yandtguy wrote:I think that's crap. There's a reason bands do studio albums. Not allowing Arnel to punch in and sing the line again, if it sounds bad (couldn't tell you 'cause I don't care for the song and don't feel like listening to it), is just stupidity. It also sounds lazy and unprofessional. If you want spontaneity, do a "live in the studio" CD as a bonus disc. I think the band just wanted to get the album done quickly. They didn't want to wait for the Caveman to finish the CD, and according to him, their was tension anyway, so I guess a quick process was needed to get the band out of the studio and back on the road.
I disagree. Studio album doesn't equal antiseptic perfectionism. This was always my biggest issue with the scrubbed-to-death sound of ROR...still my least favorite Journey album of all time (even pre-Perry).
My favorite classic "Rock God" studio albums, including some by the Rolling Stones, Led Zeppelin, and The Who, all have "mistakes" in them and yet they blow away 99% of the sanitized and soulless music that some of the studio jockeys put out today.
The studio polish is something that contemporary tastes demand so it is often an artistic concession to the demands of the listener and their auditory conditioning, but I think talking about it as if it were gospel and demand that every artist conform to it on every record is also a demand that an artist engage in the "studio sheen" as a kind of unthinking laziness and conformity in itself.
There's plenty of human moments on the album and I notice them too, but I'm not going to spotlight them for fear that it may ruin someone else's listening experience.
But for me, the closer it sounds to live and spontaneous, the more I like it.