Moderator: Andrew
Final Frontiers wrote:Very curious that so far only Arnel has made a comment on Steve Perry/Eels appearance. What do Neal, Jonathan, and Ross have to say? Why are they so quiet? For that matter, no one's asked Gregg Rolie or Steve Smith to comment. Come on people. Use your connections.
What do the tribute band singers think too? Will they start covering "It's A Motherf****er"?
Memorex wrote:Final Frontiers wrote:Very curious that so far only Arnel has made a comment on Steve Perry/Eels appearance. What do Neal, Jonathan, and Ross have to say? Why are they so quiet? For that matter, no one's asked Gregg Rolie or Steve Smith to comment. Come on people. Use your connections.
What do the tribute band singers think too? Will they start covering "It's A Motherf****er"?
I think the last couple Neal FB posts have him commenting on it. Maybe in a dickish way - I can't tell. The posts and his comments inside the post.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Arnel should either hire a publicist or just stfu. If u want out, quit.
Aaron wrote:On the other hand, maybe he thinks Steve doesn't have the capability to come back and step into his shoes and he's calling him out on it as a challenge?
steveo777 wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:Arnel should either hire a publicist or just stfu. If u want out, quit.
Arnel has always respected Steve and has ALWAYS held the position that if Steve wanted to return he would step aside. You do not understand what he means. I always have understood his position. These tabloids people read have always tried to spin it another way. Arnel does not want out, but as I said, he would for Steve Perry.
portland wrote:Something tells me Neal was hoping this day would not come...
The_Noble_Cause wrote:portland wrote:Something tells me Neal was hoping this day would not come...
And something tells me, Perry could've sharted into the microphone and you would be on here praising it as an emotional display of vocal mastery. Schon would be shaking in his boots if Perry sounded amazing. But guess what? He didn't. To his credit, his voice seems to be preserved in the same croaky state as the tail end of the FTLOSM tour.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:portland wrote:Something tells me Neal was hoping this day would not come...
And something tells me, Perry could've sharted into the microphone and you would be on here praising it as an emotional display of vocal mastery. Schon would be shaking in his boots if Perry sounded amazing. But guess what? He didn't. To his credit, his voice seems to be preserved in the same croaky state as the tail end of the FTLOSM tour.
Memorex wrote:How come if someone thinks differently than you, they must be biased and wrong? But if you think differently than them, you are stating facts? You think he sounds terrible and I think you are right - he sounds terrible to you. I think it sounded really good - and I'm right too. It sounded good to me. I am not saying it sounds good because he is Steve Perry and that's what I want. I am saying it because I enjoy hearing it. Why is that so hard for someone like you to comprehend? What sounds good to a human ear is subjective and includes a lot of factors beyond octave range and smoothness.
Memorex wrote: But you know what, if you were to hear Dream On for the first time today - not in a million years would you say that's Steven Tyler (until maybe the end). It sounds like a completely different person. Getting old is a bitch.
Memorex wrote:I find the more I watch the recent video, the more I like it. I don't expect you to.
Final Frontiers wrote:Very curious that so far only Arnel has made a comment on Steve Perry/Eels appearance. What do Neal, Jonathan, and Ross have to say? Why are they so quiet? For that matter, no one's asked Gregg Rolie or Steve Smith to comment. Come on people. Use your connections.
What do the tribute band singers think too? Will they start covering "It's A Motherf****er"?
The_Noble_Cause wrote:The Journey songs are so tuned down, they are nearly unrecognizable.I am entitled to my opinion. If you don't like it, too bad.
Steven Tyler never went into self-imposed exile for decades and has toured consistently. No comparison.
Oh I bet. Maybe someone should loop the Perry/Eels performance and burn it on a cd for all of you Loons. As it is, you are pretending it is waaay more than it really is.
Memorex wrote:Unrecognizable? Seriously? Ok. Now I know you are insane. Songs sounded fine to me. Of course the listener knows they are not as high as 1978-1981.
Memorex wrote:Is F a bad key? I don't know keys or steps. If someone sings in F key, is that something that should not be pleasing to people? I will be on the lookout for F keys now and try and avoid them. Thanks for the PSA.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Memorex wrote:Is F a bad key? I don't know keys or steps. If someone sings in F key, is that something that should not be pleasing to people? I will be on the lookout for F keys now and try and avoid them. Thanks for the PSA.
As the saying goes, you can't beat stupid and you most certainly don't fight crazy. My only wish is at the end of his performance, Perry had directed all his fans to gulp the cyanide-flavored kool-aid. At least then, music fandom would be rid of batshit window-licking nimrods like you. And hey, just imagine, you could all live happily together on Haley Bop comet with Perry croakily serenading you, as you soar past the rings of Jupiter.I'm sure you have all three minutes of Perry's "triumphant" solo "concert" blasting noisily in your bedroom as I type this. It probably compliments the soft glow of the candles surrounding the Perry as Jesus shrine, carrying the cross and weeping blood...
The_Noble_Cause wrote:portland wrote:Something tells me Neal was hoping this day would not come...
And something tells me, Perry could've sharted into the microphone and you would be on here praising it as an emotional display of vocal mastery. Schon would be shaking in his boots if Perry sounded amazing. But guess what? He didn't. To his credit, his voice seems to be preserved in the same croaky state as the tail end of the FTLOSM tour.
Memorex wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:portland wrote:Something tells me Neal was hoping this day would not come...
And something tells me, Perry could've sharted into the microphone and you would be on here praising it as an emotional display of vocal mastery. Schon would be shaking in his boots if Perry sounded amazing. But guess what? He didn't. To his credit, his voice seems to be preserved in the same croaky state as the tail end of the FTLOSM tour.
How come if someone thinks differently than you, they must be biased and wrong? But if you think differently than them, you are stating facts? You think he sounds terrible and I think you are right - he sounds terrible to you. I think it sounded really good - and I'm right too. It sounded good to me. I am not saying it sounds good because he is Steve Perry and that's what I want. I am saying it because I enjoy hearing it. Why is that so hard for someone like you to comprehend? What sounds good to a human ear is subjective and includes a lot of factors beyond octave range and smoothness.
If we are so wrong, why do so many of us play the later stuff far more than the early stuff? It simply appeals to us. I would take the emotion and depth of TBF long before Escape. LONG before. It's just what pleases my ear. Do you think I drive around and listen to TBF by myself for any other reason than I enjoy it?
I find the more I watch the recent video, the more I like it. I don't expect you to. I don't expect everyone to. And yes, we all already know Perry is not 30 and cannot hit the highs of the old days. But you know what, if you were to hear Dream On for the first time today - not in a million years would you say that's Steven Tyler (until maybe the end). It sounds like a completely different person. Getting old is a bitch. Go to youtube and view a recent video of Rod Stewart live. He's got the 3 background singers taking care of all the high and extended notes for him, as do a lot of singers these days. So the fuck what? I'd go to a Rod Stewart concert in a flat second because he pleases my ear and puts on a hell of a show.
Let people enjoy what they enjoy and stop trying to judge that or put them down for that. You come off as an old "get off my lawn" man. And you won't stop people from enjoying it, so why bother? How about be glad for the people you interact with that they have something they enjoy? Just like I would be happy for you enjoying anything you enjoy. If you were a Doors fan - which I am not - and Jim Morrison came back from the dead and performed, I would be happy that you were happy. We showed wish joy on people. I think you need more of a "not for me" attitude towards the current Steve Perry and less of a scum of the earth attitude.
And one last thing. For all the Neal and Steve talk and for whatever anyone feels - Steve chose not to sing when he felt he couldn't or when he felt he didn't want it. He never resorted to tapes to go put on a show. He could have easily done that and sustained for a very long time. So give him a little credit that at least he did the right thing. Side by side - Steve took the right path.
FamilyMan wrote:Final Frontiers wrote:Very curious that so far only Arnel has made a comment on Steve Perry/Eels appearance. What do Neal, Jonathan, and Ross have to say? Why are they so quiet? For that matter, no one's asked Gregg Rolie or Steve Smith to comment. Come on people. Use your connections.
What do the tribute band singers think too? Will they start covering "It's A Motherf****er"?
Gregg and Smitty have no dog in this fight. It's not for them to say. And Neal, Jonathan and Ross have always said "the door is always open." I'm sure they mean it, as do their accountants. But Arnel is being respectful as always. This wasn't a resignation letter.
portland wrote:Obviously we all need to hail to the music taste of a few here and the continuing "Perry hate" squad...queue Gideon and his lengthy I am right and you are wrong posts.
I liked what I heard you did not....end of story.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests