Moderator: Andrew
The_Noble_Cause wrote:This is a fun idea, but in reality, makes little sense. Augeri was the lead vocalist, and that job is now capably held by somebody else. I liked SA's era alot, but he really didn't leave much of an impression on the band's dynamics. He was just sort of a place holder, sadly. The only former member of significant historical importance who could come back would be Rolie. It would be nice if Augeri showed up on one of their NY dates. But I think the band has whitewashed his time with the group.
As Ed mentioned, a date with JSS would be cool. Always thought Chalfant, JSS, and SA should tour together - call it the "The Voices of Journey", or some sort of sleazy cash-in package deal.
Rick wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:This is a fun idea, but in reality, makes little sense. Augeri was the lead vocalist, and that job is now capably held by somebody else. I liked SA's era alot, but he really didn't leave much of an impression on the band's dynamics. He was just sort of a place holder, sadly. The only former member of significant historical importance who could come back would be Rolie. It would be nice if Augeri showed up on one of their NY dates. But I think the band has whitewashed his time with the group.
As Ed mentioned, a date with JSS would be cool. Always thought Chalfant, JSS, and SA should tour together - call it the "The Voices of Journey", or some sort of sleazy cash-in package deal.
There was a thread about that in the past, and they were calling it "The Bastards of Journey Tour".![]()
![]()
slucero wrote:they could have also said... "Stevie.. your voice needs rest... so we're gonna take some time off...."
MCC620 wrote:slucero wrote:they could have also said... "Stevie.. your voice needs rest... so we're gonna take some time off...."
but they wouldn't.......
slucero wrote:after what they put him through...
Saint John wrote:slucero wrote:after what they put him through...
Yeah, going from The Gap to a millionaire must've really sucked.
Saint John wrote:slucero wrote:after what they put him through...
Yeah, going from The Gap to a millionaire must've really sucked.
MCC620 wrote:Saint John wrote:slucero wrote:after what they put him through...
Yeah, going from The Gap to a millionaire must've really sucked.
I guess if it's all about the money then this is the perfect answer. And i know you think it should be Dan, but sometimes it isn't.
Saint John wrote:MCC620 wrote:Saint John wrote:slucero wrote:after what they put him through...
Yeah, going from The Gap to a millionaire must've really sucked.
I guess if it's all about the money then this is the perfect answer. And i know you think it should be Dan, but sometimes it isn't.
Hey, you're the one slighting him here. If you wanna infer that the guy has no backbone, was a "yes man" and simply didn't possess the courage to say "No" then you go right ahead. I'm simply giving him his fair share of the blame, in what was an organized, conscious and free decision to deceive fans. And nothing more or less.
MCC620 wrote:I was merely responding to your comment about him going from the Gap to millionaire.
MCC620 wrote:Why you are trying to bring anything else into this is beyond me.
Saint John wrote:MCC620 wrote:I was merely responding to your comment about him going from the Gap to millionaire.
Understood. However, when you say it's "not all about the money," but have a guy that along the way to becoming a millionaire (or adding to that sum) participated in shows were his voice wasn't going out to the crowd, it illustrates that it is, indeed, all about the money. How else am I to interpret such actions?MCC620 wrote:Why you are trying to bring anything else into this is beyond me.
I'm simply explaining to you why I feel that your statement was inaccurate. These guys play to make money. Sometimes, no matter what.
MCC620 wrote:dan, you can interpret whatever you believed happened however you want, just as i can.
MCC620 wrote:neither of us was there in the trenches.
MCC620 wrote:but i am able to comment on steve augeri today and where he is at. and it's all good.
Saint John wrote:MCC620 wrote:dan, you can interpret whatever you believed happened however you want, just as i can.
Absolutely, and I'm doing so using logic and reason. You? I'm not really sure. You seem incapable of admitting that Steve did anything wrong to the fans, and I really can't fathom that. I'd be glad to hear from you what blame, if any, he carries in those less than completely live shows.
Saint John wrote:MCC620 wrote:dan, you can interpret whatever you believed happened however you want, just as i can.
Absolutely, and I'm doing so using logic and reason. You? I'm not really sure. You seem incapable of admitting that Steve did anything wrong to the fans, and I really can't fathom that. I'd be glad to hear from you what blame, if any, he carries in those less than completely live shows.MCC620 wrote:neither of us was there in the trenches.
No, but as a paying customer I think I have a right to investigate and question why the lead singer was knowingly standing on stage, purporting to sing to me, when, in fact, he wasn't. At least not all the time. But that's over now, and he's admitted that there are some decisions he wishes could've been better. It's just a shame that others seem to want to cast all of the blame on everyone ... but him.MCC620 wrote:but i am able to comment on steve augeri today and where he is at. and it's all good.
Well, I must have missed the announcement naming you his new spokesperson. Regardless, I think everyone is happy that Steve is back out on the road, of seemingly great health and is once again able to what he does very well.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests