her. There are much better looking actresses out there than her... and her attitude seems nasty. Take her makeup off and she is nothing special.

With all due respect , I think 99% of the male population who dont find her attractive are the ones pushing for the same-sex marriage.

Voyager wrote:LOL - just because I don't find Jolie super attractive doesn't mean I am gay. She just doesn't turn me on for some reason. I think it's her husband-stealing attitude that bothers me the most. I don't think she is ugly by any means... just not as attractive as everyone gives her credit for.

I actually agree. I certainly wouldn't kick Jolie out of my bed, but she's never really been my type. Also, she gets way too much attention for someone who runs around the world adopting every baby she can get her hands on.


John from Boston

Enigma869 wrote:

Voyager wrote:LOL - just because I don't find Jolie super attractive doesn't mean I am gay. She just doesn't turn me on for some reason. I think it's her husband-stealing attitude that bothers me the most. I don't think she is ugly by any means... just not as attractive as everyone gives her credit for.

I actually agree. I certainly wouldn't kick Jolie out of my bed, but she's never really been my type. Also, she gets way too much attention for someone who runs around the world adopting every baby she can get her hands on.


John from Boston

I wonder if Pitt is regretting leaving Jennifer Anniston for her. I'd take Jennifer Anniston any day over Jolie.

Rick wrote:

Enigma869 wrote:

Voyager wrote:LOL - just because I don't find Jolie super attractive doesn't mean I am gay. She just doesn't turn me on for some reason. I think it's her husband-stealing attitude that bothers me the most. I don't think she is ugly by any means... just not as attractive as everyone gives her credit for.

I actually agree. I certainly wouldn't kick Jolie out of my bed, but she's never really been my type. Also, she gets way too much attention for someone who runs around the world adopting every baby she can get her hands on.


John from Boston

I wonder if Pitt is regretting leaving Jennifer Anniston for her. I'd take Jennifer Anniston any day over Jolie.

I agree with that for sure. Jennifer is way hotter! Not to mention that she doesn't need to prove her worth by running around the world picking up orphans to make her look like something better than a husband-stealing tramp. She reminds me of Heather Mills... putting on a big show with her charity works, but still being a tramp. The way Heather drug Paul McCartney around the world to promote her charities is no different than the way Jolie drags Pitt around on a leash. He does not look like a happy man. Life with Jennifer had to be much better.

Voyager wrote:

Rick wrote:

Enigma869 wrote:

Voyager wrote:LOL - just because I don't find Jolie super attractive doesn't mean I am gay. She just doesn't turn me on for some reason. I think it's her husband-stealing attitude that bothers me the most. I don't think she is ugly by any means... just not as attractive as everyone gives her credit for.

I actually agree. I certainly wouldn't kick Jolie out of my bed, but she's never really been my type. Also, she gets way too much attention for someone who runs around the world adopting every baby she can get her hands on.


John from Boston

I wonder if Pitt is regretting leaving Jennifer Anniston for her. I'd take Jennifer Anniston any day over Jolie.

I agree with that for sure. Jennifer is way hotter! Not to mention that she doesn't need to prove her worth by running around the world picking up orphans to make her look like something better than a husband-stealing tramp. She reminds me of Heather Mills... putting on a big show with her charity works, but still being a tramp. The way Heather drug Paul McCartney around the world to promote her charities is no different than the way Jolie drags Pitt around on a leash. He does not look like a happy man. Life with Jennifer had to be much better.

Agreed on all counts. Heather Mills is another one. She can hop on over here and kiss my ass.

The look on his face is like, "Life with Jennifer was heaven compared to this!"

Voyager wrote:The look on his face is like, "Life with Jennifer was heaven compared to this!"

Nah, kids are fun so he's having a blast. A beautiful wife and gazillions of dollars, what more can a man want?

Rick wrote:
I wonder if Pitt is regretting leaving Jennifer Anniston for her. I'd take Jennifer Anniston any day over Jolie.

Ha, ha a thread dissing interest in Jolie and us guys are chattin it up.

Jen's cute but in ALL this time she's still on the market? She strikes me a pretty shallow woman.

Notice most of her hookups are with famous guys? That's a lot more pubilicity seeking than adopting kids.

But no kicky out of beddy.

BTW, that manboob pic above is scary as hell. Please delete.

Voyager wrote:The look on his face is like, "Life with Jennifer was heaven compared to this!"

They're probably making them kids drink the blood of Kali and got them in a mine somewhere looking for the Shiva stone to rejuvenate Angelina's tired looking grill.

Gunbot wrote:

Voyager wrote:The look on his face is like, "Life with Jennifer was heaven compared to this!"

They're probably making them kids drink the blood of Kali and got them in a mine somewhere looking for the Shiva stone to rejuvenate Angelina's tired looking grill.

If Pitt and Aniston had stayed together, can you imagine what their kid would look like






here's some more offspring pics:

=

=


=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=


=

=

=

=

Voyager wrote:

epresley wrote:In regards to the twins, if my face was buried in Angelina's breasts, I'd be smiling too.

I think Jolie is looking pretty tired, and I never really understood the big attraction with her. There are much better looking actresses out there than her... and her attitude seems nasty. Take her makeup off and she is nothing special.

