MR

... look older than she really is? I don't really pay that much attention to her, but was shocked to find recently that she's only 33. She's been around for a while, and when I see pictures of her, she really looks around 40-ish to me, maybe even 41 or 42.



I used to think she was gorgeous ("Taking Lives" is a good example of her looking her best), but I've also seen her looking really horrible in movies like "A Mighty Heart" (the Daniel Pearl story), where she was too thin in the face with a cartoonish trout pout. I still have a hard time believing she's 33...

Rip Rokken wrote:... look older than she really is? I don't really pay that much attention to her, but was shocked to find recently that she's only 33. She's been around for a while, and when I see pictures of her, she really looks around 40-ish to me, maybe even 41 or 42.



I used to think she was gorgeous ("Taking Lives" is a good example of her looking her best), but I've also seen her looking really horrible in movies like "A Mighty Heart" (the Daniel Pearl story), where she was too thin in the face with a cartoonish trout pout. I still have a hard time believing she's 33...

I could use her lipps like a plunger to unclog my sink

Rip Rokken wrote:... look older than she really is? I don't really pay that much attention to her, but was shocked to find recently that she's only 33. She's been around for a while, and when I see pictures of her, she really looks around 40-ish to me, maybe even 41 or 42.



I used to think she was gorgeous ("Taking Lives" is a good example of her looking her best), but I've also seen her looking really horrible in movies like "A Mighty Heart" (the Daniel Pearl story), where she was too thin in the face with a cartoonish trout pout. I still have a hard time believing she's 33...

That's what happens when you run around the world adopting a bunch of children to make yourself look like something less than an adulteress husband stealer.

Rip Rokken wrote:... look older than she really is? I don't really pay that much attention to her, but was shocked to find recently that she's only 33. She's been around for a while, and when I see pictures of her, she really looks around 40-ish to me, maybe even 41 or 42.



I used to think she was gorgeous ("Taking Lives" is a good example of her looking her best), but I've also seen her looking really horrible in movies like "A Mighty Heart" (the Daniel Pearl story), where she was too thin in the face with a cartoonish trout pout. I still have a hard time believing she's 33...

She likes to kick it in the third world, and live hard. I'm not surprised at all. Look at crack addicts in their 20's, they look the same. Malnurishment can cause that look. Who's to say what her diet is when she's galloping around India or Thailand or wherever else she goes.
A lot of service guys look liked that in Vietnam and Thailand. Booze and eating from street vendor carts every day can cause that look.

Rip Rokken wrote:... look older than she really is? I don't really pay that much attention to her, but was shocked to find recently that she's only 33. She's been around for a while, and when I see pictures of her, she really looks around 40-ish to me, maybe even 41 or 42.



I used to think she was gorgeous ("Taking Lives" is a good example of her looking her best), but I've also seen her looking really horrible in movies like "A Mighty Heart" (the Daniel Pearl story), where she was too thin in the face with a cartoonish trout pout. I still have a hard time believing she's 33...

Dude, it is just you, besides if she does look older it gives guys like me that are in their forties a chance at marrying her one day!
I would love to have her on my Utah Polygamy Ranch!!
She would be a welcomed addition!

Rip Rokken wrote:... look older than she really is? I don't really pay that much attention to her, but was shocked to find recently that she's only 33. She's been around for a while, and when I see pictures of her, she really looks around 40-ish to me, maybe even 41 or 42.



I used to think she was gorgeous ("Taking Lives" is a good example of her looking her best), but I've also seen her looking really horrible in movies like "A Mighty Heart" (the Daniel Pearl story), where she was too thin in the face with a cartoonish trout pout. I still have a hard time believing she's 33...

Angelina's in that pic????

Rip, is Taking Lives the one with Ethan Hawke and Keifer Sutherland in it too? If so, that was a great movie!

