Moderator: Andrew
madsplash wrote:Is that SP is the most recognizable, influential, identifiable, undeniable, indisputable, unbelievable fucking rock singer of all time!
madsplash wrote:Is that SP is the most recognizable, influential, identifiable, undeniable, indisputable, unbelievable fucking rock singer of all time!
Vladan wrote:madsplash wrote:Is that SP is the most recognizable, influential, identifiable, undeniable, indisputable, unbelievable fucking rock singer of all time!
Damn right he is.
madsplash wrote:Is that SP is the most recognizable, influential, identifiable, undeniable, indisputable, unbelievable fucking rock singer of all time!
madsplash wrote:Is that SP is the most recognizable, influential, identifiable, undeniable, indisputable, unbelievable fucking rock singer of all time!
amaron wrote:WAS
stevew2 wrote:You are retarded, along with Blue Thighes
Gideon wrote:amaron wrote:WAS
Logically, we can conclude he is less than he once was, but there's no way to tell that he's bad now, if that's what you're getting at. I'm critical of the man and his voice, but even his works on Trial By Fire are pretty great; nothing approaching his prime or what Augeri, Soto, or Arnel can dish out now, but still some serious pipes there.
amaron wrote:Gideon wrote:amaron wrote:WAS
Logically, we can conclude he is less than he once was, but there's no way to tell that he's bad now, if that's what you're getting at. I'm critical of the man and his voice, but even his works on Trial By Fire are pretty great; nothing approaching his prime or what Augeri, Soto, or Arnel can dish out now, but still some serious pipes there.
Steve Perry has not sung a live note in almost 15 years and has not recorded an album in over 10.
There is no doubt about what he WAS, but there is serious doubt about what he IS now.
That is what I am getting it.
Vladan wrote:Steve Perry is one of the of the most influential singers of our time, definitely.
These guys are only a few who were influenced by Perry. They just don't bigger than these guys.
Arnel Pineda
Michael Bolton
Ricky Martin
Bon Jovi
amaron wrote:Gideon wrote:amaron wrote:WAS
Logically, we can conclude he is less than he once was, but there's no way to tell that he's bad now, if that's what you're getting at. I'm critical of the man and his voice, but even his works on Trial By Fire are pretty great; nothing approaching his prime or what Augeri, Soto, or Arnel can dish out now, but still some serious pipes there.
Steve Perry has not sung a live note in almost 15 years and has not recorded an album in over 10.
There is no doubt about what he WAS, but there is serious doubt about what he IS now.
That is what I am getting it.
madsplash wrote:amaron wrote:Gideon wrote:amaron wrote:WAS
Logically, we can conclude he is less than he once was, but there's no way to tell that he's bad now, if that's what you're getting at. I'm critical of the man and his voice, but even his works on Trial By Fire are pretty great; nothing approaching his prime or what Augeri, Soto, or Arnel can dish out now, but still some serious pipes there.
Steve Perry has not sung a live note in almost 15 years and has not recorded an album in over 10.
There is no doubt about what he WAS, but there is serious doubt about what he IS now.
That is what I am getting it.
Until someone surpasses what he "was", he's the man. Nobody has.
Gideon wrote:Vladan wrote:Steve Perry is one of the of the most influential singers of our time, definitely.
These guys are only a few who were influenced by Perry. They just don't bigger than these guys.
Arnel Pineda
Michael Bolton
Ricky Martin
Bon Jovi
Not to mention Nick and Aaron Carter, IIRC. Still, though, not the Jimi Hendrix of vocals in terms of influence and innovation. He's on a high tier, I'm sure, but not the high tier.
madsplash wrote:amaron wrote:Gideon wrote:amaron wrote:WAS
Logically, we can conclude he is less than he once was, but there's no way to tell that he's bad now, if that's what you're getting at. I'm critical of the man and his voice, but even his works on Trial By Fire are pretty great; nothing approaching his prime or what Augeri, Soto, or Arnel can dish out now, but still some serious pipes there.
Steve Perry has not sung a live note in almost 15 years and has not recorded an album in over 10.
There is no doubt about what he WAS, but there is serious doubt about what he IS now.
That is what I am getting it.
Until someone surpasses what he "was", he's the man. Nobody has.
madsplash wrote:Gideon wrote:Vladan wrote:Steve Perry is one of the of the most influential singers of our time, definitely.
These guys are only a few who were influenced by Perry. They just don't bigger than these guys.
Arnel Pineda
Michael Bolton
Ricky Martin
Bon Jovi
Not to mention Nick and Aaron Carter, IIRC. Still, though, not the Jimi Hendrix of vocals in terms of influence and innovation. He's on a high tier, I'm sure, but not the high tier.
Did you really just mention the Carter boys in the same sentence as SP? He INVENTED the high tier. C'mon.
Gideon wrote:madsplash wrote:amaron wrote:Gideon wrote:amaron wrote:WAS
Logically, we can conclude he is less than he once was, but there's no way to tell that he's bad now, if that's what you're getting at. I'm critical of the man and his voice, but even his works on Trial By Fire are pretty great; nothing approaching his prime or what Augeri, Soto, or Arnel can dish out now, but still some serious pipes there.
Steve Perry has not sung a live note in almost 15 years and has not recorded an album in over 10.
There is no doubt about what he WAS, but there is serious doubt about what he IS now.
That is what I am getting it.
Until someone surpasses what he "was", he's the man. Nobody has.
That's open to interpretation. Don't let preference cloud objectivity; he is my favorite singer of all time, too, but there are several vocalists who rival him.
madsplash wrote:Gideon wrote:madsplash wrote:amaron wrote:Gideon wrote:amaron wrote:WAS
Logically, we can conclude he is less than he once was, but there's no way to tell that he's bad now, if that's what you're getting at. I'm critical of the man and his voice, but even his works on Trial By Fire are pretty great; nothing approaching his prime or what Augeri, Soto, or Arnel can dish out now, but still some serious pipes there.
Steve Perry has not sung a live note in almost 15 years and has not recorded an album in over 10.
There is no doubt about what he WAS, but there is serious doubt about what he IS now.
That is what I am getting it.
Until someone surpasses what he "was", he's the man. Nobody has.
That's open to interpretation. Don't let preference cloud objectivity; he is my favorite singer of all time, too, but there are several vocalists who rival him.
Rival, maybe? Surpass? FUCK, NO!
Gideon wrote:madsplash wrote:Gideon wrote:madsplash wrote:amaron wrote:Gideon wrote:amaron wrote:WAS
Logically, we can conclude he is less than he once was, but there's no way to tell that he's bad now, if that's what you're getting at. I'm critical of the man and his voice, but even his works on Trial By Fire are pretty great; nothing approaching his prime or what Augeri, Soto, or Arnel can dish out now, but still some serious pipes there.
Steve Perry has not sung a live note in almost 15 years and has not recorded an album in over 10.
There is no doubt about what he WAS, but there is serious doubt about what he IS now.
That is what I am getting it.
Until someone surpasses what he "was", he's the man. Nobody has.
That's open to interpretation. Don't let preference cloud objectivity; he is my favorite singer of all time, too, but there are several vocalists who rival him.
Rival, maybe? Surpass? FUCK, NO!
Still open to interpretation.
amaron wrote:WAS
Jubilee wrote:amaron wrote:WAS
You say that as if it were some sort of pejorative. It's not. Time inevitably passes, and what we're left with is the "legacy". In his day, Perry wasn't necessarily considered any of those things MS mentioned. He (and his voice) was savaged by so-called music critics. It's only with the passage of time that we're able to take a backward glance and really appreciate what a talent Perry really was. He didn't become "The Voice" until AFTER his career was, for the most part, done.
madsplash wrote:Gideon wrote:Indeed.
Shame, like the rest of the band, he's tragically ignored.
Not by anyone who knows anything. Any vocalist who ignores SP's influence, is a complete joke.
Gideon wrote:madsplash wrote:Gideon wrote:Indeed.
Shame, like the rest of the band, he's tragically ignored.
Not by anyone who knows anything. Any vocalist who ignores SP's influence, is a complete joke.
The general public tends to have no idea about great talents like Steve Perry, Neal Schon, or Jonathan Cain.
madsplash wrote:Gideon wrote:madsplash wrote:Gideon wrote:madsplash wrote:amaron wrote:Gideon wrote:amaron wrote:WAS
Logically, we can conclude he is less than he once was, but there's no way to tell that he's bad now, if that's what you're getting at. I'm critical of the man and his voice, but even his works on Trial By Fire are pretty great; nothing approaching his prime or what Augeri, Soto, or Arnel can dish out now, but still some serious pipes there.
Steve Perry has not sung a live note in almost 15 years and has not recorded an album in over 10.
There is no doubt about what he WAS, but there is serious doubt about what he IS now.
That is what I am getting it.
Until someone surpasses what he "was", he's the man. Nobody has.
That's open to interpretation. Don't let preference cloud objectivity; he is my favorite singer of all time, too, but there are several vocalists who rival him.
Rival, maybe? Surpass? FUCK, NO!
Still open to interpretation.
Ageed. But SP's influence is un-de-fucking-niable.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests