Page 1 of 2

OT: New Pearl Jam Song

PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 10:24 am
by TRAGChick
Wow....

They actually sound ~ dare I say ~ UPBEAT and HAPPY! :lol:

Thoughts?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmK4i5IA4nE

Re: OT: New Pearl Jam Song

PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 10:29 am
by Duncan
TRAGChick wrote:Wow....

They actually sound ~ dare I say ~ UPBEAT and HAPPY! :lol:

Thoughts?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmK4i5IA4nE


Can't vote one way or the other. It's just not a very good song.


----------------
Now playing: Wild Horses - Criminal Tendencies

PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 10:32 am
by Don
Rumor has it that Pearl Jam Sucks turtle cocks.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 11:27 am
by Eric
Gunbot wrote:Rumor has it that Pearl Jam Sucks turtle cocks.


That aint no rumor

PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:28 pm
by ProgRocker53
I dig it.

Pearl Jam have had quite a few "upbeat" songs.. I'm glad they're still going and releasing stuff, as I'm a recently-converted fan. (Thanks to my lovely girlfriend!)

To say Pearl Jam sucks.... is flat-out ignorant.. they're one of the best bands of the past twenty years.

Re: OT: New Pearl Jam Song

PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:32 pm
by Peartree12249
Duncan wrote:
TRAGChick wrote:Wow....

They actually sound ~ dare I say ~ UPBEAT and HAPPY! :lol:

Thoughts?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmK4i5IA4nE


Can't vote one way or the other. It's just not a very good song.


----------------
Now playing: Wild Horses - Criminal Tendencies


+1 Sadly I have to agree with you. The song isn't very good. Plus I much prefer the angst. I don't listen to Pearl Jam to get happy.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:34 pm
by stevew2
He still sings like a has a mouth full of balls

PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:37 pm
by Don
I wonder how many Pearl Jam albums Kip Winger owns?

PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:39 pm
by ProgRocker53
Gunbot wrote:I wonder how many Pearl Jam albums Kip Winger owns?


Even though Pearl Jam is one of the bands arguably responsible for crippling the mainstream careers of late-wave 80s melodic rock such as Winger...

....Kip's gotta have at least Ten. That's a damn fine album. Or maybe a best-of.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:46 pm
by Don
ProgRocker53 wrote:
Gunbot wrote:I wonder how many Pearl Jam albums Kip Winger owns?


Even though Pearl Jam is one of the bands arguably responsible for crippling the mainstream careers of late-wave 80s melodic rock such as Winger...

....Kip's gotta have at least Ten. That's a damn fine album. Or maybe a best-of.


Winger was screwed royally. Their videos were all over MTV, their second album was just hitting platinum.....
and everything suddenly went to plaid flannel.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:48 pm
by ProgRocker53
Gunbot wrote:
ProgRocker53 wrote:
Gunbot wrote:I wonder how many Pearl Jam albums Kip Winger owns?


Even though Pearl Jam is one of the bands arguably responsible for crippling the mainstream careers of late-wave 80s melodic rock such as Winger...

....Kip's gotta have at least Ten. That's a damn fine album. Or maybe a best-of.


Winger was screwed royally. Their videos were all over MTV, their second album was just hitting platinum.....
and everything suddenly went to plaid flannel.


Which, oddly enough, may have been good for them.

Pull and IV are by far the best Winger albums and may not have come to be if it wasn't for their fall from the charts.

Re: OT: New Pearl Jam Song

PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 2:54 am
by Since 78
Peartree12249 wrote:
Duncan wrote:
TRAGChick wrote:Wow....

They actually sound ~ dare I say ~ UPBEAT and HAPPY! :lol:

Thoughts?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmK4i5IA4nE


Can't vote one way or the other. It's just not a very good song.


----------------
Now playing: Wild Horses - Criminal Tendencies


+1 Sadly I have to agree with you. The song isn't very good. Plus I much prefer the angst. I don't listen to Pearl Jam to get happy.


Have to agree with this also. Pearl jam is not supposed to be Upbeat and Happy, Thats what I listen to Journey for.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 3:37 am
by journeygirl
I have to agree, this is not a good song. I was disappointed with it. I can tell you that I won't be running out to buy it anytime soon.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:36 am
by Eric
stevew2 wrote:He still sings like a has a mouth full of balls


Thats hysterical

Re: OT: New Pearl Jam Song

PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:53 am
by TRAGChick
Since 78 wrote:
Peartree12249 wrote:
Duncan wrote:
TRAGChick wrote:Wow....

They actually sound ~ dare I say ~ UPBEAT and HAPPY! :lol:

Thoughts?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmK4i5IA4nE


Can't vote one way or the other. It's just not a very good song.


----------------
Now playing: Wild Horses - Criminal Tendencies


+1 Sadly I have to agree with you. The song isn't very good. Plus I much prefer the angst. I don't listen to Pearl Jam to get happy.




Have to agree with this also. Pearl jam is not supposed to be Upbeat and Happy, Thats what I listen to Journey for.


OK; I hear ya.....

Here's "forgotten option #3":

:arrow: Meh. 8)

Vote "Meh" if that's how you feel. :wink:

PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:15 am
by Since 78
:arrow: Meh. 8) :lol:

PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:21 am
by madsplash
I can't vote. There isn't a choice of "I hate Pearl Jam and everything about that bullshit Seattle, grunge-rock, can't play, can't sing, can't write, era".

Did I mention that I HATE Pearl Jam and Nirvana?

HATE. Pure trash, made for a boring, lazy, unimaginative, unmotivated generation. Garbage.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:23 am
by KDOUBLEU
madsplash wrote:I can't vote. There isn't a choice of "I hate Pearl Jam and everything about that bullshit Seattle, grunge-rock, can't play, can't sing, can't write, era".

Did I mention that I HATE Pearl Jam and Nirvana?

HATE. Pure trash, made for a boring, lazy, unimaginative, unmotivated generation. Garbage.
+1

PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:23 am
by Rick
madsplash wrote:I can't vote. There isn't a choice of "I hate Pearl Jam and everything about that bullshit Seattle, grunge-rock, can't play, can't sing, can't write, era".

Did I mention that I HATE Pearl Jam and Nirvana?

HATE. Pure trash, made for a boring, lazy, unimaginative, unmotivated generation. Garbage.


I voted for the first one, because if I've got to listen to them, I'd prefer an upbeat song. I actually like that one a bit, but I kind of feel the way you do about that genre of music altogether, with a lot less hatred though. :lol:

PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:26 am
by Don
You want to have an orgasm, get laid. You want to have a sadgasm, listen to Pearl Jam.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 10:30 am
by madsplash
Gunbot wrote:You want to have an orgasm, get laid. You want to have a sadgasm, listen to Pearl Jam.


:lol: +1000

PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 2:35 pm
by ProgRocker53
madsplash wrote:I can't vote. There isn't a choice of "I hate Pearl Jam and everything about that bullshit Seattle, grunge-rock, can't play, can't sing, can't write, era".

Did I mention that I HATE Pearl Jam and Nirvana?

HATE. Pure trash, made for a boring, lazy, unimaginative, unmotivated generation. Garbage.


I can understand the hate for Nirvana, as I too, dislike them immensely.

But Pearl Jam are hella good, same with Soungarden and Alice in Chains.

Just because bands choose to do something other than high-register, melodic vocals, standard-tune riffs, and throwing solos every which way in songs.... doesn't mean they're bad.

I dare you to walk up to Eddie Vedder, and say he can't write. Tell Chris Cornell he can't sing. Tell Jerry Cantrell he can't play.

I call bullshit ten times over.

PostPosted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:13 pm
by Eric
ProgRocker53 wrote:
madsplash wrote:I can't vote. There isn't a choice of "I hate Pearl Jam and everything about that bullshit Seattle, grunge-rock, can't play, can't sing, can't write, era".

Did I mention that I HATE Pearl Jam and Nirvana?

HATE. Pure trash, made for a boring, lazy, unimaginative, unmotivated generation. Garbage.


I can understand the hate for Nirvana, as I too, dislike them immensely.

But Pearl Jam are hella good, same with Soungarden and Alice in Chains.

Just because bands choose to do something other than high-register, melodic vocals, standard-tune riffs, and throwing solos every which way in songs.... doesn't mean they're bad.

I dare you to walk up to Eddie Vedder, and say he can't write. Tell Chris Cornell he can't sing. Tell Jerry Cantrell he can't play.

I call bullshit ten times over.


You can call Bullshit but the mopey music sounds like dogshit to a lot of us, didn't last (fortunately), and hurt our genre greatly.

PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:46 am
by KenTheDude
madsplash wrote:I can't vote. There isn't a choice of "I hate Pearl Jam and everything about that bullshit Seattle, grunge-rock, can't play, can't sing, can't write, era".

Did I mention that I HATE Pearl Jam and Nirvana?

HATE. Pure trash, made for a boring, lazy, unimaginative, unmotivated generation. Garbage.


We haven't agreed about too much in the past, but that is pure poetry written right there. Spot on perfect.

PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:50 am
by KenTheDude
ProgRocker53 wrote:
madsplash wrote:I can't vote. There isn't a choice of "I hate Pearl Jam and everything about that bullshit Seattle, grunge-rock, can't play, can't sing, can't write, era".

Did I mention that I HATE Pearl Jam and Nirvana?

HATE. Pure trash, made for a boring, lazy, unimaginative, unmotivated generation. Garbage.


I can understand the hate for Nirvana, as I too, dislike them immensely.

But Pearl Jam are hella good, same with Soungarden and Alice in Chains.

Just because bands choose to do something other than high-register, melodic vocals, standard-tune riffs, and throwing solos every which way in songs.... doesn't mean they're bad.

I dare you to walk up to Eddie Vedder, and say he can't write. Tell Chris Cornell he can't sing. Tell Jerry Cantrell he can't play.

I call bullshit ten times over.


I'd walk straight up to Eddie Vedder and tell him he can't sing one fuckin' note on key. Probably one of the worst talented "singers" on the planet. Sounds like someone is skinning a ferret alive. The dude has ZERO talent in the singing department. The epitomy of TONE DEAF . The only redeeming value he has is that he's a Cubs fan. :lol: Pearl Jam music-wise is not too bad, but too bad they have a singer with numb vocal chords.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:38 am
by jrnyman28
Eric wrote:
ProgRocker53 wrote:
madsplash wrote:I can't vote. There isn't a choice of "I hate Pearl Jam and everything about that bullshit Seattle, grunge-rock, can't play, can't sing, can't write, era".

Did I mention that I HATE Pearl Jam and Nirvana?

HATE. Pure trash, made for a boring, lazy, unimaginative, unmotivated generation. Garbage.


I can understand the hate for Nirvana, as I too, dislike them immensely.

But Pearl Jam are hella good, same with Soungarden and Alice in Chains.

Just because bands choose to do something other than high-register, melodic vocals, standard-tune riffs, and throwing solos every which way in songs.... doesn't mean they're bad.

I dare you to walk up to Eddie Vedder, and say he can't write. Tell Chris Cornell he can't sing. Tell Jerry Cantrell he can't play.

I call bullshit ten times over.


You can call Bullshit but the mopey music sounds like dogshit to a lot of us, didn't last (fortunately), and hurt our genre greatly.


Sorry, but GRUNGE did not kill "our genre", our "genre" was imploding with stupid lyrics and a tired image and nothing particularly new to offer. It is likely more accurate to say "our genre" led to the creation of of Grunge.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 8:46 am
by Peartree12249
Music is an expression of a generation. The people who grew up in the 80's who listened to melodic rock often don't appreciate the music I grew up with in the late 60's and 70's. Some of the negative comments I've read on MR iconic figures about such as the Beatles and Rolling Stones were stunning to me but after thinking about it not surprising. Kids don't want to listen to the music of their parents. They want their own. If grunge became popular it's because it struck an emotional chord in the listener at that time. Let's face it MR started to become a parody of itself. There were lot's of marginally talented groups out there who had nothing more to offer than big hair and spandex. People were ready for a change. However, the music has and will continue to inspire and influence new artiists. The good stuff will remain, new people will discover it and continue playing it, but sadly it's time has passed.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 8:55 am
by Triple S
ProgRocker53 wrote:
madsplash wrote:I can't vote. There isn't a choice of "I hate Pearl Jam and everything about that bullshit Seattle, grunge-rock, can't play, can't sing, can't write, era".

Did I mention that I HATE Pearl Jam and Nirvana?

HATE. Pure trash, made for a boring, lazy, unimaginative, unmotivated generation. Garbage.


I can understand the hate for Nirvana, as I too, dislike them immensely.

But Pearl Jam are hella good, same with Soungarden and Alice in Chains.


Just because bands choose to do something other than high-register, melodic vocals, standard-tune riffs, and throwing solos every which way in songs.... doesn't mean they're bad.

I dare you to walk up to Eddie Vedder, and say he can't write. Tell Chris Cornell he can't sing. Tell Jerry Cantrell he can't play.

I call bullshit ten times over.


I always thought I hated this kind of music, but honestly I never really gave any of it a good listen. Since I've been playing Rockband, I've actually developed an affection for some of these bands, particularly Alice In Chains. My husband, on the other hand, tells me he may jump off the deck if he hears Man In The Box one more time :).

PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 9:37 am
by Eric
jrnyman28 wrote:
Eric wrote:
ProgRocker53 wrote:
madsplash wrote:I can't vote. There isn't a choice of "I hate Pearl Jam and everything about that bullshit Seattle, grunge-rock, can't play, can't sing, can't write, era".

Did I mention that I HATE Pearl Jam and Nirvana?

HATE. Pure trash, made for a boring, lazy, unimaginative, unmotivated generation. Garbage.


I can understand the hate for Nirvana, as I too, dislike them immensely.

But Pearl Jam are hella good, same with Soungarden and Alice in Chains.

Just because bands choose to do something other than high-register, melodic vocals, standard-tune riffs, and throwing solos every which way in songs.... doesn't mean they're bad.

I dare you to walk up to Eddie Vedder, and say he can't write. Tell Chris Cornell he can't sing. Tell Jerry Cantrell he can't play.

I call bullshit ten times over.


You can call Bullshit but the mopey music sounds like dogshit to a lot of us, didn't last (fortunately), and hurt our genre greatly.


Sorry, but GRUNGE did not kill "our genre", our "genre" was imploding with stupid lyrics and a tired image and nothing particularly new to offer. It is likely more accurate to say "our genre" led to the creation of of Grunge.


Who said killed? Grunge radio and its supporters bashed Journey, for example, with a passion. I shall forever be seeking revenge.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 9:40 am
by conversationpc
KenTheDude wrote:
ProgRocker53 wrote:
madsplash wrote:I can't vote. There isn't a choice of "I hate Pearl Jam and everything about that bullshit Seattle, grunge-rock, can't play, can't sing, can't write, era".

Did I mention that I HATE Pearl Jam and Nirvana?

HATE. Pure trash, made for a boring, lazy, unimaginative, unmotivated generation. Garbage.


I can understand the hate for Nirvana, as I too, dislike them immensely.

But Pearl Jam are hella good, same with Soungarden and Alice in Chains.

Just because bands choose to do something other than high-register, melodic vocals, standard-tune riffs, and throwing solos every which way in songs.... doesn't mean they're bad.

I dare you to walk up to Eddie Vedder, and say he can't write. Tell Chris Cornell he can't sing. Tell Jerry Cantrell he can't play.

I call bullshit ten times over.


I'd walk straight up to Eddie Vedder and tell him he can't sing one fuckin' note on key. Probably one of the worst talented "singers" on the planet. Sounds like someone is skinning a ferret alive. The dude has ZERO talent in the singing department. The epitomy of TONE DEAF . The only redeeming value he has is that he's a Cubs fan. :lol: Pearl Jam music-wise is not too bad, but too bad they have a singer with numb vocal chords.


I remember reading an article in one of my guitar mags and it was with Yngwie Malmsteen. They would play a song and ask him his opinion of the song. They played a song by Pearl Jam and he commented that the singer sounded like he was sitting on the toilet pushing out a big one. :lol: