OT: Man Sells Daughter for Money and Beer

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

OT: Man Sells Daughter for Money and Beer

Postby Enigma869 » Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:50 pm

Another scumbag pursuing the "Father Of The Year" award :roll:

http://news.aol.com/article/cops-say-da ... 2010772404

Cops Say Dad Sold Girl to Groom for Beer
By JULIANA BARBASSA, AP

SAN FRANCISCO (Jan. 13) - A California man has been arrested for arranging for his 14-year-old daughter to marry a neighbor in exchange for $16,000, 100 cases of beer and several cases of meat, police said.
Authorities in Greenfield, a farming community on California's central coast, said they learned of the deal after Marcelino de Jesus Martinez, 36, asked them for help getting back his daughter after payment wasn't made.

Martinez was arrested Sunday. He's scheduled to be arraigned Wednesday in Monterey County Superior Court on felony charges of procuring a child under age 16 for lewd and lascivious acts, statutory rape and cruelty to a child by endangering health, according to the prosecutor.
The prosecutor's office said Martinez did not have an attorney of record yet.
Police also arrested the intended groom, 18-year-old Margarito de Jesus Galindo, on suspicion of statutory rape, but prosecutors have not decided whether to charge him. Police did not return a message Tuesday for information on whether Galindo had an attorney.
Martinez is a member of an indigenous Mexican Trique community. Greenfield police Chief Joe Grebmeier said the case highlights an issue confronting local authorities in that arranged marriages with girls as young as 12 are not uncommon among the Trique.
He hesitated to say the girl was being sold into marriage, as the money was intended as a dowry and the beer and meat were for the wedding. But, he added, the arrangement violates California law, where the age of consent for marriage is 18, and with parental approval, 16.
"This is not a traditional trafficking case because there is no force or coercion in this," Grebmeier said. "We're aware of the cultural issues here, but state law trumps cultural sensitivity."
Grebmeier is planning to meet with leaders in the Trique community to talk about how some cultural practices might conflict with California law.
"Initially, when everyone was talking to us, we learned a lot because they had no realization that it's against the law — an arranged marriage for money with a minor," Grebmeier said.
Many Trique immigrants are part of the stream of farmworkers who tend California's fruit and vegetable fields, living in communities scattered along the coast and the state's agricultural Central Valley. The often speak only Trique, an indigenous language, and come from villages with cultural traditions that set them apart from other Mexicans.
Service organizations have been working to help them integrate, said Jonathan Fox, a professor of Latin American and Latino Studies at the University of California, Santa Cruz, who has worked extensively with indigenous immigrants.
"This is certainly not the first such case I've heard of," he said of the marriage involving an underage girl.
Members of the indigenous community protested the news reports and public discussion of the case, saying they were painted in a very negative light.
"No one put a 'for sale' sign on this girl, and that's how it sounds," said Rufino Dominguez, an indigenous immigrant and head of the Greenfield office of the Binational Center for the Development of the Indigenous Communities.
He said arranging marriages and exchanging goods that will contribute to the wedding party are common, but money is not usually part of the transaction. When that does happen, it's not seen well within the community, he said.
"Most people don't agree with it," he said.
Police learned of the deal in mid-December, when Martinez reported his daughter as a runaway. Further investigation found the girl had not fled but moved in with Galindo as part of the marriage arrangement. Grebmeier said the girl was a willing party to the deal.
Martinez would face at least a year in prison if convicted. Because he's an undocumented immigrant, he's under an immigration hold and is not eligible for bail.
John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby Ehwmatt » Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:57 pm

If the government would have just given this scum bag money and entitlements like he deserves, this would have never happened :roll:
User avatar
Ehwmatt
MP3
 
Posts: 10907
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:15 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Postby artist4perry » Wed Jan 14, 2009 12:59 pm

Sad for the child. :(
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby Don » Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:16 pm

This Happens all the time in countries around the world, and in immigrant enclaves across the U.S. It's not just the Mexican communities, so it would be very hard to police. The money thing is probably going to earn him a tribal asskicking when he gets out of the clink. A lot of my latino coworkers and neighbors have been shacking up since the girls were 15 or 16, it's a pretty common occurance.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby G.I.Jim » Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:26 pm

Man, what's a guy got to do to make a buck around here??? :lol: :lol: :wink: Joking... I hope both of these bastards do some time!
The artist formerly known as Jim. :-)
G.I.Jim
MP3
 
Posts: 10100
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Your Momma's house

Postby Babyblue » Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:22 pm

Gunbot wrote:This Happens all the time in countries around the world, and in immigrant enclaves across the U.S. It's not just the Mexican communities, so it would be very hard to police. The money thing is probably going to earn him a tribal asskicking when he gets out of the clink. A lot of my latino coworkers and neighbors have been shacking up since the girls were 15 or 16, it's a pretty common occurance.


That just makes you sick.That poor child :cry: :cry:
Babyblue
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8023
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:04 pm
Location: Grits girls raised in the south.

Postby ScarabGator » Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:27 pm

total scumbag! Now if he had arranged to sell the wife for beer, well thats a different story...(I keed...I keed.... :lol: )
User avatar
ScarabGator
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4773
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 4:55 am
Location: in the swamp.....

Postby Babyblue » Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:58 pm

ScarabGator wrote:total scumbag! Now if he had arranged to sell the wife for beer, well thats a different story...(I keed...I keed.... :lol: )




You are just so bad. :)
Babyblue
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8023
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:04 pm
Location: Grits girls raised in the south.

Postby artist4perry » Wed Jan 14, 2009 11:00 pm

ScarabGator wrote:total scumbag! Now if he had arranged to sell the wife for beer, well thats a different story...(I keed...I keed.... :lol: )

Take my wife...................please! (this sounds familliar) :wink: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby stevew2 » Wed Jan 14, 2009 11:44 pm

I hope it wasnt bud or coors lite. That would be a real tragedy
User avatar
stevew2
MP3
 
Posts: 13073
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Maryland

Postby FishinMagician » Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:53 am

too bad it isnt rape if they are married. are they?
Image
User avatar
FishinMagician
8 Track
 
Posts: 830
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:21 am
Location: Florida

Postby wednesday's child » Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:21 am

FishinMagician wrote:too bad it isnt rape if they are married. are they?


Still statutory methinks --I mean, CA seems a strange land, but does it allow marriage involving 14 year olds?
User avatar
wednesday's child
8 Track
 
Posts: 857
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:44 am
Location: Quezon City

Postby Michigan Girl » Thu Jan 15, 2009 8:23 am

wednesday's child wrote:
FishinMagician wrote:too bad it isnt rape if they are married. are they?


Still statutory methinks --I mean, CA seems a strange land, but does it allow marriage involving 14 year olds?


"But, he added, the arrangement violates California law, where the age of consent for marriage is 18, and with parental approval, 16"

NO!!! :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby FishinMagician » Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:42 am

i know it sounds weird. it is 16 in all states and 14 with a judge's approval in 22. according to my psych professor.
Image
User avatar
FishinMagician
8 Track
 
Posts: 830
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:21 am
Location: Florida

Postby Since 78 » Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:54 am

Historically, individuals were allowed to enter into a marriage contract at a very young
age. In Ancient Rome, the appropriate minimum age was regarded as 14 for males and 12 for
females. When Rome became Christianized, these age minimums were adopted into the
ecclesiastical law of the Catholic Church. This canon law governed most marriages in Western
Europe until the Reformation. When England broke away from the Catholic Church, the
Anglican Church carried with it the same minimum age requirements for the prospective bride
and groom. The minimum age requirements of 12 and 14 were eventually written into English
civil law. By default, these provisions became the minimum marriage ages in colonial America.
These common laws inherited from the British remained in force in America unless a specific
state law was enacted to replace them.1
While Roman, Catholic, English, and early American law may have allowed marriage at
12 for girls and 14 for boys, many questioned the advisability of such an early union.
Researchers and policymakers around the turn of the 20th century recognized that teens may be
especially ill-prepared to assume the familial responsibilities and financial pressures associated
with marriage.2
Image
Image
Still They Ride
User avatar
Since 78
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8194
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 2:21 pm
Location: Pinhead Nation

Postby Michigan Girl » Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:05 am

Since 78 wrote:Historically, individuals were allowed to enter into a marriage contract at a very young
age. In Ancient Rome, the appropriate minimum age was regarded as 14 for males and 12 for
females. When Rome became Christianized, these age minimums were adopted into the
ecclesiastical law of the Catholic Church. This canon law governed most marriages in Western
Europe until the Reformation. When England broke away from the Catholic Church, the
Anglican Church carried with it the same minimum age requirements for the prospective bride
and groom. The minimum age requirements of 12 and 14 were eventually written into English
civil law. By default, these provisions became the minimum marriage ages in colonial America.
These common laws inherited from the British remained in force in America unless a specific
state law was enacted to replace them.1
While Roman, Catholic, English, and early American law may have allowed marriage at
12 for girls and 14 for boys, many questioned the advisability of such an early union.
Researchers and policymakers around the turn of the 20th century recognized that teens may be
especially ill-prepared to assume the familial responsibilities and financial pressures associated
with marriage.
2


Wow, look at you, a plethora of information...... :wink:
I did not know this!!! I'm glad the researchers and policymakers came to their senses!!!
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby JH'sTXfan » Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:12 am

The expected life span back then was probably 35
JH'sTXfan
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2176
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 6:29 pm
Location: sleepy little town down around San Antone

Postby Don » Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:42 am

JH'sTXfan wrote:The expected life span back then was probably 35


If your dead at 35, best to start early.

Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed, right?
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby JH'sTXfan » Thu Jan 15, 2009 12:10 pm

Gunbot wrote:
JH'sTXfan wrote:The expected life span back then was probably 35


If your dead at 35, best to start early.

Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed, right?


Barbaric reasoning. I can't believe people still do this nowadays. :(
JH'sTXfan
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2176
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 6:29 pm
Location: sleepy little town down around San Antone

Postby Don » Thu Jan 15, 2009 3:11 pm

JH'sTXfan wrote:
Gunbot wrote:
JH'sTXfan wrote:The expected life span back then was probably 35


If your dead at 35, best to start early.

Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed, right?


Barbaric reasoning. I can't believe people still do this nowadays. :(


I would think with a life expectancy rate of 35 years, the whole culture would be barbaric. Look at the slew of African countries were this takes place. Early mortality rates and unions involving minors will always go hand in hand. When you enter an advanced state of social and economic development, these things tend to not happen as often. This just shows you how many tiers of different social orders we have going on here in the states.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby wednesday's child » Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:59 pm

JH'sTXfan wrote:
Gunbot wrote:
JH'sTXfan wrote:The expected life span back then was probably 35


If your dead at 35, best to start early.

Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed, right?


Barbaric reasoning. I can't believe people still do this nowadays. :(


I suppose then, there's little chance you look kindly on the adage:
"If there's grass, play ball."

:lol:
User avatar
wednesday's child
8 Track
 
Posts: 857
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 6:44 am
Location: Quezon City

Postby stevew2 » Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:11 am

Since 78 wrote:Historically, individuals were allowed to enter into a marriage contract at a very young
age. In Ancient Rome, the appropriate minimum age was regarded as 14 for males and 12 for
females. When Rome became Christianized, these age minimums were adopted into the
ecclesiastical law of the Catholic Church. This canon law governed most marriages in Western
Europe until the Reformation. When England broke away from the Catholic Church, the
Anglican Church carried with it the same minimum age requirements for the prospective bride
and groom. The minimum age requirements of 12 and 14 were eventually written into English
civil law. By default, these provisions became the minimum marriage ages in colonial America.
These common laws inherited from the British remained in force in America unless a specific
state law was enacted to replace them.1
While Roman, Catholic, English, and early American law may have allowed marriage at
12 for girls and 14 for boys, many questioned the advisability of such an early union.
Researchers and policymakers around the turn of the 20th century recognized that teens may be
especially ill-prepared to assume the familial responsibilities and financial pressures associated
with marriage.2
Back on the old days the motto was "if there is grass on the field, play ball
User avatar
stevew2
MP3
 
Posts: 13073
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:20 pm
Location: Maryland


Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests