Should the Michael Jackson Band Get a YouTube Singer?

I was just thinking about how successful Journey has been by replacing their lead singer and going on tour. I couldn't help but wonder if the Michael Jackson band members should follow Journey's lead and do the same thing? I mean, the only difference is that Michael's band used his personal name to tour with instead of a band name like Journey. However, we all know that it's not Keith Richards or Charlie Watts that people pay to see when they go to a Rolling Stones concert - it's Mick Jagger. So if the Stones lost Mick, according to the Journey/Foreigner/Queen principle, they should be able to replace him with an impersonator and still tour. Why would it be different with Michael Jackson?
If a band can replace Steve Perry with an impersonator and go on a successful tour, I see no reason why it couldn't be done with Michael Jackson. I think they should keep the Michael Jackson concert dates on the books and pay Neal Schon a consulting fee to help them find a replacement for Michael on YouTube. Why cancel all the shows and refund the money when a new singer and a fat paycheck are only a few mouse clicks away?

If a band can replace Steve Perry with an impersonator and go on a successful tour, I see no reason why it couldn't be done with Michael Jackson. I think they should keep the Michael Jackson concert dates on the books and pay Neal Schon a consulting fee to help them find a replacement for Michael on YouTube. Why cancel all the shows and refund the money when a new singer and a fat paycheck are only a few mouse clicks away?
