Page 1 of 1

Rock Sugar

PostPosted: Fri Dec 25, 2015 6:37 am
by perryfan61

Re: Rock Sugar

PostPosted: Fri Dec 25, 2015 7:53 am
by STORY_TELLER
Hah. Love those guys. Check them out on "Any Highway You Want" too. Fun mashup. Lead singer sounds like Chalfant to me (on Journey tunes).

How fun would it be for Neal to tap this guy for a solo album?

Re: Rock Sugar

PostPosted: Fri Dec 25, 2015 1:27 pm
by slucero
sued into non-existence by Journey/Perry lawyers

Re: Rock Sugar

PostPosted: Fri Dec 25, 2015 2:21 pm
by STORY_TELLER
slucero wrote:sued into non-existence by Journey/Perry lawyers


What?? That happened? Oh man, really?

Re: Rock Sugar

PostPosted: Fri Dec 25, 2015 2:50 pm
by perryfan61
slucero wrote:sued into non-existence by Journey/Perry lawyers


They post on FB almost every day, I just assumed they were still playing. If not, it's a shame..they have some awesome songs, and he has a great voice.

Re: Rock Sugar

PostPosted: Sat Dec 26, 2015 5:57 am
by STORY_TELLER
Were they actually sued or simply issued a cease and desist? Two very different things.

Can't say I blame Journey. It's their songs, they created them, and no one should profit from them without their permission.

Re: Rock Sugar

PostPosted: Sat Dec 26, 2015 7:00 am
by perryfan61
STORY_TELLER wrote:Were they actually sued or simply issued a cease and desist? Two very different things.

Can't say I blame Journey. It's their songs, they created them, and no one should profit from them without their permission.


But there are plenty of tribute bands out there, and they are allowed to keep playing. What is the difference?
It gets confusing.

Re: Rock Sugar

PostPosted: Sat Dec 26, 2015 7:30 am
by STORY_TELLER
perryfan61 wrote:
STORY_TELLER wrote:Were they actually sued or simply issued a cease and desist? Two very different things.

Can't say I blame Journey. It's their songs, they created them, and no one should profit from them without their permission.


But there are plenty of tribute bands out there, and they are allowed to keep playing. What is the difference?
It gets confusing.


If I had to guess, it's the popularity line. Most tribute bands play bars or (extremely) small venues without great regularity, and the amount of money collected certainly doesn't earn them a living (i.e. they can' t quit their day jobs).

Rock Sugar opened for a number of real bands at festivals and signed a recording contract with a record company. Sounds like they stepped over a line to me.

Re: Rock Sugar

PostPosted: Sat Dec 26, 2015 10:46 am
by slucero
perryfan61 wrote:
STORY_TELLER wrote:Were they actually sued or simply issued a cease and desist? Two very different things.

Can't say I blame Journey. It's their songs, they created them, and no one should profit from them without their permission.


But there are plenty of tribute bands out there, and they are allowed to keep playing. What is the difference?
It gets confusing.



I think the difference was Rock Sugar was getting paid for Youtube hits, and they sold their music...