Brad really fucked up in my opinion:

double Boinggggggggggg maybe he needs a mom

Rip Rokken wrote:... look older than she really is? I don't really pay that much attention to her, but was shocked to find recently that she's only 33. She's been around for a while, and when I see pictures of her, she really looks around 40-ish to me, maybe even 41 or 42.

You can thank Billy Bob for that. He rode her hard.

NealIsGod wrote:

Rip Rokken wrote:... look older than she really is? I don't really pay that much attention to her, but was shocked to find recently that she's only 33. She's been around for a while, and when I see pictures of her, she really looks around 40-ish to me, maybe even 41 or 42.

You can thank Billy Bob for that. He rode her hard.

With Angelina, I think it's the exact opposite. Due to the demanding nature of being her lover, her men have a short shelf life, just like Journey singers .

NealIsGod wrote:

Rip Rokken wrote:... look older than she really is? I don't really pay that much attention to her, but was shocked to find recently that she's only 33. She's been around for a while, and when I see pictures of her, she really looks around 40-ish to me, maybe even 41 or 42.

You can thank Billy Bob for that. He rode her hard.

LMAO!!!!


I always thought she was older, too.
I was really suprised when I heard she's very nearly my age!! (she's 1 year older)

Is she the one that got the balloon lip thing going?

How many pretty ladies have ruined their appearance with lip jobs that look as if someone just popped them in the mouth?

I don't get it.

NealIsGod wrote:

Rip Rokken wrote:... look older than she really is? I don't really pay that much attention to her, but was shocked to find recently that she's only 33. She's been around for a while, and when I see pictures of her, she really looks around 40-ish to me, maybe even 41 or 42.

You can thank Billy Bob for that. He rode her hard.

alright then

Anniston is plain Jane compared to Jolie.

hoagiepete wrote:Is she the one that got the balloon lip thing going?

How many pretty ladies have ruined their appearance with lip jobs that look as if someone just popped them in the mouth?

I don't get it.

Sorry, her lips are natural. In her teens she had the same lips. Her baby girl even has the same lips. Other actresses keep trying to get that look and they look like a joke. The Nikki girl that used to be on the Jimmy Caan Las Vegas show. She was so pretty, brunette. She married Jay Moyer. She blew up her lips so big she messed up her face. She looks like a trout mouth. So sad. She was on Ghost Whisperer and nobody recognized her. Same with Lara Flynn Boyle, or whatever her name is . She's royally screwed up her face with lips blown up and huge cheek implants.

Rip Rokken wrote:... look older than she really is? I don't really pay that much attention to her, but was shocked to find recently that she's only 33. She's been around for a while, and when I see pictures of her, she really looks around 40-ish to me, maybe even 41 or 42.



I used to think she was gorgeous ("Taking Lives" is a good example of her looking her best), but I've also seen her looking really horrible in movies like "A Mighty Heart" (the Daniel Pearl story), where she was too thin in the face with a cartoonish trout pout. I still have a hard time believing she's 33...

Angelina has always had a very mature face. She does have her moments when she appears
haggard....after the death of her mother for example. No matter, she's gorgeous!!

Michigan Girl wrote:

Rip Rokken wrote:... look older than she really is? I don't really pay that much attention to her, but was shocked to find recently that she's only 33. She's been around for a while, and when I see pictures of her, she really looks around 40-ish to me, maybe even 41 or 42.



I used to think she was gorgeous ("Taking Lives" is a good example of her looking her best), but I've also seen her looking really horrible in movies like "A Mighty Heart" (the Daniel Pearl story), where she was too thin in the face with a cartoonish trout pout. I still have a hard time believing she's 33...

Angelina has always had a very mature face. She does have her moments when she appears
haggard....after the death of her mother for example. No matter, she's gorgeous!!

She is stunning. But I miss her jeans and T-shirt days.

She looks like her father.

When children ask "Where to babies come from" most parents pull out an encyclopedia, Angelina pulls out a globe.

jrnyman28 wrote:When children ask "Where to babies come from" most parents pull out an encyclopedia, Angelina pulls out a globe.

who do you like
you don't like jeniffer connelly anymore either.

She is my special friend!

Michigan Girl wrote:

Rip Rokken wrote:... look older than she really is? I don't really pay that much attention to her, but was shocked to find recently that she's only 33. She's been around for a while, and when I see pictures of her, she really looks around 40-ish to me, maybe even 41 or 42.



I used to think she was gorgeous ("Taking Lives" is a good example of her looking her best), but I've also seen her looking really horrible in movies like "A Mighty Heart" (the Daniel Pearl story), where she was too thin in the face with a cartoonish trout pout. I still have a hard time believing she's 33...

Angelina has always had a very mature face. She does have her moments when she appears
haggard....after the death of her mother for example. No matter, she's gorgeous!!

I she related to Merle Haggard?

Voyager wrote:That's what happens when you run around the world adopting a bunch of children to make yourself look like something less than an adulteress husband stealer.

Not to mention a bi-sexual, possibly incestuous, self-mutilating, blood collecting Goth vampire ho.

WIX wrote:Dude, it is just you, besides if she does look older it gives guys like me that are in their forties a chance at marrying her one day!
I would love to have her on my Utah Polygamy Ranch!!
She would be a welcomed addition!

What an odd coincidence... I was just discussing Utah and polygamy with some friends an hour ago. Does this mean we were on the same page, if even for one brief moment in time?

Rip Rokken wrote:

Voyager wrote:That's what happens when you run around the world adopting a bunch of children to make yourself look like something less than an adulteress husband stealer.

Not to mention a bi-sexual, possibly incestuous, self-mutilating, blood collecting Goth vampire ho.

Yummy!!!!!

Deb wrote:Rip, is Taking Lives the one with Ethan Hawke and Keifer Sutherland in it too? If so, that was a great movie!

It was... great love scene with her and Ethan Hawke, even though he is a snotty little Gen-X punk.

33! Holy hell, I thought she was in mid fourties!

I'm always surprised at the ages of MANY hollywood women. I think with the make-up, clothing and just the way they carry themselves, they always seem much older than they are.

Voyager wrote:Brad really fucked up in my opinion:

She can look pretty good, but I always thought Jennifer Aniston was overrated, and she's always seemed to have an overinflated sense of her own importance. But back to the issue of reasons behind having so many kids, I personally think what Angelina and Brad (and people like Madonna) are doing is, ummm... not a good thing. I think it's all about image for them. Someone like Angelina needs a globetrotting superhero savior image, so she gets an instant family of kids from all walks and races, and Brad... maybe something to prove and shove back in Aniston's face. Who knows? Madonna is just all about herself, and always has been. She's as self-worshipping as Oprah.

I'm not saying any of these folks don't genuinely love their adopted kids, but not a one of them has a personal history that shows the kind of maturity and dedication it takes to stick in it for the long haul. Well, except maybe Madonna on the dedication part -- no one has ever indicated she's a bad mother. But Brad and Angelina don't seem the long-term relationship type, and I wonder if they think all those kids will give their family stability. Hell, take some time and prove you can make it as a couple before going on a fast-paced family building spree.

NealIsGod wrote:

Rip Rokken wrote:... look older than she really is? I don't really pay that much attention to her, but was shocked to find recently that she's only 33. She's been around for a while, and when I see pictures of her, she really looks around 40-ish to me, maybe even 41 or 42.

You can thank Billy Bob for that. He rode her hard.

His first wife was very hot, and how he got her when he was still an unknown redneck in Arkansas is beyond me.

Rip Rokken wrote:

Deb wrote:Rip, is Taking Lives the one with Ethan Hawke and Keifer Sutherland in it too? If so, that was a great movie!

It was... great love scene with her and Ethan Hawke, even though he is a snotty little Gen-X punk.

I'm not an Ethan Hawke fan either, but I love Keifer (great actor)! I agree though, that frantic love scene was HOT!