Me too. I never understand the infatuation with this chick. Sure, she's hot sometimes, but honestly, she's only one step away from the trailer park.


later~

Arkansas wrote:

Voyager wrote:

epresley wrote:In regards to the twins, if my face was buried in Angelina's breasts, I'd be smiling too.

I think Jolie is looking pretty tired, and I never really understood the big attraction with her. There are much better looking actresses out there than her... and her attitude seems nasty. Take her makeup off and she is nothing special.

Me too. I never understand the infatuation with this chick. Sure, she's hot sometimes, but honestly, she's only one step away from the trailer park.


later~

Exactly. She's trying to make like she is Princess Diana with all of her charity work... but that's just a big act - and a good one (actors are good at acting). Heather Mills did the same thing, although not as good of a job because she's not an actress.

Voyager wrote:

Arkansas wrote:

Voyager wrote:

epresley wrote:In regards to the twins, if my face was buried in Angelina's breasts, I'd be smiling too.

I think Jolie is looking pretty tired, and I never really understood the big attraction with her. There are much better looking actresses out there than her... and her attitude seems nasty. Take her makeup off and she is nothing special.

Me too. I never understand the infatuation with this chick. Sure, she's hot sometimes, but honestly, she's only one step away from the trailer park.


later~

Exactly. She's trying to make like she is Princess Diana with all of her charity work... but that's just a big act - and a good one (actors are good at acting). Heather Mills did the same thing, although not as good of a job because she's not an actress.

You got it all wrong mate....She does her charity work regardless of the fame she gains from it. Diana was the one who put up a lot of act to try to make herself look a lot better than she is.

Behshad wrote:

Voyager wrote:

Arkansas wrote:

Voyager wrote:

epresley wrote:In regards to the twins, if my face was buried in Angelina's breasts, I'd be smiling too.

I think Jolie is looking pretty tired, and I never really understood the big attraction with her. There are much better looking actresses out there than her... and her attitude seems nasty. Take her makeup off and she is nothing special.

Me too. I never understand the infatuation with this chick. Sure, she's hot sometimes, but honestly, she's only one step away from the trailer park.


later~

Exactly. She's trying to make like she is Princess Diana with all of her charity work... but that's just a big act - and a good one (actors are good at acting). Heather Mills did the same thing, although not as good of a job because she's not an actress.

You got it all wrong mate....She does her charity work regardless of the fame she gains from it. Diana was the one who put up a lot of act to try to make herself look a lot better than she is.

How can you know her motives? Your guess is as good as mine is. To me it seems obvious that it's all a big show. She's trying to make herself look like a saint after stealing someone's husband. People do that stuff all the time.

Voyager wrote:

Behshad wrote:

Voyager wrote:

Arkansas wrote:

Voyager wrote:

epresley wrote:In regards to the twins, if my face was buried in Angelina's breasts, I'd be smiling too.

I think Jolie is looking pretty tired, and I never really understood the big attraction with her. There are much better looking actresses out there than her... and her attitude seems nasty. Take her makeup off and she is nothing special.

Me too. I never understand the infatuation with this chick. Sure, she's hot sometimes, but honestly, she's only one step away from the trailer park.


later~

Exactly. She's trying to make like she is Princess Diana with all of her charity work... but that's just a big act - and a good one (actors are good at acting). Heather Mills did the same thing, although not as good of a job because she's not an actress.

You got it all wrong mate....She does her charity work regardless of the fame she gains from it. Diana was the one who put up a lot of act to try to make herself look a lot better than she is.

How can you know her motives? Your guess is as good as mine is. To me it seems obvious that it's all a big show. She's trying to make herself look like a saint after stealing someone's husband. People do that stuff all the time.

Not that I want to stick up for her because she's not one of my favorite people either, but she did start all of that charity work and her adopting of children BEFORE Brad Pitt. And it takes TWO to mess up a relationship. You can't STEAL a husband. That is just ridiculous to think that a woman can actually STEAL a husband. I mean honestly, did Brad play no part in that? He was rendered helpless in her web??? PLEASE!!!!!!!

And let me add, I saw Brad Pitt on Oprah YEARS ago when his marriage to Jennifer was much newer, and he talked about how he didnt' believe that marriage was meant to last forever. That he doesn't think we are meant to spend our whole lives with one person basically. I thought in my mind back then they would not last. They lasted a LOT longer than I thought they would, but it was no shock to me when they split up. And just like you can't know what is in Angelina's mind for what she does, you cant' know what his relationship with Jennifer was like either. It couldnt' have been too perfect if he left her. Marriages break up for all kinds of reasons. Unless you know them personally you really can't know why.

SPH on the money there. Cute only lasts so long before you have to live with the person. Chin chin probably wasn't a cakewalk which is weird to say 'cause from their public persona, Jolie's the one that comes off hard. In truth she's probably a lot more laid back than the other.

Voyager wrote:

epresley wrote:In regards to the twins, if my face was buried in Angelina's breasts, I'd be smiling too.

I think Jolie is looking pretty tired, and I never really understood the big attraction with her. There are much better looking actresses out there than her... and her attitude seems nasty. Take her makeup off and she is nothing special.

Jolie has always looked much better on film than in person. Her features are naturally exaggerated (eyes, big lips, etc..) which always makes a person look better on screen. With that said, she has a somewhat exotic look to her, but I agree overall she isn't really that "pretty".

This is what I would call...current and pretty: