Perry's voice

Strange Talking Street Medicine

Moderator: Andrew

Postby annpea » Sun Sep 20, 2009 12:19 am

cyndy! wrote:
annpea wrote:I only do what the little voices tell me to. :lol: :lol: :lol:

some people claim that i do only what "the voice" tells me to do. :wink:
:lol: :lol:
Dancing between the raindrops.
User avatar
annpea
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1145
Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2008 12:20 am
Location: Somewhere along the Dixie Highway

Postby Granny » Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:39 am

[quote="Saint John"]Perry's voice is the greatest of all-time and I'm actually grateful that it changed. What makes the guy impossible to replicate is the fact that he had several voices. There were the early years...yuck. Maybe two or three songs I like, but not one single album prior to Escape interests me in totality.

Then came the Escape album and there was a hint of rasp. He had an absolutely angelic voice with just a touch of edge to it. Perhaps the pinnacle of his voice. At the very least, the middle ground between what his voice was and what it would come to be.

Frontiers and Raised On Radio ushered in a moodier, darker Steve Perry. However, the albums couldn't have been different. Frontiers had some in your face rockers, and ROR was mostly Journey with a touch of R&B. Anyway, vocally, there was a grit to his voice. A lot of resonance, but he still had the magic touch and could combine raw power (Frontiers) with the ability to carress and lay down sultry lyrics (ROR).

TBF gets an incomplete. Nothing live to go by so I can't comment.

In short, the guy's voice evolved, or whatever you want to call it, but it was a blessing in that it always gave the fans something to look forward to. Journey's albums never sounded the same post-Escape because Perry never did. I think that was an awfully incredible blessing and curse. There's not a fucking singer that has graced this planet that could hang with Perry from 1980-1983.

PS As far as what caused his voice to go I would speculate that it was a combination of an insane touring schedule, booze and age. I'm sure he can still sing, but I highly doubt it would be anything like 1986 or prior. He could sound like Darth fucking Vader and I'd pay at least $2,000 to see him on stage one more time with Schon, Cain, Smith/Castronovo and Valory.[/quote




OMG I agree with everything you said, and thats a first. :D :D
Carol



Image
User avatar
Granny
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2651
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 2:35 am
Location: Ocean City, MD

Postby steveo777 » Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:08 am

WalrusOct9 wrote:Problem with Perry is that unlike a lot of singers, he hasn't aged onstage


Seriously, who knows what he will sound like? A couple years back I bought a Michael McDonald CD remembering what he sounded like when he was with the Doobie Brothers. Man, what a let down that was. I hope SP still has it. I'm gonna spend the money anyway. :D
User avatar
steveo777
MP3
 
Posts: 11311
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:15 pm
Location: Citrus Heights, Ca

Postby annie89509 » Tue Sep 29, 2009 8:00 pm

steveo777 wrote:
WalrusOct9 wrote:Problem with Perry is that unlike a lot of singers, he hasn't aged onstage


Seriously, who knows what he will sound like? A couple years back I bought a Michael McDonald CD remembering what he sounded like when he was with the Doobie Brothers. Man, what a let down that was. I hope SP still has it. I'm gonna spend the money anyway. :D

Man, I remember Whitney Houston's voice in her prime (just about my all-time favorite female singer). This latest release of hers ... she's lost her range and sounds really raspy. But, yet, it's selling like gangbusters because it's Whitney Houston. With some guys like Rod Stewart and SP (2 of my other all-time favorites), raspy sounds good. With Whitney, not so much (to my ears).

Funny ... some people here like to criticize loons for wanting/wishing for a Perry/Journey reunion. Yet, SJ comes out and pretty much says the same thing -- and he's not a loon.
Last edited by annie89509 on Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
annie89509
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2849
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:55 am
Location: the big 5-8

Postby whirlwind » Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:20 am

annie89509 wrote:
steveo777 wrote:
WalrusOct9 wrote:Problem with Perry is that unlike a lot of singers, he hasn't aged onstage


Seriously, who knows what he will sound like? A couple years back I bought a Michael McDonald CD remembering what he sounded like when he was with the Doobie Brothers. Man, what a let down that was. I hope SP still has it. I'm gonna spend the money anyway. :D

Man, I remember Whitney Houston's voice in her prime (just about my all-time favorite female singer). This latest release of hers ... she's lost her range and sounds really raspy. But, yet, it's selling like gangbusters because it's Whitney Houston. With some guys like Rod Stewart and SP (2 of my other all-time favorites), raspy sounds good. With Whitney, no so much (to my ears).

Funny ... some people here like to criticize loons for wanting/wishing for a Perry/Journey reunion. Yet, SJ comes out and pretty much says the same thing -- and he's not a loon.








St. John is the biggest loon of all. He has just been hidding under a bushel for awhile. He was BT's biggest nightmare at one time.
PEACE!

Quote of the Day
A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep.
Saul Bellow
User avatar
whirlwind
8 Track
 
Posts: 983
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 9:13 am
Location: ELMO

Re: Perry's voice

Postby cinkidd » Wed Sep 30, 2009 9:22 am

Rockindeano wrote:
Toph wrote:If Steve Perry's voice is really shot - what did it in? Was he a smoker? Maybe a pot smoker? Did he not rest it enough on tour?

Because you think about Dennis DeYoung, who sang as much and toured as much as Perry, and his voice is as good (or even better) than it was in Styx's heyday. But he was only singing 2/3 of the songs - Tommy Shaw was there to sing at least 6-7 songs a night. Steve didn't have that back up.


Listen up Turd Brain,

Please don't run in here insinuating Perry was hitting the bong or snorting lines. He was a rock star, however, the guy took great care of his voice. He sang arguably the most difficult catalog in music history, so of course it took it's toll, but there is so very much out there that you nor I have zero idea of what affected the man to not perform or to just stay out of the industry, that to not comment at all is a much classier move than to guess what vices he may or may not have done.


Can't believe I'm going to do this, but the Rock is .... ummmm..... damn this is hard.... he is RIGHT.

Rich the Going Guy
Law of Logical Argument: Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about.
User avatar
cinkidd
45 RPM
 
Posts: 236
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:16 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL - United States - Planet Earth

Postby annie89509 » Wed Sep 30, 2009 8:01 pm

whirlwind wrote:
annie89509 wrote:
steveo777 wrote:
WalrusOct9 wrote:Problem with Perry is that unlike a lot of singers, he hasn't aged onstage


Seriously, who knows what he will sound like? A couple years back I bought a Michael McDonald CD remembering what he sounded like when he was with the Doobie Brothers. Man, what a let down that was. I hope SP still has it. I'm gonna spend the money anyway. :D

Man, I remember Whitney Houston's voice in her prime (just about my all-time favorite female singer). This latest release of hers ... she's lost her range and sounds really raspy. But, yet, it's selling like gangbusters because it's Whitney Houston. With some guys like Rod Stewart and SP (2 of my other all-time favorites), raspy sounds good. With Whitney, no so much (to my ears).

Funny ... some people here like to criticize loons for wanting/wishing for a Perry/Journey reunion. Yet, SJ comes out and pretty much says the same thing -- and he's not a loon.








St. John is the biggest loon of all. He has just been hidding under a bushel for awhile. He was BT's biggest nightmare at one time.

I don't think SJ will ever admit to being a loon :wink: . Heck, he makes fun of loons .
User avatar
annie89509
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2849
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:55 am
Location: the big 5-8

Postby Jana » Thu Oct 01, 2009 1:59 am

I would live for his voice and album to have the vibe of songs like I'll Be Alright Without You, ROR era. Loved his tone and the energy of such songs. Live I just don't know if we're going to see a concert tour b/c I don't know the shape of his voice as far as holding up for a tour at 60 after not singing for so long. But I guarantee you he will sound great on a CD and/or a DVD of a one-time concert. :wink:
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Postby Liquid_Drummer » Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:28 pm

I for one believe there was damage to Perry's voice and it happened almost over night. I have heard reasons as to why but what does it matter if it is only rumor.

Listen to Separate ways on youtube where they played it the 1st time in early 82 at day on the green. This was not too long before they recorded Frontiers. In this video he had the same Escape sound, the rasp was much less and he didnt have to belt so much to hit higher notes. Fast forward to the recording of Only Solutions which was also in 82 but late 82 and you have the Frontiers voice in full effect. This change is dramatic and sudden. I am convinced that his change in voice was from damage of some kind. I love all stages of his voice but the change was just too sudden to have been natural IMHO.

The difference between 81 Houston and late 82 (only solutions) is night and day. 2nd puberty ?
User avatar
Liquid_Drummer
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1221
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:44 am

Postby Abitaman » Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:25 am

Old Age
Eric, the Abitaman
Abitaman
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4865
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:06 pm
Location: NO LONGER in West TN, now in East TN's beautiful Smokey Mountains

Postby madsplash » Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:34 am

Liquid_Drummer wrote:I for one believe there was damage to Perry's voice and it happened almost over night. I have heard reasons as to why but what does it matter if it is only rumor.

Listen to Separate ways on youtube where they played it the 1st time in early 82 at day on the green. This was not too long before they recorded Frontiers. In this video he had the same Escape sound, the rasp was much less and he didnt have to belt so much to hit higher notes. Fast forward to the recording of Only Solutions which was also in 82 but late 82 and you have the Frontiers voice in full effect. This change is dramatic and sudden. I am convinced that his change in voice was from damage of some kind. I love all stages of his voice but the change was just too sudden to have been natural IMHO.

The difference between 81 Houston and late 82 (only solutions) is night and day. 2nd puberty ?


Well then, expain this. This is 1986 or 87 from the ROR tour. It's played very fast, but his voice is as clear as ever and his range is as big as ever. The vocal acrobatics here are amazing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPUFLfGm ... PL&index=2

I think I've heard him claim that his singing around this time was for diferent effect and he choose to sing different things different ways.
madsplash
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1330
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2008 5:02 am

Postby Abitaman » Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:37 am

I did not find the ROR tour boots to be the best, played to fast, and on some shows, Perry's vocie is shot.
Eric, the Abitaman
Abitaman
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4865
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 8:06 pm
Location: NO LONGER in West TN, now in East TN's beautiful Smokey Mountains

Postby portland » Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:32 am

Jana this one is for you!!! :wink:


and it sounds good to me 86 ROR
ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYAJCueSVOM
What's left After You Fall?.....A Cover Band?
portland
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7457
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:57 am
Location: Maine

Postby kgdjpubs » Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:04 am

Liquid_Drummer wrote:I for one believe there was damage to Perry's voice and it happened almost over night. I have heard reasons as to why but what does it matter if it is only rumor.

Listen to Separate ways on youtube where they played it the 1st time in early 82 at day on the green. This was not too long before they recorded Frontiers. In this video he had the same Escape sound, the rasp was much less and he didnt have to belt so much to hit higher notes. Fast forward to the recording of Only Solutions which was also in 82 but late 82 and you have the Frontiers voice in full effect. This change is dramatic and sudden. I am convinced that his change in voice was from damage of some kind. I love all stages of his voice but the change was just too sudden to have been natural IMHO.

The difference between 81 Houston and late 82 (only solutions) is night and day. 2nd puberty ?



I wouldn't be surprised at all if there was something like you are talking about, but you have to remember that Perry did a massive overhaul of his singing style around that time anyway, and started recording studio vocals in the morning so he could get a little rasp in there. Basically, from Frontiers onward, his studio vocals are being accentuated by a deliberate stylistic change as much as physical change. There's a world of difference in his voice comparing Frontiers record vs early Frontiers live (ie the Japan show).

From a physical standpoint, there's change all the way through, I think you're right about a drop somewhere towards the end of the Escape tour. It's pretty sudden, so my guess is that it isn't anything he did, just that his voice dropped.
kgdjpubs
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:32 am
Location: NC

Postby Jana » Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:06 am

portland wrote:Jana this one is for you!!! :wink:


and it sounds good to me 86 ROR
ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYAJCueSVOM


Portland, there's nothing there. :lol:
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Postby portland » Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:10 am

Jana wrote:
portland wrote:Jana this one is for you!!! :wink:


and it sounds good to me 86 ROR
ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYAJCueSVOM


Portland, there's nothing there. :lol:




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYAJCueSVOM

let see if this works now :)
What's left After You Fall?.....A Cover Band?
portland
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7457
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:57 am
Location: Maine

Postby kgdjpubs » Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:13 am

madsplash wrote:
Liquid_Drummer wrote:I for one believe there was damage to Perry's voice and it happened almost over night. I have heard reasons as to why but what does it matter if it is only rumor.

Listen to Separate ways on youtube where they played it the 1st time in early 82 at day on the green. This was not too long before they recorded Frontiers. In this video he had the same Escape sound, the rasp was much less and he didnt have to belt so much to hit higher notes. Fast forward to the recording of Only Solutions which was also in 82 but late 82 and you have the Frontiers voice in full effect. This change is dramatic and sudden. I am convinced that his change in voice was from damage of some kind. I love all stages of his voice but the change was just too sudden to have been natural IMHO.

The difference between 81 Houston and late 82 (only solutions) is night and day. 2nd puberty ?


Well then, expain this. This is 1986 or 87 from the ROR tour. It's played very fast, but his voice is as clear as ever and his range is as big as ever. The vocal acrobatics here are amazing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPUFLfGm ... PL&index=2

I think I've heard him claim that his singing around this time was for diferent effect and he choose to sing different things different ways.


he sounds about the same there as he did on late Escape/Frontiers---NOT the way he sounded early Escape. If you compare early Escape tour (the Japan video) with the late Escape or early Frontiers (that Japan video), you'll hear a pretty good change. To my ears, it was a change for the better as he was a bit lower-pitched, but he definately lost some range.
kgdjpubs
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:32 am
Location: NC

Postby Michigan Girl » Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:19 am

portland wrote:Jana this one is for you!!! :wink:


and it sounds good to me 86 ROR
ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYAJCueSVOM


ROR was good!!! I saw three shows and I
was completely satisfied!! Things were
sped up, but who cares they were great shows!!!
By time the ROR tour came rolling around
SP/Journey had many, many shows and several tours
under their belts w/SP singing one of the most difficult
catalogs in RNR!!! Are you surprised that some
of the songs/performances were not top notch?!?
This may come as a shock to many of you, but
SP wasn't perfect prior to ROR~Pretty Damn Close, though!!

I am LMAO at some of the comments I've seen
posted lately concerning ROR and at some of the
awful clips that were chosen to accompany their
arguments. And then reading comments
by some of the same people
who have made every excuse in the book for AP and
the tuning down of the songs after two years!!
I'm getting a huge kick out of this...very comical!!!
Yeah, I’m believing you would’ve requested a refund!! :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby portland » Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:21 am

Michigan Girl wrote:
portland wrote:Jana this one is for you!!! :wink:


and it sounds good to me 86 ROR
ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYAJCueSVOM


ROR was good!!! I saw three shows and I
was completely satisfied!! Things were
sped up, but who cares they were great shows!!!
By time the ROR tour came rolling around
SP/Journey had many, many shows and several tours
under their belts w/SP singing one of the most difficult
catalogs in RNR!!! Are you surprised that some
of the songs/performances were not top notch!!
This may come as a shock to many of you, but
SP wasn't perfect prior to ROR~Pretty Damn Close, though!!

I am LMAO at some of the comments I've seen
posted lately concerning ROR and at some of the
awful clips that were chosen to accompany their
arguments. And then reading comments
by some of the same people
who have made every excuse in the book for AP and
the tuning down of the songs after two years!!
I'm getting a huge kick out of this...very comical!!!
Yeah, I’m believing you would’ve requested a refund!! :wink:




YOU GO GIRL.....The best ones are the ones who would pay $$$$$ to see the band together again...but don't think he can sing??? WTF??
What's left After You Fall?.....A Cover Band?
portland
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7457
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:57 am
Location: Maine

Postby Jana » Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:30 am

Michigan Girl wrote:
portland wrote:Jana this one is for you!!! :wink:


and it sounds good to me 86 ROR
ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYAJCueSVOM


ROR was good!!! I saw three shows and I
was completely satisfied!! Things were
sped up, but who cares they were great shows!!!
By time the ROR tour came rolling around
SP/Journey had many, many shows and several tours
under their belts w/SP singing one of the most difficult
catalogs in RNR!!! Are you surprised that some
of the songs/performances were not top notch!!
This may come as a shock to many of you, but
SP wasn't perfect prior to ROR~Pretty Damn Close, though!!

I am LMAO at some of the comments I've seen
posted lately concerning ROR and at some of the
awful clips that were chosen to accompany their
arguments. And then reading comments
by some of the same people
who have made every excuse in the book for AP and
the tuning down of the songs after two years!!
I'm getting a huge kick out of this...very comical!!!
Yeah, I’m believing you would’ve requested a refund!! :wink:


I didn't diss him if you're referring to me in the other thread in Journey. I chose ROR for my concert to see b/c I love ROR songs and thought he looked hot and had great rhythm. After looking at a few of the clips some posted in that thead with the sped-up classics, which I never cared for that version at all of them PERIOD, I thought maybe not and would rather see Frontiers as the next DVD put out or Pre-Escape. I didn't care that his voice wasn't the same as earlier years or if he had a rough particular concert. That doesn't phase me b/c a lot of it is the delivery of Perry songs and watching him on stage that I like.

Besides they were just discussing the change in his voice and when it happened and things like that and maybe why he chose to speed them up. I considered those posters fans of Perry's and some musicians were just discussing it. And maybe some didn't like that concert for reasons they stated or the way the songs were changed.
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Postby Jana » Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:33 am

portland wrote:
Jana wrote:
portland wrote:Jana this one is for you!!! :wink:


and it sounds good to me 86 ROR
ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYAJCueSVOM


Portland, there's nothing there. :lol:




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYAJCueSVOM

let see if this works now :)


Oh, Faithfully. 8) I have this one already from ROR. Donch ya know I have a ton of the Faithfullys saved in my favorites to listen to. :wink:

Edit: Portland, this is the one I have from ROR. Better sound.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hLsrmPTAgXo
Last edited by Jana on Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Postby Michigan Girl » Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:37 am

Jana wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
portland wrote:Jana this one is for you!!! :wink:


and it sounds good to me 86 ROR
ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYAJCueSVOM


ROR was good!!! I saw three shows and I
was completely satisfied!! Things were
sped up, but who cares they were great shows!!!
By time the ROR tour came rolling around
SP/Journey had many, many shows and several tours
under their belts w/SP singing one of the most difficult
catalogs in RNR!!! Are you surprised that some
of the songs/performances were not top notch!!
This may come as a shock to many of you, but
SP wasn't perfect prior to ROR~Pretty Damn Close, though!!

I am LMAO at some of the comments I've seen
posted lately concerning ROR and at some of the
awful clips that were chosen to accompany their
arguments. And then reading comments
by some of the same people
who have made every excuse in the book for AP and
the tuning down of the songs after two years!!
I'm getting a huge kick out of this...very comical!!!
Yeah, I’m believing you would’ve requested a refund!! :wink:


I didn't diss him if you're referring to me in the other thread in Journey. I chose ROR for my concert to see b/c I love ROR songs and thought he looked hot and had great rhythm. After looking at a few of the clips some posted in that thead with the sped-up classics, which I never cared for that version at all of them PERIOD, I thought maybe not and would rather see Frontiers as the next DVD put out or Pre-Escape. I didn't care that his voice wasn't the same as earlier years or if he had a rough particular concert. That doesn't phase me b/c a lot of it is the delivery of Perry songs and watching him on stage that I like.

Besides they were just discussing the change in his voice and when it happened and things like that and maybe why he chose to speed them up. I considered those posters fans of Perry's and some musicians were just discussing it. And maybe some didn't like that concert for reasons they stated or the way the songs were changed.


LMAO!!! No, Jana~just speaking in general....why were you the one that would've requested the refund?!?!? :shock: :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby Jana » Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:49 am

Michigan Girl wrote:
Jana wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
portland wrote:Jana this one is for you!!! :wink:


and it sounds good to me 86 ROR
ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYAJCueSVOM


ROR was good!!! I saw three shows and I
was completely satisfied!! Things were
sped up, but who cares they were great shows!!!
By time the ROR tour came rolling around
SP/Journey had many, many shows and several tours
under their belts w/SP singing one of the most difficult
catalogs in RNR!!! Are you surprised that some
of the songs/performances were not top notch!!
This may come as a shock to many of you, but
SP wasn't perfect prior to ROR~Pretty Damn Close, though!!

I am LMAO at some of the comments I've seen
posted lately concerning ROR and at some of the
awful clips that were chosen to accompany their
arguments. And then reading comments
by some of the same people
who have made every excuse in the book for AP and
the tuning down of the songs after two years!!
I'm getting a huge kick out of this...very comical!!!
Yeah, I’m believing you would’ve requested a refund!! :wink:


I didn't diss him if you're referring to me in the other thread in Journey. I chose ROR for my concert to see b/c I love ROR songs and thought he looked hot and had great rhythm. After looking at a few of the clips some posted in that thead with the sped-up classics, which I never cared for that version at all of them PERIOD, I thought maybe not and would rather see Frontiers as the next DVD put out or Pre-Escape. I didn't care that his voice wasn't the same as earlier years or if he had a rough particular concert. That doesn't phase me b/c a lot of it is the delivery of Perry songs and watching him on stage that I like.

Besides they were just discussing the change in his voice and when it happened and things like that and maybe why he chose to speed them up. I considered those posters fans of Perry's and some musicians were just discussing it. And maybe some didn't like that concert for reasons they stated or the way the songs were changed.


LMAO!!! No, Jana~just speaking in general....why were you the one that would've requested the refund?!?!? :shock: :wink:


I'm the one that changed my vote on which DVD by Journey I next really wanted to see, which is what the thread was about. Nothing more than that for me. :wink:
Jana
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8227
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:21 pm
Location: Anticipating

Postby Saint John » Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:40 am

whirlwind wrote:St. John is the biggest loon of all.


Incorrect. My allegiance stops with his voice. That said, it was the greatest of all-time. Meaning in the history of the world.


whirlwind wrote:He has just been hidding under a bushel for awhile. He was BT's biggest nightmare at one time.


I used to tie those dumbfucks up in knots. :lol: I was there for nothing more than to argue that Steve Augeri was NOT better than Steve Perry, vocally. :) That was about as easy as beating a fucking tree in a 100 yard dash.
User avatar
Saint John
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 21723
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 1:31 pm
Location: Uranus

Postby portland » Wed Oct 14, 2009 8:47 am

Saint John wrote:
whirlwind wrote:St. John is the biggest loon of all.


Incorrect. My allegiance stops with his voice. That said, it was the greatest of all-time. Meaning in the history of the world.


whirlwind wrote:He has just been hidding under a bushel for awhile. He was BT's biggest nightmare at one time.


I used to tie those dumbfucks up in knots. :lol: I was there for nothing more than to argue that Steve Augeri was NOT better than Steve Perry, vocally. :) That was about as easy as beating a fucking tree in a 100 yard dash.



Yes that must have been a really hard job :wink:
What's left After You Fall?.....A Cover Band?
portland
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7457
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:57 am
Location: Maine

Postby strangegrey » Wed Oct 14, 2009 9:16 am

texafana wrote:"Dennis Deyoung is a voice that verges on operatic low tenor/upper baritone....but sung with a cleaner timbre. You don't hear about guys like this having massive vocal troubles....but 1 out of every 2 or 3 upper tenors with gritty timbres have severe vocal issues. "

And the #1 reason for their voice going out and getting node damage is lack of vocal chord lubrication. Seriously... this style of singing, a bit "airy" if you will, puts tremendous amounts of air over the vocal chords causing them to dry out quicker. The solution is to constantly sip (luke warm) water, during the performance and a gallon of water a day if you're performing. You can only lubricate the vocal chords through internal hydration, that's what the gallon of water is for. The sips during performance just help smooth out (moisten) the throat due to smoke, pollution, etc, etc, during the show.

That David Archfkinletta kid from American Idol is the POSTER BOY for this situation. Remember all the lip licking, tounging going on during his performances? Trying like hell desperately to lubricate his quickly drying vocal chords due to improper singing/breathing/preperation technique. Gawd he almost make me puke watching him sing. I seriously doubt he could handle more than 20-30min shows unless he's finally getting some proper training.



Im late on this post, but you hit it out of the park. Well said!
User avatar
strangegrey
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3622
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:31 am
Location: Tortuga

Postby ChildInTime » Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:00 am

madsplash wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPUFLfGm ... PL&index=2

(Separate Ways '86 vid)


If I recall correctly, that bootleg tape was recorded at the wrong speed, or the speed got warped with age. It is actually a bit faster than it is in actuality, thus Steve's voice sounds a few steps higher. One reason why tapes aren't the best!

PS: About the voice change, I always joke around that he finally went through puberty in 1982. Bwahaha. Whatever the reasons, though, I don't mind. I like his voice in all the incarnations it has taken. :)
*open mouth, insert foot*
User avatar
ChildInTime
45 RPM
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:16 am

Postby portland » Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:05 am

ChildInTime wrote:
madsplash wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPUFLfGm ... PL&index=2

(Separate Ways '86 vid)


If I recall correctly, that bootleg tape was recorded at the wrong speed, or the speed got warped with age. It is actually a bit faster than it is in actuality, thus Steve's voice sounds a few steps higher. One reason why tapes aren't the best!


Who really fucking cares!!! If he can still sing than bring it on!! The disection of what was is really getting old...ROR tour sucked for him..his mother was dying and well my stepmom just did and we were not that close and I had a really hard time....I can't imagine if you were really close to someone and on the road and you feel like you should be somewhere else......that in itself could change one's performance...so who knows what he has left in the tank???
What's left After You Fall?.....A Cover Band?
portland
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7457
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:57 am
Location: Maine

Postby yak » Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:24 am

whirlwind wrote:
St. John is the biggest loon of all. He has just been hidding under a bushel for awhile. He was BT's biggest nightmare at one time.


Just what can be assumed when one's location is "Elmo?" :roll:
What To Do When You See a Loon Coming


Image
User avatar
yak
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1362
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 10:46 am

Postby ChildInTime » Wed Oct 14, 2009 8:17 pm

portland wrote:
ChildInTime wrote:
madsplash wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LPUFLfGm ... PL&index=2

(Separate Ways '86 vid)


If I recall correctly, that bootleg tape was recorded at the wrong speed, or the speed got warped with age. It is actually a bit faster than it is in actuality, thus Steve's voice sounds a few steps higher. One reason why tapes aren't the best!


Who really fucking cares!!! If he can still sing than bring it on!! [....]


I'm sorry about your step-mother, that's awful; but there's no reason to be hostile. I was simply pointing out the poor quality of that bootleg, which many people use as evidence for their cause anyway or so it would seem. I am in no way implying that his voice in all actuality was worse for it; I was actually saying that he would sound WORSE on a bad, tinny bootleg than in-real-life or on a good quality boot. (But seriously, I'm really sorry that you're going through that right now. I know it doesn't sound like it, but I really am. *hugs* :( )
*open mouth, insert foot*
User avatar
ChildInTime
45 RPM
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:16 am

PreviousNext

Return to Steve Perry

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest