Moderator: Andrew
Art Vandelay wrote:It was the media, not Perry, who spun his positive vibes comment into the false reunion rumor. I'm sure that Perry is just as tired as Schon, if not more so, about hearing the false reunion rumors. Tip to Schon...if you want the old hype to disappear, stop mentioning Perry's name in every interview that you do.
Monker wrote:Art Vandelay wrote:It was the media, not Perry, who spun his positive vibes comment into the false reunion rumor. I'm sure that Perry is just as tired as Schon, if not more so, about hearing the false reunion rumors. Tip to Schon...if you want the old hype to disappear, stop mentioning Perry's name in every interview that you do.
That's hypocritical of you. If the media is responsible for the questions they asked Perry and his response, then the media is also responsible for asking questions about Perry and writing Neal's responses. It's the EXACT SAME THING>
Art Vandelay wrote:Monker wrote:Art Vandelay wrote:It was the media, not Perry, who spun his positive vibes comment into the false reunion rumor. I'm sure that Perry is just as tired as Schon, if not more so, about hearing the false reunion rumors. Tip to Schon...if you want the old hype to disappear, stop mentioning Perry's name in every interview that you do.
That's hypocritical of you. If the media is responsible for the questions they asked Perry and his response, then the media is also responsible for asking questions about Perry and writing Neal's responses. It's the EXACT SAME THING>
Chill out. I was referring to Neal directing the blame on Perry about the rumors and saying that he opened and closed that door...whatever that means. Perry's previous quotes were taken way out of context and the media ran with it. I'm sure that most on this board would agree on that. I know that they both get asked questions about each other. The difference is that Perry quickly squashes the reunion rumors, while Neal goes on and on about them.
pf1965 wrote:They are not talking of re-recording Arrival ! They are talking about songs that were recorded around the same time that were scrapped and never released.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:pf1965 wrote:They are not talking of re-recording Arrival ! They are talking about songs that were recorded around the same time that were scrapped and never released.
Pretty sure they're talking about Arrival. What other tunes were being recorded in 2000? There was nobody else besides SA.
"...some of that older material may become 'Rival,' an album Journey recorded in 2000 but ultimately scrapped....
...stuff that we had done before in the past that just never kinda saw the light and redoing it, rearranging it, maybe adding some new sections to it, and writing some new stuff, too. So we've got a lot of stuff sitting started playing some stuff in rehearsal and it really sounded great. When you start doing that and you get the juices flowing, there's always gonna be new songs to come out of nowhere, and usually those are the best ones."
slucero wrote:Well if they're rehashing old songs.. then they aren't writing new ones...
Which is interesting considering how prolific Neal is saying his writing has been of late... not to mention the whole Eclipse record...
Something is amiss....
"When you start doing that [tinkering with songs] and you get the juices flowing, there's always gonna be new songs to come out of nowhere, and usually those are the best ones."
Majestic wrote:Arrival was being recorded in 2000, but read a little closer..
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Majestic wrote:Arrival was being recorded in 2000, but read a little closer..
Why read closer when an interviewer has obviously not done his homework? No album was scrapped. Both Cain and Schon sound like they are talking about Arrival material. Songs like Never Too Late and Gone Crazy and Where Did I Lose Your Love were all demos before they were recorded for Revelation and Generations. Nobody in the band said they were redoing stuff. Why? Cuz it was never on an album. If something is being redone, it was already released. Count on it.
Majestic wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:Majestic wrote:Arrival was being recorded in 2000, but read a little closer..
Why read closer when an interviewer has obviously not done his homework? No album was scrapped. Both Cain and Schon sound like they are talking about Arrival material. Songs like Never Too Late and Gone Crazy and Where Did I Lose Your Love were all demos before they were recorded for Revelation and Generations. Nobody in the band said they were redoing stuff. Why? Cuz it was never on an album. If something is being redone, it was already released. Count on it.
I see what you mean about journalists not doing their homework, but it seems that he has quoted Neal. Am I wrong?
Majestic wrote:slucero wrote:Well if they're rehashing old songs.. then they aren't writing new ones...
Which is interesting considering how prolific Neal is saying his writing has been of late... not to mention the whole Eclipse record...
Something is amiss....
Why?
Majestic wrote:"When you start doing that [tinkering with songs] and you get the juices flowing, there's always gonna be new songs to come out of nowhere, and usually those are the best ones."
What is it that's amiss?
The_Noble_Cause wrote:There are no direct quotations around the Revival comment or the mention that a 2000 album was scrapped. Seems to me that the reporter is paraphrasing and got it wrong.
Monker wrote:Rerecording Arrival as "Rival" absolutely sucks. It wasn't recorded right and doesn't sound right? When was this opinion formed by the band? Arrival, Red 13, etc, had their time...and the only one I felt sounded bad enough to rerecord was Generations.
I just think this is very, very stoopid...almost as dumb as rerecording the Perry songs. Is that what the plan is, a double CD set of old/new stuff in a desperate attempt to up the sales to claim another gold or platinum album, a "Hey, it worked once..." moment? Lame.
This is where the shark has been jumped in the Arnel era....it wreaks of desperation.
pf1965 wrote:They are not talking of re-recording Arrival ! They are talking about songs that were recorded around the same time that were scrapped and never released.
Navarro wrote:Monker wrote:Rerecording Arrival as "Rival" absolutely sucks. It wasn't recorded right and doesn't sound right? When was this opinion formed by the band? Arrival, Red 13, etc, had their time...and the only one I felt sounded bad enough to rerecord was Generations.
I just think this is very, very stoopid...almost as dumb as rerecording the Perry songs. Is that what the plan is, a double CD set of old/new stuff in a desperate attempt to up the sales to claim another gold or platinum album, a "Hey, it worked once..." moment? Lame.
This is where the shark has been jumped in the Arnel era....it wreaks of desperation.
Amen. This is annoying as hell. SA may not have been the best live singer but his studio stuff is good, especially Arrival. I picked Generations at a K Mart. The mix sucks, but there is some good stuff on Generations with SA. Not all, but some. What an insult to whatever legacy SA has left with Journey. This sort of bush league stuff is one of the reason Perry wants nothing to do with Journey. Move forward or disband, period.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests