New Kevin Shirley Interview

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew


Re: New Kevin Shirley Interview

Postby Jana » Fri Dec 03, 2010 1:12 am



Second time he's alluded to the tensions. It sounds like Jon and Neal were butting heads on where this album was going.
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Re: New Kevin Shirley Interview

Postby Escape Artist » Fri Dec 03, 2010 2:08 am

Jana wrote:


Second time he's alluded to the tensions. It sounds like Jon and Neal were butting heads on where this album was going.


Yup...He said almost the exact same thing during the Revelation recordings. I guess they can butt heads and still co-exist, kinda flies in the face of what is said about Neal and Jon quite frequently around here.
User avatar
Escape Artist
LP
 
Posts: 536
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2002 6:50 am
Location: Southwest USA

Postby SF-Dano » Fri Dec 03, 2010 2:37 am

From this interview.

Q: Did you have the feeling that Steve Perry and drummer Steve Smith were going to quit again? Which, of course, they did.


A: "No, I didn't. But you know, Steve Perry developed, and he reached the point where he…you know, people's voices change. You look at a guy like Robert Plant, who's doing his Alison Krauss thing now. In 1969 he was doing the Whole Lotta Love Thing, and he just doesn't do that anymore. Same thing with Steve Perry, who probably struggles to do Open Arms now. He was probably scared to go out there and have trouble doing what people wanted."


Q: There was a rumor going around recently that Steve Perry wanted back in.

A: "Well, that's just that - a rumor. But I can tell you he's still a key component of the decision-making part of the band. Nothing gets played or released without Steve Perry signing off on it. I'm not privy to the details of their arrangement, but I can tell you this: if Steve Perry wanted to be back singing with Journey, everybody would find a way to make that happen."
Image
User avatar
SF-Dano
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1991
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 9:00 am
Location: Near Sacramento missin' my City by the Bay

Postby S2M » Fri Dec 03, 2010 2:44 am

SF-Dano wrote:From this interview.

Q: Did you have the feeling that Steve Perry and drummer Steve Smith were going to quit again? Which, of course, they did.


A: "No, I didn't. But you know, Steve Perry developed, and he reached the point where he…you know, people's voices change. You look at a guy like Robert Plant, who's doing his Alison Krauss thing now. In 1969 he was doing the Whole Lotta Love Thing, and he just doesn't do that anymore. Same thing with Steve Perry, who probably struggles to do Open Arms now. He was probably scared to go out there and have trouble doing what people wanted."


Case in point why I have the utmost respect for Perry....Who wants to see an aging singer with depleting talents trying to struggle through his songs night after night....people want to hear 'Album'. Perry used to be able to reproduce near studio quality songs in concert. Perry went out as close to 'on top' as you can. He was Barry Sanders, not Favre....
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby Michigan Girl » Fri Dec 03, 2010 2:47 am

SF-Dano wrote:From this interview.

Q: Did you have the feeling that Steve Perry and drummer Steve Smith were going to quit again? Which, of course, they did.


A: "No, I didn't. But you know, Steve Perry developed, and he reached the point where he…you know, people's voices change. You look at a guy like Robert Plant, who's doing his Alison Krauss thing now. In 1969 he was doing the Whole Lotta Love Thing, and he just doesn't do that anymore. Same thing with Steve Perry, who probably struggles to do Open Arms now. He was probably scared to go out there and have trouble doing what people wanted."
"Probably", indicates that he does not know for sure ...now!!
If he/SP was scared to go out there and afraid of disappointing his fans/people, it just
makes me respect him that much more!! He allegedly, made a choice that so many of you wished
the following incarnation would have made ...hmmmmmm!! :?
Last edited by Michigan Girl on Fri Dec 03, 2010 2:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby Jana » Fri Dec 03, 2010 2:48 am

S2M wrote:
SF-Dano wrote:From this interview.

Q: Did you have the feeling that Steve Perry and drummer Steve Smith were going to quit again? Which, of course, they did.


A: "No, I didn't. But you know, Steve Perry developed, and he reached the point where he…you know, people's voices change. You look at a guy like Robert Plant, who's doing his Alison Krauss thing now. In 1969 he was doing the Whole Lotta Love Thing, and he just doesn't do that anymore. Same thing with Steve Perry, who probably struggles to do Open Arms now. He was probably scared to go out there and have trouble doing what people wanted."


Case in point why I have the utmost respect for Perry....Who wants to see an aging singer with depleting talents trying to struggle through his songs night after night....people want to hear 'Album'. Perry used to be able to reproduce near studio quality songs in concert. Perry went out as close to 'on top' as you can. He was Barry Sanders, not Favre....


It sounds like the deterioration in his voice must have been noticeable while he was producing TBF for Journey for him to make that statement.
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Postby Michigan Girl » Fri Dec 03, 2010 2:54 am

S2M wrote:
SF-Dano wrote:From this interview.

Q: Did you have the feeling that Steve Perry and drummer Steve Smith were going to quit again? Which, of course, they did.


A: "No, I didn't. But you know, Steve Perry developed, and he reached the point where he…you know, people's voices change. You look at a guy like Robert Plant, who's doing his Alison Krauss thing now. In 1969 he was doing the Whole Lotta Love Thing, and he just doesn't do that anymore. Same thing with Steve Perry, who probably struggles to do Open Arms now. He was probably scared to go out there and have trouble doing what people wanted."


Case in point why I have the utmost respect for Perry....Who wants to see an aging singer with depleting talents trying to struggle through his songs night after night....people want to hear 'Album'. Perry used to be able to reproduce near studio quality songs in concert. Perry went out as close to 'on top' as you can. He was Barry Sanders, not Favre....
That's right!! And the main story here is
the current incarnation's inability to see eye to eye ...you know, same as when Perry was in the band!! :lol:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby Don » Fri Dec 03, 2010 2:58 am

SF-Dano wrote:"...But I can tell you he's still a key component of the decision-making part of the band. Nothing gets played or released without Steve Perry signing off on it. I'm not privy to the details of their arrangement, but I can tell you this: if Steve Perry wanted to be back singing with Journey, everybody would find a way to make that happen."


More verification that the band and Perry are married for life. If Perry were broke and needed back in, it would happen, you can bank on it. Fortunately for Pineda, Perry not only understands his own vocal limitations at this point but he seems to have a solid concept on how to manage his money also.
The band is his annuity and he in turn gives them a valuable asset in marketing. Every interview the guy does now just helps the band from a PR standpoint, which in turn helps Perry too, from a finacial standpoint. It all works out in its own way.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby S2M » Fri Dec 03, 2010 3:01 am

Don wrote:
SF-Dano wrote:"...But I can tell you he's still a key component of the decision-making part of the band. Nothing gets played or released without Steve Perry signing off on it. I'm not privy to the details of their arrangement, but I can tell you this: if Steve Perry wanted to be back singing with Journey, everybody would find a way to make that happen."


More verification that the band and Perry are married for life. If Perry were broke and needed back in, it would happen, you can bank on it. Fortunately for Pineda, Perry not only understands his own vocal limitations at this point but he seems to have a solid concept on how to manage his money also.
The band is his annuity and he in turn gives them a valuable asset in marketing. Every interview the guy does now just helps the band from a PR standpoint, which in turn helps Perry too, from a finacial standpoint. It all works out in its own way.


I still say that there WILL be an occasion for at least a one-off in the near future, for the fans....and, of course, the Left Coast benefits - as always.... :roll: :lol:
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby kidlatham » Fri Dec 03, 2010 3:32 am

Does anyone know if they are done recording the new album?
kidlatham
Radio Waves
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 4:16 am

Postby Don » Fri Dec 03, 2010 3:41 am

kidlatham wrote:Does anyone know if they are done recording the new album?


From all accounts, they are. Just need to find a distributor I guess. Cain said "probably Wal-mart" but he wasn't definate about it.
Last edited by Don on Fri Dec 03, 2010 3:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Re: New Kevin Shirley Interview

Postby kgdjpubs » Fri Dec 03, 2010 3:41 am

Escape Artist wrote:
Jana wrote:


Second time he's alluded to the tensions. It sounds like Jon and Neal were butting heads on where this album was going.


Yup...He said almost the exact same thing during the Revelation recordings. I guess they can butt heads and still co-exist, kinda flies in the face of what is said about Neal and Jon quite frequently around here.



no real surprise---and the big reason why Journey NEEDS an outside producer. Push it too far one way or the other, and you lose the sound of the band. Some things never change either, which is probably a good thing. That's what makes the chemistry work.
kgdjpubs
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:32 am
Location: NC

Postby steveo777 » Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:12 am

So it sounds like Jon and Neal had a battle over ballads or rock. I'll bet there are at least 4 ballads on the new album. I noticed Kevin didn't allude to his opinion of the new album, so I also wonder what that means? You'd think he'd have been giving it props if it is any good. Maybe Schon and Pineda wanted it to rock harder and JC wanted sap.
User avatar
steveo777
MP3
 
Posts: 11311
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:15 pm
Location: Citrus Heights, Ca

Postby SF-Dano » Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:23 am

steveo777 wrote:So it sounds like Jon and Neal had a battle over ballads or rock. I'll bet there are at least 4 ballads on the new album. I noticed Kevin didn't allude to his opinion of the new album, so I also wonder what that means? You'd think he'd have been giving it props if it is any good. Maybe Schon and Pineda wanted it to rock harder and JC wanted sap.


Doesn't the Frig always want sap? :lol: And for the record, I don't mind a couple ballads on a record.

Jon has had his ballad filled releases already. It is time for this band to rock out a bit harder. I guess we will see what the outcome is.
Image
User avatar
SF-Dano
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1991
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 9:00 am
Location: Near Sacramento missin' my City by the Bay

Postby Don » Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:42 am

I am surprised he was so liberal in a few of his opinions. Obviously Kevin isn't privy to everything but he certainly didn't filter himself as much as he has in the past regarding the band's inner turmoils. Of course Journey isn't his sole bread and butter and if they ever decide to make a change in the relationship, it won't make or break him.
Last edited by Don on Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby Eric » Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:49 am

Tension is good.
Eric
Eric
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3932
Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 12:51 am

Postby Don » Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:50 am

Eric wrote:Tension is good.


That is what Perry alluded to in that last interview he did with Classic Rock.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby Jana » Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:53 am

steveo777 wrote:So it sounds like Jon and Neal had a battle over ballads or rock. I'll bet there are at least 4 ballads on the new album. I noticed Kevin didn't allude to his opinion of the new album, so I also wonder what that means? You'd think he'd have been giving it props if it is any good. Maybe Schon and Pineda wanted it to rock harder and JC wanted sap.


Didn't he give it props before? It was, essentially, finished in the spring.
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Postby Saint John » Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:56 am

S2M wrote:
SF-Dano wrote:From this interview.

Q: Did you have the feeling that Steve Perry and drummer Steve Smith were going to quit again? Which, of course, they did.


A: "No, I didn't. But you know, Steve Perry developed, and he reached the point where he…you know, people's voices change. You look at a guy like Robert Plant, who's doing his Alison Krauss thing now. In 1969 he was doing the Whole Lotta Love Thing, and he just doesn't do that anymore. Same thing with Steve Perry, who probably struggles to do Open Arms now. He was probably scared to go out there and have trouble doing what people wanted."


Case in point why I have the utmost respect for Perry....Who wants to see an aging singer with depleting talents trying to struggle through his songs night after night....people want to hear 'Album'. Perry used to be able to reproduce near studio quality songs in concert. Perry went out as close to 'on top' as you can. He was Barry Sanders, not Favre....


I could totally agree with what you're saying, but why not just let the band move on without him? A "passing of the torch" would have been classy. You know, like Rolie did. :wink:
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Don » Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:57 am

Jana wrote:
steveo777 wrote:So it sounds like Jon and Neal had a battle over ballads or rock. I'll bet there are at least 4 ballads on the new album. I noticed Kevin didn't allude to his opinion of the new album, so I also wonder what that means? You'd think he'd have been giving it props if it is any good. Maybe Schon and Pineda wanted it to rock harder and JC wanted sap.


Didn't he give it props before? It was, essentially, finished in the spring.


That was before everything was mixed, vocals with instruments and so forth. He certainly hasn't hyped it up as much as his other projects with Mr. Big, Iron Maiden, etc. but he may not be sure what the band is going for either with this NEW change of direction.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby Don » Fri Dec 03, 2010 5:00 am

Saint John wrote:
S2M wrote:
SF-Dano wrote:From this interview.

Q: Did you have the feeling that Steve Perry and drummer Steve Smith were going to quit again? Which, of course, they did.


A: "No, I didn't. But you know, Steve Perry developed, and he reached the point where he…you know, people's voices change. You look at a guy like Robert Plant, who's doing his Alison Krauss thing now. In 1969 he was doing the Whole Lotta Love Thing, and he just doesn't do that anymore. Same thing with Steve Perry, who probably struggles to do Open Arms now. He was probably scared to go out there and have trouble doing what people wanted."


Case in point why I have the utmost respect for Perry....Who wants to see an aging singer with depleting talents trying to struggle through his songs night after night....people want to hear 'Album'. Perry used to be able to reproduce near studio quality songs in concert. Perry went out as close to 'on top' as you can. He was Barry Sanders, not Favre....


I could totally agree with what you're saying, but why not just let the band move on without him? A "passing of the torch" would have been classy. You know, like Rolie did. :wink:


He can't. Without Journey, Perry is nothing. Cain may have said that Neal got his band back but in reality Perry will never, truly let it completely go.

Pinning his severance notice to the wall? Means nothing, just more double speak.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby Saint John » Fri Dec 03, 2010 5:10 am

Don wrote:
Saint John wrote:
S2M wrote:
SF-Dano wrote:From this interview.

Q: Did you have the feeling that Steve Perry and drummer Steve Smith were going to quit again? Which, of course, they did.


A: "No, I didn't. But you know, Steve Perry developed, and he reached the point where he…you know, people's voices change. You look at a guy like Robert Plant, who's doing his Alison Krauss thing now. In 1969 he was doing the Whole Lotta Love Thing, and he just doesn't do that anymore. Same thing with Steve Perry, who probably struggles to do Open Arms now. He was probably scared to go out there and have trouble doing what people wanted."


Case in point why I have the utmost respect for Perry....Who wants to see an aging singer with depleting talents trying to struggle through his songs night after night....people want to hear 'Album'. Perry used to be able to reproduce near studio quality songs in concert. Perry went out as close to 'on top' as you can. He was Barry Sanders, not Favre....


I could totally agree with what you're saying, but why not just let the band move on without him? A "passing of the torch" would have been classy. You know, like Rolie did. :wink:


He can't. Without Journey, Perry is nothing. Cain may have said that Neal got his band back but in reality Perry will never, truly let it completely go.

Pinning his severance notice to the wall? Means nothing, just more double speak.


The worst thing you can ever be is ... forgotten. Sounds like he is terrified of that. But I thought he just wants a private life? :roll:
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby Don » Fri Dec 03, 2010 5:16 am

Saint John wrote:
Don wrote:
Saint John wrote:
S2M wrote:
SF-Dano wrote:From this interview.

Q: Did you have the feeling that Steve Perry and drummer Steve Smith were going to quit again? Which, of course, they did.


A: "No, I didn't. But you know, Steve Perry developed, and he reached the point where he…you know, people's voices change. You look at a guy like Robert Plant, who's doing his Alison Krauss thing now. In 1969 he was doing the Whole Lotta Love Thing, and he just doesn't do that anymore. Same thing with Steve Perry, who probably struggles to do Open Arms now. He was probably scared to go out there and have trouble doing what people wanted."


Case in point why I have the utmost respect for Perry....Who wants to see an aging singer with depleting talents trying to struggle through his songs night after night....people want to hear 'Album'. Perry used to be able to reproduce near studio quality songs in concert. Perry went out as close to 'on top' as you can. He was Barry Sanders, not Favre....


I could totally agree with what you're saying, but why not just let the band move on without him? A "passing of the torch" would have been classy. You know, like Rolie did. :wink:


He can't. Without Journey, Perry is nothing. Cain may have said that Neal got his band back but in reality Perry will never, truly let it completely go.

Pinning his severance notice to the wall? Means nothing, just more double speak.


The worst thing you can ever be is ... forgotten. Sounds like he is terrified of that. But I thought he just wants a private life? :roll:

His parents gone, no siblings; His career in Journey is all that he can pin his star to. As long as he remains known as the voice of Journey, he will enjoy his solitude. When there is tangible threat to that perception, he obviously will come forth from his den to set things to right (as far as his own definition of what that should be).
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby Don » Fri Dec 03, 2010 5:22 am

I'm not a psychiatrist, I just play one on the internet.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby slucero » Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:03 am

Jana wrote:
steveo777 wrote:So it sounds like Jon and Neal had a battle over ballads or rock. I'll bet there are at least 4 ballads on the new album. I noticed Kevin didn't allude to his opinion of the new album, so I also wonder what that means? You'd think he'd have been giving it props if it is any good. Maybe Schon and Pineda wanted it to rock harder and JC wanted sap.


Didn't he give it props before? It was, essentially, finished in the spring.


Could be he's thinking this is their last one..

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.


~Albert Einstein
User avatar
slucero
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 5444
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 1:17 pm

Postby Jana » Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:08 am

slucero wrote:
Jana wrote:
steveo777 wrote:So it sounds like Jon and Neal had a battle over ballads or rock. I'll bet there are at least 4 ballads on the new album. I noticed Kevin didn't allude to his opinion of the new album, so I also wonder what that means? You'd think he'd have been giving it props if it is any good. Maybe Schon and Pineda wanted it to rock harder and JC wanted sap.


Didn't he give it props before? It was, essentially, finished in the spring.


Could be he's thinking this is their last one..


Maybe. I think Neal was pushing harder this time for more rocking. So probably definitely creative differences. Jon's last blurb on his site seemed excited about the album, so I'm sure it all worked out in the end.
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Postby Don » Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:34 am

Kevin wrote:Nothing gets played or released without Steve Perry signing off on it.

Well, that seems to answer a few questions I had.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Postby steveo777 » Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:41 am

Don wrote:
Kevin wrote:Nothing gets played or released without Steve Perry signing off on it.

Well, that seems to answer a few questions I had.


Strange....what would Perry have to do with releases of new material?
Maybe he has attachment to the Journey name for life, no matter what they do.
If so, now that's what I call a ball and chain.
User avatar
steveo777
MP3
 
Posts: 11311
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:15 pm
Location: Citrus Heights, Ca

Postby Don » Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:52 am

steveo777 wrote:
Don wrote:
Kevin wrote:Nothing gets played or released without Steve Perry signing off on it.

Well, that seems to answer a few questions I had.


Strange....what would Perry have to do with releases of new material?
Maybe he has attachment to the Journey name for life, no matter what they do.
If so, now that's what I call a ball and chain.


No, I think this is more to do with Songs like DSB used in a promotional way, even being performed live. Like singing it at the Superbowl (an unpaid performance that is NOT for charity). I think he has clout with high exposures endeavors like that and could make himself a factor in whether or not they happen.
It's really difficult for the band to do any kind of special appearance without performing at least on song that has Perry's name on the credits. I'm sure he holds their feet to the fire sometimes when those requests come up. It probably depends on how significant the gig is.

Of course this all speculation for my part. I'm just using what limited knowledge I have in the music industry to leverage my opinions.
Don
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 24896
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 3:01 pm

Next

Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests