Moderator: Andrew
Andrew wrote:It's going to be an album of Trump approved white supremacist hymns.
FamilyMan wrote:Said "probably." Will believe it when I hear it.
Andrew wrote:I can't imagine Cain and Schon working in any close collaborative form required to pump out an album at this stage.
Andrew wrote:I can't imagine Cain and Schon working in any close collaborative form required to pump out an album at this stage.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Andrew wrote:I can't imagine Cain and Schon working in any close collaborative form required to pump out an album at this stage.
Perhaps. But Neal has gone from attacking Jon daily on Twitter to saying that they are brothers, are back on track, and the future is bright. I wouldn't be surprised if they have already started writing.
Andrew wrote:It's going to be an album of Trump approved white supremacist hymns.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Andrew wrote:It's going to be an album of Trump approved white supremacist hymns.
I think you're in the wrong thread, dude.
For most fans of melodic rock, a new Journey album - especially with Smitty playing - is pretty big news.
scarab wrote:Just hoping they bring in Jack Blades and limit Cain to one sappy ballad (Think of Arrival's Loved by You).
And PLAY the songs live.
Andrew wrote:I can't imagine Cain and Schon working in any close collaborative form required to pump out an album at this stage.
Jana wrote:I have no faith in a good album being put out by Journey without outside help. Why? Jon has lost the plot. It will be saccharine music full of cliches.
Jana wrote:I have no faith in a good album being put out by Journey without outside help. Why? Jon has lost the plot. It will be saccharine music full of cliches. Neal needs someone with some musical creative fire in him to help make a Journey album, with minimal lyrics from Jon. Actually, these days I would prefer zero lyrics coming from Jon. And Arnel's lyrics aren't strong enough to offset Jon's. And Jon will have a fit if anything seems too edgy (secular).
Monker wrote:And, BTW, I think Augeri did some of that with Generations...and how did that all turn out? I thought the sound on Generations sucked, and phoning in the vocals is part of the reason why.
Monker wrote:Jana wrote:I have no faith in a good album being put out by Journey without outside help. Why? Jon has lost the plot. It will be saccharine music full of cliches. Neal needs someone with some musical creative fire in him to help make a Journey album, with minimal lyrics from Jon. Actually, these days I would prefer zero lyrics coming from Jon. And Arnel's lyrics aren't strong enough to offset Jon's. And Jon will have a fit if anything seems too edgy (secular).
Well, I disagree. I think Jonathan could write on a Journey album if he wants to. I think he knows what Journey is and isn't...and he knows that Journey is not a Christian rock band. He also seems to understand that Journey's sound is bigger than just one person. So, if it goes into Neal 'taking the reigns" again, like on Eclipse, I doubt he will do it. If it is a collaborative effort where they ALL have input and are at least considered, then maybe it will happen. If it's not like that, then I don't think it should. None of this 'phoning it in' stuff.
And, BTW, I think Augeri did some of that with Generations...and how did that all turn out? I thought the sound on Generations sucked, and phoning in the vocals is part of the reason why.
Jana wrote:You are describing Jon before he lost his mind. That was before he was on stage in Paula's mega church helping and supporting Paula in her scam trying to brainwash families into giving a month's salary to the church so that they can get back. Most of those people are living month to month, and here his wife is trying to scam them out of a whole month's salary the first of every year,. And when Jon was on criminal Jim Bakker's show fawning all over him in between Bakker's infomercials it was evident Jon was a lost cause. So, no, I don't know that he is capable of co-writing a full Journey album to my liking. I would like to be proven wrong, but as of right now, I stand by what I've said. I think he's gone down the rabbit hole too far.
Jana wrote:You are describing Jon before he lost his mind. That was before he was on stage in Paula's mega church helping and supporting Paula in her scam trying to brainwash families into giving a month's salary to the church so that they can get back. Most of those people are living month to month, and here his wife is trying to scam them out of a whole month's salary the first of every year,. And when Jon was on criminal Jim Bakker's show fawning all over him in between Bakker's infomercials it was evident Jon was a lost cause. So, no, I don't know that he is capable of co-writing a full Journey album to my liking. I would like to be proven wrong, but as of right now, I stand by what I've said. I think he's gone down the rabbit hole too far.
Monker wrote:That's a very well formed opinion. Thank you for posting it.
