Saint John wrote:This should spark some discussion:
Original Foreigner singer Lou Gramm isn't a big fan of the current version of the band.
Like Journey, when Foreigner lost its original voice they eventually replaced it with a virtual sound-alike; exit Gramm, enter Kelly Hansen.
In a new interview with Spinner, Gramm sounds off on the subject of having his voice, and vocal style, replicated. "It is [strange]. It totally is," says Gramm. "But what's stranger to me is that, as I've learned talking to people who see those shows, is that in many cases the audience, especially if they're younger, don't even know it's not the original lead singer."
"In Foreigner's case," continues Lou, "as I understand it, the singer was actually trained to deliver pretty much exactly everything as I did it, note for note. If I were in the audience and learned that while I was there, I'd get up and leave. I think when the band name remains the exact same, but something as important as the lead vocal is different, it's misleading. It's like false advertising."
A lot of mixed feelings about this. There are so many variables to this equation, that saying you'd rather have the original guy or a clone come in is not really an easy answer. A lot depends upon who the song writers were, when did the band reach the height of its success, how unique and identifiable is/was that singer? With Journey, Perry was as much part of the song writing as Cain, and probably more so than Schon. So, not only did Journey lose a very identifiable lead vocalist, but a third of the song writing. They hired guys who could cover the classics in concert, but they haven't captured that magic in song writing that was there when all three song writers collaborated. I don't know how much Gramm contributed to the song writing of Foreigner's top hits, but I do know Foreigner's last album with Kelly Hansen was a great album, classic sound, and one that I could listen to from start to finish. Kelly Hansen fits Foreigner. Yet, Foreigner hasn't exactly had large commercial success with their new album, so it's kind of the same situation.
I'd say, if the original guy contributes more than just singing, and his voice was so recognizable that you knew it was THAT band on the radio, then I'd say going with the original singer is always the best bet, even if they couldn't cover the songs perfectly.