Beyond Jonathan's writing, what I am trying to say is that I don't think Jonathan will be a part of Journey where Neal takes over the direction, like on Eclipse. It seems to me that is not the type of thing he would want to be a part of, again. He's said that Neal sorta earned Eclipse...but I doubt he will continue down that path at this point in his life.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Monker wrote:That's a very well formed opinion. Thank you for posting it.
Beyond Jonathan's writing, what I am trying to say is that I don't think Jonathan will be a part of Journey where Neal takes over the direction, like on Eclipse. It seems to me that is not the type of thing he would want to be a part of, again. He's said that Neal sorta earned Eclipse...but I doubt he will continue down that path at this point in his life.
Jon wrote 100% of the lyrics for Eclipse. Songs like Tantra sound like Cain through and through. The idea that he was somehow creatively sidelined doesn't seem accurate to me.
The only thing confirmed is that Neal wanted a rock direction and vetoed any more romantic ballads.
But it's hard to disown a record when you wrote 100% of the lyrics.
Monker wrote:Nobody in this thread said Jonathan was creatively sidelined.
Monker wrote:Which is EXACTLY what I was saying when I said that Neal took over the direction of the album.
Monker wrote:Jonathon wrote or cowrote EVERY song on EVERY album from the time he joined the band with Escape up to Arrival where he is not credited on a couple songs. This includeds ROR where Perry took over the direction of the band and dictated everything from the musical direction, members of the band, and even the album cover.
Monker wrote:IMO, what Jonathan has said in some of his past interviews leads me to believe that he wants to return to the classic Journey sound and style...an album more like Revelation than Eclipse.
Monker wrote:So, if Neal decides to act similar to how Perry did during ROR, again, then I would not expect Jonathan to want to record.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:You seem to believe that Cain was not allowed to collaborate and not allowed to have input
Monker wrote:Jonathon wrote or cowrote EVERY song on EVERY album from the time he joined the band with Escape up to Arrival where he is not credited on a couple songs. This includeds ROR where Perry took over the direction of the band and dictated everything from the musical direction, members of the band, and even the album cover.
Monker wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:You seem to believe that Cain was not allowed to collaborate and not allowed to have input
That is absolutely not true. I have not said that. I have not implied that.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:All I am saying is that if Neal wants to control the direction of an album, AS YOU DESCRIBE he did with Eclipse, then I don't think he'll participate.
Monker wrote:The point is that one member directing the direction of the band does NOT equate to Jonathan not having input on the album. If he could have a hand in EVERY song on ROR under the dictatorship of Steve Perry, then OF COURSE he could have input under the direction of Neal Schon. BUT, I don't think he will be willing to do it again.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Sigh. Your gas-lighting act is getting so old.
You literally said in this thread (quote below) that Cain will only participate if the next album is collaborative and band members have their input considered.
"So, if it goes into Neal 'taking the reigns" again, like on Eclipse, I doubt he will do it. If it is a collaborative effort where they ALL have input and are at least considered, then maybe it will happen. If it's not like that, then I don't think it should. None of this 'phoning it in' stuff."
The_Noble_Cause wrote:All I am saying is that if Neal wants to control the direction of an album, AS YOU DESCRIBE he did with Eclipse, then I don't think he'll participate.
Again - Cain wrote 100% of Eclipse's lyrics.
He said he was inspired to write City of Hope after visiting Manila.
Monker wrote:The point is that one member directing the direction of the band does NOT equate to Jonathan not having input on the album. If he could have a hand in EVERY song on ROR under the dictatorship of Steve Perry, then OF COURSE he could have input under the direction of Neal Schon. BUT, I don't think he will be willing to do it again.
Cain described it as a partnership initially. He only made it sound like a Schon dictatorship once it disappointed. For those paying attention, Cain had a negative attitude after Arrival also failed on the charts. Whatever Cain thinks, the music of Arrival and Eclipse speaks for itself.
Monker wrote:Yes, I am talking about NEAL above and his general attitude towards the writing and recording of Eclipse. How, AS YOU SAID, he wanted a specific musical direction and would not allow ballads. What I am saying is that is bullshit. If somebody brings in a ballad, that idea should be considered and not dismissed. If someone brings in a reggae song, the idea should be considered and not dismissed....and I am not talking specifically about Jonathan, but ANY member of the band. Neal should not be able to dictate those things. If that is what he wants to do with the next album, then I doubt Jonathan will participate....and frankly, I don't think the album should be recorded with that type of attitude in the band.
Monker wrote:Yeah, and "Open Arms" was greeted by Neal with "what am I supposed to do on this?" And, the entire band mocked Perry during the recording. "Sounds kinda Mary Poppins to me."
Monker wrote:Some of Journey's most popular songs and biggest hits...none would have been recorded by Neal under his "no ballad" rule during Eclipse.
Monker wrote:I am not even talking about this bullshit.
Monker wrote:In a Force interview, Jonathan went on about Bad English and how he had to negotiate with John Waite and the label to get songs on the album, like "Ghost In My Heart"...and they (both Waite and the label) insisted on "When I See You Smile" being recorded. Jonathan said something like "Neal Schon, Ricky Phillips, John Waite, and Jonathan Cain can't write songs good enough to be on the album? Wrong." He said John Waite wanted to be a rock star and had that mentality...essentially saying that is what caused so much chaos in the band. A band born from uniting the Babys and Journey - that should get along. He said a band has a fate, a life, an existence, and that he knew what it took to be in a band. He said they had a number one song, but couldn't sell 2000 seats...and that told him all that he needed to know.
And, he has repeated bits of the above over the years as well.
Monker wrote:Again, I don't think Jonathan will participate if Neal has the same attitude of wanting to control the direction and sound of the band.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Monker wrote:Yes, I am talking about NEAL above and his general attitude towards the writing and recording of Eclipse. How, AS YOU SAID, he wanted a specific musical direction and would not allow ballads. What I am saying is that is bullshit. If somebody brings in a ballad, that idea should be considered and not dismissed. If someone brings in a reggae song, the idea should be considered and not dismissed....and I am not talking specifically about Jonathan, but ANY member of the band. Neal should not be able to dictate those things. If that is what he wants to do with the next album, then I doubt Jonathan will participate....and frankly, I don't think the album should be recorded with that type of attitude in the band.
And now you are contradicting yourself. After denying you stated/implied that Cain wasn't allowed to collaborate or have input, you are now saying that Cain was not allowed to collaborate or have any input.
With all due respect, it's basically impossible to have any sort of conversation with you.
It's not productive. All you do is gaslight. When someone references one of your posts or even quotes it directly, you deny saying it.
Monker wrote:Yeah, and "Open Arms" was greeted by Neal with "what am I supposed to do on this?" And, the entire band mocked Perry during the recording. "Sounds kinda Mary Poppins to me."
Glad you brought this up. When Cain was promoting he Eclipse he actually cited Open Arms as an example of their creative kinship.
Were you also against Neal fighting with Sony to add rockers to Arrival?
Without Herbie, someone has to make creative decisions and I trust Neal much more than Azoff or Baruck.
Also saying "no" to any more bubble-gum wedding ballads is different from not letting Cain have ANY input and ballads were allowed (see "To Whom It May Concern") - they just couldn't be the typical boy-meets-girl radio friendly pablum.
It's not bullshit to point out that Cain promoted Eclipse until it failed to live up to sales expectations.
You just want to call this "bullshit" because it undermines your claim that Cain had no creative input.
Monker wrote:In a Force interview, Jonathan went on about Bad English and how he had to negotiate with John Waite and the label to get songs on the album, like "Ghost In My Heart"...and they (both Waite and the label) insisted on "When I See You Smile" being recorded. Jonathan said something like "Neal Schon, Ricky Phillips, John Waite, and Jonathan Cain can't write songs good enough to be on the album? Wrong." He said John Waite wanted to be a rock star and had that mentality...essentially saying that is what caused so much chaos in the band. A band born from uniting the Babys and Journey - that should get along. He said a band has a fate, a life, an existence, and that he knew what it took to be in a band. He said they had a number one song, but couldn't sell 2000 seats...and that told him all that he needed to know.
And, he has repeated bits of the above over the years as well.
Talk about irrelevant bullshit. What does this have to do with anything?
[/quote]Monker wrote:Again, I don't think Jonathan will participate if Neal has the same attitude of wanting to control the direction and sound of the band.
One way or another, new Journey music is happening. Jon can either be a part of it or keep singing about the baby Jesus.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests